Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 60–81
© Krasavina Y. V., Ponomarenko E. P., Gareyev A. A., Shishkina A. A., 2023
UDC: 
37.015.31+376+004.81

Learning experiences of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in digital media: Challenges and the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies

Krasavina Y. V. 1 (Izhevsk, Russian Federation), Ponomarenko E. P. 1 (Izhevsk, Russian Federation), Gareyev A. A. 1 (Izhevsk, Russian Federation), Shishkina A. A. 1 (Izhevsk, Russian Federation)
1 Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 377
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper deals with the problem of developing cognitive competence of deaf and hard-of-hearing students when learning in the digital media. It is aimed at identifying and generalizing difficulties and successful strategies of metacognitive and cognitive nature in deaf and hard of hearing students of a technical university when performing assignments in the digital media.
Materials and Methods. For the preliminary selection of participants, V.S. Yurkevich's "Intensity of cognitive interests" inventory and N.S. Kopeina’s learning styles questionnaire were used. Qualitative research methods applied included verbal records and observation; data analysis was carried out using the grounded theory method. The study involved 5 deaf and hard-of-hearing students, selected on the basis of survey results and academic performance. During individual sessions, participants were required to complete assignments developed on the basis of a scenario requiring the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies.
Results. The study identified main difficulties and cognitive and metacognitive strategies in carrying out learning activities in the digital media used by deaf and hard-of-hearing students, who were characterized as high achievers. They were generalized and classified into the following categories: understanding the task; predicting the result; planning; information search; online reading; information selection; "survival" strategies; personal learning network.
Conclusions. The paper presents specific features of cognitive competence of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the digital media: limited range of cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and challenges associated with insufficiently developed reading skills at the stage of understanding the task, selecting and correcting keywords, abstract analysis, site selection and information selection. The analysis of the study results led to the conclusion that deaf and hard-of-hearing students should be educated about cognitive and metacognitive e-learning strategies. The identified difficulties when working in the digital media have shown that digital content developers should consider the problem of generating incorrect subtitles, as well as recommendations for the designing digital texts using highlighting, hyperelements and plenty of illustrations.

Keywords: 

Learning; E-learning; Digital media; Deaf and Hard-of-hearing students; Cogni-tive and metacognitive strategies

For citation:
Krasavina Y. V., Ponomarenko E. P., Gareyev A. A., Shishkina A. A. Learning experiences of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in digital media: Challenges and the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 60–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.03
References: 
  1. Thorén E. S., Öberg M., Wänström G., Andersson G., Lunner T. Internet access and use in adults with hearing loss. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013, vol. 15 (5), pp. e91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2221 
  2. Krasavina J. V., Ponomarenko Е. P., Serebryakova Y. V., Zhuikova О. V. The use of information and communication technologies when teaching students with hearing impairment at a technical university. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2021, no. 4, pp. 418–435. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.4.28 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46673415
  3. Ponomarenko Е. P., Krasavina Yu. V., Zhuykova O. F., Serebryakova Yu. V. Specific features of intellectual and cognitive processes in hearing impaired students of technical university. Pedagogical Image, 2019, vol. 13 (4), pp. 664–675. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32343/2409-5052-2019-13-4-664-675  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41861839 
  4. Roslyakova S. V. On essence and structure of epistemic competence. University Bulletin, 2012, no. 10, pp. 300–305. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18344983 
  5. Fooladvand M. The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in academic achievement: A systematic review. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 3 (1), pp. 313–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v3i1.1780 
  6. Costley J. Using cognitive strategies overcomes cognitive load in online learning environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2020, vol. 17 (2), pp. 215–228. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2019-0053
  7. Pešić D. Cognitive and metacognitive strategies in foreign language listening comprehension at the studies of tourism – students’ preference and university lecturers’ utility rating. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 2022, vol. 10 (2), pp. 89–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-2-89-99 
  8. Perikova E. I., Loviagina A. E., Bysova V. M. Metacognitive strategies of decision making in educational activities: Efficiency in higher education. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (4), pp. 19–35. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.02 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39256952
  9. Liu Y., Feng H. An empirical study on the relationship between metacognitive strategies and online-learning behavior and test achievements. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2011, vol. 2 (1), pp. 183–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.183-187 

10. Marschark M., Knoors H. Educating deaf children: Language, cognition, and learning. Deafness and Education International, 2012, vol. 14 (3), pp. 136–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/1557069X12Y.0000000010 

11. Yan P., Paul P. V. Metacognition and English reading-related outcomes for d/deaf and hard of hearing students: A narrative review. Human Research in Rehabilitation, 2021, vol. 11 (2), pp. 94–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092106 

12. Gareyev A. A., Ponomarenko E. P., Shishkina A. A., Krasavina Yu. V. Structure and contents of hearing impaired university students’ epistemic competence within digital learning environment: Criteria and evaluation methods. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13 (4), pp. 148–169. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.07   URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54390177

13. Ericsson K. A., Simon H. A. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 1980, vol. 87 (3), pp. 215–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215 

14. Russo J. E., Johnson E. J., Stephens D. L. The validity of verbal protocols. Memory & Cognition, 1989, vol. 17 (6), pp. 759–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202637 

15. Lebedeva M. Yu. Strategies of reading digital texts for performing educational reading tasks: Study based on the think-aloud protocols. Educational Studies Moscow, 2022, no. 1, pp. 244–270. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-244-270 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48162618    

16. Leslie L., Caldwell J. Formal and informal measures of reading comprehension. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, New York: Routledge, 2009, pp. 403–427.

17. Borgna G., Convertino C., Marschark M., Morrison C., Rizzolo K. Enhancing deaf students’ learning from sign language and text: Metacognition, modality, and the effectiveness of content scaffolding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2011, vol. 16 (1), pp. 79–100. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq036 

18. Abdul Halim N., Ariffin K., Darus N. A. Discovering students’ strategies in learning English online. Asian Journal of University Education, 2021, vol. 17 (1), pp. 261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12695 

19. Wei X., Saab N., Admiraal W. Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies. Internet and Higher Education, 2023, vol. 56, pp. 100880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880 

20. Rasheed R. A., Kamsin A., Abdullah N. A. An approach for scaffolding students peer-learning self-regulation strategy in the online component of blended learning. IEEE Access, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 30721–30738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059916

21. Lahza H., Khosravi H., Demartini G. Analytics of learning tactics and strategies in an online learner sourcing environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023, vol. 39 (1), pp. 94–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12729 

22. Albantani A. M., Madkur A., Rozak Abd. Student self regulated learning strategy in online Arabic learning. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning, 2022, vol. 5 (1), pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v5i1.13582

23. Bohn-Gettler C. M., Kendeou P. The interplay of reader goals, working memory, and text structure during reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2014, vol. 39 (3), pp. 206–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.003 

24. Kuntze M., Branum-Martin L., Scott J. Pandemic effects on the reading trajectories of deaf and hard of hearing students: A pilot analysis. Reading and Writing, 2023, vol. 36 (2), pp. 429–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10365-4 

25. Ponomarenko E., Krasavina Y., Zhuykova O., Serebryakova Yu. Comparative study on perception of paper and digital texts when working with hearing impaired students. EDULEARN20 Proceedings. 12th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2020, pp. 7141–7146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.1838 

26. Nikolaraizi M., Vekiri I., Easterbrooks S. R. Investigating deaf students’ use of visual multimedia resources in reading comprehension. American Annals of the Deaf, 2012, vol. 157 (5), pp. 458–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2013.0007 

27. Sommer K. The effect of covid-19 on deaf and hard of hearing college students. MCNair Research Journal, 2020, vol. 3, pp. 312–325. URL: https://www.leeuniversity.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020-2021-McNair-Academic-Journal.pdf  

28. Kožuh I., Hintermair M., Ivanišin M., Debevc M. The concept of examining the experiences of deaf and hard of hearing online users. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, vol. 27, pp. 148–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.018

Date of the publication 31.12.2023