Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 92–118
© Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A., 2022
UDC: 
101+316.3/.4+378+371

Evaluating the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies

Pushkarev Y. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Pushkareva E. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 402
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines the formation of cognitive foundations of individual’s intellectual potential and their ability to reflect and introspect. The purpose of the study is to determine and evaluate the characteristic features of the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of the research includes a conceptual analysis and reviewing research papers focusing on cognitive development of the individual, the assessment of this development in a distance educational environment, and the specifics of the manifestation of reflexive cognitive processes. The philosophy of education as a methodological basis of the research involves the identification, evaluation and generalization of the main features of the development of reflexive individual skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies.
Results. The authors consider reflection in the education system, on the one hand, as a process of understanding knowledge and information through study and comparison, on the other hand, as a principle of human thinking aimed at self-understanding and self-examination. The main content of a person's reflexive ability as a cognitive ability for critical self-examination is presented: developed human abilities to recognize and solve complex mental problems, developed imagination; an aptitude to introspection and critical thinking.
The authors have identified the key problems in the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies. They include a decrease in the quality of assimilation and understanding of information and knowledge; difficulties in retaining attention and implementing reflection in general; problems in the formation and implementation of personality self-organization, the development of self-control skills, the development of uncertainty in the positive result of cognitive activity and in their own capabilities.
It is emphasized that the dissonance in the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance learning technologies contributes to a restrained attitude to online learning.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the main features of the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies.

Keywords: 

Cognitive development of personality; Intellectual potential of personality; Abilities for reflection; Reflexive personality skills; Distance educational technologies.

For citation:
Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Evaluating the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 92–118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2204.05
References: 
  1. O’Dea X., Stern J. Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post Covid-19 era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 437–442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13211
  2. Tyumentseva E. Y., Abramchenko N. V., Shamis V. A., Mukhametdinova S. K. Cognitive modeling the level of university students’ perceptions of distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (2), pp. 74–91. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48392223
  3. Marmolejo F. J., Groccia J. E. Reimagining and redesigning teaching and learning in the post-pandemic world. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2022, vol. 2022 (169), pp. 21–37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.20480  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tl.20480 
  4. Tkacová H., Pavlikova M., Jenisová Z., Maturkanič P., Kralik R. Social media and students’ wellbeing: An empirical analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13 (18), pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442
  5. Pavlíkova M., Sirotkin A., Kralik R., Petrikovicova L., Garcia M. J. How to keep university active during COVID-19 pandemic: Experience from Slovakia. Sustainability, vol. 13 (18), pp. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810350
  6. Guppy N., Verpoorten D., Boud D., Lin L., Tai J., Bartolic S. The post-COVID-19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13212  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13212 
  7. Cui Y., Zhao G., Zhang D. Improving students' inquiry learning in web-based environments by providing structure: Does the teacher matter or platform matter? British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (4), pp. 1049–1068. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13184  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13184 
  8. Topping K. J., Douglas W., Robertson D., Ferguson N. Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 2022, vol. 10 (2), pp. e3353. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rev3.3353 
  9. Kizilcec F., Reich J., Yeomans M., Dann Ch., Brunskill E., Lopez G., Turkay S., Williams J., Tingley D. Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, vol. 117 (26), pp. 14900–14905. DOI: http://dx.doi.org10.1073/pnas.1921417117 
  10. Conrad C., Deng Q., Caron I., Shkurska O., Skerrett P., Sundararajan B. How student perceptions about online learning difficulty influenced their satisfaction during Canada's Covid-19 response. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 534–557. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13206   URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13206 
  11. Ryleeva А. S., Stefanik J. V. The model of formation of digital competence of teachers of the educational organization. The World of Science, Culture, Education, 2021, no. 2, pp. 97–99. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2021-287-97-99  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45677559
  12. Ma M., Li M., Wang Q., Qiu A., Wang T. Online self-regulated learning and academic procrastination: A moderated mediation model. Psychology in the Schools, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.22730 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pits.22730
  13. Chiang F.-K., Zhu D., Yu W. A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12656  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12656 
  14. Foster C., Burkhardt H., Schoenfeld A. Crisis-ready educational design: The case of mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/curj.159  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/curj.159 
  15. Zhang L., Allen Carter R., Qian X., Yang S., Rujimora J., Wen S. Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 620–646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13191   URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13191 
  16. Kolomytseva O. N., Statyivka A. M., Ding Shujin, Stathivka V. I. The determinism of the information society and the educational system: Enhancing academic attainments within distance learning. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 102–121. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.05 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45741071
  17. Savage A. J., McNamara P. W., Moncrieff T. W., O'Reilly G. M. Review article: E-learning in emergency medicine: A systematic review. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2022, vol. 34 (3), pp. 322–332. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13936  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.13936 
  18. Stephens M. L., Lowney J., Ybarra C. M., Stephens S. Adult learning facilitators in any setting, instructional designers’ roles as the adult learner and educator, and their perceived knowledge construction when preparing graduate faculty for teaching online: An interpretive study. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 2022, vol. 34 (1), pp. 3–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20319  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nha3.20319
  19. Niu L., Wang X., Wallace M. P., Pang H., Xu Y. Digital learning of English as a foreign language among university students: How are approaches to learning linked to digital competence and technostress? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12679  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12679
  20. Liu B., Xing W., Zeng Y., Wu Y. Linking cognitive processes and learning outcomes: The influence of cognitive presence on learning performance in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13193  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13193 
  21. Qiao S., Yeung S. S., Shen X., Wah Chu S. K. The effects of a gamified morphological awareness intervention on students' cognitive, motivational and affective outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (4), pp. 952–976. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13178    URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13178 
  22. Kuznetsova M. V., Pushkareva E. A. Foreign language education and value formation of a personality: Analysis of contemporary trends and developments (review). Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (1), pp. 55–75. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2201.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48057195 
  23. Erden Z. Ş., Aliyev R. Anxiety and psychological needs of high school students: COVID-19 period. Psychology in the Schools, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.22767  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pits.22767 
  24. Liu J. From offline learning to online learning: Moderating effect of relationship inertia and satisfaction. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cae.22511 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22511 
  25. Qiao S., Yeung S. S., Zainuddin Z., Kit Ng D. T., Wah Chu S. K. Examining the effects of mixed and non-digital gamification on students' learning performance, cognitive engagement and course satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13249  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13249 
  26. May R. J., Tyndall I., McTiernan A., Roderique-Davies G., McLoughlin S. The impact of the SMART program on cognitive and academic skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13192  URL:  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13192
  27. Packer R., Abbinett E., Morris E. ‘Be prepared and give it a go!’ Transitions into further education for learners with additional learning needs. British Journal of Special Education, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12409 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12409 
  28. Begalinov A. S., Ashilova M. S., Begalinova K. K. On the image of higher education in the post-covid world: Formation and development of the new type of thinking. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 110–123. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.07 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44849696
  29. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Reflexive principles of personal development in the changing information content. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 52–66. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38191464
  30. Pushkareva E. A., Pushkarev Y. V. Philosophy of continuing education: cognitive foundations of personal development in modern conditions. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019, 143 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43300997
  31. Ryapisova A. G. Reflection of the results educational activities. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2015, no. 4, pp. 54–65. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25085277
  32. Gu X., Ritter S. M., Delfmann L. R., Dijksterhuis A. Stimulating creativity: Examining the effectiveness of four cognitive-based creativity training techniques. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.531  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.531 
  33. Shaposhnikova N. Y., Berezhnova E. V. Assisting UK university teachers in the provision of tutor support to students. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 92–108. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.06 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44849695
  34. Clegg S., Bradley S. The implementation of progress files in higher education: Reflection as national policy. Higher Education, 2006, vol. 51 (4), pp. 465–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7764-8
  35. Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical analysis of the integration of education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24174773
  36. Bayborodova L. V., Belkina V. N., Gruzdev M. V., Gushchina T. N. Student-centered educational technology of individualization within the framework of teacher education institutions. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, no. 5, pp. 7–21. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1805.01 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36433775
  37. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Education of knowledge society: Specificity of modern development. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 196 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960634
  38. Knyazev N. A. Philosophical problem of essence and existence of a science: Monograph. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian State Aerospace University Acad. M. F. Reshetnev Publ., 2008, 270 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20047299 
  39. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Communication foundation for intellectual culture: tendencies of contemporary development. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.18
  40. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Specifics of information and communication developments in education: Analysis of value changes before and after 2020 (A critical review). Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (6), pp. 96–119. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.06 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47447640
  41. Tchoshanov M. A. Learning sciences perspective on engineering of distance learning. Part 2. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30 (3), pp. 43–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-3-43-58  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44888828 
  42. Baron R. J. Digital literacy. The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0053  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0053 
  43. Hobbs R., Coiro J. Design features of a professional development program in digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 2018, vol. 62 (4), pp. 401–409. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jaal.907  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal.907 
  44. Detlor B., Julien H., La Rose T., Serenko A. Community-led digital literacy training: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.24639  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24639 
  45. Soboleva Zh. S. Theoretical prerequisites for the formation of the concepts of “digital literacy” and “digital competence”. Actual Problems of Philology and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, 2019, no. 13, pp. 110–114. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40629885
  46. Weninger C. Skill versus social practice? Some challenges in teaching digital literacy in the university classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3134  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesq.3134
  47. Baiguzhin P. A., Shibkova D. Z., Aizman R. I. Factors affecting psychophysiological processes of information perception within the context of education informatization. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 5 (9), pp. 48–70. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41271740 
  48. Záhorec J., Hašková A., Munk M. Self-reflection of digital literacy of primary and secondary school teachers: Case study of Slovakia. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2021, vol. 10 (2), pp. 496–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.496
  49. Ayling D. Measured reflection to assist in dealing with conflict: Can an educative approach improve reflection and cultivate a healthier classroom community?  In: Luetz J., Dowden T., Norsworthy B. (eds) Reimagining Christian Education, Springer, Singapore, 2018, pp. 175–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0851-2_13 
  50. Burov Yu. B. Personal cognitive style of student: Structure and diagnostics. Innovative Development of Vocational Education, 2020, no. 1, pp. 65–72. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42634823
  51. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical interpretation of knowledge and information: Knowledge value and information diversity in modern communication. XLinguae, 2018, vol. 11 (3), pp. 176–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.17 
  52. Pushkareva E. A. Value foundations of interaction between modern education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960640  
  53. Zheng H. Y., Mayberry E., Stanley L. Building an agile data analytics environment to support university decision-making: A case study of Ohio state university's rapid development of a COVID-19 dashboard system. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2021, vol. 2020 (187–188), pp. 31–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.20345 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.20345 
  54. Gibbs P. Transdisciplinary possibilities after the pandemic. Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655 
  55. Guo Y., Liu H., Hao A., Liu S., Zhang X., Liu H. Blended learning model via small private online course improves active learning and academic performance of embryology. Clinical Anatomy, 2022, vol. 35 (2), pp. 211–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23818
  56. Ryleeva A. S., Khomutnikova E. A., Emanova S. V. Developing soft skills in high school students using digital tools. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (1), pp. 77–98. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2201.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48057196 
  57. Pujiati E., Sonhaji A. The effectiveness of conflict management in private university management efforts. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, vol. 175 (1), pp. 012073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012073
  58. Živčić-Bećirević I., Smojver-Ažić S., Martinac Dorčić T. Predictors of university students’ academic achievement: A prospective study. Drustvena Istrazivanja: Journal for General Social Issues, 2017, vol. 26 (4), pp. 457–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5559/di.26.4.01
  59. Dresden J., Thompson K. F. Looking closely at clinical practice: A clear-eyed vision for the future of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 2021, vol. 96 (1),   pp. 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1864242
  60. Bai X., Gu X. Effect of teacher autonomy support on the online self-regulated learning of students during COVID-19 in China: The chain mediating effect of parental autonomy support and students’ self-efficacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12676  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12676 
  61. Khodaei S., Hasanvand S., Gholami M., Mokhayeri Y., Amini M. The effect of the online flipped classroom on self-directed learning readiness and metacognitive awareness in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Nursing, 2022, vol. 21 (1), pp. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00804-6 
  62. Lee Y.-J., Davis R., Li Y. Implementing synchronous online flipped learning for pre-service teachers during COVID-19. European Journal of Educational Research, 2022, vol. 11 (2), pp. 653–661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.653 
  63. Chanchaeva E. A., Kurilenko T. K., Nedelski V. O., Kruglikova E. V., Grjibovski A. M. The effectiveness of distance and traditional teaching natural sciences: A comparative analysis. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (3), pp. 149–168. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.08 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48762166
  64. Kuryan M. L., Voronina E. A. Students and faculty interaction outside the classroom: Perception and actual experience. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (3), pp. 42–57. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38538207
  65. Morris R., Perry T., Wardle L. Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 2022, vol. 9 (3), pp. e3292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rev3.3292
  66. Yang L.-P., Xin T. Changing educational assessments in the post-COVID-19 Era: From assessment of learning (AoL) to assessment as learning (AaL). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022, vol. 41 (1), pp. 54–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12492 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12492  
  67. Su C. The effects of students' learning anxiety and motivation on the learning achievement in the activity theory based gamified learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, vol. 13 (5), pp. 1229–1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00669a
  68. Sadikova R. A. Distance learning of students: Realities and experience. Concept, 2020, no. 9, pp. 41–56. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2304-120X-2020-11063 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43989413
  69. Leshutina I. A. Motivation for distance learning foreign languages as a challenge of the present and a component of success. Russian Language Abroad, 2020, no. 2, pp. 15–19. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42835913
  70. Qiao S., Wah Chu S. K., Shen X., Yeung S. S. The impact of an online gamified approach embedded with self-regulated learning support on students' reading performance and intrinsic motivation: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12684  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12684 
  71. Cho S., Jang S. J. Nursing students' motivational and self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 2022, Accepted Articles. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12968  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nhs.12968  
  72. Matuszak A. F., Pavlova O. Y., Akhkamova Y. A., Zyryanova A. V., Alekhina N. V., Gribacheva N. V., Tsilitsky V. S. A comparative analysis of moral education forms in the digital learning environment within educational settings and students’ preferences. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (3), pp. 7–30. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.01 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48762157
  73. Sharmin V. G., Sharmina T. N., Sharmin D. V. Identifying the degree of influence of various factors on students’ academic performance based on their self-assessment, taking into account students’ gender. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (3), pp. 92–114. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.05 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48762162
  74. Pogodaeva M. V., Chepurko Y. V. The study of teachers’ emotional competence and its development during training sessions. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (2), pp. 51–72. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.03  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48392222
  75. Vesely A. K., Saklofske D. H., Nordstokke D. W. EI training and pre-service teacher wellbeig. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, vol. 65, pp. 81–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.052 
  76. Wang C. J. Facilitating the emotional intelligence development of students: Use of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TRACK). Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 2019, vol. 25, pp. 100198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100198
  77. Phungsoonthorn T., Charoensukmongkol P. How does mindfulness help university employees cope with emotional exhaustion during the COVID-19 crisis? The mediating role of psychological hardiness and the moderating effect of workload. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12826  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.12826  
  78. Randazzo-Eisemann F. Meditation in educational places as a protective factor against violence.   Revista Electronica Educare, 2021, vol. 25 (3),   pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-3.24 
  79. Sivrikova N. V., Ptashko T. G., Perebeynos A. E., Vorozheikina A. V., Chernikova E. G. Relationship between prospective teachers’ self-assessment of the level of tolerance and their willingness to increase conflict resolution competence. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (2), pp. 33–50. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.02 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48392221 
  80. Vesely A. K., Saklofske D. H., Nordstokke D. W. EI training and pre-service teacher wellbeig. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, vol. 65, pp. 81–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.052
  81. Lavy S., Eshet R. Spiral effects of teachers’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies: Evidence from a daily diary study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 73 (1), pp. 151–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.001 
Date of the publication 31.08.2022