Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 51–68
© Dunaevskaya E. B., Nikolaeva E. I., 2024
UDC: 
159.91+371.263+612.821.34

Factors determining high academic attainment in primary school (based on the longitudinal study of year 2 and year 4 Russian schoolchildren)

Dunaevskaya E. B. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation), Nikolaeva E. I. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State pedagogical university
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 138
Abstract: 

Introduction. The study attempts to solve the problem of predicting academic attainment in primary school. The main emphasis in selecting factors to predict success in learning was on personal and contextual ones. Among personal factors, executive functions were considered, which are described by many authors as significant for successful learning. Among the contextual factors, the main focus is on marks given to schoolchildren in each subject by their teacher. An attempt is made to predict children’s academic attainment in Year 4 based on data on academic attainment in Year 2.
Materials and Methods. 53 primary schoolchildren were examined first in Year 2 and then in Year 4. The following executive functions were studied: working memory (using the O.M. Razumnikova’s technique) and inhibitory control (using E. G. Vergunova and E. I. Nikolaeva’s inventory). In addition, final marks in all subjects were analyzed for each year. All schoolchildren were assigned to one of the following groups: ‘excellent students’, ‘good students’, ‘C students’. This parameter was called ‘academic attainment’. First, using factor analysis, correlations between the studied parameters were identified separately for Year 2 and Year 4, then a regression analysis was carried out, with the help of which the factors influencing high academic attainment in Year 2 and Year 4 for the same children were identified. Finally, a factor analysis was conducted in order to assess academic attainment in Year 4 based on data collected in Year 2.
Results. Factor analysis revealed that marks given to primary schoolchildren by the main teacher in Year 2 correlate with each other, that is, a halo effect is noted when marks are given not for a particular student’s answer, but according to teacher’s general impression about them. As part of the regression analysis, it was shown that in Year 2, academic attainment is determined only by final marks in the Russian language. Only in Year 4 the influence of inhibitory control and working memory on academic attainment was found. An attempt to predict academic attainment based on the results of Year 2 showed that academic attainment in Year 4 can only be predicted on the basis of final assessment in the Russian language. It can be assumed that this subject is more difficult for children than others; therefore it requires maximum inclusion of executive functions.
Conclusions. The study revealed that executive functions do not affect academic attainment in Year 2, but inhibitory control is a significant factor predicting academic attainment in Year 4. Inhibitory control at the behavioral level is assessed as the level of manifestation of volitional quality in a child. A significant relationship was found in Year 4 between high scores in Reading and high scores in Music, Art, and Science. This indicates that central processes that underlie activities in these subjects are interconnected. Finally, it was found that a significant factor predicting academic attainment in Year 4 is the mark for Russian language in Year 2.

Keywords: 

Executive functions; Final marks; Primary school; Primary schoolchildren; Academic attainment.

For citation:
Dunaevskaya E. B., Nikolaeva E. I. Factors determining high academic attainment in primary school (based on the longitudinal study of year 2 and year 4 Russian schoolchildren). Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 51–68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2404.03
References: 
  1. Dobrin A. V., Dobrina E. V., Shchuchka T. A. Psychophysiological predictors of adaptation success to the learning process in the conditions of digitalization of education: Problem statement. Bulletin of Psychophysiology, 2022, vol. 2 (1), pp. 29-37. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48612602
  2. Nikolaeva E. I., Vergunov E. G., Plotnikov S. G. The ratio of indicators of general and non-verbal intelligence and creativity with grades in subjects in fourth grade students. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2014, no. 3, pp. 106-109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38222571
  3. Nikolaeva E. I., Vergunov E. G. What are “Executive functions” and their development in ontogenesis. Theoretical And Experimental Psychology, 2017, vol. 10 (2), pp. 62-81. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30162468
  4. Nikolaeva E. I., Goncharov D. A., Borisenkova E. Y. Relationship of intelligence of a child of school age with age and education level of parents at his birth. Bulletin of Psychophysiology, 2017, no. 3, pp. 51-55. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32422594
  5. Nikolaeva E. I., Strekosova V. S., Zinovjeva I. I. The relation of educational success with the psychological characteristics of 4-7 grade students (longitudinal study). Russian Humanitarian Journal, 2017, vol. 6 (5), pp. 404-408. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30781475
  6. Razumnikova O. M., Nikolaeva E. I. Age characteristics of inhibition control in the model of proactive interference. Questions of psychology, 2019, no. 2, pp. 124-132. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38533324
  7. Semerikov A.V., Glazyrin M. A. Simulation of a process model of functioning of the enterprises for rendering of services. Information Technologies In Management And Economics, 2021, no. 4, pp. 85-94. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47570034
  8. Anderson P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 2010, vol. 8 (2), pp. 71-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724
  9. Aron A. R., Robbins T. W., Poldrack R. A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2014, vol. 18 (4), pp. 177-185. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003

10. Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. J., Allen R. J. Working memory and binding in sentence recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 2009, vol. 61 (3), pp. 438-456. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.004

11. Balkis M. Academic amotivation and intention to school drolopout: The mediation role of academic achievement and absenteeism. Asia and Pacific Journal of Education, 2018, vol. 38 (2), pp. 257-270. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460258

12. Baniqued P. L., Gallen C. L., Voss M. W., Burzynska A. Z., Wong C. N., Cooke G. E., Duffy K., Fanning J., Ehlers D. K., Salerno E. A., Aguiñaga S., McAuley E., Kramer A. F., D’Esposito M. Brain network modularity predicts exercise-related executive function gains in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2018, vol. 9, pp. 426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00426 URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29354050/

13. Cinel C., Cortis Mack C., Ward G. Towards augmented human memory: Retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2018, vol. 147 (5), pp. 632-661. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000441

14. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review in Psychology, 2013, vol. 64 (1), pp. 135-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750  URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23020641/

15. Duckworth A. L., Taxer J. L., Eskreis-Winkler L., Galla B. M., Gross J. J. Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review in Psychology, 2019, vol. 70 (1), pp. 373-399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230  URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30609915/

16. Gordon R., Smith-Spark J. H., Newton E. J., Henry L. A. Executive function and academic achievement in primary school children: The use of task-related processing speed. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, vol. 9, pp. 582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00582 URL: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/27242/

17. Iglesias-Sarmiento V., Carriedo N., Rodríguez-Villagra O. A., Pérez L. Executive functioning skills and (low) math achievement in primary and secondary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2023, vol. 235, pp. 105715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105715 URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37307647/

18. Cortés Pascual A., Moyano Muñoz N., Quílez Robres A. The relationship between executive functions and academic performance in primary education: Review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, pp. 1582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582 URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31354585/

19. Quílez-Robres A., Moyano N., Cortés-Pascual A. Task monitoring and working memory as executive components predictive of general and specific academic achievements in 6-9-year-old children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, vol. 18 (13), pp. 6681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136681 URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34206172/

20. Rowland C. A., Bates L. E., DeLosh E. L. On the reliability of retrieval-induced forgetting. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01343  URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25484872/

21. Sánchez-Pére N., Fuentes L. J., Eisenberg N., González-Salinas C. Effortful control is associated with children's school functioning via learning-related behaviors. Learning and Individual Differences, 2018, vol. 63, pp. 78-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.009  URL: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3295326

22. Willoughby M. T., Wylie A. C., Little M. H. Testing longitudinal associations between executive function and academic achievement. Developmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 55 (4), pp. 767-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000664 URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30589340/

Date of the publication 31.08.2024