Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 172–182
© Markasova O. A., 2015
UDC: 
81'374 + 81'26

The notion of “literacy” in the naive language conscience: in search of criteria and the means of achieving

Markasova O. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4051
Abstract: 

The modern interpretation of the notion “literacy” in the scientific and everyday picture of the world is examined in the article. Lexicographical data permit to find vivid signs of some transformation of the notion in our society caused by ambiguous demands to modern people. According to dictionaries the word “literate” has 3 meanings. But the contexts of the Internet communication analysis as well as the Russian National Corpus materials show that the naïve Russian language users reduce the notion оf literacy to basic knowledge of spelling and punctuation standards. This statement is in contrast with the theories developed by psychologists, anthropologists and professional linguists. These are the theories of the development of a more functionally specialized cultural personality. The same generalizing tendency is seen in choosing criteria for a dictionary: universal many-volume dictionaries and reference books are preferred. Generalized literacy causes changes in categories of dictionaries. The opposition “encyclopedia vs language dictionary” is disappearing. The author of the article draws attention to the intense discussion of the problem in blogs and a new lexicographic phenomenon of online editing and commenting

Keywords: 

literacy, lexicography, picture of the world, semantics, linguistic changes

https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23199335

For citation:
Markasova O. A. The notion of “literacy” in the naive language conscience: in search of criteria and the means of achieving. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 172–182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1502.17
References: 

1. Ryazantsev A. “Total dictation – 2013”: the percent of the literate is going down. Russian world.ru.2014, no. 12. Available at: http://www.russkiymir.ru/publications/86156 (accessed: 12.10.2014) (In Russian)

2. Thesaurus by F. A. Brokgaus and I. A. Efron: 86 volumes with illustrations and additional materials. St. Petersburg, 1890–1907. Available at: http://enc-dic.com/brokgause/Gramotnost-95447.html (accessed: 14.10.2014) (In Russian)

3. Big Soviet Encyclopedia. Moscow, 1969–1978. Available at: http://www.big-soviet.ru/132/ 22604/Грамотность (accessed: 14.10.2014) (In Russian)

4. Smetannikova N.  N.  Literacy, singular or plural? On the issue of functional illiteracy. Library.ru, Sociologist’s page. Available at: http://www.library.ru/1/sociolog/text/article.php?a_uid=77 (accessed: 05.11.2014) (In Russian)

5. Bogin G. I. The model of linguistic personality and the attitude to different types of texts.  Leningrad, 1984, 33 р. (In Russian)

6. Gubernskaya T. V., Efremov V. A. The Russian Language Olympiads and the problems of students’ speech standards. The Emissia.Offline Letters. Electronic Scientific Publishing (Scientific and Pedagogical Internet Journal).  2013. Available at: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2013/2111.htm (accessed: 14.10.2014) (In Russian)

7. The Dictionary of the Russian Language. In 4 vol., (ed.) A. P. Evgenyeva.  Moscow, Russkij yazyk Publ., 1999, vol. 1. А—Й, 698 р. (In Russian)

8. Efremova T. F.  The New Dictionary of the Russian Language. Lexicon and word-formative Dictionary. Moscow,  2000, 1233 р. (In Russian)

9. The Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language of the late 20th century. Linguistic changes.  (Ed.) G. N. Sklyarevsky. St.-Petersburg, 1998. – 700 р. (In Russian)

10. Elistratov V. S. The Dictionary of the Russian argot. Materials of 1980–1990.  Moscow, 2000, 694 р. (In Russian)

11. Dictionary of Synonyms: reference book. (Ed.) A. P. Evgenyeva.  Moscow, 1976, 648 p. (In Russian)

12. L’vov M. R. Dictionary of antonyms in Russian language. (Ed.) L. A. Novikov. Moscow, 1985, 384 p. (In Russian)

13.The Russian dictionary of language associations In 2 vol., (ed.) Yu. N. Karaulov. Moscow, AST-Astrel Publ., 2002, vol. I. Tarasov. From stimulus to reaction, 784 р. (In Russian)

14.Koshkaryova N. B., Isachenko O. M.  Monitoring of literacy of the Novosibirsk population based on the results of the «Total dictation». The Russian Language as the factor of stability of the state and the moral health of the nation. Works and materials of the second All-Russia scientific and practical conference.  Tyumen, 2010, part 1, pp. 54–64. (In Russian)

15. Lovtsov A. Why Do people Need literacy?  School of life.Ru. 25.07.2011. Available at: http://shkolazhizni.ru/archive/0/n-47419/ (accessed: 12.10.2014). (In Russian)

16. Are you Literate, or 5000 words which will help check up it.  (ed.) V. A. Pushnuh, N. Shevchenko. Tomsk, 1994, 87 p. (In Russian)

17. Zaykovskaya I. A. Assotsiative and semantic potential and textual realisations of a lexical paradigm "dictionary”. St.-Petersburg, 2011, 20 р. (In Russian)

18. Shcherba L. V. AnEssay on the general theory of lexicography. Scherba L. V. Language system and speech activity. Leningrad, 1974, pр. 265–304. (In Russian)

19. Russianverbal Sentences: An Experimental syntactic dictionary. (Ed.) L. G. Babenko.  Moscow, 2002, 464 р. (In Russian)

20. The Russian dictionaryof word compatibility. (Ed.) P. N. Denisov, V. V. Morkovkin.  Moscow, 2002, 816 р. (In Russian)

Date of the publication 06.04.2015