| 
User login
Interpretational potential pragmatically marked with the word : interaction ideological and evaluative component
The interests of modern linguistics extended considerably. Now it investigates the most sophisticated, subtle, nearly indiscernible matters of semantics. In recent years many linguists focused their interests on pragmatic components of lexical meanings – “the thinnest matter of the word” – as an object of semantic, pragmatic and lexicographic description.
In the present Project the essential problems for discussion are Pragmatic Semantics, the speaker – language sign interrelations. The problem that demands a combined systematic, structural and communicative approach is description of lexical meanings. There are certain pragmatically marked elements of human lexicon that should be revealed and described systematically.
Another important task is to classify various micro-components comprising a larger structure of the pragmatic macro-component of the lexical meaning, and analyze their textual potential. Solutions of these theoretical problems are necessary for creation of correct models for lexicographic description and typology of Pragmatically Marked Lexicon. The ‘pragmatic words’ are gathered, for example, in active type dictionaries or in special computer databases.
Semantics, pragmatic macrocomponent, dynamic processes, ideologically marked vocabulary
1. Telia V. N. Connotation. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. (Ed.) V. N. Yartseva. Moscow, Great Russian Encyclopedia Publ., 2002, 236 p. (In Russian)
2. Shvedova N. Yu. Types of contexts, constituting a multifaceted word description. Russian language. Text as a whole and parts of the text. XI Vinogradov Readings. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982,
pp. 142–154. (In Russian)
3. Lukyanova N. A. Expressive vocabulary conversational use: Challenges in semantics. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1986, 227 p. (In Russian)
4. Apresyan Yu. D. Pragmatic information for explanatory dictionary. Pragmatics and problems intensionality. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1987, pp. 3–22. (In Russian)
5. Sklyarevskaya G. N. On the question of pragmatic information in the Dictionary: are pragmatic litters? Linguistic pragmatics in the dictionary. St. Petersburg, Institute of Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1997, pp. 6–13. (In Russian)
6. Telia V. N. Connotative aspect of semantics of nominative units. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, 141 p. (In Russian)
7. Krysin L. P. Sociolinguistic aspects of the study of modern Russian language. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, 256 p. (In Russian)
8. Apresyan Yu. D. Selected Works. Integral description of language and systemic lexicography. V. II. Moscow, School Languages of Russian Culture Publ., 1995, 766 p. (In Russian)
9. Sklyarevskaya G. N. Pragmatics and lexicography. Language – system. Language – text. Language – the ability. Moscow, Institute of Russian Language of the RAS Publ., 1995, pp 63–71. (In Russian)
10. Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Ideological semantics as object lexicographically different-temporal dictionaries. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2015, no. 2, pp. 28–40. (In Russian)
11. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Y. Dictionary of Russian language. Moscow, Az Publ., 1994. (In Russian)
12. Dictionary of Russian. (Ed.) D. N. Ushakov, 4 vol., Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1935–1940. (In Russian)
13. Russian National Corpus. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru (accessed: 17.07.2015). (In Russian)
14. Ozhegov S. I. Dictionary of Russian language. Moscow, Institute of Russian Language
V.V. Vinogradov Publ., 1999. (In Russian)
15. Great Dictionary of the Russian Language. (Ed.) S. A. Kuznetsov. St. Petersburg, Norit Publ., 1998 (In Russian)
16. Economic Dictionary Corpus. Available at: http://gufo.me/content_eco/partner-28135.html#ixzz3frIX0cDW (accessed: 17.07.2015). (In Russian)
17. Sociological Dictionary. Available at: http://gufo.me/content_soc/partner-3816.html#ixzz3frIeup6E (accessed: 17.07.2015). (In Russian)
