The relationship between diligence and academic performance of university students with the focus on their gender
Introduction. The article examines the problem of the influence of gender differences on the peculiarities of students’ academic performance at the university. The purpose of the article is to identify gender differences in the properties of dependencies determined by the level of diligence and academic performance of first-year university students.
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the research is the aspect and system approaches. The research utilized theoretical (analysis, synthesis, generalization and scholarly literature reviewing) and empirical (questionnaire) methods. Mathematical statistics methods were used to process the collected data. The experimental research was conducted at Tyumen State University and consisted of several stages. The total sample size was 633 people, including 335 male and 298 female participants.
Results. The conclusion drawn by the authors in the previous study is confirmed: in the senior grades of secondary school and in the first year of university, the self-assessment of the diligence level by female participants in all disciplines is higher than the self-assessment of male students, and in most cases these differences are statistically significant. It is shown that in the first year at university, the academic performance of female students in most disciplines is statistically significantly higher than that of male students. It was found that the correlations between the level of diligence in the first and second terms in core and non-core disciplines in the group of male students are strongly expressed, and they are moderate in the group of female students. The same correlations were found between academic attainments in these semesters in the mentioned disciplines. The relationships between the level of diligence and student performance range from moderate (female students) to weak (male students). The reasons for the lack of strong correlations between diligence and academic performance require additional research.
Conclusions. Based on the self-assessment of first-year university students and other collected data, statistically significant differences in the level of diligence and academic performance were revealed, as well as differences in the properties of correlations between diligence and academic performance in core and non-core disciplines in different semesters related to the students’ gender.
Academic performance; Level of diligence; Core disciplines; Non-core disciplines; Secondary school; First-year students; Gender differences.
- Sharmin V. G., Sharmina T. N., Sharmin D. V. Identifying the degree of influence of various factors on students’ academic performance based on their self-assessment, taking into account students’ gender. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (3), pp. 92-114. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/UBXYZN DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.05
- Moradi F., Amiripour P. The prediction of the students' academic underachievement in mathematics using the DEA model: A developing country case study. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2017, vol. 6 (3), pp. 432-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.3.432
- 3. Berisha N. S., Novikov A. L., Novikova I. A., Shlyakhta D. A. Individual and personal factors for successful learning of a foreign language by linguistics students. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7 (1), pp. 4-15. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/YQXRHL DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-1-4-15
- Palmen L., Vorstenbosch M., Tanck E., Kooloos J. What is more effective: A daily or a weekly formative test? Perspectives on Medical Education, 2015, vol. 4 (2), pp. 73-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0178-8
- Boman B. Vietnam’s exceptional educational achievement: A thematic review of the emerging literature. Discover Education, 2022, vol. 1 (1), pp. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-022-00014-x
- Rytkönen H., Parpala A., Lindblom-Ylänne S., Virtanen V., Postareff L.Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instructional Science, 2012, vol. 40 (2), pp. 241-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9176-3
- Sharmin V. G., Sharmina T. N., Sharmin D. V. Exploration of gender-determined differences in the level of university students' diligence. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13 (6), pp. 37-59. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/PYGKSE DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.02
- Akhmetvalieva M. G., Mergenova Zh. M. Formation of students' responsibility for learning: Module and directions of education of the value system. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 2021, no. 3, pp. 95-108. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/RRDSQU DOI: https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.57.3.05
- Van Houtte M., Demanet J., Stevens P. A. J. Curriculum tracking and teacher evaluations of individual students: Selection, adjustment or labeling? Social Psychology of Education, 2013, vol. 16 (3), pp. 329-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9216-8
10.Spielmann J., Yoon H. J. R., Ayoub M., Chen Y., Eckland N. S., Trautwein U., Zheng A., Roberts B. W. An in-depth review of conscientiousness and educational issues. Educational Psychology Review, 2022, vol. 34 (4), pp. 2745-2781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09693-2
11.Vera Gil S. The Influence of gender on academic performance and psychological resilience, and the relationship between both: Understanding the differences through gender stereotypes. Trends in Psychology,2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-024-00370-7
12.Verbree A. R., Hornstra L., Maas L., de Meij L. W. Conscientiousness as a predictor of the gender gap in academic achievement. Research in Higher Education, 2023, vol. 64 (3), pp. 451-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09716-5
13.Galos D. R., Strauss S., Hinz T. Discrimination or a competitive climate? Why women cannot translate their better high school grades into university grades. Research in Higher Education, 2024, vol. 65 (8), pp. 1804-1825. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09815-5
14.Wrigley-Asante C., Ackah C. G., Frimpong L. K. Gender differences in academic performance of students studying science technology engineering and mathematics (stem) subjects at the university of Ghana. SN Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 3, pp. 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00608-8
15.Eshetu A. A., Alemu S., Mulat A., Abdu A., Gobezie B., Muluken E., Anagaw A., Mulugeta E., Hailemariam E., Aragaw S. Examining the gender gap: academic performance disparity in regional and national examinations in Dessie city administration, Ethiopia. Discover Education, 2025, vol. 4 (1), pp. 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00575-7
16.Schrempft S., Piumatti G., Gerbase M.W., Baroffio A. Pathways to performance in undergraduate medical students: Role of conscientiousness and the perceived educational environment. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2021, vol. 26 (5), pp. 1537-1554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10059-6
17.Jiang L., Zhang S., Li X., Luo F. How grit influences high school students’ academic performance and the mediation effect of academic self-efficacy and cognitive learning strategies. Current Psychology, 2023, vol. 42 (1), pp. 94-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01306-x
18.Icekson T., Slobodin O. When is optimistic expectation most beneficial? Optimistic expectations, conscientiousness and academic performance in a sample of freshman students. Current Psychology, 2024, vol. 43 (46), pp. 35205-35216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07008-y
19.Wu X., Liu H., Xiao L., Yao M. Reciprocal relationship between learning interest and learning persistence: Roles of strategies for self-regulated learning behaviors and academic performance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2024, vol. 53 (9), pp. 2080-2096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-01994-9
20.Soseliya I. L. Motivation of the students and psychological difficulties wehn learning foreign languages. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2009, no. 2, pp. 45-50. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/KOHROH
21.Slepko Yu. N. Psychological content and dynamics of learning activity goals in students of pedagogical university. Psychological Science and Education, 2022, vol. 27 (2), pp. 69-81. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/OFBGKM DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270206
22.Zheng Q., Shi Y. Can service scholarships boost academic performance? Causal evidence from China’s free teacher education scholarship. Higher Education, 2024, vol. 89 (3), pp. 691-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01242-w
23.Gill E., Guterman O., Neuman A. Different motivation, different achievements: The relationship of motivation and dedication to academic pursuits with final grades among Jewish and Arab undergraduates studying together. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2024, vol. 11 (1), pp. 1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03548-7
24.Wild S., Neef C. Analyzing the associations between motivation and academic performance via the mediator variables of specific mathematic cognitive learning strategies in different subject domains of higher education. International Journal of STEM Education, 2023, vol. 10 (1), pp. 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00423-w
25.Rochev K. V., Kudelin A. G. Prediction of students’ academic performance: the correlation between the results of the unified state exam and academic success. Psychological Science and Education, 2025, vol. 30 (1), pp. 158-170. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/NIYMDT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2025300112










