Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 144–160
© Devyatlovskiy D. N., Ignatova V. V., 2019
UDC: 
378.018.5

Praxiological culture of technical university students: Educational factors and conditions for their implementation

Devyatlovskiy D. N. 1 (Lesosibirsk, Russian Federation), Ignatova V. V. 2 (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)
1 Branch of SibGU in the city of Lesosibirsk
2 Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1104
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors investigate the problem of developing technical university students’ praxiological culture. The purpose of the study is to identify educational factors which influence the effectiveness of developing technical university students’ praxiological culture and conditions for their implementation.
Materials and Methods. Experimental work was carried out on the basis of Siberian State University of Science and Technology named after Academician M.F. Reshetnev (Krasnoyarsk) and Lesosibirsk branch of Siberian State University from 2012 to 2017. It involved students (n=798 ) and academic staff (n=57) of Engineering and Economics Faculty. A set of complementary methods was used: theoretical (analysis of methodological, psychological and educational literature, the study of legislative and program-methodical documents in the field of education, system analysis, synthesis), empirical (observation, interviews, study and synthesis of existing teaching practice), sociological (questionnaires, expert surveys); mathematical (ranking, scaling), educational experiments, and expert assessments.
Results. The authors have revealed the educational factors influencing the praxiological culture of technical university students. The set of interrelated educational conditions for the realization of the identified factors within the framework of higher education is clarified. The effectiveness of developing students’ praxiological culture in the educational process of a technical university is experimentally proved.
Conclusions. As a result of the study, educational factors which influence the effectiveness of developing technical university students’ praxiological culture are identified and clarified through the set of interrelated educational conditions.

Keywords: 

Pedagogical factors; Praxiological culture; Professional training; Educational process; Technical university students; Professional success

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 18.280 Bildung | Science of Communication | Educational Research

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074667208&origin=...

Praxiological culture of technical university students: Educational factors and conditions for their implementation

For citation:
Devyatlovskiy D. N., Ignatova V. V. Praxiological culture of technical university students: Educational factors and conditions for their implementation. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 144–160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.09
References: 
  1. Danilov A. N., Gitman M. B., Stolbov V. Yu., Gitman E. K. Engineering personnel training system in modern Russia: Educational trajectories and quality control. Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 5–15. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32673069
  2. Devyatlovsky D. N. A conceptual model of the formation of the praxiological culture of a university under study. Alma Mater (Herald of Higher School), 2019, no. 2, pp. 41–44. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-19.041 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37006322
  3. Devyatlovskiy D. N. Praxiological culture of university students: The essence and content. Global Scientific Potential, 2018, no. 8, pp. 16–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35723373
  4. Korchagin E. A., Safin R. S. Educational component of doctoral training at engineering university. Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28, no. 3, pp.  67–74. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37184526
  5. Kumykov A. M., Lyuev A. Kh., Zhabelova G. A., Zhuravel K. N. Students'' social activities as a guarantee of their professional success. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 3, pp. 127–132. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28863454
  6. Oliver V. M. Adaptations on training design and performing to answer the current context: The importance of C*M*A Alignment. Education and Self Development, 2017, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 44–53. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32662811
  7. Osipova S. I. Competence-based approach in realization of engineering education. Pedagogy, 2016, no. 6, pp. 53–59. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26535252
  8. Puchkov N. P., Zabavnikova T. Yu. On the question of self-development of students in a modern technical university. Education and Self Development, 2017, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 28–34. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35353163
  9. Stepanova I. Yu., Adolf V. A. Professional socialization as a condition of formation graduates'' competitiveness. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 4, pp.  104–110. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28998169
  10. Stromov V. Y., Sysoyev P. V. Model of organization of students'' scientific and research activity. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 10, pp. 75–82. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30383245
  11. Shageeva F. T., Galikhanov M. F., Strekalova G. R. Entrepreneurial competencies of engineering student as a factor of successful professional career. Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 47–55. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32481790
  12. Adolf V., Yakovleva N. La formazione del carattere nelle organizzazioni studentesche imbarco. Italian Science Review, 2014, no. 7, pp. 388–392. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23449363
  13. Dreher R., Gornov A. O., Kondratyev V. V. Concept of the natural structure of engineering training and the code of professional ethics of an engineer. Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 76–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-76-85 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36826100
  14. Elboubekri A. The intercultural communicative competence and digital education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2017, no. 45 (4), pp. 520–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516670994   
  15. Furyaeva T. V., Markevich A. N., Furyaev E. Supported accommodation of young people with psychophysical disorders as a condition for social and pedagogical inclusion. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 2017, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 114–127. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30632773
  16. Mustafa G. M. M. Learning with each other: Peer learning as an academic culture among graduate students in education. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, vol. 5, issue  9, pp. 944–951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-9-3
  17. Odağ Ö., Wallin H. R., Kedzior K. K. Definition of intercultural competence according to undergraduate students at an international university in Germany. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2016, vol. 20 (2), pp. 118–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315587105
  18. Parks E. Communicative criticality and savoir se reconnaitre: Emerging new competencies of criticality and intercultural communicative competence. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2018, vol. 18, issue 1, pp. 107–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1401691
  19. Perraton H. Foreign students in the twentieth century: A comparative study of patterns and policies in Britain, France, Russia and the United States. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2017, vol.  1, issue 2, pp. 161–186. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1303788
  20. Riaño Y., Van Mol C., Raghuram P. New directions in studying policies of international student mobility and migration. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2018, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 283–294. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2018.1478721
  21. Smirnaia A. A., Ignatova V. V. Involving future bachelors in the development of an information-cognitive model of introduction to social-pedagogical values. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2016, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 126–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-1-126-132 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25360394
  22. Song Ya., Loewenstein G., Shi Ya. Heterogeneous effects of peer tutoring: Evidence from rural Chinese middle schools. Research in Economics, 2018, vol. 72, issue 1, pp. 33–48. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2017.05.002
  23. Troth A. C., Jordan P. J., Lawrence S. A. Emotional intelligence, communication competence, and student perceptions of team social cohesion. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2012, vol. 30, issue 4, pp. 414–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912449447
  24. Van Laer S., Elen J. In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 2017, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 1395–1454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
  25. Osipov A., Kudryavtsev M., Fedorova P., Zakharova L., Zhavner T., Klimuk Y., Serzhanova Z., Panov E., Savchuk A., Yanova M. Components of positive impact of exposure to university physical culture and sports on students’ physical activity. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 871–878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.02133 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31048139

 

Date of the publication 31.08.2019