The model of tandem content and language integrated learning: Justification and evaluation of its effectiveness by education stakeholders
Introduction. The need to master a foreign language in the professional field of education is determined by contemporary challenges: the rapid growth of intercultural interaction, as well as the processes of globalization and informatization of education. The article examines the problem of using tandem content and language integrated learning focused on developing future teachers’ readiness and ability to communicate effectively in a foreign language in the professional environment. The purpose of the article is to propose the model of tandem content and language integrated learning and evaluate the effectiveness of its implementation in the process of developing foreign language professional communicative competence of future teachers.
Materials and Methods. The study was conducted during 2020–2023 period. The sample included 86 students of 3–5 years majoring in Primary education and English as a Foreign language. The authors used the following research methods: theoretical and methodological analysis, comparison, interpretation, modeling, questionnaires, analysis and systematization of accumulated experience of tandem content and language integrated learning.
Results. The main results consist in substantiating the model of tandem content and language integrated learning and in assessing the effectiveness of its implementation in the process of developing foreign language professional communicative competence of future teachers. The authors identified a mechanism of interaction between all education stakeholders in dynamic groups based on task level-differentiation within the framework of content and language integrated learning (CLIL).
Conclusions. The study concludes that the model of tandem content and language integrated learning was substantiated and the effectiveness of its implementation in the process of developing foreign language professional communicative competence of future teachers was assessed.
Tandem training; Content and language integrated learning (CLIL); Education stakeholders; Dynamic groups; Foreign language professional communicative competence.
- Ruiz-Madrid N., Valeiras-Jurado J. Developing multimodal communicative competence in emerging academic and professional genres. International Journal of English Studies, 2020, vol. 20 (1), pp. 27–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.401481
- Cloudia Ho Y.-Y. Communicative language teaching and English as a foreign language undergraduates’ communicative competence in tourism English. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 2020, vol. 27, pp. 100271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100271
- Byrdina O. G., Yurinova E. A., Dolzhenko S. G. Developing foreign language professional-communicative competence of pedagogical university students by means of CLIL. The Education and Science Journal, 2020, vol. 22 (7), pp. 77–100. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-7-77-100 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43898804
- Llinares A. Discussion: Multiple approaches in CLIL: Cognitive, affective and linguistic insights. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2023, vol. 26 (5), pp. 658–663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1918055
- Lu Ch., Gu M. M., Lee J. Ch.-K. A systematic review of research on translanguaging in EMI and CLIL classrooms. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2023, Latest Articles, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2256775
- Lazarević N. CLIL teachers’ reflections and attitudes: Surviving at the deep end. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2022, vol. 25 (2), pp. 571–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1703897
- Whittaker R., McCabe A. Expressing evaluation across disciplines in primary and secondary CLIL writing: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2020, vol. 26 (3), pp. 345–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1798869
- Fajardo Dack T., Argudo J., Abad M. Language and teaching methodology features of CLIL in university classrooms: A research synthesis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 2020, vol. 22 (1), pp. 40–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.13878
- Kordíková B., Brestenská B. Bilingual science education: Perceptions of Slovak in-service and pre-service teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2020, vol. 25 (2), pp. 728–741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1718590
10. Verikaitė-Gaigalienė D. Andziulienė L. To be or not to be: An overview of CLIL implementation in Lithuania. Sustainable Multilingualism, 2019, vol. 14 (1), pp. 123–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2019-0006
11. Nguyen H. Th. M., Nguyen H. Th. Th., Gao X., Hoang T.H., Starfield S. Developing professional capacity for content language integrated learning (CLIL) teaching in Vietnam: Tensions and responses. Language and Education, 2024, vol. 38 (1), pp. 118–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2260374
12. Pappa S., Moate J., Ruohotie-Lyhty M., Eteläpelto A. Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: Tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2019, vol. 22 (5), pp. 593–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1286292
13. Wilkinson R. Content and language integration at universities? Collaborative reflections. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2018, vol. 21 (5), pp. 607–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1491948
14. Menegale M. Learning strategies instruction in CLIL textbooks and teacher-authored materials: A qualitative study. International Journal of Linguistics, 2020, vol. 12 (2), pp. 186–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i2.16537
15. De Smet A., Mettewie L., Hiligsmann Ph., Galand B., Van Mensel L. Does CLIL shape language attitudes and motivation? Interactions with target languages and instruction levels. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2023, vol. 26 (5), pp. 534–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1671308
16. Cañado M. L. P., Lancaster N. K. The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: A longitudinal case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2017, vol. 30 (3), pp. 300–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1338717
17. Mahan K. R., Brevik L. V., Ødegaard M. Characterizing CLIL teaching: new insights from a lower secondary classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2021, vol. 24 (3), pp. 401–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206
18. Feddermann M., Baumert J., Möller J. A replication study to assess CLIL effects on second language learning in Germany: More than selection and preparation effects? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2023, vol. 27 (2), pp. 173–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2164174
19. Otto A., Estrada J. L. Towards an understanding of CLIL assessment practices in a European context: Main assessment tools and the role of language in content subjects. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2019, vol. 2 (1), pp. 31–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.11
20. Wallace A., Spiliotopoulos V., Ilieva R. CLIL Collaborations in higher education: A critical perspective. English Teaching and Learning, 2020, vol. 44 (2), pp. 127–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00052-4
21. Tleuzhanova G. K., Syrymbetova L. S., Mekezhanova A. B., Sarzhanova G. B., Kulsharipova Z. K. Subject-based speaking as a method for the development of foreign-language professional competence among students. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 14 (3), pp. 408–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0731 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45718116
22. Godzhaeva N. S., Logunov T. A., Lokteva M. S., Zolotareva S. A. Approaching CLIL from the periphery: Integration of content and language in Russian higher education institution. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2019, vol. 8 (2), pp. 280–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2019.2.280 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39189464
23. Babich I. M., Omarova V. K., Baratova A. A., Churkina N. I. Integration of IBL and CLIL in preparing prospective teachers for teaching natural sciences in multilingual environment. Integration of Education, 2021, vol. 25 (2), pp. 304–320. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.103.025.202102.304-320 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46154607
24. Popova N. V., Kogan M. S., Vdovina E. K. Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) as actualization methodology of interdisciplinary links in technical university. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2018, vol. 23 (173), pp. 29–42. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2018-23-173-29-42 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32824921
25. Sidorenko T. V., Kudryashova A. V. CLIL methodology evolution in Russian Technical University (Tomsk Polytechnic). Rhema, 2021, no. 1, pp. 129–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2021-1-129-143 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45648220
26. Bogdanova N. V. Integration of assessment methods for foreign language competence in the framework of the tandem language course. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2023, no. 2, pp. 42 (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.32555 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=53701826