Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 36–55
© Miklyaeva A. V., Khoroshikh V. V., Volkova E. N., 2019
UDC: 
159.9

Subjective factors of gifted adolescents’ psychological well-being: A theoretical model

Miklyaeva A. V. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation), Khoroshikh V. V. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation), Volkova E. N. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1526
Abstract: 

Introduction. The problem of the research is determined by contradictory data on psychological well-being of gifted adolescents presented in Russian and international psychological studies. The aim of this article is to identify the subjective factors which mediate psychological well-being of gifted adolescents.
Materials and Methods. The study uses methods of analytical literature review and theoretical modeling. The theoretical and methodological bases of the research include the process-activity approach to understanding giftedness, as well as C. Ryff’s concept of psychological well-being and self-determination theory of R. Ryan and E. Deci.
Results. The study reveals the following main subjective factors of gifted adolescents’ psychological well-being: subjectivity, persistence, self-efficacy, problem orientation, dominant emotional background, and characteristics of Self-concept. The element which moderates the relationship between the above listed factors and gifted adolescents’ psychological well-being is their attitude toward their own giftedness. Gender, age, type of giftedness and type of educational environment are identified as the main conditions determining the specifics of gifted adolescents’ development and affecting their psychological well-being. On this basis, the authors have proposed a theoretical model. The model of subjective factors of gifted adolescents’ psychological well-being can be used to determine the most important areas of research on psychological well-being of gifted adolescents, to operationalize private research models in "psychology of adolescent giftedness", to compare the results of various empirical studies aimed at revealing the relationship between giftedness and psychological well-being in adolescence.
Conclusions. Thus, the study has identified the main subjective factors which mediate psychological well-being of gifted adolescents.

Keywords: 

Psychological well-being; Giftedness; Adolescents; Attitude toward their giftedness; Persistence; Subjectivity; Self-efficacy; Problem experiences; Self-concept; Emotional state.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:39256953

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 95.672 Flourishing | Eudaimonia | Psychological Well-Being

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074638047&origin=...

The development of engineering students’ foreign language discursive competence: Motivational educational factors

For citation:
Miklyaeva A. V., Khoroshikh V. V., Volkova E. N. Subjective factors of gifted adolescents’ psychological well-being: A theoretical model. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 36–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.03
References: 
  1. Archakova T. O., Veraksa A. N., Zotova O. Yu., Perelygina E. B.  Subjective well-being in children: Measurement tools and age dynamics. Psychological Science and Education, 2017, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 68–76. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2017220606 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30773809
  2. Bulynko N. A. The influence of self-efficiency of a personality on the effectiveness of sports activity. Bulletin of the Yanka Kupala Grodno State University. Series 3: Philology. Pedagogy. Psychology, 2014, no. 3, pp. 118–125. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29896111
  3. Gordeeva T. O., Shepeleva E. A. Gender differences in academic and social self-efficacy and coping strategies in modern Russian adolescents. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 14: Psychology, 2006, no. 3, pp. 78–85. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9276431
  4. Grishina A. V., Volkova E. N. Structure of subjectivity of adolescents with different degree of computer games addiction. Bulletin of Minin University, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 14. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-1-14 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32833350
  5. Zhukovskaya L. V., Troshikhina E. G. K. Ryff's scale of psychological well-being. Psychological Journal, 2011, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 82–93. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16331526
  6. Klimontova T. A. Personality Self-Attitude of Intellectually Gifted High School Students. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2015, no. 1, pp. 247–251. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22917629
  7. Pechenkina A. P., Golovei L. A. Self-attitude of gifted adolescents in connection with the peculiarities of the motivational sphere. Scientific Studies of Graduates of the Faculty of Psychology of St. Petersburg State University, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 217–221. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21955950
  8. Podolskij A.I., Karabanova O.A., Idobaeva O.A., Heymans P. Psychoemotional wellbeing of contemporary adolescents: International study experience. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2011, no. 2, pp. 9–20.  (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17284222 
  9. Regush L. A., Alekseeva E. V., Orlova A. V., Pezhemskaya Yu. S., Undusk E. N. Psychological problems of Russian adolescents (1993-2013): monograph. Saint-Petersburg, Elvi-print Publ., 2017, 297 p.  (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28081122
  10. Ryseva A. A. Self-awareness of the personality and its features among intellectually gifted adolescents. News of the Russian State Pedagogical University. A. I. Herzen, 2007, vol. 17, no. 43-2, pp. 203–207. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11932501 
  11. Semenova A. A. The specific nature of self-attitude of intellectually gifted pupils and its interconnection with the components of person’s self-consciousness. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2016, no. 3, pp. 138–144. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25838722
  12. Scheblanova E. I. Intellectual self-concept of gifted adolescents. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 2016, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 23–38. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28868308
  13. Shcheblanova E. I., Tsoi A. B. Social and psychological adjustment of gifted students with different kinds of intellectual abilities. Psychological Research, 2013, vol. 6, no. 31, pp. 7. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21631628
  14. Ablard K. E. Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender. Roeper Review, 1997, vol. 20, issue 2, pp. 110–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553870
  15. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, vol. 84 (2), pp. 191–215. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  16. Barendregt C. S., van der Laan A. M., Bongers I. L., van Nieuwenhuizen C. Longitudinal relation between general well-being and self-esteem: Testing differences for adolescents admitted to secure residential care and after discharge. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2016, vol. 60, issue 16, pp. 1836–1855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15588773
  17. Baudson T. G., Zeimes J. F.  The Importance of being gifted: Stages of gifted identity development, their correlates and predictors. Gifted and Talented International, 2016, vol. 31, issue 1, pp. 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2016.1194675
  18. Bergold S., Wirthwein L., Rost D. H., Steinmayr R. Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers?. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 1623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01623
  19. Boazman J., Sayler  M. Personal well-being of gifted students following participation in an early college-entrance program.  Roeper Review, 2011, vol. 33, issue 2, pp. 76–85.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554153
  20. Bowers E. P.,  Li Y., Kiely M. K.,  Brittian A.,  Lerner J. V., Lerner R. M.  The five Cs model of positive youth development: A longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2010, vol. 39, issue 7, pp. 720–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9530-9
  21. Brounstein P. J., Holahan W., Dreyden J.  Change in self-concept and attributional styles among academically gifted adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1991, vol. 21, issue 3, pp.  198–218.  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb02723.x
  22. Chan D. W. Positive and negative perfectionism among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: Their relationships to general self-efficacy and subjective well-being. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2007, vol. 31, issue 1, pp. 77–102. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-512
  23. Chen X., Fan X., Cheung H. Y., Wu J. The subjective well-being of academically gifted students in the Chinese cultural context. School Psychology International, 2018, vol. 39, issue 3, pp. 291–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318773788
  24.  De Caroli M. Е., Sagone Е. Generalized self-efficacy and well-being in adolescents with high vs. low scholastic self-efficacy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 141, pp. 867–874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.152
  25. Demirbas-Çelik N. Mental well-being predictivity of personal meaning profile in various age groups. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2018, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 198–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i10.3490
  26. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, vol. 95 (3), pp. 542–575. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
  27. Fouladchanga M., Kohgardb A., Salah V. A study of psychological health among students of gifted and nongifted high schools. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, vol. 5, pp. 1220–1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.264
  28. Freer E., Evans P. Psychological needs satisfaction and value in students’ intentions to study music in high school. Psychology of Music, 2018, vol. 46, issue 6, pp. 881–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617731613 
  29. Góngora V. C., Solano A. C. Well-being and life satisfaction in Argentinean adolescents. Journal of Youth Studies, 2014, vol. 17, issue 9, pp. 1277–1291. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.918251
  30. Jones T. W. Equally cursed and blessed: Do gifted and talented children experience poorer mental health and psychological well-being?. Educational & Child Psychology, 2013,  vol. 30 (2), pp. 44–66. URL:  https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-23017-005
  31. Keyes C. L. M., Shmotkin D., Ryff C. D.  Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, vol. 82 (6), pp. 1007–1022. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
  32. Kroesbergen E. H., van Hooijdonk M., Van Viersen S., Middel-Lalleman M. M. N., Reijnders J. J. W. The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2016, vol. 60, issue 1, pp. 16–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0016986215609113  
  33. Krok D. When is meaning in life most beneficial to young people? Styles of meaning in life and well-being among late adolescents. Journal of Adult Development, 2018, vol. 25, issue 2, pp. 96–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-017-9280-y
  34. Lea-Wood S. S., Clunies-Ross G. Self-esteem of gifted adolescent girls in Australian Schools. Roeper Review, 1995, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 195–197. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553658
  35. Li T., Feng F.  Goal content, well-being, and psychological needs satisfaction in Chinese adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2018, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 541–550.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6831
  36. Lindwall M., Weman-Josefsson  K., Sebire S. J., Standage M. Viewing exercise goal content through a person-oriented lens: A self-determination perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2016, vol. 27, pp. 85–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.011
  37. Litster K., Roberts J.  The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: a meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Need, 2011, vol. 11, issue 2, pp. 130–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
  38. Maddi S. R. Hardiness: An operationalization of existential courage. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2004, vol. 44, issue 3, pp. 279–298. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167804266101
  39. Malinauskas R., Dumciene A. Psychological wellbeing and self-esteem in students across the transition between secondary school and university: A longitudinal study. Psihologija, 2017, vol.  50, issue 1, pp. 21–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI160506003M
  40. Martin L. T., Burns R. M., Schonlau M. Mental disorders among gifted and nongifted youth: A selected review of the epidemiologic literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2010, vol. 54, issue 1, pp. 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209352684
  41. Neihart M.  The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say?. Roeper Review, 1999, vol. 22, issue 1, pp. 10–17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553991
  42. Ogurlu U., Yalin H. S., Yavuz Birben F. The relationship between psychological symptoms, creativity, and loneliness in gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2018, vol. 41, issue 2, pp. 193–210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162353218763968 
  43. Pollet E., Schnell T.  Brilliant: But what for? Meaning and subjective well-being in the lives of intellectually gifted and academically high-achieving adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2017, vol. 18, issue 5, pp. 1459–1484.  DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9783-4
  44. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, vol. 52, pp. 141–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  45. Ryan R. M., Huta V., Deci E. L. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on Eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2008, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 139–170.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
  46. Renshaw T. L., Arslan G.  Psychometric properties of the student subjective wellbeing questionnaire with Turkish adolescents: A generalizability study. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2016, vol. 31, issue 2, pp. 139–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573516634644
  47. Rinn A. N., Jamieson K. M., Gross C. M., McQueen K. S.  A canonical correlation analysis of the influence of social comparison, gender, and grade level on the multidimensional self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 2009, vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 251–269. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9076-9
  48. Ritchie  L., Williamon А. Measuring distinct types of musical self-efficacy. Psychology of Music, 2011, vol. 39, issue 3, pp. 328–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610374895
  49. Ryff C. D. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2014, vol. 83, pp. 10–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
  50. Shek D. T. L., Lu-Yin L. Psychosocial factors influencing individual well-being in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: A six-year longitudinal study. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2018, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 561–584. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9545-4  
  51. Snyder К. Е., Barger M. M., Wormington S. V., Schwartz-Bloom R., Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Identification as gifted and implicit beliefs about intelligence: An examination of potential moderators. Journal of advanced academics, 2013, vol. 24, issue 4, pp. 242–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13507971
  52. Sortheix F. M.,  Schwartz S. H.  Values that underlie and undermine well-being: Variability across countries. European Journal of Personality, 2017, vol. 31, issue 2, pp. 187–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2096
  53. Tatli C. Investigating of the subjective well-being of gifted adolescents. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 4, issue 4, pp. 56–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v4i4.2595
  54. Tong J., Yewchuk C. Self concept and sex-role orientation in gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1996, vol. 40, issue 1, pp. 15–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001698629604000103
  55. Tvorogova N. D. Psychological support of gifted students’ learning activity. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2018, vol. XLIII, pp. 147–155. DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.07.21
  56. Viejo C., Gomez-Lopez M., Ortega-Ruiz R. Adolescents' psychological well-being: A multidimensional measure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, vol. 15 (10), pp. 2325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102325
  57. Yang Y., Li P., Kou Y. Orientations to happiness and subjective well-being in Chinese adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 2017, Vol. 10, issue 4, pp. 881–897. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9410-2
  58. Zeidner M., Shani-Zinovich I.  Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the Big-Five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, vol. 51, issue 5, pp. 566–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.007
  59. Zimmerman B. J.  Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 82–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

 

Date of the publication 31.08.2019