Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 142–155
© Kozlov A. E., Sazhenin I. I., 2015
UDC: 
81’33 + 81’27

Provocative discourse as object of linguistic investigation

Kozlov A. E. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Sazhenin I. I. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4074
Abstract: 

The article is devoted to investigation of different types of provocation (as tactic, strategies and characteristic of pragmatically directed discourse). In our mind, consideration of the explicit verbal provocation and implicit provocation too are constituted the problem of cognitive linguistic and theory of communicative acts. On our opinion, provocation may be characterized as multipronged and multidimensional phenomenon of everydayness communication. Frequently provocation presents a communicative intention, but in some cases it may be unintended. As a general rule, reaction is main parameter of the communicative situation provocation; other parameters can be considered optional. In some cases it is difficult to the very possibility of objective linguistic analysis.This problem is seen on the material blogging, information resources (media sphere or mass-media) of the Novosibirsk region, as well as other texts that are of interest from the point of view of linguistic analysis and examination.

Keywords: 

Conflicted discourse, linguistic analysis, provocative discourse, linguistic examination

https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24284523

For citation:
Kozlov A. E., Sazhenin I. I. Provocative discourse as object of linguistic investigation. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 142–155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1505.13
References: 
  1. Arutunova N. D. Discourse. Linguistic dictionary. Moscow, Soviet encyclopedia Publ., 1990. pp. 136–137. (In Russian)
  2. Baranov A. N. Authorization of text. The price of words. Moscow, Galerya Publ., 2002. pp. 356-364. (In Russian)
  3. Baranov A. N. Forensic linguistic examination of text: theory and practice. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Science Publ., 2007, 592 p. (In Russian)
  4. Galperin I. R. Text as object of linguistic investigation. Moscow, ComBooks Publ., 2005. 148 p. (In Russian)
  5. Dymarskiy M. Y. Pragmatic as vector semantics. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2015, no 2, pp. 118–125. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1502.11 (In Russian)
  6. Efremov V. A. Dictionaries of substandart language in lingvo expert practice. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2015, no 2, pp 41–49 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1502.03 (In Russian).  
  7. Kubryakova E. S. On the term “discourse” and behind it the structure of knowledge.  Language. Personality. Text. Moscow, Languages of the Slavic culture Publ., 2005, pp. 23–33. (In Russian)
  8. Culture of Russian speech: Collegiate Dictionary Directory (Ed.: Ivanova L. Y., Skovorodnikova A. P., Shiryaev E. N).  Moscow, Flinta Publ., Science Publ., 2003. (In Russian)
  9. Lappo M. A. Essence of identity and methods of analysis in the linguistic / psycholinguistic research. Questions of psycholinguistics. 2014, no 2, pp. 30–39. (In Russian)
  10. New in foreign linguistics. Cognitive aspects of language. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988. 320 p. (In Russian)
  11. Instruction on the appointment of forensic linguistic expertise (Ed.: Gorbanevsky M. V). Moscow, Medeja Publ., 2004, 104 p.  (In Russian)
  12. Rozental D. E., Golub I. B., Telenkova М. А. Modern Russian. Moscow, Foreign Relations Publ., 1995, 446 p. (In Russian)
  13. Russian Grammar: in 2 vol. Vol 2. Moscow, Science Publ., 1980, 714 p. (In Russian)
  14. Sazhenin I. I. Vocabulary corpus as element of optimization of research. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013, no 2,. pp. 120–127. (In Russian)
  15. Dictionary of Modern Language: in 4 vol. Moscow, Russian Language Publ., 1999. Available at: http://feb-web.ru/feb/mas/mas-abc/0encyc.htm (accessed 20.05.15) (In Russian)
  16. Stepanov V. N. Provocative discourse of mass communication. Saint Petersburg, 230 p. (In Russian)
  17. Tripolskaya T. A., Bulygina E. Y. Ideological semantics as the object of lexicographically different-temporal dictionaries. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2015, no. 2, pp. 28–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1502.02 (In Russian)

Tripolskaya T. A., Goncharova E. A. Dynamic processes in the lexicon of a language personality. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2014, no. 3, pp. 57–67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15293/2226-3365.1403.06 (In Russian).

Date of the publication 09.10.2015