Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 7–30
© Salahub N. S., Navumenka N. V., Aizman R. I., 2023
UDC: 
371.1+372.857+372.891+378.2

Evaluating STEAM-competence of prospective natural science teachers

Salahub N. S. 1 (Minsk, Republic of Belarus), Navumenka N. V. 1 (Minsk, Republic of Belarus), Aizman R. I. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank
2 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 352
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article studies the problem of developing STEAM competence in undergraduates pursuing their first degree in natural science education. The authors justify the necessity of introducing the discipline called ‘STEAM-approach in natural science education’ into the curriculum. The purpose of the article is to assess the readiness of future teachers of natural science subjects to implement STEAM education.
Materials and Methods. The research methodology follows integrative, complex and contextual principles and the essential ideas of STEAM education aimed at the formation of STEAM-competencies in future natural science teachers.
The authors summarized existing approaches to identifying key competencies, developed the structure of STEAM competence and designed the syllabus for ‘STEAM approach in natural science education’ discipline. The academic discipline ‘STEAM approach in natural science education’ was integrated in the curriculum of ‘Biology and Geography’ undergraduate programme and tested in the educational process.
Final evaluating procedures which assessed the level of developing the components of STEAM competence included the comparative analysis of data obtained by means of questionnaires of teachers and students and the comparative assessment of some components of the STEAM competence in the control and experimental groups.
Experimental work was conducted in secondary education settings in the Republic of Belarus and in the Faculty of Natural Sciences at Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank. The study involved 33 natural science teachers and 70 undergraduates doing their first degrees in the Faculty of Natural Sciences at BSPU named after Maxim Tank. The methods of theoretical analysis, comparison, questionnaire, testing, and statistical data processing were used in the study.
Results. In the course of the research, the need for the formation of STEAM competence in future teachers of natural science subjects is substantiated; a system of their preparation for the implementation of STEAM education is developed and justified.
The results of experimental work confirm that the effectiveness of training future natural science teachers to implement STEAM approach is determined by academic disciplines, which involve students in STEAM education.
Conclusions. The results obtained prove the effectiveness of developing STEAM competence in future natural science teachers by means of targeted method training provided at the first stage of higher education. Teaching ‘STEAM approach in natural science education’ discipline as one of the elements of future teachers’ method preparation for implementing STEAM education contributes to the improvement of their STEAM competence.

Keywords: 

Education; Natural science education; Natural science teachers; STEAM education; Competence; STEAM competence; STEAM approach.

For citation:
Salahub N. S., Navumenka N. V., Aizman R. I. Evaluating STEAM-competence of prospective natural science teachers. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 7–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2305.01
References: 
  1. Alimbekova G. B., Babaev D., Ajdarbekova A. A. Features of the organization of STEM-education. News of Universities of Kyrgyzstan, 2018, no. 4, pp. 126–129. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36605268  
  2. Anisimova T. I., Sabirova F. M., Shatunova O. V. Formation of educational environment of new quality in the framework of training of teachers of additional education for the implementation of STEAM. Economic and Humanitarian Studies of the Regions, 2021, no. 4, pp. 14–19. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46521765  
  3. Bayandina O. V. Analysis of approaches to understanding the “universal competencies” category. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 2021, no. 71-1, pp. 38–41. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46491105 
  4. Byuller A. G., Merkusheva M. E. From the experience of developing a system of assessment and development of meta-subject universal learning activities. Perm Pedagogical Journal, 2018, no. 9, pp. 11–15. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36869720 
  5. Vy`chuzhanina S. V. Organization of extracurricular activities using STEAM technology. Scientific and Methodological Journal Search, 2019, no. 3 (67), pp. 16–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41271207
  6. Grigoriev S. G., Kurnosenko M. V. Introduction of elements of STEM education in the training of teachers in the profile “Informatics and technology”. Izvestiya Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 5–13. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35260903 
  7. Kondakov A. M., Kosty`leva A. A. Digital education: From school for all to school for each. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Informatization of Education, 2019, vol. 16 (4), pp. 295–307. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2019-16-4-295-307  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42358361 
  8. Konyushenko S. M., Zhukova M. S., Mosheva E. A. STEAM vs STEAM-education: Changing the understanding of how to teach. Proceedings of the Baltic State Academy of Fishing Fleet: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 2018, no. 2, pp. 99–103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35248833 
  9. Pecherskaya E. A., Savelenok E. A., Artamonov D. V. Involving students in research work at the university: The mechanism and evaluation of efficiency. Innovations, 2017, no. 8, pp. 96–104. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30771399 
  10. Sologub N. S., Arshanskij E. Ya. Features of the construction of the academic discipline “STEAM-approach in natural science education” in the context of training future teachers of natural science subjects. High School, 2021, no. 3, pp. 47–52. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/qdkihn  
  11. Sologub N. S., Arshanskij E. Ya. STEAM-competence as an integrative quality of a modern teacher. P. M. Masherov Bulletin of Vitebsk State University, 2022, no. 1, pp. 54–65. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48213768 
  12. Aguilera D., Ortiz-Revilla J. STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 2021, vol. 11 (7), pp. 331–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
  13. Belbase S., Mainali B. R., Kasemsukpipat W., Tairab H., Gochoo M., Jarrah A. At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (11), pp. 2919–2955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
  14. Bertrand M. G., Namukasa I. K. STEAM education: student learning and transferable skills. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 2020, vol. 13 (1), pp. 43–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2020-0003
  15. Cedere D., Birzina R., Pigozne T., Vasilevskaya E. Perceptions of today’s young generation about meaningful learning of STEM. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 2020, vol. 78 (6), pp. 920–932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.920  
  16. Conradty C., Bogner F. X. STEAM teaching professional development works: Effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart Learning Environments, 2020, vol. 7 (1), pp. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9
  17. Dubek M., DeLuca C., Rickey N. Unlocking the potential of STEAM education: How exemplary teachers navigate assessment challenges. The Journal of Educational Research, 2021, vol. 114 (6), pp. 513–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1990002
  18. Fadzil H. M., Saat R. M., Awang K., Adli D. S. H. Students’ perception of learning STEM-related subjects through scientist-teacher-student partnership (STSP). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2019. vol. 18 (4), pp. 537–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.537
  19. Holbrook J., Rannikmäe M., Soobard R. STEAM Education – a transdisciplinary teaching and learning approach. Science Education in Theory and Practice, 2020, pp. 465–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_31
  20. Lee Y. Examining the impact of STEAM education reform on teachers’ perceptions about STEAM in Uzbekistan. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 2021, vol. 7 (1), pp. 34–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10025
  21. Lytra N., Drigas A. STEAM education- metacognition – specific learning disabilities. Scientific Electronic Archives, 2021, vol. 14 (10), pp. 41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36560/141020211442
  22. Ozkan G., Umdu Topsakal U. Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019, vol. 31 (1), pp. 95–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z
  23. Perignat E., Katz-Buonincontro J. STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2019, vol. 31, pp. 31–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
  24. Tran N.-H., Huang C.-F., Hung J.-F. Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM-Based courses on junior high school students’ scientific creativity. Frontiers in Education, 2021, vol. 6, pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.666792
Date of the publication 31.10.2023