| 
User login
Factors determining connection between teaching deficiencies and students’ learning outcomes
Introduction. The article addresses the problem of assessing teachers’ professional deficiencies. The purpose of the research is to identify the essential factors determining the connection between teachers’ professional deficiencies and learning outcomes of schoolchildren.
Materials and Methods. In order to study the relationship between teachers’ professional deficiencies and schoolchildren’s learning outcomes, the authors have developed a model of teachers’ professional deficiencies and followed a comprehensive research approach. The sample consisted of 3375 teachers who were interviewed. The authors analyzed the results of National Examinations (the Unified State Exams) of higher educational institutions applicants from 50 municipalities of the region. The method of factor analysis revealed a stable system of latent properties of teachers’ professional deficiencies affecting learning outcomes. The materials and methods that formed the basis of this study were obtained with the support of Krasnoyarsk Regional Fund for the Support of Research and Scientific-Technical Activities within the framework of the project “Comprehensive study of professional shortcomings and difficulties of teachers of the Krasnoyarsk Territory”.
Results. The research findings consist in the developed system of factors obtained by indirect measurements. The content structure and characteristics of teachers’ professional deficiencies determining teaching effectiveness are revealed. It has been established that the selected groups of factors have a specific representation in each subject area. The results of teaching students in various subjects depend on the specifics of teachers’ professional deficiencies. The identified set of factors in the subject areas of “Mathematics”, “Literature”, “History”, “English” has a complex structure of the selected properties and is more diverse than in “Russian”, “Social Studies” and “Biology”. It is established that the theoretical model of teachers’ professional deficits has its own subject expression.
Conclusions. Conclusions are drawn about the stability of the identified system of latent properties of teachers’ professional deficiencies, on which the results of schoolchildren's education depend. The authors emphasize that the established connection between teachers’ professional deficiencies and the results of schoolchildren's education contributes to the development of professional development programs and can become the main work of professional development centers for educators.
Professional deficiencies; Content structure of factors; Learning outcomes; Academic subject; Teachers’ deficiencies; Results of National Examinations.
URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:47447635
1. Polivanova K. N. Educational outcomes of middle school in the context of international research. Psychological Science and Education, 2015, vol. 20 (4), pp. 19–30. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2015200402 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25239097
2. Braun H. I., Singer J. D. Assessment for monitoring of education systems: International comparisons. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2019, vol. 683 (1), pp. 75–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843804
3. Morgan C. The spectacle of global tests in the Arabian Gulf: a comparison of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Comparative Education, 2018, vol. 54 (3), pp. 285–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1348018
4. Hernández-Torrano D., Courtney M. G. R. Modern international large-scale assessment in education: An integrative review and mapping of the literature. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00109-1
5. Snoek M. Educating quality teachers: How teacher quality is understood in the Netherlands and its implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2021, vol. 44 (3), pp. 309–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1931111
6. Rumbeshta E. A., Nikolaeva S. L. Students’ education results estimation as a problem of the modern basic school standard. Pedagogical Review, 2018, no. 2, pp. 83–94. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2018-2-83-94 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34992930
7. Jeschke C., Kuhn C., Heinze A., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Saas H., Lindmeier A. M. Teachers’ ability to apply their subject-specific knowledge in instructional settings – a qualitative comparative study in the subjects mathematics and economics. Frontiers in Education, 2021, vol. 6, pp. 683962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.683962
8. Taylor J., Roehrig A. D., Hensler B. S., Connor C. M., Schatschneider C. Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 2010, vol. 328, pp. 512–514. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1186149
9. Zainuddin Z., Perera C. J. Supporting students' self-directed learning in the flipped classroom through the LMS TES BlendSpace. On the Horizon, 2018, vol. 26 (4), pp. 281–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2017-0016
10. Kuzina D. V., Kayzer Ya. R. The problem of the development of motivation to study at middle school students. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, vol. 8 (6), pp. 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15862/51PDMN620 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44901695
11. Gutnik I. Y. Designing an evaluation inventory for identifying teachers’ professionalism deficits in the context of transformation of contemporary education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (4), pp. 33–45. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.02 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46513824
12. Fomichenko A. S. Teacher-student relationships as a factor of successful learning activity in schoolchildren. Psychological Science and Education, 2017, vol. 22 (5), pp. 39–47. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2017220505 URL https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30455084
13. Chernyavskaya V. S., Mishareva А. E. Teacher’s pedagogical intentionality and its influence on the educational motivation of primary school students. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, vol. 9 (4), pp. 352–356. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26140/anip-2020-0904-00 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44356638
14. Sobkin V. S., Kalashnikova E. A. On the issue of pedagogical authority. Social Psychology and Society, 2016, vol. 7 (1), pp. 88–107. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2016070107 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25781975
15. Pudenko T. I., Рotemkinа T. V., Rudneva A. A. External quality assessment of general education as a factor of teachers’ professional development. The Education and Science Journal, 2017, vol. 19 (6), pp. 52–70. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-52-70 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29459491
16. Demirdogen B., Korkut H. M. Does teacher education matter? Comparison of education and science major teachers’ assessment literacy. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 2021, vol. 26, pp. 23–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/enad.26.2 URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1749464
17. Stronge J. H., Ward T. J., Grant L. W. What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 2011, vol. 62 (4), pp. 339–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111404241
18. Wallace M. F. G., Rust J., Jolly E. ‘It’s all there’: Entanglements of teacher preparation and induction. Professional Development in Education, 2021, vol. 47 (2–3), pp. 406–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1887921
19. Qin X, Yi C. Preservice teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in English writing class: Mentoring matters. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2021, vol. 70, pp. 101019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101019
20. Kriaučiūnienė R., Targamadzė V. Mapping the concept of good school with teachers’ characteristics in the context of a good school concept. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2019, vol. 10 (2), pp. 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.32.42
21. Кandaurova A. V. Resource approach to overcoming teachers’ professional and daily difficulties. Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, 2019, no. 4, pp. 36–43. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.36906/2311-4444/19-4/06 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41569884
22. McCullough S. N., Granger K. L., Sutherland K. S., Conroy M. A., Pandey T. A preliminary study of BEST in CLASS–elementary on teacher self-efficacy, burnout, and attributions. Behavioral Disorders, 2021, pp. 53–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211010672 URL: https://en.x-mol.com/paper/article/1388225371116167168
23. Setkova I. N., Lukina A. R., Volkova M. A. New teacher roles in distance learning. Lifelong Education: The XXI Century, 2021, no. 1, pp. 92–102. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2021.6690 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44894903
24. Boronenko T. A., Fedotova V. S. Research of the digital competence of teachers in the conditions of digitalization of the educational environment of the school. Bulletin of Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 2021, vol. 27 (1), pp. 51–61. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-1-51-61 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45632110
25. Dmitriev D. S. The results analysis of innovative educational tools use in teacher professional activity. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education. 2019; vol. 15 (4), pp. 855–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.15.201904.855-865 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43575601
26. Yawson D. E., Yamoah F. A. Understanding satisfaction essentials of E-learning in higher education: A multi-generational cohort perspective. On the Heliyon. 2020, vol. 6, pp. e05519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05519 URL: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(20)32362-8.pdf
27. Kachimskaya A. Yu., Gordienko V. N. Comparative analysis of students' assessments of some professionally important qualities of teachers with different levels of satisfaction with professional activities. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2021, vol. 9 (2), pp. 37. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46322895
28. Lisovskaya N. B., Ikonnikova G. Yu. Conflicts among the teaching staff at school. The Herzen University Conference on Psychology in Education, 2020, no. 3, pp. 421–428. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-13 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44271308
29. Suhodimtseva A. P. Implementation of an interdisciplinary approach to training and development of gifted children: Results of experimental work. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 2019, vol. 1 (6), pp. 143–157. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/2224–0772–2019–10050 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41570846
30. Skripova Yu. Yu., Shabalina O. V. Features of the use of formative assessment in the correctional and developmental activities of a primary school teacher. Humanitarian Studies. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, no. 3, pp. 36–48. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24412/2712-827X-2020-3-36-48 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44310778
31. Anthony C. J., DiPerna J. C. Piloting a short form of the academic competence evaluation scales. School Mental Health, 2018, vol. 10 (3), pp. 314–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9254-7
32. Maznichenko M. A., Platonova A. N. Professional difficulties of the teacher and the possibilities of overcoming them by means of integration of scientific and non-scientific forms of presenting pedagogical information. Science and School, 2021, no. 1, pp. 157–168. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2021-1-157-168 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44896447
33. Tyumeneva J. A., Havenson T. E. Teachers Characteristics and school students achievements. Findings of application of the first difference method to TIMSS-2007 data. Educational Studies, 2012, no. 3, pp. 113–140. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2012-3-113-140 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18023052
34. Novopashina L. A., Grigoryeva E. G., Kuzina D. V., Cherkasova Y. A. The capabilities of mathematical modeling tools for the system of assessing teacher shortages. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (6), pp. 220–236. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2006.12 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44478890
35. Оleynikova O. N., Muravyeva A. A., Aksenova N. M. National qualifications frameworks: Conceptual and methodological principles in the context of unresolved issues. The Education and Science Journal, 2018, vol. 20 (6), pp. 70–89. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-70-89 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35191282
36. Bardach L., Klassen R. Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 2020, vol. 30, pp. 100312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312
37. Sozinov A. A., Laukka S., Lyashchenko A. I., Siipoc A., Nopanen M., Tuominen T., Alexandrov Yu. I. Greater learning transfer effect for avoidance of loss than for achievement of gain in Finnish and Russian schoolchildren. Helion, 2020, vol. 6 (6), pp. e04158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04158 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43296030
38. Case J. A. C., Olino T. M. Approach and avoidance patterns in reward learning across domains: An initial examination of the Social Iowa Gambling Task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2020, vol. 125, pp. 103547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103547
39. Sobkin V. S., Kalashnikova E. A. On the issue of private tutoring: Students, parents and teachers' opinions. Pedagogy, 2019, no. 6, pp. 39–56. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38532292
40. Sobkin V. S., Kalashnikova E. A. Student preferences and socio-cultural transformations of professional groups. Social Psychology and Society, 2020, vol. 11 (3), pp. 114–134. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110308 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44015395
