Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 32–49
© Vericheva Y. I., Vericheva O. N., Saporovskaya M. V., 2025
UDC: 
159.9.072.5+37.015.31+316.77

Strategies for conditionally constructive and conditionally non-constructive anger management: Assessment of the severity of affective and cognitive components of anger among students in the educational environment of the university

Vericheva Y. I. 1 (Kostroma, Russian Federation), Vericheva O. N. 1 (Kostroma, Russian Federation), Saporovskaya M. V. 1 (Kostroma, Russian Federation)
1 Kostroma State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 28
Abstract: 

Introduction. The main research problem addressed in this article is related to the substantiation of the phenomenological and structural features of anger manifestation and coping with it among students in the educational environment of universities.
The purpose of the study is to identify and substantiate strategies for conditionally constructive and conditionally non-constructive anger management among students in the educational environment of the university.
Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional quantitative psychological study was conducted as part of a survey on the platform of the All-Russian student competition “Your Move” as part of a survey by the Expert Center of the Your Move project “Stress under a magnifying glass” in the period from 01/27/2025 to 02/27/2025. The survey structure of the Expert Center “Stress under a Magnifying Glass” used questions from a modified version of the Multidimensional School Anger Inventory (MSAI).
Among the 4,740 respondents in our study “Stress under a Magnifying glass” (2024-2025) at the universities of Central (27 %); Volga Region (21 %); Siberian (11 %); Southern (11 %); Northwestern (9 %); Ural (8 %); North Caucasus (7 %); the Far Eastern (6 %) federal districts of the Russian Federation. These figures correspond to 0.001 of the total population of the study, the social group “university students of the Russian Federation” (4.33 million).
Results.
A psychometric check of the Multidimensional School Anger Inventory (MSAI) was carried out in a modification for students in the Russian Federation (in the context of the development of new methods of psychological assessment), as well as the assessment of the severity of affective and cognitive components of anger in the context of the educational environment of Russian universities, as well as conditionally constructive and conditionally non-constructive coping strategies.
This research has revealed the degree of severity of affective and cognitive components of anger among students in the educational environment of universities in the Russian Federation. We have identified the following features of the severity of the affective and cognitive components of anger, as well as the use of conditionally constructive and conditionally non-constructive coping strategies. Moreover, men and women are more likely to use conditionally constructive strategies for coping with anger (positive coping). Conditionally non-constructive anger management strategies are less common among Russian students. The affective component (anger expression) and the cognitive component (negative attitudes towards the educational process) in male students are expressed at an average level. Among female students, anger is also expressed at an average level, but high and average indicators of the severity of negative attitudes towards the educational process at the university are more common. The reliability and validity of the modified MSAI methodology in the context of the university’s educational environment has been confirmed. Strategic conditions for anger prevention in the educational environment of universities have been identified: 1) physical safety, protection from violence and insults, a stable psychological climate necessary for adaptation and self-expression; 2) student participation in the development of university educational rules; 3) creation of psychological assistance services for students, psychological training in methods and techniques for coping with stress in a university setting.
Conclusions. Based on the conducted research, it is concluded that when implementing the model of the higher education system, emphasis should be placed on the formation of activities and the implementation of students’ own experience in organizing psychological assistance services, psychological training on the principle of “peer-to-peer” (psychology students teach these techniques to students of other fields of study); the educational policy of the university should be implemented taking into account the principle “for us, nothing without us” (students should play a key role in shaping the rules of educational activities of the university).

Keywords: 

Students’ anger; Coping strategies; Educational environment; Psychological safety

For citation:
Vericheva Y. I., Vericheva O. N., Saporovskaya M. V. Strategies for conditionally constructive and conditionally non-constructive anger management: Assessment of the severity of affective and cognitive components of anger among students in the educational environment of the university. Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 32–49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2505.02
References: 
  1. Aryadoust V., Akbarzadeh S., Akbarzedeh S. Psychometric characteristics of the Persian version of the multidimensional school anger inventory–revised. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2011, vol. 31 (1), pp. 51-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2011.544070
  2. Bany Yassien B., Melhem M., Albadarneh M., Rababah M. Strategies of coping with anger as a state and a trait among female students. The Education and Science Journal, 2023, vol. 25 (8), pp. 162-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-8-162-185
  3. Boman P., Curtis D. D., Furlong M. J., Smith D. C. Cross-validation and rasch analyses of the Australian version of the multidimensional school anger inventory–revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2006, vol. 24, pp. 225-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906288472
  4. Chaudhry S., Tandon A., Shinde S., Bhattacharya A. Student psychological well-being in higher education: The role of internal team environment, institutional, friends and family support and academic engagement. PLoS One, 2024, vol. 19 (1), pp. e0297508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297508
  5. Deepthi D. P., Jeyavel S., Subhasree G., Jojo C. E. Proactive coping and social-emotional adjustment among students with and without learning disabilities in Kerala, India. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, vol. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949708
  6. Furlong M. J., You S., Smith D. C., Gonzalez V., Boman P., Shimoda Y., Terasaka A., Merino C., Grazioso M. del P. An Examination of the factorial invariance and refinement of the multidimensional school anger inventory for five pacific Rim countries. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 2013, vol. 1 (1), pp. 20-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2013.780194
  7. Ishida W., Inada N., Terasaka A., Shimoda Y., Kuroyama R., Yun S., Yotsutsuji S. Application of Japanese short form multidimensional school anger inventory to middle elementary school students. Japanese Journal of Research on Emotions, 2024, vol. 31 (1), pp. 21-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4092/jsre.31.1_21
  8. Macbeth G., Razumiejczyk E., Ledesma R. D. Cliff’s delta calculator: A non-parametric effect size program for two groups of observations. Universitas Psychologica, 2011, vol. 10 (2), pp. 545-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy10-2.cdcp 
  9. Magomedova A., Ghizal F. Mental health and well-being in the modern era: A Comprehensive review of challenges and interventions. Cureus, 2025, vol. 17 (1), pp. e77683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77683

10. Mouatsou C., Koutra K. Emotion regulation in relation with resilience in emerging adults: The mediating role of self-esteem. Current Psychology, 2023, vol. 42 (2), pp. 734-747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01427-x

11. Özmen A. Anger and psychological symptoms relationship: Mediator role of maladaptive schemas. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, vol. 14, pp. 1183618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183618

12. Quinn C. A., Rollock D., Vrana S. R. A test of Spielberger's state-trait theory of anger with adolescents: Five hypotheses. Emotion, 2014, vol. 14 (1), pp. 74-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034031

13. Richard Y., Tazi N., Frydecka D., Hamid M. S., Moustafa A. A. A systematic review of neural, cognitive, and clinical studies of anger and aggression. Current Psychology, 2023, vol. 42 (20), pp. 17174-17186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03143-6

14. Riepenhausen A., Wackerhagen C., Reppmann Z., Deter H., Kalisch R., Veer I., Walter H. Positive cognitive reappraisal in stress resilience, mental health, and well-being: A comprehensive systematic review. Emotion Review, 2022, vol. 14 (4), pp. 310-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221114642

15. Shimoda Y., Terasaka A. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the multidimensional school anger inventory. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 2012, vol. 83 (4), pp. 347-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.83.347

16. Shochet I., Orr J., Cockshaw W., Tran T., La N., Nguyen H., Nguyen N., Wurfl A., Nguyen H., Stocker R., Fisher J. Validation of the behavioral anger response questionnaire for children (BARQ-C) in a large community sample of Vietnamese middle adolescents in Hanoi. BMC Psychology, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00907-4

17. Smith D. C., Furlong M. J., Bates M. P., Laughlin J. Development of the multidimensional school anger inventory for males. Psychology in the Schools, 1998, vol. 35 (1), pp. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199801)35:1<1::AID-PITS1>3.0.CO;2-U

18. Aetdinova R. R. Formation of an individual trajectory of a student’s professional development. Modern Pedagogical Education, 2023, no. 11, pp. 250-253. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=nlbwge

19. Bogdanova M. V., Terekhova O. I. The effectiveness of coping with the emotional state in a situation of interpersonal conflict Tyumen state university. Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 2016, no. 1, pp. 116-120. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25791150  

20. Vericheva O. N. Peculiarities and principles of the formation of the developing rehabilitation space for social and pedagogical support of the low- mobile categories of children and youth. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2017, no. 6, pp. 112-118. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30611547

21. Rean A. A., Egorova A. V., Konovalov I. A., Stavtsev A. A., Shevchenko A. O., Kuzmin R. G. The relationship between the risks of aggression among university students and indicators of self-efficacy, self-esteem, and humility. Psychological Science and Education, 2024, vol. 29 (6), pp. 21-34. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=79000591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2024290602  

22. Tretyakova A. N. Students and aggression: Perception and strategies of behavior. Education and Selfdevelopment, 2022, vol. 17 (4), pp. 187-198. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50099291   DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.4.14   

23. Finogenova T. A. Emotional safety of the educational environment as a condition for reducing the destructive protective and coping behavior of boarding school students. Human Capital, 2022, no. 7, pp. 174-184. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49168213  DOI: https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2022.07.19   

24. Khudyakova T. L., Seraji P., Khoteeva R. I., Arpentieva M. R. Factors of psychological ill-/well-being of modern university students. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 335-343. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=67857116  DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-16   

25. Shutova N. V., Kurzyukova Yu. F. Features of students’ aggressive manifestations at different stages of study at university. Nizhny Novgorod Education, 2022, no. 4, pp. 39-45. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/rhcvji 

Date of the publication 31.10.2025