Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 200–214
UDC: 
37.013.43

Nurturing cultural attitudes within the framework of multicultural education

Uaikhanova M. A. 1 (Pavlodar, Republic of Kazakhstan), Ushakova N. M. 1 (Pavlodar, Republic of Kazakhstan)
1 S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents the research on the problem of personal development in the terms of nurturing personality’s value-notional sphere based on culturological approach to education. The aim of the article is to reveal the peculiarities of developing personality’s culturological attitudes within the framework of multicultural education.
Materials and Methods. The culturological approach in education has become the methodological basis of the study. The research methods include analysis of scientific literature, questionnaires, observation, studying students’ works, analysis and scientific interpretation of the collected data, comparative and contrastive methods, and ascertaining, forming, and control educational experiments.
Results. The authors have revealed the main ways of developing individual experience of value-notional attitudes to oneself and the world in the educational process and identified the criteria for evaluating the levels of their development. The authors argue that education, oriented to the development of the personality’s emotional-value attitudes to the world and oneself, contributes to nurturing culturological position, which structure includes value-notional, value-active, and emotional-value components. Individual’s culturological attitudes are developing throughout the life-course influenced by a range of different factors, including the educational ones. Within the framework of education there are basic ways of developing individual experience of value-notional attitudes to oneself and the world, taking into account age-specific factors and sociocultural situations, which should be considered in the educational process.
Conclusions. The authors conclude about the peculiarities of developing personality’s culturological position within the framework of multicultural education.

Keywords: 

Culturological attitudes; Criteria for evaluating; The levels of personal attitudes; Culturological approach; Emotional-value attitude; Value-notional sphere; Personal development.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38191474

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 98.337 Critical Race Theory | Testimonio | Intercultural Education

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065966061&origin=...

Nurturing cultural attitudes within the framework of multicultural education

For citation:
Uaikhanova M. A., Ushakova N. M. Nurturing cultural attitudes within the framework of multicultural education. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 200–214. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.14
References: 
  1. Ladson-Billings G. Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 1995, vol. 32, issue 3, pp. 465–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465  
  2. Yanutsh O. A. Trends in cultural industries evolution in education. Integracija obrazovanija = Integration of Education, 2015, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 126–131. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/Inted.079.019.201502.126  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25015021
  3. Aronson B., Laughter J. The theory and practice of culturally relevant education:A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, issue 1, pp. 163–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
  4. Bal A., Trainor A. A. Culturally responsive experimental intervention studies: The development of a rubric for paradigm expansion. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, issue 2, pp.  319–359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315585004
  5. Tsirulnikov A. M. Phenomena and cultural practices: Formal and informal education from the perspective of the sociocultural approach. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies. Moscow, 2016, no. 3, pp. 260–275. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26636953
  6. Oberle E., Domitrovich C. E., Meyers D. C., Weissberg R. P. Establishing systemic social and emotional learning approaches in schools: A framework for schoolwide implementation. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2016, vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 277–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1125450
  7. Domitrovich C. E., Durlak J. A., Staley K. S., Weissberg R. P. Social-emotional competence: An essential factor for promoting positive adjustment and reducing risk in school children. Child Development, 2017, vol. 88, issue 2, pp. 408–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12739
  8. Uaikhanova M. A., Ushakova N. M. Value orientations of a modern school teacher of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Man in India, 2017, vol. 97, issue 25, pp. 285–301. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35713689
  9. Nucci L., Creane M. W., Powers D. W. Integrating moral and social development within middle school social studies: A social cognitive domain approach. Journal of Moral Education, 2015, vol.  44, issue 4, pp. 479–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2015.1087391
  10. Schwarz-Franco O. Touching the challenge: Embodied solutions enabling humanistic moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 2016, vol. 45, issue 4, pp. 449–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1230052
  11. Nishino M. The challenge of developing meaningful curriculum initiatives for moral education in Japan. Journal of Moral Education, 2017, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 46–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1276438
  12. McCarty T., Lee T. Critical culturally sustaining/ revitalizing pedagogy and indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 2014, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 101–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.q83746nl5pj34216
  13. Waitoller F. R., King Thorius K. A. Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning. Harvard Educational Review, 2016, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 366–389. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
  14. Khalifa M. A., Gooden M. A., Davis J. E. Culturally responsive school leadership: A Synthesis of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, issue 4, pp. 1272–1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
  15. Halstead J. M. Is moral education working? Extracts from the diary of a twenty-first century moral educator. Journal of Moral Education, 2011, vol. 40, issue 3, pp. 339–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2011.596335
  16. Durlak J. A. Programme implementation in social and emotional learning: basic issues and research findings. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2016, vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 333–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1142504
  17. Paris D. Сulturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 2012, vol. 41, issue 3, pp. 93–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
  18. Paris D., Alim H. S. What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy?. Harvard Educational Review, 2014, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 85–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
  19. Dugas D. Group dynamics and individual roles: A differentiated approach to social-emotional learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2017, vol.  90, issue 2, pp. 41–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1256156
  20. Taylor R. D., Oberle E., Durlak J. A., Weissberg R. P. Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 2017, vol. 88, issue 4, pp. 1156–1171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
  21. Coelho V. A., Sousa V. Differential effectiveness of a middle school social and emotional learning program: Does setting matter? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2018, vol. 47, issue 9, pp. 1978–1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0897-3
  22. Davies S., Rizk J. The three generations of cultural capital research: A narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 2018, vol. 88, issue 3, pp. 331–365. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317748423
  23. Greenberg M. T., Domitrovich C. E., Weissberg R. P., Durlak J. A. Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The Future of Children, 2017, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13–32. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44219019
  24. Lovat T. Values education as good practice pedagogy: Evidence from Australian empirical research. Journal of Moral Education, 2017, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 88–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1268110
  25. Portnow S., Downer J. T., Brown J. Reductions in aggressive behavior within the context of a universal, social emotional learning program: Classroom- and student-level mechanisms. Journal of School Psychology, 2018, vol. 68, pp. 38–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.004
  26. Evnina K.Yu. Positive phenomena in the value-sense personality sphere. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2013, no. 2, pp. 524. (In Russian) URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21285878
Date of the publication 30.04.2019