Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 149–166
© Kormiltseva E. A., Sokur E. A., Filimonov V. A., Shmakova A. P., Burmistrova N. A., 2024
UDC: 
331.102+316.75+378.14

Evaluating the functions of the teacher-producer for preparing prospective economists in the modern context of education system digitalization

Kormiltseva E. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Sokur E. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Filimonov V. A. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Shmakova A. P. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Burmistrova N. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
2 Sobolev Institute of Mathematics SB RAS
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 309
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors explore the problem of enhancing the communication culture of prospective economists in the context of digital transformation and interaction with artificial intelligence systems. The purpose of the article is to identify the role of the teacher-producer in organizing teacher-student interaction in the system of economic education (secondary school-university), as well as to evaluate the functions of pedagogical production necessary to improve the communicative culture of future economists in the era of digitalization.
Materials and Methods. The Pareto principle is used as the methodological basis of the study, according to which 20% of teaching resources provide 80% of the obtained educational result. The sociological survey was conducted among students and academic staff of economic faculties at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Astrakhan State University, State Social and Humanitarian University (Kolomna) and schoolchildren of specialized classes (gymnasium 19, Omsk).
Results. The analysis of empirical data demonstrates the relevance of the role of the teacher-producer in the economic education system in the era of digitalization, as well as the positive attitude of the younger generation towards the prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence. The functions of pedagogical production are highlighted, taking into account the digital specifics of modern economic education. Using the Pareto principle confirms that mastery of the functions of pedagogical production (information, communication, organizational) in the system of economic education, constituting about 20% of the component composition of pedagogical functions, determine 80% of the educational result in terms of increasing the level of communicative culture of future economists.
Conclusions. The authors revealed and described the functions of pedagogical production are highlighted, taking into account the digital specifics of modern economic education.

Keywords: 

Economic education; School; University; Pedagogical functions; Teacher-producer; Pedagogical producing; Communicative culture; Digitalization; Collective activity; Artificial intelligence.

For citation:
Kormiltseva E. A., Sokur E. A., Filimonov V. A., Shmakova A. P., Burmistrova N. A. Evaluating the functions of the teacher-producer for preparing prospective economists in the modern context of education system digitalization. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 149–166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.07
References: 
  1. Billon M., Lera-Lopez F., Marco R. Differences in digitalization levels: A multivariate analysis studying the global digital divide. Review of World Economics, 2010, vol. 146, pp. 39–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0045-y
  2. Chimalakonda S., Nori K. V. A family of software product lines in educational technologies. Computing, 2020, vol. 102 (8), pp. 1765–1792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-019-00772-x
  3. Engin A. The cognitive ability and working memory framework: Interpreting cognitive reflection test results in the domain of the cognitive experiential theory. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2021, vol. 29 (1), pp. 227–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00721-6
  4. Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V., Kuleshov S. M., Shikhgafizov P. S. Digitalization of higher education: New trends and the factors that are associated students' grades. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2022, vol. 11 (1), pp. 59–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.59 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49243983
  5. Hurajova A., Kollarova D., Huraj L. Trends in education during the pandemic: Modern online technologies as a tool for the sustainability of university education in the field of media and communication studies. Heliyon, 2022, vol. 8 (5), pp. e09367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09367
  6. Karumbaiah S., Ocumpaugh J., Baker R. S. Context matters: Differing implications of motivation and help-seeking in educational technology. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, vol. 32 (3), pp. 685–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00272-0
  7. Kowalczuk Z., Czubenko M. Cognitive motivations and foundations for building intelligent decision-making systems. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, vol. 56 (4), pp. 3445–3472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10255-9
  8. Madani Y., Ezzikouri H., Erritali M., Hssina B. Finding optimal pedagogical content in an adaptive e-learning platform using a new recommendation approach and reinforcement learning. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2020, vol. 11 (10), pp. 3921–3936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01627-1
  9. Marone V., Heinsfeld B. D. “Everyone pursuing their dreams”. Google’s and Microsoft’s discourse one educational technology. Computers and Education Open, 2023, vol. 4, pp. 100138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100138

10. Novak E., McDaniel K., Li J. Factors that impact student frustration in digital learning environments. Computers and Education Open, 2023, vol. 5, pp. 100153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100153.

11. Ronzhina N., Kondyurina I., Voronina A., Igishev K., Loginova N. Digitalization of modern education: Problems and solutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2021, vol., 16 (4), pp. 122–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i04.18203 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46807178

12. Ullah M. S., Hoque Md. R., Aziz M. A., Islam M. Analyzing students e-learning usage and post-usage outcomes in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 2023, vol. 5, pp. 100146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100146.

13. Gairbekova P. I. Current problems of digitalization of education in Russia. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2021, no. 2, pp. 65. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30673  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45687515

14. Ivanchenko I. S. Assessing the prospects for using artificial intelligence in higher education system. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 170–194. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.08URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54390178

15. Ilaltdinova E. Yu., Frolova S. V. The role of a teacher in the digital educational world. Nizhny Novgorod Education, 2019, no. 2, pp. 34–39. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38979358

16. Noskova A. V., Glukhova D. V., Kuzmina E. I. Inequalities in education and prospects of digital learning in students' assessments. Tomsk State University Journal. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science, 2021, no. 62, pp. 29–39. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46673595

17. Noskova A. V., Glukhova D. V, Proskurina A. S., Nguyen E. H. Digitalization of the educational environment: risk assessment of distance education by Russian and Vietnamese students. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30 (1), pp. 156–167. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-156-167  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44609924

18. Rakhmetov A. T. The main functions of the teacher’s pedagogical activity. The World of Science, Culture and Education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 153–154. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32542652

19. Rakhmetov A. T. Psycho-pedagogical positions of the producer of a teacher-producer in universities. The World of Science, Culture and Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 264–265. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34904382

20. Ronzhina N. V. Learning personality in the world of digitalization and (or) humanization of education. Noospheric Studies, 2020, no. 3, pp. 69–75. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.46726/NOOS.2020.3.69-75 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44431948

21. Shulga I. I. Teaching activity in the context of digital education. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2022,vol. 6 (3), pp. 216–221. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2022-6-3-216-221  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49521966

Date of the publication 29.02.2024