Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and motivational learning outcomes in teaching fundamentals of safety and homeland protection in the context of developing readiness for decision-making and risk assessment
Introduction. Modern school practice in teaching Fundamentals of Safety and Homeland Protection is characterized by the predominance of reproductive teaching methods that limit the development of students’ ability to make independent decisions and critically assess risks under conditions of uncertainty. This leads to a gap between the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and the formation of practical skills, behavioral models, and intrinsic motivation that ensure readiness to act in dangerous situations. There arises a need to theoretically substantiate and assess learning outcomes that reflect the complex development of cognitive, behavioral, and motivational-personal components of students’ actions in risk conditions.
The aim of the study is to examine the impact of situational learning in the Fundamentals of Safety and Homeland Protection course on the development of students’ cognitive, behavioral, and motivational characteristics that form their ability to make decisions and critically evaluate risks.
Materials and Methods. The empirical part of the study was conducted as a teaching experiment involving 118 eighth-grade students divided into control and experimental groups. To assess the effectiveness of the author’s teaching procedure based on the integration of the situational approach and Bloom’s taxonomy–testing, structured observation, and questionnaires were applied. Data processing was carried out using methods of mathematical statistics and content analysis.
Results. The authors identified a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group: the proportion of students with high scores increased by 20.7% (p = 0.004). Cognitive activity grew by 40 %; a strong positive correlation was found between academic motivation and learning outcomes (r = 0.87). The study also revealed the development of students’ decision-making readiness, civic responsibility, and patriotic identity.
Conclusions. It was experimentally confirmed that the integration of the situational approach with Bloom’s taxonomy significantly enhances cognitive, behavioral, and motivational learning outcomes. The proposed teaching procedure develops students’ readiness for decision-making and risk assessment, overcoming the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the Fundamentals of Safety and Homeland Protection course.
Practice-oriented learning; Academic motivation; Safety behavior skills; Cognitive activity; Risk-oriented thinking; Situational approach; Fundamentals of Safety Protection; Bloom’s taxonomy
- Bates S. P., Galloway R. K., Homer D., Riise J. Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 2014, vol. 10 (2), pp. 020105. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020105
- Benevolenza M. A., DeRigne L. The impact of climate change and natural disasters on vulnerable populations: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2018, vol. 29 (2), pp. 266-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1527739
- Chuwa E. I., Maro W. E. Experiences and challenges of using the revised Bloom’s taxonomy in teaching and learning geography: A study of ordinary-level secondary school teachers in Tanzania. Cogent Education, 2025, vol. 12 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2553834
- Cong-Lem N. Vygotsky’s, Leontiev’s and Engeström’s cultural historical (activity) theories: overview, clarifications and implications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2022, vol. 56 (4), pp. 1091-1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09703-6
- Duckett S. M., Rushton E. A. C., Löfstedt R. Where is risk education? Exploring risk education in secondary schools in England. Journal of Risk Research, 2025, pp. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2496225
- Egerau A. Developing situational adaptation skills in young students through multimedia learning strategies. Journal Plus Education, 2025, vol. 38, pp. 147-155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24250/jpe/si/2025/AME/
- Henriksen D., Mishra P., Creely E. The role of creative risk taking and productive failure in education and technology futures. TechTrends, 2021, vol. 65, pp. 602-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00622-8
- Ivo A. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. International Review of Education, 2011, vol. 57 (1-2), pp. 219-221. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8
- Kai L., Yi Z., Jiangmin Z., Hongrui Z., Xiangyu X. The application of situational teaching in large unit teaching of high school physical education. Frontiers in Educational Research, 2024, vol. 7 (9), pp. 59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2024.070910
10. Krathwohl D. R. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 2002, vol. 41 (4), pp. 212-218. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
11. Mahapoonyanont N., Phinla W., Mahapoonyanont T., Jeerarat K. Visible learning: Educational innovation for shaping 21st century Thai teachers. Library Progress (International), 2025, vol. 45, pp. 166-176. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5102877
12. Ou Y. An analysis on the application of situational teaching method in middle school English education. Education Journal, 2023, vol. 6 (10), pp. 61-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31058/j.edu.2023.61008
13. Rodeghiero N. I., Amaral F. G. Teaching occupational health and safety in engineering using active learning: A systematic review. Safety Science, 2024, vol. 171, pp. 106391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106391
14. Seddighi H., Salmani I., Javadi M. H., Seddighi S. Child abuse in natural disasters and conflicts: A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2021, vol. 22 (1), pp. 176-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019835973
15. Danchenko S. P., Kostetskaya G. A. “Basics of safety and protection of the motherland”: Awaiting a new course. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 88 (4), pp. 73-83. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=67202609
16. Danchenko S. P., Kostetskaya G. A. School course OBZH: New standards, old problem. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 86 (10), pp. 65-73. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49787547
17. Danchuk I. I., Pavlova M. I. Distinctiveness of designing situational tasks in the educational practice of higher professional school. World of University Science: Culture, Education, 2023, no. 5, pp. 61-68. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2658-6983-2023-5-61-68
18. Polyakova K. A., Polyakov R. Yu., Volynkina N. V. Future technosphere safety specialists’ risk-based thinking formation: Theoretical and methodological aspect. Psychology of Education in a Multicultural Space, 2024, no. 2, pp. 115-124. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24888/2073-8439-2024-66-2-106-115
19. Soltanbekova O., Mishchenko I., Sharonova T. Effectiveness of using B. Bloom's taxonomy when teaching students Russian as a foreign language. Bulletin of Karaganda University. Pedagogy Series, 2023, no. 1, pp. 183-191. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31489/2023Ped1/183-191










