Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 193–208
© Vershinina T. S., Zhukova N. V., 2023
UDC: 
37.015.31+808.5+316.77

The unity of subjective predictors of speech actions as an indicator of the subject’s agency in learning: An empirical study

Vershinina T. S. 1 (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation), Zhukova N. V. 2 (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation)
1 Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Urals State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
2 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 332
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents the results of an empirical study of subjective predictors of speech actions.
The purpose of the article is to substantiate the indicators of students’ agency in learning on the basis of empirical research in subjective predictors of speech actions.
Materials and Methods. The study follows A. N. Leontiev’s activity-based approach, A. A. Verbitsky’s theory of context education, and J. Kelly’s cognitive theory of personality. The research methods include the following: analysis, synthesis, generalization, classification, J. Kelly’s method of repertoire gratings, methods of mathematical statistics. Moreover, the author used co-therapeutic computer system «KELLI-98».
Results. The empirical study on the unity of (connection between) subjective predictors of speech actions, which include significant roles, conjugations of the I-real/I-ideal, and the type of communication allowed to reveal four kinds of students’ agency in learning. The first one is a normal type of communication, characterized by manifested agency in interpersonal interaction with all subjects of the educational process, and speech action at the dialogue level. The second is a normal type of communication characterized by latent agency in interpersonal interaction with all subjects of the educational process; speech action at this level is an internal dialogue. The third type is a rigid type of communication distinguished by lack of objectivity in interpersonal interaction with all subjects of the educational process; speech action is characterized by opposition to others and resistance. The fourth type of communication is a rigid one. Its distinctive features include a poorly developed ability to solve problems in interpersonal interaction with all subjects of the educational process; speech actions include manipulation.

Conclusions. Finally, relying on the empirical data analysis, the author concludes that the unity of subjective predictors of speech actions (significant roles, conjugation of the I-real/I-ideal, type of communication) is an indicator of ‘activity/inactivity’; on the basis of this indicator, four kinds of students’ learning behaviors are described.

Keywords: 

Subjective predictors of speech action; Significant roles; Conjugation of the I-real/I-ideal; Type of communication; Activity indicator

For citation:
Vershinina T. S., Zhukova N. V. The unity of subjective predictors of speech actions as an indicator of the subject’s agency in learning: An empirical study. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 193–208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.09
References: 
  1. Jayadiputra E. The implementation of project citizen in contextual teaching and learning approach. Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018), 2018, vol. 251, pp. 524–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/acec-18.2018.118
  2. Mussadad A. A., Sulistyaningrum I. C. D., Agung S. L. The effective ness of multicultural education implementation model in social science learning using contextual teaching and learning. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Arts, Language and Culture (ICALC 2018), 2019, vol. 279, pp. 121–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icalc-18.2019.18
  3. Osman K., Suryawati Е. Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, vol. 14 (1), pp. 79329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329
  4. Wahyuningtyas R. S., Wuryadi. The Influence of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) on critical thinking ability and conceptual understanding of skeletal system materials. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, pp. 5062828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062828
  5. Tari D. K., Rosana D. Contextual teaching and learning to develop critical thinking and practical skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1233 (1), pp. 012102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012102 
  6. Kim H-J. Socio-cultural development approach to investigate teacher learning across two contexts. Education Sciences, 2021, vol. 11 (2), pp. 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020037 
  7. Schirmbeck K., Rao N., Wang R., Richards B., Chan S. W. Y., Maehler C. Contrasting executive function development among primary school children from Hong Kong and Germany. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2021, vol. 36 (4), pp. 923–943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00519-9  
  8. Benz A. Epistemic perspectives and communicative acts. Frontiers in Communication, 2021, vol. 6, pp. 612733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.612733
  9. Sun J., Zhang Z., Sun B., Liu H., Wei C., Liu Y. The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test. Frontiers Aging Neuroscience, 2022, vol. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.924193

10. Mogilevich B. R. Socio-cultural context of speech conflicts. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 2021, vol. 21 (2), pp. 172–174. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2021-21-2-172-174 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46452728 

11. Shi X., Li S., Dang J. Dimensional emotion prediction based on interactive context in conversation. Interspeech, 2020, pp. 4193–4197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2020-1820   

12. Lockshin J., Williams T. “We Need to Start Thinking Ahead”: The Impact of Social Context on Linguistic Norm Adherence. Center for Open Science, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2wtzq  

13. Verbitsky A. A., Kalashnikov V. G. Contextual approach in psychology. Psychological Journal, 2015, vol. 36 (3), pp. 5–14. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23803959

14. Zhukova N. V. Simulation game as a means of inner cross-cultural context formation in vocational training of students. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2015, no. 1, pp. 25–30. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22989165

15. Verbitsky A. A., Danilochkina V. V. Theoretical and empirical research of the impact of psychological context effects on participants of short-term business negotiations. Psychological and Pedagogical Search, 2021, no. 2, pp. 208–220. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37724/RSU.2021.58.2.019 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46303728

16. Zhukova N. V., Vershinina T. S. Speech act in contextual education. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2021, no. 2, pp. 137–149. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-297X-2021-2-137-149  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46423955

17. Nandy A., Nixon E., Quigley J. Communicative functions of parents’ child-directed speech across dyadic and triadic contexts. Journal of Child Language, 2021, vol. 48 (6), pp. 1281–1294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500092000080x  

18. Paz C., Aguilera M., Salla M., Compañ V., Medina J. C., Bados A., García-Grau E., Castel A., Cañete Crespillo J., Montesano A., Medeiros-Ferreira L., Feixas G. Personal construct therapy vs cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depression in women with fibromyalgia: Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neuro-Psychiatric Disease and Treatment, 2020, vol. 16, pp. 301–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S235161

19. Irtelli F., Durbano F., Marchesi B. The real self and the ideal self. Psychoanalysis – A New Overview, 2021, pp. 98194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98194 

20. Rikel A. M. Professional self-concept and professional identity in self-consciousness structure. Part 1. Psychological Research, 2011, no. 4, pp. 6. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v4i16.863 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16350653

21. Indraswari N. M., Ningrum N. K., Maharani B. D., Wahid R. A. Does self-congruence mediate brand familiarity on brand attachment? Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 2023, pp. 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-160-9_6   

22. Li M.-H., Lai I. K. W. Actual self-image versus ideal self-image: An exploratory study of self-congruity effects on gambling tourism. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, vol. 12, pp. 588190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588190 

23. Wu Sh., Ren M., Pitafi A. H., Islam T. Self-image congruence, functional congruence, and mobile app intention to use. Mobile Information Systems, 2020, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5125238 

24. Zogaj A., Tscheulin D. K., Lindenmeie, J., Olk S. Linking actual self-congruence, ideal self-congruence, and functional congruence to donor loyalty: The moderating role of issue involvement. Journal of Business Economics, 2021, vol. 91 (3), pp. 379–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-01006-9 

25. Kalashnikov V. G. The concept of “context” and the contextual approach in education. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 20. Pedagogical Education, 2019, no. 4, pp. 40–55. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2019-4-40-55  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42236665

26. Matveeva T. V. On method of revealing value information of conversation dialogue. Nauchnyy Dialog, 2018, no. 10, pp. 89–101. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2018-10-89-101   URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36332712

Date of the publication 31.12.2023