Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 25–51
© Belashina T. V., Gurina E. S., Klepikova N. M., 2026
UDC: 
159.9+37.015.31+316.6

Investigating the propensity for the teaching profession in preliminary and initial stages of teacher education: Assessment of personality characteristics, communicative tolerance and reflexivity

Belashina T. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Gurina E. S. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Klepikova N. M. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1
Abstract: 

Introduction. The research problem is determined by the fact that the current educational system is experiencing a colossal shortage of qualified professionals, despite the fact that pedagogical universities award a sufficient number of Education degrees annually. Thus, it is required to study the inclination towards the teaching profession and to identify its structural components in the preliminary and initial stages of teacher education as a way to solve the staffing problems in the field of education. The article aims to identify the psychological characteristics of a predisposition to the teaching profession and to create descriptive profiles of students who exhibit the most pronounced specific configurations of personality traits, communicative tolerance, and reflexivity.
Materials and Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was formed by the activity approach, presented in the provisions on the foundations of professional performance and the model of basic competencies from the perspective of V. D. Shadrikov’s functional system of performance. The individual-centered approach, revealing the role of the teacher’s personality in the development of students, was also utilized. The empirical study was conducted using general research methods (analysis of theoretical sources on the problem) and empirical methods (questionnaires, testing). Based on the theoretical analysis conducted, psychological characteristics were identified – personality traits, motivation, empathy, orientation, communicative tolerance, and reflection – the evaluation of them formed the basis of the early career guidance model. Data processing was carried out using methods of mathematical and statistical analysis (hierarchical cluster analysis, analysis of variance, φ-Fisher criterion). The study sample consisted of 140 people: EG-1 (N=81) –Year 10 and Year 11 students (secondary school based preliminary teacher education) and EG-2 (N=50) – students of a pedagogical university.
Results. The authors obtained the following results: 1) psychological characteristics were identified – empirically verifiable markers of predisposition to the teaching profession; 2) profiles of students with the most pronounced combination of personality traits, communicative tolerance, and reflectivity were statistically determined and substantiated, the totality of which indicates the manifestation of a predisposition to the teaching career; 3) the validity of the identified profiles of students with different levels of predisposition to the career in Education was confirmed by the results of a comparative analysis with the profile of a group of students from a pedagogical university who had already chosen a career in teaching.
Conclusions. The results of the conducted research made it possible to identify and describe profiles of students with varying degrees of manifestation of psychological characteristics related to a propensity for the teaching profession. This significantly expands the capabilities of educational institutions in carrying out more precisely targeted career guidance with schoolchildren at different stages of education.

Keywords: 

Inclination towards pedagogical activity; Learners; Specialized stage; Assessment and diagnostic toolkit; Comparative analysis; Professional orientation.

For citation:
Belashina T. V., Gurina E. S., Klepikova N. M. Investigating the propensity for the teaching profession in preliminary and initial stages of teacher education: Assessment of personality characteristics, communicative tolerance and reflexivity. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 25–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.02
References: 
  1. Usacheva E. A. The teaching concept as a category of the pedagogical science: The search for content. Legal Education and Science, 2024, no. 4, pp. 38-41. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/CMCBBX DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1190-2024-4-38-41  
  2. Zhang J., Wu. Y. Impact of university teachers’ digital teaching skills on teaching quality in higher education. Cogent Education, 2025, vol. 12 (1), pp. 1004-1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2436706
  3. Kharrasova G. V., Gumerova F. F. The personality of a teacher in the modern educational space. Society, Law, Statehood: Retrospective and Perspective, 2023, vol. 3 (15), pp. 88-92. URL: https://elibrary.ru/KRKSGJ 
  4. Layek D., Koodamara N.K. Motivation, work experience, and teacher performance: A comparative study. Acta Psychologica, 2024, vol. 245, pр. 104-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104217
  5. Liu X.Yu., Yu C., Zhu E., Yin M. How teachers’ emotional display and emotional labor influence the relationship between students’ intrinsic learning motivation and mind wandering in class. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2025, vol. 34, pp. 739-751. DOI: https://10.1007/s40299-024-00892-9 
  6. Hu X., Lv Ya., Tan M., Hao B. Influence of early childhood teachers' psychological contracts on teacher competency: Chain mediating role of job crafting and professional identity. Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10 (7), pр. e29130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29130
  7. Berkovich I., Eyal O. Teachers’ Big Five personality traits, emotion regulation patterns, and moods: Mediation and prototype analyses. Research Papers in Education, 2021, vol. 36 (3), pp. 332-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677758
  8. Tong Q. Exploring the interplay between teachers' emotions, personal traits, environmental factors and psychological well-being. European Journal of Education, 2025, vol. 60 (1), pp. e12903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12903
  9. Kokkinos C. M., Kargiotidis A., Markos A. The relationship between learning and study strategies and big five personality traits among junior university student teachers. Learning and Individual Differences, 2015, vol. 43, pp. 39-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.031

10.Töre E. Effects of intrinsic motivation on teacher emotional labor: Mediating role of affective commitment. International Journal of Progressive Education, 2020, vol. 16 (5), pp. 390-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.24

11.Belashina T. V., Nesterova S. B. Experience in implementing specialized psychological and pedagogical classes: Challenges and prospects. Human Development in the Modern World, 2025, no. 4, pp. 58-72. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/NYGRYB

12.Tsomartova M. E., Volik M. V. Consequences of the shortage of specialists in the labor market and challenges of 2024. Discussion, 2024, no. 4, pp. 128-138. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/YKZLBG DOI: https://doi.org/10.46320/2077-7639-2024-4-125-128-138 

13.PovarIOnkov Yu. P. Systemogenetic approach to the analysis of a professional's career goals. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2021, no. 3, pp. 118-126. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/VDWEQI DOI: https://doi.org/10.20323/1813-145X-2021-3-120-118-126

14.Volkova E. N. Personal characteristics of a 21st-century teacher: An analysis of empirical studies of the problem. Education and Science, 2022, vol. 24 (3), pp. 126-157. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/SSTLAT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-3-126-157 

15.Karpov A. V., Karpov A. A., Chemyakina A. V. The specifics of the structural organization of the metacognitive components of reflexivity. Russian Psychological Journal, 2022, vol. 19 (1), pp. 127-142. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/MVSXWZ DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.1.10

16.Bohndick C., Ehrhardt-Madapathi N., Weis S., Lischetzke T., Schmitt M. Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and their relationships to personality traits and learning opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2020, vol. 37 (1), pр. 146-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1857929

17.Serafimovich I. V. Peculiarities of cognitive and personal resources of teachers within the psychological system of activity. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, no. 2, pp. 33. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/XTJCVS DOI: https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2020-26-2-107-114

18.Jiayuan Ma., Hidayat R. The mediating role of emotional intelligence and emotional resistance between interpersonal mindfulness and teacher- student interaction among teachers in China. Current Psychology, 2025. vol. 44 (4), pp. 2805-2819. DOI: https://10.1007/s12144-025-07393-y

19.Xie F., Derakhshan A. A. Conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, vol. 12, pp. 708490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490 

20.Kim J., Yoon S., Hong S. Analysis of the structural relationship between student and school characteristics variables affecting elementary school students' intrinsic regulatory motivation. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 2024, vol. 24 (17), pp. 331-349. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=73970523 DOI: https://10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.17.331 

21.Greenier V. T., Derakhshan A., Fathi J. Emotion regulation and psychological well-being in teacher work engagement: A case of British and Iranian English language teachers. System, 2021, vol. 97, pp. 102446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102446

22.Nazari M., Mansouri B., Behzadpoor S. F. “I think that I am fossilized”: Examining the role of tensions in a novice Iranian EFL teacher’s identity (re) construction and (re) negotiation. Second Language Teacher Education, 2022, vol. 1 (2), pр. 137-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/slte.23865

23.Xiyun S., Fathi J., Shirbagi N., Mohammaddokht F. A Structural model of teacher self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and psychological wellbeing among English teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, vol. 13, pp. 904151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904151

24.Bhuvaneswari G., Baskaran D. A Study on emotional intelligence of higher secondary school teachers in Chengalpattu district. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 2020, vol. 9 (1), pр. 146-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i1.3388 

25.Kalugin A. Yu., Shchebetenko S. A., Mishkevich A. M., Soto Ch. J., John O. P. Properties of the Russian version of the big five inventory-2. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2021, vol. 18 (1), pp. 7-33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/RPRLUM DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33

 

Date of the publication 30.04.2026