Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–91
© Dyakov S. I., 2021
UDC: 
37.015.31

Motivational and value constructs of personal self-organization in the semantic space of education

Dyakov S. I. 1 (Sevastopol, Russian Federation)
1 Federal public autonomous educational institution of the higher education "Sevastopol state university"
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 747
Abstract: 

Introduction. This psychological research addresses the problem of motivational-value self-organization of teachers and students in education. The purpose of the article is to determine the features of motivational and value self-organization of teachers and students in the post-Soviet educational environment.
Materials and Methods. The research was conducted from 2002 to 2020 on the basis of higher education institutions and secondary schools in Ukraine (Donbass, the Nikolaev Region) and the Crimea. The sample consisted of 2128 people including students doing degrees in the fields of Humanities, Law, Economics, and Engineering; secondary school teachers and students; academic staff of higher education institutions. The study has investigated the constructs of motivational-value self-organization of teachers and students in terms of meaning of life orientations. The author developed and used ‘motivational-value self-organization inventory’ in order to disclose levels and types of personal values as well as factors determining personal life goals.
Results. The main research findings are that (1) ‘Individual pragmatic type’ of motivational-value self-organization predominates among value orientations of teachers and students (education, work, happiness in private life, housing and material well-being, health, etc.); (2) teachers and students are not focused on social (public achievements and problems), cultural (existence and civilization) or moral values. (3) Students are more optimistic about self-fulfillment and more internal in clarifying their life goals.
Conclusions. The article concludes that motivational-value self-organization being a personal quality is developed within the sociocultural environment (educational semantic space) which determines personal identity.

Keywords: 

Motivational-value self-organization; Educational semantic space; Individual pragmatic orientation; Meaning of life orientation.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:44849694

For citation:
Dyakov S. I. Motivational and value constructs of personal self-organization in the semantic space of education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.05
References: 
  1. Cable P. E. The need for orienting new teachers. Peabody Journal of Education. 2009, vol. 37 (2), pp. 102–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01619565909536892
  2. Bessonova T. I. Veritable volunteering as an intension to spirituality. Humanitarian and Pedagogical Education, 2018, vol. 4 (1), pp. 13–18. (In Russian) DOI: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32684921
  3. Sobolev A. B. The program of teacher education: new challenges (Current status and development trends of state policy in higher teacher education). Psychological Science and Education, 2015, vol. 20 (5), pp. 5–12. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2015200502 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24844417
  4. Menter I., Valeeva R., Kalimullin A. A tale of two countries – forty years on: Politics and teacher education in Russia and England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 40 (5), pp. 616–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01619565909536892
  5. Alakaev E. A. Youth value orientations of the 1990s – early 2010s. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2017, no. 4, pp. 31–42. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.4.3 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29005458
  6. Dobrokhleb V. G., Zvereva N. V. The potential of modern Russian generations. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2016, no. 2, pp. 61–78. (In Russian) DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2016.2.44.4  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26004222
  7. Serafimovich I. V., Belyaeva O. A. Axiological orientations of participants of educational relationships: Social-psychological aspect. Integration of Education, 2019, vol. 23 (2), pp. 232–246. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.095.023.201902.232-246 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37820730
  8. Tan L., Miksza P. A cross-cultural examination of university students’ motivation toward band and academics in Singapore and the United States. Journal of Research in Music Education, 2017, vol. 65 (4), pp. 416–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417735095
  9. Margolis A. A., Safronova M. A., Panfilova A. S., Shishlyannikova L. M. Testing of assessment tools of future teachers professional competence. Psychological Science and Education, 2015, vol. 20 (5), pp. 77–91. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2015200507 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24844422
  10. Inoguchi T., Le L. T. Q. Global citizens’ preferences for value orientation. The Development of Global Legislative Politics. Trust (Interdisciplinary Perspectives), Springer, Singapore, 2020, vol. 3, pp. 25–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9389-2_3
  11. Fu X., Kou Y., Yang Y. Materialistic values among Chinese adolescents: Effects of parental rejection and self-esteem. Child & Youth Care Forum, 2015, vol. 44 (1), pp. 43–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-014-9269-7
  12. Livazović G., Matić M. Sociodemographic characteristics and value orientations in adolescence. Current Psychology, 2018, vol. 39 (5), pp. 1562–1568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9858-y
  13. Inglehart R., Baker W. E. Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 2000, vol. 65 (1), pp. 19–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288
  14. Beutel A. M., Johnson M. K. Gender and prosocial values during adolescence: A research note. Sociological Quarterly, 2004, vol. 45 (2), pp. 379–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb00017.x
  15. Block K., Gonzalez A., Schmader T., Baron A. S. Early gender differences in core values predict anticipated family versus career orientation. Psychological Science, 2018, vol. 29 (9), pp. 1540–1547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618776942 Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q26vx
  16. Lee C., Beckert T. E., Goodrich T. R. The relationship between individualistic, collectivistic, and transitional cultural value orientations and adolescents' autonomy and identity status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2010, vol. 39 (8), pp. 882–893. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9430-z.
  17. Selivanova Z. K. Life goals and professional preferences of older adolescents. Sociological Studies, 2017, no. 5, pp. 51–56. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29276827
  18. Roest A. C., Dubas J. S., Gerris J. M. Value transmissions between fathers, mothers, and adolescent and emerging adult children: The role of the family climate. Journal of Family Psychology, 2009, vol. 23 (2), pp. 146–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015075.
  19. Roest A. C., Dubas J. S., Gerris J. M., Engels R. E. Value similarities among fathers, mothers, and adolescents and the role of a cultural stereotype: Different measurement strategies reconsidered. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2009, vol. 19 (4), pp. 812–833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00621.x.
  20. Knutsen O. Socio-structural variables and value orientations. Social Structure, Value Orientations and Party Choice in Western Europe. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018, pp. 59–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52123-7_3
  21. Knutsen O. Social Structure, Value Orientations and Party Choice in Western Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Ebook, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52123-7
  22. Rickenbach O., Reyes-García V., Moser G., García C. What explains wildlife value orientations? A study among Central African forest dwellers. Human Ecology, 2017, vol. 45 (3), pp. 293–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9860-7
  23. Višak T. Understanding “Meaning of life” in terms of reasons for action. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 2017, vol. 51 (3), pp. 507–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-017-9591-z
  24. Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis A., Orehek E., Scheier M. F. The meaning of action: Do self-regulatory processes contribute to a purposeful life? Personality and Individual Differences, 2017, vol. 116, pp. 115–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.040
  25. Kvashis V. E., Nastuyev I. M. Suicides and murders in modern japan (to the issue of interrelation of tendencies). Society and Law. 2017, no. 4, pp. 81–86. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32297752
  26. Raifman J., Charlton B. M., Arrington-Sanders R., Chan Ph. A., Rusley J., Mayer K. H., Stein M. D., Austin S. B., McConnell M. Sexual orientation and suicide attempt disparities among US adolescents: 2009–2017. Pediatrics March, 2020, vol. 145 (3), pp. e20191658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1658
  27. Bränström R., van der Star A., Pachankis J. E. Untethered lives: Barriers to social integration as predictors of the sexual orientation disparity in suicidality. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2020, vol. 55 (1), pp. 89–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01742-6
  28. Hu Z. On the value orientation of modern market economic system. In: Li D. (ed.) Values of Our Times. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 231–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38259-8_22
  29. Ilyin V. A., Ilyicheva I. V., Levanova E. A., Mikhailova E. A., Pushkareva T. V. Psychosocial development in schoolchildren: Creating and testing the monitoring system. Psychological Science and Education, 2018, vol. 23 (4), pp. 52–60. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2018230405 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36375959
Date of the publication 28.02.2021