Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 33–45
© Gutnik I. Y., 2021
UDC: 
37.012+37.082+373.1

Designing an evaluation inventory for identifying teachers’ professionalism deficits in the context of transformation of contemporary education

Gutnik I. Y. 1 (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 2631
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of identifying teachers’ professional deficits in the context of transformation of modern school education. The purpose of this study is to describe a set of diagnostic methods aimed at identifying professional deficits of teachers in the context of transformation of contemporary education, which can be used both by teachers for self-assessment in order to subsequently overcome the detected deficits, and by school leaders to support teachers’ professional growth.
Materials and Methods. In order to develop the set of diagnostic methods aimed at revealing teachers’ professional deficits, the author has used the following methods of educational research: conversations, focus-group method, in-depth and narrative interviews, action research, and soft systems methodology. The study involved 25 teachers and 720 students of grades 5-9.
Results. The author has clarified the concept of ‘professional deficits’ and analyzed advantages and drawbacks of quantitative methods used in identifying teachers’ professional deficits. The study justifies using the set of diagnostic methods aimed at identifying teachers’ professional deficits in the context of contemporary education. Moreover, it has been proved that the presented evaluation inventory contributes to enhancing teachers’ professional self-assessment and reflection.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the author summarizes the research findings about the implementation of the presented evaluation inventory and its contribution to teachers’ continuing professional growth.

Keywords: 

Teachers’ professional deficits; Methods of educational research; Transformation of the educational process; Internal self-knowledge; Reflection of the teacher; Implementation of the teacher's support.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46513824

For citation:
Gutnik I. Y. Designing an evaluation inventory for identifying teachers’ professionalism deficits in the context of transformation of contemporary education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 33–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.02
References: 
  1. Arieli S., Sagiv L., Roccas S. Values at work: The impact of personal values in organisations. Applied Psychology, 2020, vol. 69 (2), pp. 230–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12181  
  2. Bartolomé A., Castañeda L., Adell J. Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 15 (1), pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0
  3. Börü N. The factors affecting teacher-motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 2018, vol.  11 (4), pp. 761–776. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11448a
  4. Cappannini O. M., Espíndola O. R. Obstacles in diagnostic assessment. A proposal for overcoming them by identifying models presented in the course. Education Quimica, 2012, vol. 23 (4), pp. 484–491. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30137-4
  5. Caukin N., Trail L. SAMR: A tool for reflection for Ed tech integration. International Journal of the Whole Child, 2019, vol. 4 (1), pp. 47–54. URL: https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/ijwc/article/view/1370
  6. Konieczny K. Pedagogical diagnosis in the activities of non-governmental organizations. Osvitologiya, 2018, no. 7, pp. 125–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2018.7.125130
  7. Kriaučiūnienė R., Targamadzė V. Mapping the concept of a good school with teachers’ characteristics in the context of a good school concept. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2019, vol. 10 (2), pp. 33–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.32.42
  8. Kucirkova N., Mackey M. Digital literacies and children’s personalized books: Locating the ‘self’. London Review of Education, 2020, vol. 18 (2), pp. 151–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.2.01
  9. Leite E. А. М., Lencastre J. A. M., Silva B. D., Neto H. B. Learning style in a virtual environment: a study with elementary school teachers at in-service training. Research, Society and Development, 2020, vol. 9 (7), pp. e467973790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3790
  10. Mohamadi Z., Malekshahi N. Designing and validating a potential formative evaluation inventory for teacher competences. Language Testing in Asia, 2018, vol. 8 (1), pp. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2
  11. Nemtcan E., Sæle R. G., Gamst-Klaussen T., Svartdal F. Drop-out and transfer-out intentions: The role of socio-cognitive factors. Frontiers in Education, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 606291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.606291
  12. Rossi P. G. Le tecnologie digitali per la progettazione didattica. ECPS – Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 2014, no. 10, pp. 113–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-010-ross
  13. Skaalvik E. M., Skaalvik S. Motivated for Teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 152–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
  14. Aksenova A. Yu., Primchuk N. V. Essential characteristics of personalization of learning: Environmental approach. Man and Education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 43–49. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44737029
  15. Bezrukova O. V. Action research" method in sociologycal researches: Basic ideas. Bulletin of the Samara State University, 2014, vol. 20 (5), pp. 25–29. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21781856
  16. Gavrilina E. A. An experiment in socio-humanitarian cognition: Genesis and evolution. Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2017, vol. 22 (1), pp. 30–45. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29772493    
  17. Gutnik I. Yu. Training future teachers in reflective pedagogical diagnostics. Proceedings of the A. I. Gertsen Russian State Pedagogical University, 2019, no. 193, pp. 145–153. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41257942
  18. Dudina O. P. Monitoring the professional deficits of the workers of the additional vocational education system as a tool of the programs quality enhancement. Scientific and Methodological Support for Assessing the Quality of Education, 2020, no. 1, pp. 113–118. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42915576
  19. Klimenko L. V., Posukhova O. Yu. School teachers' professional identity in the context of the precariatization of social and labor relations in large Russian cities. Questions of Education, 2018, no. 3, pp. 36–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-36-67 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35618156
  20. Lazarev M. A., Stukalova O. V., Temirov T. V. Professional sustainability of future teachers: potential in the process of preparation and evaluation criteria. Nauka i Shkola, 2018, no. 2, pp. 62–68. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34992697
  21. Lenskaya E. A. The quality of education and the quality of teacher training. Questions of Education, 2008, no. 4, pp. 81–96. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11714769
  22. Plotnikova A. M. Criticism of professional incompetence expressed through language play. Ural Philological Bulletin. Series: Language. The system. Personality: The linguistics of Creativity, 2016, no. 2, pp. 192–198. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26465437
  23. Smoleusova T. V. Methodical readiness of teachers to introduce innovations in the classroom, the relevant requirements of the federal state educational standard. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5 (4), pp. 27–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1504.03  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23917472
  24. Temnyatkina O. V., Tokmeninova D. V. Modern approaches to teacher performance assessment an overview of foreign publications. Questions of Education, 2018, no. 3, pp. 180–195. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-180-195 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35618161
  25. Yakovleva I. P., Romanova M. L., Kiseleva E. S., Matveeva L. A. Modern methods of teachers professional reliability evaluation. Scientific Works of the Kuban State Technological University, 2017, no. 2, pp. 259–269. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29952620
Date of the publication 31.08.2021