Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 128–154
UDC: 
167.7+316.3+316.752+37.01

Cognitive-reflexive personality development: Evaluating the impact of the changing information and educational environment

Pushkareva E. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Pushkarev Y. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents the results of a research investigation on the problem of modern individuals’ cognitive development, the mechanisms of formation of their reflexivity in modern conditions of societal information development.
The aim of this study is to assess and identify the features of the impact of changing information and educational environment on cognitive processes of modern individuals, which determine transformations in the development of the mechanisms of their reflexivity based on a critical review of current research investigations.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on the systematic approach, the theory of philosophy of education, and the cognitive theory of personality. The research methodology involves analysis and generalization of international and Russian scholarly works that consider the problems of information development of society, the specifics of the formation of cognitive processes in the development of education.
Results. The article presents the results of the theoretical study, assessment and systematization of the impact of changing information and educational environment on cognitive-reflexive mechanisms of modern personality development.
The critical review of current studies has shown that the issues of assessing and identifying the features of the impact of the changing information and educational environment on the cognitive processes of a modern personality, which determine the transformation in the development of the mechanisms of its reflexivity, are significantly updated at the present time in connection with changes in the cognitive and educational fields.
It is shown that nowadays the problem of changing development orientation within the education system is significantly relevant with the focus on global transformations of social development, which entailed transformations in the higher education system, which determined the transformations not only of the university, but also the entire education system.
Special attention is paid to the changes in the ontological and methodological foundations of changes taking place in modern conditions. Currently, the problems of forming critical thinking and determining personal mechanisms of reflexive cognition require a revision of theoretical foundations.
As a result, the basic understanding of modern changes has been revealed: the problems of changes in the modern educational environment; the capabilities of the changing digital environment for the adequate functioning of the education system in modern conditions; the potential of the new educational environment for the formation of cognition of educational stakeholders.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the authors summarise the results of the analysis of modern individuals’ cognitive development, the mechanisms of developing their reflexivity in modern conditions of changing information and educational environment.

Keywords: 

Educational values; Educational transformation; Philosophy of education; Changes in the information and educational environment; Cognitive-reflective personality development.

For citation:
Pushkareva E. A., Pushkarev Y. V. Cognitive-reflexive personality development: Evaluating the impact of the changing information and educational environment. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 128–154. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2406.06
References: 
  1. Lv Y. Cultivation of teenagers' digital media literacy and network legal literacy in the era of digital virtual technology. Scientific Programming, 2022, vol. 2022, pp.  2978460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2978460
  2. Xie C. Effectiveness of computer-aided technology for teaching English courses in the internet era. Scientific Programming, 2022, vol. 2022, pp. 2133028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2133028
  3. Peng X. Holistic language teaching method in college English vocabulary teaching under big data and multimedia environment. Scientific Programming, 2022, vol. 2022, pp.  4250202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4250202
  4. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Specifics of information and communication developments in education: Analysis of value changes before and after 2020 (A critical review). Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (6), pp. 96–119. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.06
  5. Coiro Ju., Dobler E., Pelekis K. Laying the foundation for personal digital inquiry. From Curiosity to Deep Learning, 2023, pp. 32–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032681146-5
  6. Kormiltseva E. A., Adelshin A. V., Varova N. L., Starikov V. I., Shmakova A. P., Burmistrova N. A. Researching the possibilities of using digital financial instruments by future economists for sustainable development purposes. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (4), pp. 93–116. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2404.05
  7. Elizarova L. V., Trubitsina O. I., Semenova E. Y., Kostina E. A., Bagramova N. V. Characteristic features of designing the system of students’ practical training in the context of education transformation. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (1), pp. 7–24. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.01
  8. Kayra Z. Enhancing English vocabulary learning through mobile apps: A new paradigm in educational technology. Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning (RSELTL), 2024, vol. 2 (2), pp. 87–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v2i2.41
  9. Wiliam D. Studies in educational evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2011, vol. 37 (1), pp.  3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001 
  10. Golubinskaya A. V., Viakhireva V. V. Fundamental theoretical conflicts in the science of critical thinking. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 100–123. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.05
  11. Ennis R. Incorporating critical thinking in the curriculum: An introduction to some basic issues. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 1997, vol. 16 (3), pp. 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews199716312
  12. Wright I. Challenging students with the tools of critical thinking. The Social Studies, 2002, vol. 93 (6), pp. 257–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990209600175
  13. Ivanova S. V., Ivanov O. B. Systemic transformation on the sphere of education in the context of the digital technologies introduction. Values and Meanings, 2020, no. 5, pp.  6–27. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6427-2020-10042 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44157917
  14. Zhukova T. A., Bogoslovskiy V. I., Drobotenko Y. B., Dyuzhakova M. V., Dzhurinsky А. N. Regional peculiarities of training teachers for education systems of multicultural regions: Substantiation of the forecasting model. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (4), pp. 143–170. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2404.07
  15. Soloveva T. S. The Russian education system: An overview of global challenges. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2019, no. 9, pp. 201–209. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10923 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41495321
  16. Asmolov A. G., Guseltseva M. S. Value sense of sociocultural modernization of education: From reforms to reformation. RSUH Bulletin. Psychology. Pedagogics. Education Series, 2019, no. 1, pp. 18–43. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2019-1-18-43  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39143022
  17. Braun H. I., Singer J. D. Assessment for monitoring of education systems: International comparisons. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2019, vol. 683 (1), pp. 75–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843804
  18. Maaliw R. R. Adaptive virtual learning environment based on learning styles for personalizing e-learning system: Design and implementation. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 2020, vol. 8 (6), pp. 3398–3406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.F8901.038620
  19. Goss H. Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2022, vol. 48 (2), pp. 102485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
  20. Farias-Gaytan S., Aguaded I., Ramirez-Montoya M. S. Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2023, vol. 10 (1), pp. 386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9
  21. Tummons J. Higher education, theory, and modes of existence: Thinking about universities with Latour. Higher Education Research and Development, 2021, vol. 40 (6), pp. 1313–1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1804337
  22. Laurens-Arredondo L. A. Information and communication technologies in higher education: Comparison of stimulated motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 2023, pp. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12160-2   
  23. Bordovsky G. A. Problems and tasks of higher pedagogical education at the present stage of country’s development. Higher Education in Russia, 2023, vol. 32 (6), pp. 9–18. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-9-18 URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54145950
  24. Serkova V. A. Formation of conceptual representations of reality on the basis of reflective practice (research experience). Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 70–87. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.04
  25. Tikholaz T. M., Kazakova I. V., Kocheulova O. A. The study of newly-qualified teachers’ psychological well-being and personal reflection. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (5), pp. 27–45. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2405.02
  26. Kotlyarova I. O., Serikov G. N. Resource approach to education for sustainable development. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Education. Pedagogical sciences, 2022, no. 2, pp. 6-20. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/ped220201   URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48591897
  27. Permyakov A. V., Petryakov P. A., Shirin A. G., Tsyvunina A. D., Pevzner M. N. Professional and personal development of newly-qualified teachers as a factor in sustainable development of the region. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (5), pp. 158–180. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2405.08
  28. Kicherova M. N., Trifonova I. S., Payusova T. I. Principles of instructional design in adult education: Vectors of change and modelling opportunities based on educational technologies. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 44–69. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.03
  29. Vlasova O. A., Kornienko A. G. Actor-network interpretation of phenomena and current issues of education: The historicist grounds and specificity. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (1), pp. 80–95. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.04
  30. Pozdnyakov M. V. Critical thinking: Its essence and presence in the educational programs of Russian universities. Tomsk State University Journal, 2023, no. 492, pp. 68–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/492/8  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=55367883
  31. Anggraeni D., Binar K., Suprapto N., Shofiyah N., Jatmiko B. Systematic review of problem based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2023, vol. 49 (3), pp. 101334. DOI: https://doi.org/101334.10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
  32. Bensley D. A. Critical thinking, intelligence, and unsubstantiated beliefs: An integrative review. Journal of Intelligence, 2023, vol. 11 (11), pp. 207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11110207
  33. Dwyer C. P. An evaluative review of barriers to critical thinking in educational and real-world settings. Journal of Intelligence, 2023, vol. 11 (6), pp. 105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060105
  34. Pettersson H. From critical thinking to criticality and back again. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2023, vol. 57 (2), pp. 478–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad021
  35. Trofimov V. M. Sustainable dynamics of neural connections: A new concept of the emergence of cognition. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 89–112. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.05
  36. Betzel R. F., Faskowitz J., Sporns O. Living on the edge: network neuroscience beyond nodes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2023, vol. 27 (11), pp. 1068–1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.009
  37. Shamov A. N., Merkish N. E., Printsipalova O. V. Research into the capacities of the global digital environment for obtaining cultural and conceptual information at institutional and individual levels. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (1), pp. 168–183. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.08
  38. Shishkina A. A., Ponomarenko E. P., Gareyev A. A., Krasavina Y. V. Peculiarities of developing deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ study skills in the digital learning environment based on gamification. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (5), pp. 182–199. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2405.09
  39. Lambton-Howard D., Kiaer J., Kharrufa A. 'Social media is their space': student and teacher use and perception of features of social media in language education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2021, vol. 40 (16), pp. 1700–1715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1774653
  40. Liu Y. Research on Online and Offline Mixed Teaching Practice Based on College Film and Television Literature Course. Scientific Programming, 2022, vol. 2022, pp. 3336282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3336282
  41. Wu F., Huang Sh., Cheng L. Analyzing the Application of Multimedia Technology Assisted English Grammar Teaching in Colleges. Scientific Programming, 2022, vol. 2022, pp. 4422754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4422754
  42. Cuervo Sánchez S. L., Foronda Rojo A., Rodríguez Martínez A., Medrano Samaniego C. Media and information literacy: a measurement instrument for adolescents. Educational Review, 2021, vol. 73 (4), pp. 487–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1646708
  43. Chambers D. Media and Moral Education: A Philosophy of Critical Engagement. Educational Theory, 2020, vol. 70 (6), pp. 807–816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12455
  44. Abitov R. N., Safin R. S. Analysis of the effectiveness of clustering algorithms for multimodal samples using computer simulation of an educational experiment. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 125–151. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.06
  45. Rodriguez M. Z., Comin C. H., Casanova D., Bruno O. M., Amancio D. R., Costa L. da F., Rodrigues F. A. Clustering algorithms: A comparative approach. PloS ONE, 2019, vol. 14 (1), pp. e021023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210236
  46. Stefaniak J., Xu M. An Examination of the Systemic Reach of Instructional Design Models: a Systematic Review. TechTrends, 2020, vol. 64 (5), pp. 710–719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00539-8
  47. Milkevich O. A. Features of labour education of students in modern social and educational environments. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (5), pp. 7–26. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2405.01
  48. Vershinina T. S., Kocheva O. L., Shkurin D. V., Maltsev A. V. Job satisfaction as a condition for teachers’ psychological well-being: An empirical study. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (4), pp. 27–50. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2404.02
  49. Konstantinidis E. I., Petsani D., Bamidis P. D. Teaching university students co-creation and living lab methodologies through experiential learning activities and preparing them for RRI. Health Informatics Journal, 2021, vol. 27 (1), pp. 1460458221991204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458221991204
  50. Kormiltseva E. A., Baygusheva I. A., Varova N. L., Starikov V. I., Shmakova A. P., Burmistrova N. A. Study of the future economists’ readiness to use artificial intelligence based on the hierarchy analysis method. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 113–134. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.06
  51. Goulet-Pelletier J.-Ch., Gaudreau P., Cousineau D., Do students motivated to learn have better creative abilities? Learning and Individual Differences, 2023, vol. 106, pp. 102327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102327
  52. Samra R., França A. B., Lucassen M. F. G., Waterhouse P. A network approach to understanding distance learners' experience of stress and mental distress whilst studying. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2023, vol. 20 (1), pp. 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00397-3 
  53. Oyewobi L. O., Bolarin G., Oladosu N. T., Jimoh R. A. Influence of stress and coping strategies on undergraduate students' performance. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2021, vol. 13 (4), pp. 1043–1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2020-0066
  54. Nguyen P.-B.-T., Degrave P., Van Steendam E., Sercu L. Self-determination in EMI education. A study of university students’ motivation in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2023, vol. 5, pp. 100295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100295
  55. Goss H. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education and in Academic Libraries: A Review of the Literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2022, vol. 48 (2), pp. 102485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
  56. Kazakova I. V., Tikholaz T. M., Sarf E. A., Bel’skaya L. V. Investigating changes in prevailing mental states among students with different levels of academic performance. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 231–249. (In Russian)  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.10
  57. Jehanghir M., Ishaq K., Akbar R. A. Effect of learners’ autonomy on academic motivation and university students’ grit. Education and Information Technologies, 2023, pp. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11976-2 
  58. Bostrom L., Bostedt G., Eriksson V., Stenberg I. Student conceptions of motivation to study revealed through phenomenography: Differences and similarities among primary school students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2023, vol. 8 (1), pp. 100505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100505
  59. Blair C., Seulki K. A Hierarchical Integrated Model of Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, vol. 13, pp. 725828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.725828
  60. Dvoinin A.M., Trotskaya E. S. Cognitive predictors of academic success: How do the general patterns work in the early stages of education? Psychological Science and Education, 2022, vol. 27 (2), pp. 42-52. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270204  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49179021
  61. Tretyakova V. S., Kaigorodova A. E., Sharov A. A., Zeer E. F. Basic components of a personal resource determining a personified subject of activity: The impact on university students’ academic achievement. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 206–230. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.09
  62. Gertsen S. M., Babich O. A., Shutova E. Y., Ojgibesova N. Y. The effectiveness of metacognitive strategies for online reading in a foreign language at university. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 24–42. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.02
  63. Aziz A., Nordin N., Yatim A., Shaidin S., Saad N., Rahmat N. A Study of the Relationship between Metacognitive Reading Strategies among Undergraduates International. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 13 (6), pp. 253–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17044
  64. Bakhsh I., Soomro A., Bughio F. Increasing motivation at university level: A paradigm of action research. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2015, vol. 6 (1), pp. 140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0601.17
  65. Shin M. Effects of project-based learning on students’ motivation and self-efficacy. English teaching, 2018, vol. 73 (1), pp. 95–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95
  66. Madani Y., Ezzikouri H., Erritali M., Hssina B. Finding optimal pedagogical content in an adaptive e-learning platform using a new recommendation approach and reinforcement learning. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2020, vol. 11 (10), pp. 3921–3936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01627-1
  67. Levenkova A. Y., Trifonova I. S., Zemlyanova M. P., Muraveva N. G. Study of International Relations students’ motivation: Assessing the effectiveness of educational process management via Action Research strategy. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 32–53.  (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.02
  68. Shin M., Bolkan S. Intellectually stimulating students' intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 2021, vol. 70 (2), pp. 146–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959
  69. Kowalczuk Z., Czubenko M. Cognitive motivations and foundations for building intelligent decision-making systems. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, vol. 56 (4), P. 3445–3472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10255-9
  70. Ullah M. S., Hoque Md. R., Aziz M. A., Islam M. Analyzing students e-learning usage and post-usage outcomes in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 2023, vol. 5, pp. 100146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100146
  71. Bakel M. V., Vaiman V., Vance C. M., Haslberger A. Broadening international mentoring: Contexts and dynamics of expatriate and HCN intercultural mentoring. Journal of Global Mobility, 2021, vol. 10 (1), pp. 14–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-06-2021-0065
  72. Manderstedt L., Anderström H., Sädbom R. F., Bäcklund J. Consensus and discrepancies on quality: Mentor and student teacher statements on work placement mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2022, vol. 116, pp. 103762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103762
  73. Kormiltseva E. A., Sokur E. A., Filimonov V. A., Shmakova A. P., Burmistrova N. A. Evaluating the functions of the teacher-producer for preparing prospective economists in the modern context of education system digitalization. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (1), pp. 149–166. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.07
  74. Lavrinenko S. V., Startseva E. V. Studying the characteristics of mentoring university students with the main focus on supporting their professional development. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (2), pp. 179–204. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.08
  75. Kalabina I. A., Nikitina E. A., Nikolaeva E. I. Peculiarities of preschool children’s usage of digital gadgets determined by adults. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 7–23. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.01
  76. Filippova T. A., Verba A. S., Orlov K. V., Sokolova L. V. The relationship between the level of preschoolers’ cognitive development and the success of their adjustment to primary school. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (5), pp. 200–222. (In Russian)  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2405.10
  77. Polyanina A. K. Information security of childhood in the context of a new media culture. Information Society, 2019, no. 1-2, pp. 108-115. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39555284
  78. Yanak A. L. Children and parents in the information space: Interaction, risks and safety strategies. Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. Series: Sociology. Political Science, 2021, vol. 21 (1), pp. 64-71. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45483250
  79. Kerai S., Almas A., Guhn M., Forer B., Oberle E. Screen time and developmental health: Results from an early childhood study in Canada. BMC Public Health, 2022, vol. 22 (1), pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12701-3
  80. Undheim M. Children and teachers engaging together with digital technology in early childhood education and care institutions: a literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2022, vol. 30 (3), pp. 472–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1971730
  81. Ermakova E. V., Voronina E. V., Tsalikova I. K., Sorokina T. I., Katashinskaya L. I. Features of forming coordination abilities and properties of the nervous system of schoolchildren (aged 11-12) at physical education classes. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 182–200.  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.09
  82. Papadakis S., Alexandraki F., Zaranis N. Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 2022, vol. 27, pp. 2717–2750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10718-6  URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10718-6
  83. Khaustov S. A., Dubynin V. A. Characteristic features of brain development and remedial methods for autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Review of current research. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14 (3), pp. 154–181. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2403.08
Date of the publication 31.12.2024