Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 115–135
© Sokur E. A., Starikov V. I., Burmistrova N. A., 2024
UDC: 
378

Professionally significant qualities of teaching producing in the context of digital development: Evaluating the effectiveness by education stakeholders

Sokur E. A. 1 (Omsk, Russian Federation), Starikov V. I. 2 (Omsk, Russian Federation), Burmistrova N. A. 3 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Omsk State Pedagogical University
2 Omsk State Technical University
3 Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 48
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of increasing the level of communicative culture in future economists in the digital era. The purpose of the research is to substantiate the effectiveness of professionally important qualities of teaching producing in universities of Economics, taking into account the digital format of interaction.
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the study is the Pareto optimality principle (2080), which allows the authors to determine the necessary minimum of teaching resources in terms of modern communication knowledge for training economists in the digital age. During the study, an online survey was conducted in order to substantiate the effectiveness of professionally important qualities of teaching producing in the context of the digital specifics of the socio-economic space. The research sample consisted of students and academic staff of economics departments of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Omsk State Pedagogical University, and Omsk State Technical University.
Results. The theoretical analysis of the research problem revealed professionally important qualities of teaching producing (communication skills, digitals kills, knowledge of the principles of teaching ethics to create an atmosphere of trust and psychological safety), which facilitate the development of future economists’ communicative culture (motivational, cognitive, and functional components).
According to the results of the empirical part of the study, the education stakeholders highly appreciated the effectiveness of professionally significant qualities of teaching producing and their positive correlation.
Conclusions. The use of the Pareto rule allows the authors to conclude that the formation of professionally significant t qualities of teaching producing, which make up about 20% of the professional qualities composition for academic staff at universities of economics, determines 80% of the productivity of educational outcomes in terms of developing future economists’ communicative culture. This, in turn, determines the ability of graduates to build communication taking into account the career prospects at various levels of digitalization and interaction with artificial intelligence systems.

Keywords: 

Economics education; Future economists; Teaching producing; Professionally significant qualities; Communicative culture; Levels of communicative culture; Digital technologies; Artificial intelligence.

For citation:
Sokur E. A., Starikov V. I., Burmistrova N. A. Professionally significant qualities of teaching producing in the context of digital development: Evaluating the effectiveness by education stakeholders. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 115–135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2405.06
References: 
  1. Boronenko T. A., Fedotova V. S. Fundamentalisation of professional training of future teachers of mathematics and computer science in the conditions of digitalisation. Perspectives of Science & Education, 2023, vol. 64 (4), pp. 90-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2023.4.6  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54401642 
  2. Bygstad B., Оvrelid E., Ludvigsen S., Dæhlen M. From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 2022, vol. 182, pp. 104463. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49255777
  3. Fan Y., Xie X., Cai Y., Chen J., Ma X., Li X., Zhang R., Guo J. Pre-training Methods in Information Retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2022, vol. 16 (3), pp. 178-317. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1500000100
  4. Farias-Gaytan S., Aguaded I., Ramirez-Montoya M. S. Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2023, vol. 10 (1), pp. 386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9
  5. Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V., Kuleshov S. M., Shikhgafizov P. S. Digitalization of higher education: New trends and the factors that are associated students' grades. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2022, vol. 11 (1), pp. 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.59  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49243983
  6. Karumbaiah S., Ocumpaugh J., Baker R. S. Context matters: Differing implications of motivation and help-seeking in educational technology. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, vol. 32 (3), pp. 685-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00272-0
  7. Mahmud M. E., Malik L. R. Phenomenological study on enhancing education quality of madrasa: Effective strategies from school principals perspectives. Perspectives of Science & Education, 2024, vol. 69 (3), pp. 685-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.3.42
  8. Owan V., Abang K., Idika D., Etta E., Bassey B. Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2023, vol. 19 (8), pp. em2307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428
  9. Ruiz-Alfonso Z., Santana-Vega L. E., Vallerand R. J. Communicative teaching style as predictor of students' passion and dedication. Revista de Psicodidactica, 2023, vol. 28 (1), pp. 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2022.11.002

10.Stefaniak J., Luo T., Xu M. M. Fostering pedagogical reasoning and dynamic decision-making practices: a conceptual framework to support learning design in a digital age. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021, vol. 69 (4), pp. 2225-2241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09964-9

11.Thomson T. J., Thomas G., Irvine L. Conceptualising communication: A survey of introduction to communication university units. Communication Research and Practice, 2021, vol. 7 (2), pp. 111-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.1964049

12.Ullah M. S., Hoque Md. R., Abdul Aziz M., Islam M. Analyzing students e-learning usage and post-usage outcomes in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 2023, vol. 5, pp. 100146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100146

13.Wang Ya., Gong Sh., Cao Ya., Fan W. The power of affective pedagogical agent and self–explanation in computer–based learning. Computers & Education, 2023, vol. 195, pp. 104723. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=60513448

14.Atyushkina V. B. Students' perceptions of digital culture and digital educational environment: From research experience. Business. Education. Law, 2023, no. 2, pp. 357-363. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2023.63.600  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=53853768

15.Boronenko T. A., Kaysina A. V., Fedotova V. S. Conceptual model of the concept of digital literacy. Perspectives of Science & Education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 47-73. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.4.4  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43917943

16.Grunis M. L., Kirilova G. I. Color differentiation of digital risks in teacher education. Integration of Education, 2023, vol. 27 (2), pp. 325-339. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.111.027.202302.325-339  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54044146

17.Drugova E. A., Zhuravleva I. I., Zakharova U. S., Sotnikova V. Ye., Yakovleva K. I. Artificial Intelligence for learning analytics and instructional design steps: An overview of solutions. Voprosy Obrazovaniya, 2022, no.4, pp. 107-153. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-107-153  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50066300

18.Ivanchenko I. S. Assessing the prospects for using artificial intelligence in higher education system. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13 (4), pp. 170-194. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.08  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54390178

19.Noskova A. V., Glukhova D. V., Proskurina A. S., Nguyen E. H. Digitalization of the educational environment: risk assessment of distance education by Russian and Vietnamese students. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30 (1), pp. 156-167. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-156-167  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44609924

20.Polunina L. I., Bauder G. A. Ethics in the professional competence of a teacher. The Education and Science Journal, 2023, no. 1, pp. 3. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54072834

21.Sablukov A. V. Student’s communication culture in the context of modern labor market requirements. Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences, 2020, no. 2, pp. 229-241. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43863293

22.Strelkova I. A. Digitalization of the economy: A new format of globalization. Economics. Taxes. Law, 2020, vol. 13 (4), pp. 20-28. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X 2020-13-4-20-28  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44037995

23.Tsyvunina A. D., Pevzner M. N. Evaluation criteria for communicative culture in different information environments. Bulletin of Novgorod State University, 2019, no. 4, pp. 114-118. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41571547

Date of the publication 31.10.2024