Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 42–57
UDC: 
378

Students' and faculty interaction outside the classroom: Perception and actual experience

Kuryan M. L. 1 (Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation), Voronina E. A. 1 (Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation)
1 National Research University Higher School of Economics
Abstract: 

Introduction. The study looks into the issues of student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. The research aims at investigating its specific features in terms of perception and actual experiences of the participants. Materials and Methods. The research utilized interpretation, analysis and generalization of the existing body of scholarly literature on the problem under investigation. As the methodological framework of the study socio-psychological approach was used, positing that the interpersonal context plays a significant role in the development of beliefs and values of the participants of social interaction. A questionnaire was prepared to collect data from students and academic staff. The design was identical for both groups of participants with variations in the word choice made where appropriate. The study involved 148 Bachelor students and 35 academic staff members of the National Research University Higher School of Economics in Nizhniy Novgorod. The feedback from the two samples was analysed and then compared to establish the points of convergence and divergence. Results. The research identified specific features of students’ and academics’ perception of out-of-class contact and pinpointed its most and least preferred forms, as well as most and least frequent types. The analysis shows that there is a discrepancy between the reported interest in out-of-class interaction and the actual experience in it among students and academics. The preferences and experiences of both groups of respondents are rather similar and formalized. Conclusions. The authors conclude that out-of-class contact between students and academic staff members has specific characteristics which influence its nature and frequency.

Keywords: 

Out-of-class contact (OCC); Higher education; Quality of education; Interpersonal communication; Educational experience; Academic staff

For citation:
Kuryan M. L., Voronina E. A. Students' and faculty interaction outside the classroom: Perception and actual experience. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 42–57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.03
References: 
  1. Astin A. W. How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research (review). The Review of Higher Education, 2005, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 120–122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2005.0057   
  2. Casidy R. The role of perceived market orientation in the higher education sector. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 2014, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 155–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.02.001
  3. Chory R. M., Offstein E. H. “Your professor will know you as a person”. Evaluating and rethinking the relational boundaries between faculty and students. Journal of Management Education, 2017, vol. 41, issue 1, pp. 9–38.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916647986
  4. Cotton S. R., Wilson B. Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 2006, vol. 51, issue 4, pp. 487–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-1705-4
  5. Cox B. E., Orehovec E. Faculty-student interaction outside the classroom: A typology from a residential college. The Review of Higher Education, 2007, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 343–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0033
  6. Elhay A. A., Hershkovitz A. Teachers' perceptions of out-of-class communication, teacher-student relationship, and classroom environment. Education and Information Technologies, 2019, vol. 24, issue 1, pp. 385–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9782-7
  7. Ibad F. Personality and ability traits of teachers: student perceptions. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2018, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 162–177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i2.2215
  8. Golde C. M., Pribbenow D. A. Understanding faculty involvement in residential learning communities. Journal of College Student Development, 2000,  vol. 41, issue 1, pp. 27–40. URL: http://chris.golde.org/filecabinet/facultyinvolvement.html
  9. Goldman Z. W., Goodboy A. K., Bolkan S. A Meta-analytical review of students’ out-of-class communication and learning effects. Communication Quarterly, 2016, vol. 64, issues 4, pp. 476–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103293
  10. Grantham A., Robinson E. E., Chapman D. “That truly meant a lot to me”: A qualitative examination of meaningful faculty-student interactions. College Teaching, 2015, vol. 63, issue 3, pp. 125–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2014.985285
  11. Hanson J. M., Paulsen M. B., Pascarella E. T. Understanding graduate school aspirations: The effect of good teaching practices. Higher Education, 2016, vol. 71, issue 5, pp.  735–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9934-2
  12. Hoffman E. M. Faculty and student relationships: Context matters. College Teaching, 2014, vol. 62, issue 1, pp. 13–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.817379
  13. Kim Y. K., Sax L. J. Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 2009, vol. 50, issue 5, pp. 437–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x
  14. Kim Y. K., Sax L. J. Are the effects of student–faculty interaction dependent on academic major? An examination using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 2011, vol. 52, issue 6, pp. 589–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9209-9
  15. Kuh G. D., Hu S. The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 2001, vol. 24, no. 3, pp.  309–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0005
  16. Parker E. Do non classroom interactions with faculty affect moral development among college students? College Student Affairs Journal, 2017, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3–12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/csj.2017.0001 
  17. Pascarella E. T. Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 1980, vol. 50, issue 4, pp. 545–595. DOI: https://doi.org /10.3102/00346543050004545
  18. Pascarella E. T., Pierson C. T., Wolniak G. C., Terenzini P. T. First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 2004, vol. 75, issue 3, pp. 249–284. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256  
  19. Popa M. C. In Search of the ideal teacher–students’ perspective. Education and Self Development, 2018, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 16–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/esd13.3.03       
  20. Raufelder D., Nitsche L., Breitmeyer S., Keßler S., Herrmann E., Regner N. Students’ perception of “good” and “bad” teachers–Results of a qualitative thematic analysis with German adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 75, pp. 31–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.004
  21. Smith M. A. Making MY Grade: Privilege and student–faculty interaction at a twenty-first-century U.S. research university. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 2016, vol. 45, issue 5, pp. 553–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241615587378
  22. Tan A. H. T., Muskat B., Zehrer A. A systematic review of quality of student experience in higher education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2016, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 209–228. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-08-2015-0058
  23. Terenzini P. T., Pascarella E. T. Voluntary freshman attrition and patterns of social and academic integration in a university: A test of a conceptual model. Research in Higher Education, 1977, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 25–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992014
  24. Trolian T. L., Jach E. A., Hanson J. M., Pascarella E. T. Influencing academic motivation: The effects of student–faculty interaction. Journal of College Student Development, 2016, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 810–826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0080
  25. Wood L., Wilson R. C. Teachers with impact. Research Reporter, 1972, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–4. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Research+Reporter+&ff1=souResearch+Reporter&ff2=autWilson% 2c+Robert+C.&id=ED067006
  26. Young S. L., Pulido M. D., Brooks C. F. Reasons for student engagement in extra-class communication. Communication Research Reports, 2018, vol. 35, issue 2, pp. 172–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1383234
  27. Dukhnovsky S. V. Analysis of interpersonal distance as a new resource for harmonizing relations in the system “Teacher - student”. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2012, no. 2, pp. 25–27. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17762406
  28. Moroz V. V., Belaya G. V.  Achievement Motivation Development in the Creative-Value Interaction “Teacher-Student” Process. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2014, no. 6, pp. 824. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22878052
  29. Sergeeva O. V. A study of the interpersonal role of university teachers. Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2016, no. 2, pp. 131–136. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25828112
  30. Sivrikova N. V., Chernikova E. G., Sokolova N. A. Teachers’ satisfaction with life and educational process as predictors of their social and psychological adaptation. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 87–100. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1706.06
  31. Sharok V. V. Emotional and motivational factors of satisfaction with university education. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2018, no. 69, pp. 33–45. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/69/2 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35656099
Date of the publication 30.06.2019