Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 73–97
UDC: 
167.7+37.03+004.8+378.14

Specifics of nurturing university students’ independent research activities in a digital educational environment: Theoretical justification of the factors of successful organization

Andrienko E. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Romm M. V. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Romm T. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
2 Novosibirsk State Technical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines the problem of fostering successful independent students’ research. The purpose of the study is to theoretically substantiate, analyze and specify the factors of organizing independent research activities of university students in a digital educational environment.
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the research is a set of subjective, learner-centered and activity-based, cross-cultural, competence-based and professionally oriented approaches that allow analyzing the organization of students’ independent research activities in the context of the relationship between personality and professional activities with a focus on the formation of research competence, taking into account Russian and international experience that determines the specifics of educational and professional activities of university students in modern conditions of digital transformation of education.
Results. It is revealed that in modern conditions, university students have low motivation for independent research due to its complexity and versatility. The relationship between research and development, education and commercialization for effective university development in modern conditions is highlighted. It is revealed that the factors considered as the driving force behind the organization of independent research can be implemented: at the socio-psychological level (interaction with the supervisor); didactic level (implementation of innovative technologies in the educational process); personal and professional level (development of certain personal qualities; digital level (use of artificial intelligence and digital educational environment); and methodological level (methodological culture and reading competencies).
Conclusions. The study concludes that the main factors in the organization of students’ independent research include the following: the role of a supervisor as a mentor and facilitator; the formation of a preventive position of a young researcher to develop attitudes and readiness for research; the development of proactive behavior and cognitive flexibility as professional and personal qualities of students; attracting students to active participation in student scientific societies with a well-thought-out demonstration of the results and achievements of student-led research; formation of students’ research competence in the digital educational environment.

Keywords: 

Research activities; Independent work of students; Academic motivation; Academic engagement; Proactive behavior; Cognitive flexibility; Mentoring; Artificial intelligence; Research competence.

For citation:
Andrienko E. V., Romm M. V., Romm T. A. Specifics of nurturing university students’ independent research activities in a digital educational environment: Theoretical justification of the factors of successful organization. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 73–97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2603.04
References: 
  1. Avalueva N. B., Garkusha N. S., Krolevetskaya E. N. Updating the Russian higher education system: A review and evaluation of cultural and value-based content of modern challenges. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16 (1), pp. 82-106. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2601.04
  2. Radianti J., Majchrzak T. A., Fromm J., Wohlgenannt I. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 2020, vol. 147, pp. 103778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  3. Vikhman V. V., Romm M. V. Evaluating digital maturity of education. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (5), pp. 40-56. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.03
  4. Romm M. V., Romm T. A., Zaiakina R. A. Partner network communities – a resource of universities' activities. SHS Web of Conferences, 2016, vol. 29, pp. 01058. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/zkwvvr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162901058
  5. Đurek V., Kadoic N, Begičević Ređep N. Assessing the digital maturity level of higher education institutions. International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2018, pp. 0671–0676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400126
  6. Narimanova O. V. University 3.0 concept: Prospects for implementation in Russia under the conditions of a new technological revolution. Personality in a Changing World: Health, Adaptation, Development, 2019, vol. 7 (2), pp. 350-363. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/uuzlgn DOI: https://doi.org/10.23888/humJ20192350-363
  7. Hashim M. A. M., Tlemsani I., Mason-Jones R., Matthews R., Ndrecaj V. Higher education via the lens of industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2024, vol. 9, pp. 100828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100828
  8. Tran M. T. Fostering sustainable mindsets: A critical exploration of educational psychology in business education. The International Journal of Management Education, 2024, vol. 22 (3), pp.  101054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101054
  9. Mora-Valentín E. V., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado M. Improving the effectiveness of academic-business models: An analysis of obstacles in R&D activities in service industries. Service Business, 2009, vol. 3 (4), pp. 395-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-009-0075-5

10.Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. The concept of intellectual potential development: the main dimensions and bases within the context of lifelong education (review). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 140–156. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/zfrofn   DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1703.09 

11.Nur J. The role of technology integration in enhancing critical thinking skills. JEDA: Journal of Educational Analytics, 2025, vol. 4 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v4i3.363

12.Latuha O. A. Assessing the sustainability development of an organization. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 142–159. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/lpjsas  DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.08 

13.Oliveira D. S. de, Silva R. L. F., Azeiteiro U. M. Curriculum assessment system for sustainability (CASS): A theoretical-methodological tool for assessment in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2025, vol. 26 (9), pp. 281-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2024-0414

14.Guillén-Gámez F. D., Mena-Rodriguez E., Recio-Muñoz F., Díaz-Vargas B. L. Empowering teachers for the AI-GenAI era: Predictors of digital competence in curriculum innovation. TechTrends, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-026-01185-2

15.Shabaeva S. V., Kekkonen A. L. Practical research of university-business cooperation in Russia and the Emcosu countries. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2017, vol. 21 (6), pp. 93-100. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/yocssc DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.06.078

16.Yakushkina N. A., Gavrilyuk E. S. Models and forms of interaction between university and corporate partners. Ekonomika. Pravo. Innovacii, 2024, no. 1, pp. 24-33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/ctbkfw DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17586/2713-1874-2024-1-24-33

17.Evdokimova A. I., Morozov A. V. Тhe development of the research competence of students in the internship with the use of the modern digital technologies and services. Izvestia VSPU, no. 8, pp. 58-65. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/jsfflm

18.Taranenko A. V., Kushvakha H. N. Involvement of students majoring in advertising and public relations in academic research activities. Pedagogy. Theoretical and Practical Issues, 2023, vol. 8 (2). pp. 224-228. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/madnlb DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/ped20230037 

19.Pisareva S. A., Brazhnik E. I., Gladkaya I. V., Piskunova E. V., Fedorova N. M. Studying the peculiarities of the universities students’ motivation for research activities. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (1), pp. 25-53. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/jdrivf   DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.02

20.Afanasenkova E. L. Distinctions in educational motivation of students of I and IV courses of humanitarian training programs. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2017, no. 10, pp. 72-80. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/xdbywa DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/po17-10-11 

21.Malоva M. M. Motivation development of research skills building of the university students. Focus on Language Education and Research, 2023, vol. 4 (4), pp. 100-129. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/ovlpqh

22.Kogan E. A. Аttitude of university students to scientific research. Human Capital, 2020, no. 8, pp. 179-187. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/jxwyxo DOI: https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2020.08.17

23.Andrienko E. V. digitalization of education in the context of solving psychological and pedagogical problems of education and training. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2022, no. 1, pp. 7-18. (In Russian) URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/ldorpq DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2201.01 

24.Mudrik A. V. Socialization: Innovations of recent decades. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2023, no. 3, pp. 6-15. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/dfclyn   DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2303.01

25.Niazi Y., Javaid F., Gul M. Parental bonding as a predictor of self-regulation, proactive attitude and academic performance in university students. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2022, vol. 10 (1), pp. 53-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20547jess1012210104 

26.Kochan N. V., Ten V. H., Pushkareva I. Y. Social engagement of youth as a manifestation of a subjective position: Evaluating the value of involvement in socially significant activities. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 97–120. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.05

27.Bazylev Ya. S. Features of cognitive processes of generations: X, Y, Z, Alpha. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2024, no. 10, pp. 64-69. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/glstus  DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2024.10.8 

28.Osavolyuk E. Yu., Kurginyan S. S. Person's cognitive flexibility: Theory, measurement, and practice. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2018, vol. 15 (1), pp. 128-144. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/ywyoot   DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2018-1-128-144

29.Romm T. The development of social pedagogy in Russia. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 2016, vol. 27 (1), pp. 83-102. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/pxfhui  DOI: https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2016.27.07

30.Khodyrev A. M. Dynamics of value-meaning orientations in the professional-personal development of pedagogical and non-pedagogical students during university studies. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2025, no. 3, pp. 74-86. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/SCYUDS DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2503.07

31.Romm M. V., Romm T. A. Socialization and professional education in higher education. Higher Education in Russia, 2010, no. 12, pp. 104-114. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ncuhxt

32.Pavlova E. V., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Shcheglova E. A. Value-semantic measurement of commitment: An empirical study. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, vol. 23 (3), pp. 691-704. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/wpibqk DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-691-704 

33.Bekhter A. A. Proactive coping of a human at different age stages. Pacific Bulletin of Psychology, 2025, no. 2 (2), pp. 5-15. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/bdrqoq  DOI: https://doi.org/10.38161/3034-6568-2025-2-5-15

34.Bordovskaya N. V., Kostromina S. N., Rozum S. I., Moskvicheva N. L. Student’s research potential: Construct’s content and method for its assessment. Psychological Journal, 2017, vol. 38 (1), pp. 89-103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/yfpwvr

35.Basiuk V. S., Selivanova N. L., Shakurova M. V., Romm T. A. The specifics of modern university practices in introducing students to traditional moral values: A problem-focused expert assessment. Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15 (4), pp. 7-33. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2504.01

36.Samoylova A. V., Krezhevskikh O. V., Bulatova O. V. Specifics of integrating artificial intelligence into teaching and learning: Evaluating the development of cognitive flexibility among university students majoring in various fields. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16 (2), pp. 321-339. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/xcqcbh DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.14

37.Pevneva A. N. The relationship between rigidity to flexibility and students' research potential. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2023, no. 87, pp. 86-103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/fobeuj  

38.Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Evaluating the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (4), pp. 92-118. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/eefumj  DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2204.05 

39. Narbut N. P., Aleshkovski I. A., Gasparishvili A. T., Krukhmaleva O. V., Savina N. E. Students’ engagement in research at the university: A sociological analysis. Bulletin of the Russian Peoples' Friendship University. Series: Sociology, 2023, vol. 23 (2), pp. 256-271. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/upjudw  DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-2-256-271 

40.Khlaif Z. N., Mousa A., Hattab M. K., Itmazi J., Hassan A. A., Sanmugam M., Ayyoub A. The potential and concerns of using ai in scientific research: ChatGPT performance evaluation. JMIR Medical Education, 2023, vol. 9, pp. e47049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47049

41.Cheung K. K. C. Science identity and AI chatbots: A systematic review of empirical studies in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10295-8

42.Ambarova P. A., Shabrova N. V., Kemmet E. V. Scientific supervisor and scientific mentor: Updating old roles and meanings. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 2024, vol. 15 (4), pp. 282-302. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/fngwgx  DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2024.15.4.14

43.Andrienko E. V. The specifics of mentoring as a factor enhancing the development of gifted children within the educational environment: Comparative analysis of theoretical studies. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16 (1), pp. 136-158. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/gpfmrs DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2601.06 

44.Palmov S. V., Neverova E. A., Zhilkina D. V. The impact of emotional intelligence on effective leadership. Industrial Economy, 2024, no. S1, pp. 153-159. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/qzfuur  DOI: https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.71.47.023

45.Wan T., Doty C. M., Geraets A. A., Saitta E. K. H., Chini J. J. Responding to incorrect ideas: Science graduate teaching assistant s operationalization of error framing and undergraduate students’ perception. International Journal of STEM Education, 2023, vol. 10 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00398-8

46.Kuzmenko M. V. Artificial intelligence in research and academic writing: An analytical review of application domains and limitations. Lifelong Education: the 21st Century, 2025, vol. 13 (3), pp. 22–42. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/hkohbk DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j5.art. 2025.10846

47.Yarovikova Y. V., Balygina E. A., Logvinova O. K. Developing professionally oriented communicative competence: Evaluating the factors of integrating large language models into foreign language instruction of non-linguistic university students. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16 (2), pp. 264-300. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/mhncls  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.12

48.Sysoyev P. V., Evstigneev M. N. The use of artificial intelligence technologies in the students’ research work. Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal, 2025, no. 1, pp. 85-101. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/aynwsu DOI: https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-28-1-6

49.Wu C., Carroll J. M. Evolving perspectives on generative AI in higher education: Insights from two years of university stakeholder analysis. TechTrends, 2026, vol. 70, pp. 346-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01150-5

Date of the publication 30.03.2026