Education students’ readiness for academic mobility: A study of characteristics features
2 Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky
Introduction. The main research problem of the article is to obtain up-to-date knowledge about the trends in the development of readiness of Russian pedagogical universities students for academic mobility within the country.
The purpose of the article is to identify the features of Education students’ readiness for academic mobility.
Materials and Methods. The research methodology is based on the ideas of axiological, competence-based and system-activity approaches. Theoretical and empirical methods employed in this research include: theoretical analysis, synthesis, classification; online testing aimed at identifying various aspects of pedagogical university students’ readiness for academic mobility within the country; mathematical methods of data processing.
Results. The research findings include the following:
– the characteristics of pedagogical university students’ readiness for academic mobility are considered with the focus on the degree programme and as an important academic and professional quality of a future teacher, which has its own structure consisting of value-motivational, cognitive, activity, reflexive, and communicative components, and determines the development of the student’s personality;
– specific features of the structure of students' readiness for academic mobility are identified and it is proven that the communicative component is presented most clearly, whereas the cognitive component is expressed to the least extent. It was found that students who took part in academic mobility programmes are characterized by a significantly higher level of all components within academic mobility readiness;
–the study identifies the role of readiness for academic mobility in the general structure of the student’s personality and reveals no significant differences between male and female students in terms of readiness for academic mobility.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that it is necessary to take into account the content and structure of students’ readiness for academic mobility as their educationally important personal quality when organizing the educational process in a pedagogical university, as well as emphasize the importance of attracting students - future teachers to domestic academic mobility in order to develop their civic identity.
Academic mobility; Pedagogical university students; Readiness structure for academic mobility; Professional development; Personality structure; Teacher education; Author’s questionnaire.
- Guryanchik V. N., Makeeva T. V. Assessment of the formation of universal pedagogical competencies of undergraduate students by means of interactive simulators. Innovations in Education, 2023, no. 4, pp. 98-113. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50735919
- Gadušova Z., Haškova A., Szarszoi D. Teachers` competences evaluation: Case study. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (3), pp. 164-177. DOI: https://doi.org/110.15293/2658-6762.2003.09
- Koryakovtseva O. A. Modernization of the professional development system of scientific and pedagogical workers in conditions of university. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2023, no. 6, pp. 8-17. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=59855363
- Fedina L. V. Academic mobility in higher education: Contemporary discourses. Kant, 2019, no. 4, pp. 347-351. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=xrjpab
- Didisse J., Nguyen-Huu T. T., Tran T. A.-D. The long walk to knowledge: On the determinants of higher education mobility to Europe. The Journal of Development Studies, 2018, vol. 55 (6), pp. 1099–1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1475647
- Saribas D., Ozer F. Action research in a teacher education program: Probing into pre-service elementary teachers’ understandings of scientific practices and teaching scientific practices. Journal of Education for Teaching, 2021, vol. 48, pp. 197–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1985937
- Almazova N. I., Kostina E. A., Khalyapina L. P. The new position of foreign language as education for global citizenship. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, no. 4, pp. 7-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1604.01
- Yin X., Zong X. International student mobility spurs scientific research on foreign countries: Evidence from international students studying in China. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, vol. 16 (1), pp. 101227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101227
- Aleksandrova A. N. Academic mobility of teaching staff as а form of international university cooperation. Higher Education Today, 2021, no. 6, pp. 2-7. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46529855
10. Kryachko V. I. Academic mobility assessment: the strengths and limitations of different approaches. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2020, vol. 24 (4), pp. 130-145. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.04.040 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44753987
11. Laurens-Arredondo L. A. Information and communication technologies in higher education: Comparison of stimulated motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 2023, vol. 29(7) , pp. 8867–8892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12160-2
12. Mulyono H., Suryoputro G. The use of social media platform to promote authentic learning environment in higher education setting. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (2), pp. 105-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.07
13. Kryuchkova K. S. Virtual academic mobility of future teachers as a process and as a personality trait. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 2019, no. 3, pp. 190-194. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41200480
14. Pyoryshkova S. A. Psychological support of academic mobility among students of higher education. Psychological and Pedagogical Journal Gaudeamus, 2022, no. 2, pp. 88-96. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-231X-2022-21-2-88-96 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48964518
15. Zagvyazinskiy V. I., Volosnikova L. M., Kukuyev E. A., Patrusheva I. V. Academic mobility in teacher education. Education and Science, 2020, vol. 22 (6), pp. 31-48. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-6-31-48 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43795220
16. Noskov I. A., Maratova A. M. The criteria and evaluation parameters of the development of the students’ academic mobility. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2023, no. 6, pp. 48-54. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54633643
17. Guryanchik V. N., Makeeva T. V. Standardization of higher pedagogical education: Value-semantic aspect. Educational Technologies (Moscow), 2023, no. 1, pp. 44-55. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.52422/23077832_2023_1_44 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=53749342
18. Villegas A. M., Lucas T. Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 2002, vol. 53 (1), pp. 20-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001003
19. Krupchenko A. K., Khaladov КH.A.S., Medvedeva T. Y., Paputkova G. A., Golovina I. V. Value orientations as the basis for the formation of the axiological profile of a teacher's civic identity. Bulletin of Minin University, 2023, vol. 11 (3), pp. 1. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2023-11-3-1 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54600948
20. Fedina N. V., Dormidontov R. A., Eliseev V. K. Main trends and priorities in Russian and international studies on cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of academic success. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (6), pp. 7-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2206.01
21. Ruiz-Corbella M., Álvarez-González B. Virtual mobility as an inclusion strategy in higher education: Research on distance education master degrees in Europe, Latin America and Asia. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2014, vol. 9 (2), pp. 165-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2014.9.2.165
22. Hašková A., Lukáčová D., Noga H. Teacher’s self-assessment as a part of quality management. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 156–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.11
23. Castro P., Woodin J. A., Lundgren U., Byram M. Student mobility and internationalization in higher education: Perspectives from practitioners. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2016, vol. 16 (3), pp. 418-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1168052
24. Gulyuk L. A., Golovina I. V., Krupchenko A. K., Medvedeva T. Yu., Khaladov Kh.A. S. State educational policy: Value-target orientations of a modern teacher. Municipal Formation: Innovations and Experiment, 2023, no. 4, pp. 13-20. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54708031
25. Volosnikova L. M., Fedina L. V., Kukuev E. A., Patrusheva I. V., Ogorodnova O. V. Academic mobility for everyone: Between vision and reality. Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2019, vol. 11 (3), pp. 26-43. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2019110303 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40805414
26. Valeeva R., Ziyatdinova J., Osipov P., Oleynikova O. Development of international academic mobility: Success stories. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2020, vol. 1135, pp. 443-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40271-6_44 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43273725
27. Khodyrev A. M. Development and justification of a methodology for studying the development of value-semantic foundations of the content of Russian pedagogical education (on a sample of students of a pedagogical university). Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 2024, vol. 30 (1), pp. 5-14. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2024-30-1-5-14 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=67889523
28. Han J., Yin H., Boylan M. Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 2016, vol. 3 (1), pp. 1217819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
29. Börü N. The Factors affecting teacher-motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 2018, vol. 11 (4), pp. 761-776. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11448a
30. Othman A., Ruslan N. Intercultural communication experiences among students and teachers: Implications to in-service teacher professional development. Journal for Multicultural Education, 2020, vol. 14 (3/4), pp. 223-238. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-04-2020-0024
31. Mazilov V. A., Bugaychuk T. V. The problem of the relationship between motivation and abilities of the subject of activity. Bulletin of the Vyatka State University, 2020, no. 2, pp. 107-114. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25730/VSU.7606.20.029 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44039243
32. Chen J. Efficacious and positive teachers achieve more: Examining the relationship between teacher efficacy, emotions, and their practicum performance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2019, vol. 28 (4), pp. 327-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0427-9
33. Kuk A., Guszkowska M., Gala-Kwiatkowska A. Changes in emotional intelligence of university students participating in psychological workshops and their predictors. Current Psychology, 2019, vol. 40 (4), pp. 1864-1871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0115-1