Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 121–144
© Tarasov S. V., Proekt Y. L., 2023
UDC: 
331.1+332.02+378.2

Interaction practices between pedagogical universities and regional educational systems: Indicators of scientific and educational effectiveness

Tarasov S. V. 1 (St.-Petersburg, Russian Federation), Proekt Y. L. 1 (St.-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 79
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper raises the issue of interactions between pedagogical universities and regional educational systems (hereinafter – RES) in the context of improving the efficiency of universities. The purpose of the study was to identify and systematically describe the nature of the interaction between pedagogical universities and RES in its relationship with the indicators of scientific and educational effectiveness of universities.
Materials and Methods. The theoretical and methodological framework of the study is based on the ecosystem approach and the concepts of the educational environment. The authors used a mixed design of the study; the characteristics of the interaction between 33 federal pedagogical universities and RES were analyzed. The information posted on the official websites of universities was subjected to content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Quantitative indicators of universities that made up the sample of the study were also analyzed based on the results of monitoring the activities of higher educational institutions. The data obtained were subjected to frequency, comparative, cluster and factor analysis.
Results. It is revealed that universities are more likely to implement practices of interaction with the RES, aimed to strengthen practical preparation of students and meet the employment needs of regions. The results of the cluster analysis made it possible to substantiate the provisions on four types of practices of interaction between universities and RES: "integration", "cooperation", "development" and "presence". It is shown that universities implementing integration and developing interaction practices demonstrate higher indicators of scientific and academic efficiency. The authors come to the conclusion that with the coincidence of the targets of federal universities and RES, there is a need to develop mechanisms for their interaction. Different practices of interaction between universities and RES are generated by different strategies of their construction, which determine the role of a pedagogical university in the educational space of the region. It is shown that scientific and academic excellence of the university is associated with the implementation of integration practices of interaction.
Conclusions. According to the research finding, the nature of the interaction between federal pedagogical universities and RES is revealed and described, the key types of interaction practices reflecting the vectors of inclusion of the federal university in the regional educational space are determined.

Keywords: 

Regional educational system; Pedagogical universities; Interaction practices; Performance indicators; Scientific and educational activities; Ecosystem approach; Socio-cultural educational environment.

For citation:
Tarasov S. V., Proekt Y. L. Interaction practices between pedagogical universities and regional educational systems: Indicators of scientific and educational effectiveness. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 121–144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.06
References: 
  1. Tavares M. C., Azevedo G., Marques R. P., Bastos M. A. Challenges of education in the accounting profession in the Era 5.0: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 2023, vol. 10 (2), pp. 2220198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2220198
  2. Zhao K. Educating for wholeness, but beyond competences: Challenges to key-competences-based education in China. ECNU Review of Education, 2020, vol. 3 (3), pp. 470–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120935463
  3. Xu Y., Fang F. Internationalization of teacher education and the nation state: Rethinking nationalization in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2022, pp. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2151740
  4. Khangeldieva I. G. Educational ecosystems – a trend of development of modern Russian education in the near future. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20: Teacher Education, 2022, no. 1, pp. 68–88. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48631193
  5. Sergeeva M. G., Bedenko N. N., Machekhina O. N. Scientific foundations of personality socialization in the context of globalization and informatization of society: monograph. Moscow: Publishing house of RUDN, 2017, 152 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32549962
  6. Tarasov S. V. The educational ambience: Notion, structure, typology. Pushkin Leningrad State University Bulletin, 2011, no. 3, pp. 133–138. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18935614
  7. Tarasov S. V., Maron A. E. Innovative development of education system based on the methodology of the environmental approach. Man and Education, 2010, no. 3, pp. 14–18. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15568513
  8. Volosnikova L. M., Kukuev E. A., Ogorodnova O. V., Patrusheva I. V., Fedina L. V. Individual Educational Trajectories in University Pedagogical Education: monograph. Moscow: Publishing house "Znanie-M", 2021, 152 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48236559
  9. Makarenko A. N., Smyshlyaeva L. G., Minaev N. N., Zamyatina O. M. Digital horizons in teacher education development. Higher Education in Russia, 2020, vol. 29 (6), pp. 113–121. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-113-121 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=muraqu&ysclid=lnd6vb4bin24893587

10. Romanova M. A., Shashkina O. V., Starchenko E. V. Practice-oriented exercises as one of the ways to form the competences of university students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2016, vol. 11 (7), pp. 1509–1526. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27160535  URL: http://www.ijese.net/makale/227.html

11. Bolotov V. A., Levitskii M. L., Remorenko I. M., Serikov V. V. Pedagogical education in the context of challenges and problems of the XXI century: Relevance of transformation. Pedagogy, 2020, vol. 84 (12), pp. 73–86. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45694966

12. Lestari E., Rahmawatie D. A., Wulandari C. L. Does online interprofessional case-based learning facilitate collaborative knowledge construction? Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2023, vol. 16, pp. 85–99. DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S391997

13. Krutka D. G., Carpenter J. P., Trust T. Elements of engagement: A model of teacher interactions via professional learning networks. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 32 (4), pp. 150–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1206492

14. Crisol-Moya E., Romero-López M. A., Caurcel-Cara M. J. Active methodologies in higher education: Perception and opinion as evaluated by professors and their students in the teaching-learning process. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01703  URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01703

15. Wang Z., Zhang Q. Higher-education ecosystem construction and innovative talents cultivating. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 7 (3), pp. 146–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73011

16. Jain V., Mogaji E., Sharma H., Babbili A. S. A multi-stakeholder perspective of relationship marketing in higher education institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2022, pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2034201

17. Andreeva E. B. Ecosystem approach as a mechanism for investigating the regional system of additional education for children. Pedagogical Review, 2021, no. 6, pp. 27–37. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2021-6-27-37 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47322500&ysclid=lnd6zpzlhg425690007

18. Izotova A. G., Gavrilyuk E. S. Ecosystem approach as a new trend in the development of higher education. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2022, vol. 12 (2), pp. 1211–1226. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.12.2.114869 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48939624&ysclid=lnd70nmfr4996745021

19. Makhnovets S. N., Popova O. A. A new ecosystem of education as a backbone vector of quality of life. Tver State University Bulletin. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2017, no. 4, pp. 141–149. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/zitmnd?ysclid=lnd729g1te262245967

20. Chaipongpati J., Thawesaengskulthai N., Koiwanit J. Development of a university innovation ecosystem assessment model for Association of Southeast Asian Nations Universities. Industry and Higher Education, 2022, vol. 36 (6), pp. 846–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221084861

21. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 2000, vol. 29 (2), pp. 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

22. Trubina L. A., Erokhina E. L. The contents and new forms of methodological subject-training organization while introducing the core of pedagogical education. Science and School, 2022, no. 4, pp. 34–44. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2022-4-34-44 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49450714&ysclid=lm97zmncxo529606245

23. Clarysse B., Wright M., Bruneel J., Mahajan A. Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 2014, vol. 43 (7), pp. 1164–1176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014

24. Bakioglu A., Kirisci Sarikaya A. University-school partnership: Feedback and assessment. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 2022, vol. 32, pp. 269–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.32.789

25. Jacobson M. J., Levin J. A., Kapur M. Education as a complex system: Conceptual and methodological implications. Educational Researcher, 2019, vol. 48 (2), pp. 112–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x19826958

Date of the publication 31.12.2023