Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 158–181
© Popova O. I., Agafonova I. V., Sysoeva T. L., 2026
UDC: 
004.81+378.4 +37.03+316.276

The specifics of developing critical thinking and complex analytical problem-solving skills: Evaluating the quality of educational interaction

Popova O. I. 1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation), Agafonova I. V. 2 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation), Sysoeva T. L. 2 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation)
1 Ural State University of Railway Engineering
2 Ural State University of Economics
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 34
Abstract: 

Introduction. Modern higher education is focused on improving the ability to critically analyze information and solve complex professionally oriented tasks which are considered as integral indicators of the quality of educational interaction. This problem remains insufficiently studied in the scholarly literature. The purpose of the article is to identify the specific dynamics of developing critical thinking and complex analytical problem-solving skills among university students by means of evaluating the quality of educational interaction.
Materials and Methods. The study follows competence-based, activity-based and human-centered approaches. The research methods include the following: (1) the analysis of scholarly literature by Russian and international researchers, (2) the action research (experiment) involving bachelor’s students majoring in Marketing at USUE (N = 135), (3)elements of longitudinal observation (2023–2025), (4)a survey based on a 5-point Likert scale, (5) a comparative analysis, (6) methods of mathematical statistics (Student’s t-test) and (7)a correlation analysis. A model for evaluating the quality of educational interaction has been developed and tested through the systematic use of the gamification method throughout the bachelor's degree programmes. The assessment of the quality of educational interaction was carried out according to four interrelated components: academic, cognitive, professional and personal.
Results. A steady positive dynamics within the components of educational interaction quality has been revealed within the framework of long-term use of gamification tools. It has been substantiated that the most pronounced changes are observed within the academic component (+130.7 %), reflecting an increase in students’ involvement in academic and professionally oriented activities. It has been established that the long-term use of game-based educational practices contributes to the development of critical thinking (+41.2 %) and skills for solving complex analytical problems (+42.1 %), including the ability to make decisions under conditions of uncertainty (+47.8 %), evaluate alternative points of view (+45.4 %), and use the results of data analysis when making management decisions (+45.1 %).
The close interrelation of the identified components of educational interaction — academic, cognitive, professional and personal — is confirmed (r = 0.78; p < 0.01).
Conclusions. The obtained results allow considering the quality of educational interaction as an integral characteristic feature of the educational process. The developed and tested model for evaluating the quality of educational interaction can be used in designing, monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of practice-oriented degree programs.

Keywords: 

Quality of educational interaction; Development of critical thinking; Skills for solving analytical problems; University educational environment; Professional competencies; Assessment of educational outcomes; Gamification method.

For citation:
Popova O. I., Agafonova I. V., Sysoeva T. L. The specifics of developing critical thinking and complex analytical problem-solving skills: Evaluating the quality of educational interaction. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 158–181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2605.08
References: 
  1. Tolmacheva Yu. N. Satisfaction with the quality of education and educational environment among students of pedagogical university. Social and Humanitarian Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2023, no. 1, pp. 51-58. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/vbczaz 
  2. Tarasov S. V., Spasskaya E. B., Proekt Yu. L. The image of the university instructor as a factor in students’ assessment of the educational environment and academic motivation. Higher Education in Russia, 2025, vol. 34 (7), pp. 52-73. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/eduwln DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-7-52-73
  3. Baklashova T. A. Editorial: Quality vs quantity: a study of experience in education. Education and Self-Development, 2025, vol. 20 (2), pp. 6-11. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/crgukb DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.01
  4. Lyz N. A., Istratova O. N., Golubeva E. V. Evidence-based practice in education: Tools for assessing learning in the context of innovation. Higher Education in Russia, 2024, vol. 33 (6), pp. 55-72. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/bkpodf DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-6-55-72
  5. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. The concept “student experience” from the point of view of philosophical anthropology and developmental psychology. Higher Education in Russia, 2024, vol. 33 (3), pp. 28-48. (In Russian) URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4872 URL: https://elibrary.ru/rntlklDOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-3-28-48
  6. Silaicheva V. V. Sociocultural dominance in modern Russian education. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 2025, vol. 29 (2), pp. 565-576. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/uropzz DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-2-565-576
  7. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Virtualization of social communication in education: Values-based approach to information development (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (2), pp. 73-90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/apuvod  DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.05
  8. de la Fuente J., Sander P., Kauffman D. F., Yilmaz Soylu M. Differential effects of self- vs. external-regulation on learning approaches, academic achievement, and satisfaction in undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, pp. 543884.   URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543884/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543884
  9. Hašková A., Lukáčová D., Noga H. Teacher self-assessment as a part of quality management. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 156-169. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/feroif DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.11 

10.Gadušova Z., Haškova A., Szarszoi D. Teachers` competences evaluation: Case study. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 164-177.URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/suwlou  DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2003.09

11.Lyz N. A., Golubeva E. V., Istratova O. N. Students’ educational experience: The conceptualization and development of a tool for the assessment of education quality. Educational Studies Moscow, 2022, no. 3, pp. 67-98. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/viddbk DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-67-98

12.Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Reflexive principles of personal development in the changing information content. Science for Education Today, 2019, no. 2, pp. 52-66. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/hdhlgr DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.04

13.Bolotnikova E. N. Metamorphoses of values in the modern education and training system. Philosophy and Society, 2024, no. 1, pp. 86-103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/eurtzz DOI: https://doi.org/10.30884/jfio/2024.01.06

14.Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. The concept of intellectual potential development: the main dimensions and bases within the context of lifelong education (review). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7 (3), pp. 140–156. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/zfrofn  DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1703.09 

15.Shmelev I. M. Problems and contradictions of the digital transformation of the individual in the context of modern reality. Tomsk State University Journal, 2023, no. 496, pp. 115-124. (In Russian) URL: https://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/koha:001153260 URL: https://elibrary.ru/shwhdg 

16.Likhotelov V. V., Abdullin A. G. Knowledge-beliefs and conviction as the core landmark of Russian youth education and upbringing. Integration of Education, 2025, vol. 29 (1), pp. 81-96. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/gtifkq DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.029.202501.081-096

17.Lyz N. A., Labyntseva I. S. Digital generation: Students' difficulties and ways for their overcoming. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 86 (6), pp. 86-94. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/bqrbzv

18.Razinkina E. M., Pankova L. V., Zima E. A. End-to-end system of engaging students in project activities as a tool to ensure education quality. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2023, vol. 27 (1), pp. 42-49. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/pqznbk DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2023.01.005

19.Kazakova E. I., Kuzminov Ya. I. We should foster a culture of critical attitude towards artificial intelligence. Educational Studies Moscow, 2025, no. 1, pp. 8-24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/fmenzj DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2025-25882

20.Mulyono H., Suryoputro G. The use of social media platform to promote authentic learning environment in higher education setting. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (2), pp. 105-123. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ogralp DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.07

21.Azbel A. A., Ilyushin L. S. Characteristic features of students’ motivation for productive learning behavior: Evaluating teacher feedback in the process of student-led research. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16 (2), pp. 164-188. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/SBWOHV DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.08

22.Gnatik E. N. Gamification as a growing trend in higher education: prospects and problems. Questions of Philosophy, 2023, no. 6, pp. 116-123. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/zkxdjf DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-6-116-123

23.Ukrozhenko D. S., Neverova O. P., Stepanov A. V., Pavlova Ya. S., Kurash D. K. Gamification in higher education: The impact of game-based approaches on students’ motivation and academic achievement. Law and Management, 2024, no. 12, pp. 479-483. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/dbjhof 

24.Sagaidak V. A., Kuzevanova A. L., Kapshuk A. N. Gameization of educational process in the assessments of students and teachers. Higher Education in Russia, 2024, vol. 33 (12), pp. 122-141. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/jfqkpc DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-12-122-141

25.Vasilyeva E. N., Scherbakov A. V., Kuragina M. F. Communicative competence in the structure of "soft skills" as part of the university students professional training. Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2023, vol. 15 (1), pp. 21-36. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/eqpgpy DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2023150102

26.Triantafyllou S. A., Georgiadis C., Sapounidis T. Gamification in education and training: a literature review. International Review of Education, 2025, vol. 71, pp. 483-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-10111-8

27.Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Specifics of information and communication developments in education: Analysis of value changes before and after 2020 (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (6), pp. 96-119. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/llroxv DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.06

28.Zeybek N., Saygı E. Gamification in education: Why, where, when, and how? – A systematic review. Games and Culture, 2024, vol. 19 (2), pp. 237-264. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15554120231158625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231158625

29.Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Digital transformations of the education system: Trends, problems, and priorities of personal development (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15 (6), pp. 71-96. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/llroxv DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2506.04

30.Zhukovskaya E. I., Xashimxodjayev Sh. I., Amirov R. A., Norboeva N. E. The role of intelligent systems in the activities of higher education institutions and personnel training in the face of new challenges. Digital Models and Solutions, 2024, vol. 3 (3), pp. 68-78. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/nqgpqk DOI: https://doi.org/10.29141/2949-477X-2024-3-3-5

31.Nikitina O. M. From a traditional university to the development of the metaverse: Network and target effects. Digital Models and Solutions, 2024, vol. 3 (2), pp. 73-84. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/rulajr DOI: https://doi.org/10.29141/2949-477X-2024-3-2-6

32.Mikhnenko P. A. The impact of intelligent decision support systems on the transformation of management practices. Upravlenets, 2025, vol. 16 (6), pp. 2-16. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/ihxakm DOI: https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-6-1

Date of the publication 31.10.2026