Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 120–140
UDC: 
159.923.2+37.015.3+101

Educational media psychology: Methodological foundations of an integrated model

Skorova L. V. 1 (Irkutsk , Russian Federation), Kyshtymova I. M. 1 (Irkutsk , Russian Federation)
1 Irkutsk State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents a model of educational media psychology. It is considered as a branch of educational psychology which focuses on processes of education and development within media environments.
The research problem is determined by the controversy between new tasks of educational psychology associated with the transformation of the modern educational environment into a media environment and the lack of an integrated approach to fulfill them. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the new branch of educational psychology, to identify its problems, clarify its notions, and to describe its concepts and methodological foundations.
Materials and Methods. The research employs methods of theoretical analysis and modeling.
Results. The study suggests that educational media environment as an object of psychology is characterized by distinctive features which require systematic integration of disciplinary, methodological and instrumental approaches to research.
At the disciplinary level, research investigations in the field of educational media psychology involve the integration of basic concepts of educational psychology and media psychology. At the interdisciplinary level, studies on educational media psychology deal with integration of approaches and methods of psychology, philosophy, linguistics, text theory, sociology and cultural studies, which are significant for conducting a psychological analysis of the media text as a mediator of educational processes.
The study reveals the need for a multidisciplinary paradigm of integration of (1) activity theory, which is traditional for educational psychology, with ideas of discursive psychology, psychosemiotics, narrative psychology and psychoanalysis; (2) explanatory and complex approaches to the analysis of research objects; (3) quantitative and qualitative research methods.
Conclusions. Educational media psychology is presented as an integrated model, which comprises objects and interconnected approaches (paradigmatic and disciplinary).

Keywords: 

Educational psychology; Media psychology; Model; Integration; Media environment; Media text; Media competence; Subjects of education.

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 98.383 Community of Inquiry | Social Presence | Online Discussion

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096857811&origin=...

Educational media psychology: Methodological foundations of an integrated model

For citation:
Skorova L. V., Kyshtymova I. M. Educational media psychology: Methodological foundations of an integrated model. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 120–140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2005.07
References: 
  1. Baeva I. A., Laktionova E. B., Gayazova L. A., Kondakova I. V. Ensuring psychological safety of adolescents in the learning environment. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2019, no. 194, pp. 7–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42344740&
  2. Dolganov D. N. The current condition and actual problems of educational psychology. Journal of Experimental Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 29–45. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35123029
  3. Kiseleva M. I., Nechaev N. N. The category of development within the framework of educational psychology. Reconsideration perspectives. Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University, 2012, no. 640, pp. 9–24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17904039  
  4. Kondakov A. M., Kostyleva A. A. Digital identity, digital self-identification, digital profile: Problem statement. RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education, 2019, vol. 16 (4), pp. 207–218. (In Russian) DOI:  https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2019-16-4-295-307 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42358361  
  5. Kostromina S. N., Medina Bracamonte N. A., Zashchirinskaia O. V. Modern tendencies of development of pedagogical psychology and psychology of education. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University. Psychology. Education, 2016, no. 1, pp. 109–117. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25896527
  6. Kyshtymova I. M., Kyshtymova Е. S. Developing potential of a media space. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Psychology, 2019, vol. 27, pp. 58–73. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2019.27.58 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37337757
  7. Kyshtymova I. M., Skorova L. V. Psychological media competence: a Meta-level model. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Psychology, 2018, vol. 23, pp. 77–87. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32714546  
  8. Kyshtymova I. M., Timofeev S. B. The impact of video games on gamers: on problem of determining the transformational potential of gaming activity. Baikal Research Journal, 2019, vol.  10 (4), pp. 3. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2019.10(4).3 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42324626  
  9. Poddiakov A. N. Psychology of teaching/learning under conditions of novelty, complexity and uncertainty. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, vol. 8 (40), pp. 6. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23593084 
  10. Podolsky A. I. Challenges of time and some issues of educational psychology. World of Psychology, 2016, no. 4, pp. 67–75. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28947797   
  11. Soldatova G. U. Digital socialization in the cultural-historical paradigm: A changing child in a changing world. Social Psychology and Society, 2018, vol. 9 (3), pp. 71–80. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090308URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36598708
  12. Smirnov S. D. Methodological issues of educational psychology as viewed from within the post-non-classical rationality framework. Psychological Studies, 2014, vol. 7 (36), pp. 8. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22927601
  13. Smirnova E. O. Specific features of modern preschool childhood. National Psychological Journal, 2019, vol. 2 (2), pp. 25–32. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2019.0205 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41103103
  14. Stepanova M. A. On the state of pedagogical psychology in the light of the contemporary social situation. Voprosy Psychologii, 2010, no. 1, pp. 78–91. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18931710
  15. Tkachenko N. N. Typology of educational environments in modern pedagogical psychology. Strahov Reading, 2018, no. 26, pp. 319–324. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36999015  
  16. Yanitskiy M. S. Psychological aspects of digital education. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2019, no. 2, pp. 38–44. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39243353  
  17. Alexander P. A. Past as prologue: Educational psychology’s legacy and progeny. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2018, vol. 110 (2), pp. 147–162. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000200
  18. Barr R. Growing up in the digital age: Early learning and family media ecology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2019, vol. 28 (4), pp. 341–346. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838245
  19. Bensley D. A, Lilienfeld S. O. Psychological misconceptions: Recent scientific advances and unresolved. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2017, vol. 26 (4), pp. 377–382. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721417699026
  20. Burns M. Success, failure or no significant difference: Charting a course for successful educational technology integration. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2013, vol.  8  (1), pp. 38–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8i1.2376
  21. Cain J. It’s time to confront student mental health issues associated with smartphones and social media. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2018, vol. 82 (7), pp. 6862. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6862
  22. Camilleri M. A., Camilleri A. C. Digital learning resources and ubiquitous technologies in education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2017, vol. 22 (1), pp. 65–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9287-7 
  23. Fullan M., Pinchot M. The fast track to sustainable turnaround. Educational Leadership, 2018, vol.  75 (6), pp. 48–54. URL: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85054337536 &origin=resultslist&sort=cp-f&src=s&st1=Fullan+&st2=m&nlo=1&nlr=20&nls=afprfnm-t&sid=04162add6eee4f6fdede228af1e20d29&sot=anl&sdt=cl&cluster=scopubyr%2c%222018%22%2ct%2c%222017%22%2ct&sl=38&s=AU-ID%28%22Fullan%2c+Michael+G.%22+  6602002006%29&relpos=2&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=#references
  24. Gao F., Zhang, T., Franklin, T. Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2013, vol.  44  (3), pp. 469–483. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
  25. Goldie J. G. S. Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 2016, vol. 38 (10), pp. 1064–1069. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
  26. González-Fernández N., Ramírez-García A., Salcines-Talledo I. Media competence and audiovisual literacy needs of Spanish teachers and families. Education XX1, 2018, vol. 21 (2), pp.  301–321. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.16384
  27. Gunnar Megan R. Perspectives on psychological science: Right way/wrong way symposium institute of child development, university of Minnesota. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2017, vol. 12 (4), pp. 680–683. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689088
  28. Heflin H., Shewmaker J., Nguyen J. Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers and Education,2017, vol. 107, pp. 91–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
  29. Hodgetts D., Chamberlain K. Developing a critical media research agenda for health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 2006, vol. 11 (2), pp. 317–327. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105306061190 
  30. Kelly C., Brower C. Making meaning through media: Scaffolding academic and critical media literacy with texts about schooling. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 2017, vol. 60 (6), pp.  655–666. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jaal.614
  31. Kember D., Douglas T., Muir T., Salter S. Umbrella action research projects as a mechanism for learning and teaching quality enhancement. Higher Education Research and Development, 2019, vol.38 (6), 1285–1298. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1638350 
  32. Kross E. Is psychology headed in the right direction? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2017, vol. 12 (4), pp. 694–698. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691617701184
  33. Kyshtymova I. M., Skorova L. V., Medvedeva T. A. Development of psychological media competence. Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 2018, no. 4, pp. 95–108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13187/me.2018.4.95 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43780299
  34. Licorish S. A., Owen H. E., Daniel B., George J. L. Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2018, vol. 13 (1), pp. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8
  35. Lewandowsky S., Ecker U. K. H., Cook J. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2017, vol. 6 (4), 353–369. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
  36. Ling P., Ze Z. Developing digital learning resources for the college market in China.  Publishing Research Quarterly, 2011, vol. 27 (4), pp. 354–363. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-011-9234-3
  37. Luo T., Clifton L. Examining collaborative knowledge construction in microblogging-based learning environments. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2017, vol. 16, pp.  365-390. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/3869
  38. Montreuil T. C. The practice of school and educational psychology in Canada: The best is yet to come. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2016, vol. 31 (3), pp. 155–159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0829573516655231
  39. Perez-Escoda A., Garcia-Ruiz R., Aguaded-Gomez I. Media competence in university teaching staff validation of an instrument of evaluation. Attic-revista d Innovacio Educative, 2018, vol. 21, pp. 1–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/attic.21.12550
  40. Pötzsch H. Critical digital literacy: Technology in education beyond issues of user competence and labour-market qualifications. TripleC, 2019, vol. 17 (2), pp. 221–240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v17i2.1093
  41. Saceda M. U., Tesch B. Textual and media competence in the ELE classroom. Foro de profesores de e-le, 2017, vol. 13, pp. 301–311. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/foroele.13.10855
  42. Wagner C. J., González-Howard M. Studying discourse as social interaction: The potential of social network analysis for discourse studies. Educational Researcher, 2018, vol. 47 (6), pp. 375–383. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18777741
Date of the publication 31.10.2020