Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 34–60
© Politsinskaya E. V., Lizunkov V. G., 2025
UDC: 
378.2+001.891.57+331.1

Organizational teaching model for the development of future professionals’ intellectual and innovative potential: Content and effectiveness of implementation

Politsinskaya E. V. 1 (Yurga, Russian Federation), Lizunkov V. G. 1 (Yurga, Russian Federation)
1 Tomsk Polytechnic University Yurga Institute of Technology
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 13
Abstract: 

Introduction. The main problem of the research is the formation of future engineers’ intellectual and innovative potential in the conditions of the modern educational process at the university. The purpose of the article is to identify and substantiate the content and effectiveness of the organizational teaching model aimed at formation and development of intellectual and innovative potential of future professionals.
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the research includes systematic, learner-centered, activity-based and neuropedagogical approaches that identify key aspects of developing intellectual and innovative potential of a personality.
The study used the methods of observation, monitoring the dynamics of students’ learning, as well as a quantitative analysis of data obtained by means of questionnaires and testing technical students at the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University.
Results. Based on the theoretical analysis of the research problem, the component composition of the organizational teaching model for the development of the intellectual and innovative potential of future engineers was identified, including stages of project implementation, the content component and methodological techniques. The content of the model components demonstrates the importance of an integrated approach to the formation of intellectual and innovative potential of future engineers in the context of modern higher education. The effectiveness of the proposed model is proven by the results of a comparative analysis of the control and experimental groups, the calculation of the χ2 criterion, indicating a significant increase in the level of intellectual and innovative potential in the experimental group. The data obtained allow the authors to assert that the integration of neuropedagogy elements into the organization of project activities significantly increases students’ readiness to solve complex scientific and technological problems, contributing to preparing highly qualified professionals in demand in the modern labor market.
Conclusions. The results of the study allow the authors to conclude that the organizational teaching model for developing the intellectual and innovative potential of future professionals, implemented within the framework of the educational process at the university, ensures a high level of the intellectual and innovative potential and, as a consequence, the achievement of high learning outcomes

Keywords: 

Intellectual and innovative potential; Future engineer; Project activities; Principles of neuropedagogy; High learning outcomes.

For citation:
Politsinskaya E. V., Lizunkov V. G. Organizational teaching model for the development of future professionals’ intellectual and innovative potential: Content and effectiveness of implementation. Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 34–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2504.02
References: 
  1. Galushko M. V., Alabina Yu. Yu. Use of intellectual potential as a condition of innovative development of the region. Questions of Innovation Economy, 2019, vol. 9 (3), pp. 771-786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.9.3.40878
  2. Prokopenko S. A., Gritskevich T. I., Ravochkin N. N., Dyagileva A. V. The essence of the intelligent and innovation potential of a mining engineer. Mountain Information Analytical Bulletin, 2020, no. 7, pp. 155-177. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43162664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2020-7-0-155-177
  3. Solodikhina A. A. Solodikhina M. V. Development of innovative competence model and its testing in the course “techno-startup”. Integration of Education, 2023, vol. 27 (2), pp. 289-308. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54044144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.111.027.202302.289-308
  4. Nikitina O. A., Nikitina A. R. Emotional intelligence: Notion, structure, genesis. Psychology and Pedagogy of Service Activities, 2024, no. 3, pp. 58-63. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=73524298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2658-638X-2024-3-58-63
  5. Khukhlaev O. E., Gritsenko V. V., Dagbaeva S. B., Konstantinov V. V., Kornienko T. V., Kulesh Е. V., Tudupova T. T. Intercultural competence and effectiveness of intercultural communication. Experimental Psychology, 2022, vol. 15 (1), pp. 88-102. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48546532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150106 
  6. Berqat, Setinawati, Basrowi. The role of educational management in enhancing innovation and problem-solving competencies for students towards global competitiveness: A literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2025, vol. 11, pp. 101280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101280 
  7. Dečman N., Rep A. Digitalization in teaching economic disciplines: Past, current and future perspectives. Business Systems Research, 2022, vol. 13 (2), pp. 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0012
  8. Xu Y., Liu W. A project-based learning approach: a case study in China. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 2010, vol. 11 (3), pp. 363-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9093-1  
  9. Lihui Xu. Innovative interdisciplinary models in engineering education: Transforming practices across global universities. Engineering Education Review, 2024, vol. 2 (3), pp. 129-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2024.0846 
  10. Sahin A. The Role of Interdisciplinary Project-Based. In: STEM Education 2.0, pp. 93–103. Brill Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004405400_006 
  11. Giang N. N. Project-based learning on the topic of aromatic wax production. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 2021, vol. 8 (4), pp. 395-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.395.407
  12. Haatainen O., Aksela, M. Project-based learning in integrated science education: Active teachers' perceptions and practices. International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 2021, vol. 9 (1), pp. 149-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392
  13. Hanif S., Wijaya A. F. C., Winarno N. Enhancing students' creativity through stem project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2019, vol. 2 (2), pp. 50-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271
  14. Hawari A. D. M., Noor A. I. M. Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian Journal of University Education, 2020, vol. 16 (3), pp. 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11072 
  15. Yakovleva N. O., Yakovlev E. V. Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education. Pacific Science Review, 2014, vol. 16 (2), pp. 75-80. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28859467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.016  
  16. Tikhomirova D., Tregubova A., Ternikov A. Gamification in education and demand for acquired skills: A systematic review. Educational Studies Moscow, 2024, issue 1 (3). P. 151-179 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=75140882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17587
  17. Alekseeva L., Azar J., Gine M., Samila S., Taska B. The demand for AI skills in the labor market. Labour Economics, 2021, vol. 71, pp. 102002. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=73034408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102002
  18. Schmidt L., Lebreton M., Cléry-Melin M.-L., Daunizeau J., Pessiglione M. Neural mechanisms underlying motivation of mental versus physical effort. PLoS Biology, 2012, vol. 10 (2), pp. e1001266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266
  19. Allard E. S., Kensinger E. A. Age-related differences in neural recruitment during the use of cognitive reappraisal and selective attention as emotion regulation strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 5, p. 296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00296
  20. Zaidi F. Z., Zaidi A. R. Strategies for improving memory in students. Journal of Shalamar Medical & Dental College, 2022, vol. 3 (2), pp. 99-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53685/jshmdc.v3i2.130
  21. Politsinskaya E. V., Trofimov A. V., Lizunkov V. G. Neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster: Evaluating the effectiveness of preparing labor resources. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13 (6), pp. 145-171. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=58731701 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.07
  22. Bostrom R. P., Gupta S., Hill J. R. Peer-to-peer technology in collaborative learning networks: Applications and research issues. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 2008, vol. 4 (1), pp. 36-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2008.019736.
  23. Stigmar M. Peer-to-peer teaching in higher education: A critical literature review. Mentoring and Tutoring, 2016, vol. 24 (2), pp. 124–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963.
  24. Spiridonov V., Loginov N., Ivanchei I., Kurgansky A. The role of motor activity in insight problem solving (the case of the nine-dot problem) Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, pp. 2. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38647996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00002

 

Date of the publication 31.08.2025