Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 33–45
© Gutnik I. Y., 2021
UDC: 
37.012+37.082+373.1

Designing an evaluation inventory for identifying teachers’ professionalism deficits in the context of transformation of contemporary education

Gutnik I. Y. 1 (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 2229
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of identifying teachers’ professional deficits in the context of transformation of modern school education. The purpose of this study is to describe a set of diagnostic methods aimed at identifying professional deficits of teachers in the context of transformation of contemporary education, which can be used both by teachers for self-assessment in order to subsequently overcome the detected deficits, and by school leaders to support teachers’ professional growth.
Materials and Methods. In order to develop the set of diagnostic methods aimed at revealing teachers’ professional deficits, the author has used the following methods of educational research: conversations, focus-group method, in-depth and narrative interviews, action research, and soft systems methodology. The study involved 25 teachers and 720 students of grades 5-9.
Results. The author has clarified the concept of ‘professional deficits’ and analyzed advantages and drawbacks of quantitative methods used in identifying teachers’ professional deficits. The study justifies using the set of diagnostic methods aimed at identifying teachers’ professional deficits in the context of contemporary education. Moreover, it has been proved that the presented evaluation inventory contributes to enhancing teachers’ professional self-assessment and reflection.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the author summarizes the research findings about the implementation of the presented evaluation inventory and its contribution to teachers’ continuing professional growth.

Keywords: 

Teachers’ professional deficits; Methods of educational research; Transformation of the educational process; Internal self-knowledge; Reflection of the teacher; Implementation of the teacher's support.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46513824

For citation:
Gutnik I. Y. Designing an evaluation inventory for identifying teachers’ professionalism deficits in the context of transformation of contemporary education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 33–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.02
References: 

REFERENCES:

1. Antonio Bartolomé, Linda Castañeda, Jordi Adell. Personalisation in educational technology: the absence of underlying pedagogies. - 2018.- Vol. 15,n.1.- P. 1-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0

2. Arsović Branka B. Tendencies in future education development: Prsonalized and adaptive e-learning //Zbornik radova (Univerzitet u Kragujevcu. Pedagoški fakultet u Užicu).-2018-no.20.- P. 283 – 292. DOI: https://doaj.org/article/455b7106bf7349afb955170c22fd694b

3. Kucirkova N, Mackey M. Digital literacies and children's personalized books: Locating the 'self' / / London Review of Education, 2020. - Vol. 18, Issue: 2.- P. 151-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.2.01

4. Nemtcan E., Rannveig Grøm Sæle, Thor Gamst-Klaussen, Frode Svartdal. Drop-Out and Transfer-Out Intentions: The Role of Socio-Cognitive Factors //Frontiers in Education. - 2020.- Vol. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.606291

5. E. A. M. Leite, J. A. M. Lencastre, B. D. Silva, H. B. Neto Learning style in a virtual environment: a study with elementary school teachers at in-service training/ / Research, Society and Development. - 2020. - Vol. 9, n. 7. pp. e467973790 – e467973790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3790

6. Rossi Pier Giuseppe. Le tecnologie digitali per la progettazione didattica //Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies.-2014- Vol. 0, n.10. P. 113-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-010-ross

7. Caukin N., Trail L. SAMR: A Tool for Reflection for Ed Tech Integration// International Journal of the Whole Child . - 2019.- Vol. 4,n.1.- P. 47-54. DOI: https://doaj.org/article/f6802001f3c845b685fadbeb5ee1cc36

8. Roma Kriaučiūnienė, Vilija Targamadzė. Mapping the concept of a good school with teachers’ characteristics in the context of a good school concept. - 2019.- Vol. 10,n.2.- P. 33-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.32.42

9. Konieczny Kinga. Pedagogical diagnosis in the activities of non-governmental organizations. - 2018.- Vol. 7- P. 125-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2018.7.125130

 

10. Mohamadi Z., Malekshahi N. Designing and validating a potential formative evaluation inventory for teacher competences // Language Testing in Asia. – 2018. – Vol. 8. – P. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2

11. Skaalvik E. M., Skaalvik S. Motivated for Teaching? Associations with School Goal Structure, Teacher Self-Efficacy, Job Satisfaction and Emotional Exhaustion // Teaching and Teacher Education. – 2017. – Vol. 67. – P. 152–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006

12. Cappannini O. M., Espíndola O. R. Obstacles in diagnostic assessment. A proposal for overcom-ing them by identifying models presented in the course // Educacion Quimica. – 2012. – Vol. 23, № 4. – P. 484–491. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30137-4

13. Aksenova A. Yu., Primchuk N. V. Essential characteristics of personification of learning: an environmental approach. - Man and Education-2020, No. 4. - p. 43-49 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44737029 14

. Gutnik I. Yu. Substantiation of the modern understanding of the concept of "pedagogical diagnostics" / I. Yu.Gutnik // Bulletin of the Oryol State University. Series: New Humanitarian Studies. – 2015. – № 5(46). – P. 116-120. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25716780

15. Dudina O. P. Monitoring of professional deficits of pedagogical workers of the system of additional professional education as a tool for improving the quality of program implementation / O. P. Dudina / / Scientific and methodological support for assessing the quality of education. – 2020. – № 1(9). – P. 113-118. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42915576

16. Ingenkamp K. Pedagogical diagnostics/Translated from German-M.: Pedagogika,1991. - 240s.

17. Lenskaya E. A. The quality of education and the quality of teacher training // Education issues. – 2008. – № 4. – C. 81–96. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11714769

18. Plotnikova, A.M. Professional incompetence as a field of language game / A.M. Plotnikova / / Ural philological Bulletin. Series: Language. The system. Personality: The Linguistics of Creativity. - 2016. - No. 2. - p. 192-198. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26465437

19. Smoleusova T. V. Methodological readiness of teachers to implement innovations in the classroom that meet the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard / / Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. - 2015. - No. 4. - pp. 27-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1504.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23917472

20. Temnyatkina O. V., Tokmeninova D. V. Modern approaches to assessing the effectiveness of teachers ' work. Review of foreign publications // Education issues. - 2018. - No. 3. - PP. 180-195. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35618161

21. Trapeznikova, T. N. The latest pedagogical technologies: case-method (method of situational analysis) / T. N. Trapeznikova // The territory of science. - 2015. - No. 5. - p. 52-59. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27186335

Date of the publication 31.08.2021