Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 150–163
© Dymarskiy M. Y., 2016
UDC: 
81'367: 811.161.1'04

Vocatives and the barriers theory

Dymarskiy M. Y. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 5649
Abstract: 

The paper proves inadequacy of incorporating elements of the so called communicative escort, i.e. vocatives, parenthesis and interjections, into the scope of Barriers within the Barriers Theory introduced by A. Zaliznyak. It is shown that in this theory the notion of clause is used in its broadest sense. The clause is defined as a grammatical structure (“a group, including non-predicative groups, headed by verb”), but at the same time it is treated as a result of linearization of this structure. The borders of this linearized structure are identified not only grammatically (according to the definition) but also taking semantics into account. This forces the investigator to regard elements of the communicative escort as components of the linearized structure. But it means, in turn, that this linearized structure is no more a clause but an utterance which contradicts the clause definition. At the same time, the linear structure of an utterance may not be interpreted simply as equal to the clause linearized structure, since it arises as a result of imposing two structures: the linearized basic grammatical (clause) structure + the communicative structure, the latter including linear-accent transformations as well as positions for the elements of the communicative escort. These positions may occur at any place of the linear utterance structure but they do not impact the positioning of the components of the grammatical structure. Therefore, interpreting elements of the communicative escort as one of the objects of the Barriers Theory is pleonastic. It is shown by means of reanalysis of some examples from the Old Russian language which have already been analysed by A. Zaliznyak and A. Zimmerling.

Keywords: 

clause, utterance, word order, Barrier Theory, vocative phrase, Old Russian

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017577547&origin=...

Vocatives and the barriers theory

For citation:
Dymarskiy M. Y. Vocatives and the barriers theory. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 150–163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1606.12
References: 
  1. Andreeva S. V. Principles of classifying of syntactic-structural units of spoken language. Problems of Speech Communication. 2003, issue 3, pp. 235–244.
  2. Andreeva S. V. Syntactic-structural units of Russian spoken language. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 2005, 190 p.
  3. Arkadyev P. M. Theory of Grammar Enlighted by evidence from Kayardilt. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2015, no. 6, pp. 108–139.
  4. Valova E. A. Syntactic properties of the Russian enclitic particle zhe. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series 3: Filologiya. 2014, no. 4 (39), pp. 16–33.
  5. Vahtel' N. M., Golicyna T. N. Sentence, utterance, speech act. Traditional and new in Russian grammar: In memoriam of V. A. Beloshapkova. Moscow, Publ., 2001, pp. 42–44.
  6. Zaliznyak A. A. Old Novgorod dialect. Moscow, Shkola „Yazyki russkoj kul'tury” Publ., 1995, 720 p.
  7. Zaliznyak A. A. Old Russian enclitics. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury Publ., 2008, 276 p.
  8. Zvegincev V. A. Sentence and its relations to language and speech. 3rd ed.  Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007, 312 p.
  9. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Northwest-indoeuropean and Urals tones with laringalization: synchronic and diachronic linguistics and genetics. Studies on typology of Slavic, Baltic and Balkan languages, predominantly in the light of language contacts. Ed. Vyach. Vs. Ivanov,  comp. P. M. Arkadyev. S. Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., 2013, pp. 266–279.
  10. Kisilier M. L. Wackernagel’s law in the late Koine (Based on „Lug Duhovnyj” by Ioann Moskh). Yazyk i rechevaya deyatel'nost'. S. Petersburg, S. Petersburg State University Publ., 2003, pp. 122–140.
  11. Kisilier M. L., Fedchenko V. V. On language of the New Greek literature. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2011, vol. VII, no. 1, pp. 409–444.
  12. Kovtunova I. I. The contemporary Russian language. Word order and the functional sentence perspective. 2nd ed. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2002, 240 p.
  13. Koneva V. P. The peculiarities of text functioning of elementary utterancies correlated to the denotative sphere „introducing a subject”. Russistics: The linguistics paradigm of the late XX century: In honor of Prof. S. G. Ilyenko. S. Petersburg,  S. Petersburg State University Publ., 1998, pp. 113–119.
  14. Norman B. Yu. On binomial constructions of the type Vzroslym o detyah, S pesnej v dorogu, Privet roditelyam. From meaning to form, from form to meaning: In honor of the RAS corr. member A. V. Bondarko. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskih kul'tur Publ., 2012, pp. 432–444.
  15. Paducheva E. V. Utterance and its correlation to the reality. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985, 272 p.
  16. Popova Z. D. Clause structural scheme and utterance positional scheme as different levels of the syntactic analyses. Dictionary. Grammar. Text. Moscow, Publ., 1996, pp. 255–276.
  17. Raspopov I. P. The functional sentence perspective: Based on narrative clauses predominantly in monologue. 2nd ed. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2009, 168 p.
  18. Raspopov I. P. Essays in the theory of syntax. 2nd ed, supp. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2009, 224 p.
  19. Raspopov I. P. The clause construction in contemporary Russian. 3rd ed. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2013, 192 p.
  20. Semantic and pragmatic aspects of utterance. Ed. T. I. Steksova. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical Institute Publ., 1991, 164 p.
  21. Sichinava D. V. [Review of:] B. Hansen, J. Grković-Major (eds.). Diachronic Slavonic Syntax: Gradual Changes in Focus. München etc.: Sagner, 2010. 208 P. (Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband 74). Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2012, no. 6, pp. 150–154.
  22. Zimmerling A. V. Typological syntax of Scandinavian languages. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury Publ., 2002, 895 p.
  23. Zimmerling A. V. Word order systems with clitics in the typological perspective. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2012, no. 4, pp. 3–38.
  24. Zimmerling A. V. Word order systems in Slavic languages. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2012, no. 5, pp. 3–37.
  25. Zimmerling A. V. Word order systems of Slavic languages in the typological perspective. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury Publ., 2013, 544 p.
  26. Zimmerling A. V. Clitics and the utterance informational structure in classical Greek. Rhema. Rema. 2015, no. 1, pp. 74–96.
  27. Yanko T. E. Communicative strategies of the Russian language. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury Publ., 2001, 384 p.
  28. Chomsky N. Barriers.X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press Publ., 1986, 103 p.
  29. Dikken M. [Review of:] Mirrors and microparameters: phrase structure beyond free word order. David Adger, Daniel Harbour, Laurel J. Watkins. Cambridge Univ. Press (2009). Lingua. 2010, vol. 129, issue 9, pp. 2311–2318.
  30. Feldstein R. F. [Review of:] Andrej A. Zaliznjak, Drevnerusskie ènklitiki. Acta Slavica Iaponica. 2009, vol. 29, pp. 133–140.
  31. Gutschmidt K., Berger T., Kempgen S., Kosta P. Die slavischen Sprachen/The slavic languages. Halbband 2. Berlin, Munich, Boston, de Gruyter Publ., 2014, 1150 p.
  32. Hill V., Mladenova O. Mapping the information structure in Early Modern Bulgarian clauses with the particle TA. Lingua. 2011, vol. 121, issue 15, pp. 2103–2119.
  33. Kosta P., Zimmerling A. Slavic clitic systems in a typological perspective. The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond (Studies in generative grammar 116). Eds. L. Schürcks, U. Etxeberria, A. Giannakidou. Berlin, London, de Gruyter Publ., 2013, pp. 439–486.
  34. Lahousse K., Laenzlinger C., Soare G. Contrast and intervention at the periphery. Lingua. 2014, vol. 143, pp. 56–85.
  35. Sáez L. The Structure of COMP in Slavic: some evidence from Slovak. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology. 1991, vol. XXV-2, pp. 515–542.
  36. Schürcks L., Etxeberria U., Giannakidou A. Nominal arguments and the role of D: An introduction. The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond (Studies in generative grammar 116). Eds. L. Schürcks, U. Etxeberria, A. Giannakidou. Berlin, London, de Gruyter Publ., 2013, pp. 3–16.
  37. Wallenberg J. C. Scrambling, LF, and phrase structure change in Yiddish. Lingua. 2013, vol. 133, pp. 289–318.

35.      Newell H., Piggott G. Interactions at the syntax–phonology interface: Evidence from Ojibwe. Lingua. 2014, vol. 150, pp. 332–362.

Date of the publication 26.12.2016