Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–121
UDC: 
17.022.1+316.752+37.01

Values in foundation of modern globalizing society: Change study [in English]

Ashilova M. S. 1 (Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Begalinov A. S. 2 (Almat, Republic of Kazakhstan), Pushkarev Y. V. 3 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Begalinova K. K. 4 (Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Pushkareva E. A. 3 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Department of Mass Communication, Ablai Khan Kazakh University of International Relations and Foreign Languages
2 International University of Information Technologies
3 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
4 Department of Philosophy, Al Farabi Kazakh National University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The modern era is experiencing a prolonged pandemic, migration issues, conflicts, and other global catastrophes. Many researchers see the cause of these problems in the crisis of traditional values, which is becoming increasingly apparent today. Values and value orientations are an integral part of human life and culture. They determine life goals, as well as ways and means of achieving them. Global catastrophes and continuous social changes lead to the transformation of the value system, which is reflected in scholarly literature, as researchers primarily react to particularly acute and relevant problems of modern times.
The main goal of this study is to reveal values which constitute the foundations of modern globalizing society and to describe their recent transformations.
Materials and Methods. In this regard, an analysis of scholarly literature devoted to the issues of values was conducted. The universal classification of values proposed by S. Schwartz was used as the basis for the analysis. The main methodology was content analysis of scholarly literature for the prevalence and occurrence of the main types of values in scientific works in the Web of Science database from 2017 to 2022.
Results. Research findings include the following: 1) the prevalence and use of all types of values has been increasing for the period; 2) the dominance of individualistic egoistic values over public collective values; 3) the most common categories of values are: independence, health, success, responsibility, and capability. The least common values are: open-mindedness, common preferences, self-indulgence, respect for elders, mature love, and true friendship; 4) in recent years despite social upheavals, the main values of society have not changed.
Thus, it can be concluded that spiritual values do not generate as much scientific interest as material values. Although the pandemic was able to make people reflect on the moral foundations of their life, it did not significantly affect the re-evaluation of modern values. However, the researchers emphasize that within a decaying culture, some precursors of the emerging (post-technocratic) culture are developing. According to them, the new worldview will be built on overcoming anthropocentric attitudes.
Conclusions. This study will complement the understanding of the transformation of modern values under the influence of the pandemic, globalization, crises, and other factors. Its results will be useful to educators in higher education institutions, education philosophers, and anyone interested in higher education problems.

Keywords: 

Philosophy of education; Pandemic; Educational values; Axiology; Educational goals; Educational transformation; Crisis of values.

For citation:
Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Pushkarev Y. V., Begalinova K. K., Pushkareva E. A. Values in foundation of modern globalizing society: Change study [in English]. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05
References: 
  1. Gibbs P. Transdisciplinary possibilities after the pandemic. Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655 
  2. O’Dea X., Stern J. Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post Covid-19 era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 437–442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13211
  3. Phungsoonthorn T., Charoensukmongkol P. How does mindfulness help university employees cope with emotional exhaustion during the COVID-19 crisis? The mediating role of psychological hardiness and the moderating effect of workload. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12826 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.12826 
  4. Tkacová H., Pavlikova M., Jenisová Z., Maturkanič P., Kralik R. Social media and students’ wellbeing: An empirical analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, vol.  13 (18), pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442
  5. Yang L.-P., Xin T. Changing educational assessments in the post-COVID-19 Era: From assessment of learning (AoL) to assessment as learning (AaL). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022, vol. 41 (1), pp. 54–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12492 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12492  
  6. Zhang L., Allen Carter R., Qian X., Yang S., Rujimora J., Wen S. Academia's responses to crisis: A  bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 620–646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13191 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13191 
  7. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical interpretation of knowledge and information: Knowledge value and information diversity in modern communication. XLinguae, 2018, vol.  11  (3), pp.  176–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.17
  8. Šmajs J. The philosophical conception of a constitution for the Earth. Human Affairs, 2015, vol.   25  (3), pp. 342–361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0028
  9. Foster C., Burkhardt H., Schoenfeld A. Crisis-ready educational design: The case of mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/curj.159   URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/curj.159 
  10. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Communication foundation for intellectual culture: Tendencies of contemporary development. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.18
  11. Baeva L. V. Values of the changing world: Existential axiology of history: a monograph. Astrakhan, 2004. 275 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20066010
  12. Meer F. The global crisis - a crisis of values and the domination of the weak by the strong. Journal of Human Values, 1999, vol. 5 (1), pp. 65–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097168589900500107
  13. Danek J. Philosophical and societal elements of human upbringing. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 66–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.06 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42254245
  14. Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Latuha O. A., Pushkarev Yu. V., Begalinova K. K., Pushkareva E. A. Prospects of the post-digital university: Analysis of program documents in the field of education. Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 2022, vol. 30 (3), pp. 698–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.698-720 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49467874
  15. Begalinova, K. K., Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S. Media-educational space as interaction between traditional and media sides of the educational process. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Philosophical Sciences, 2017, no. 3, pp. 78–83. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30362072
  16. Pushkareva E. A. Value foundations of interaction between modern education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960640 
  17. Mills B., Wilner A. The science behind “values”: Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight. Futures & Foresight Science, 2022, vol. 5 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.145  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.145
  18. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Fundamental knowledge in the continuing education: methodology and axiology of the problem. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (1), pp. 87–98. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.08
  19. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Continuous education philosophy in the context of global culture development. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (3), pp.  60–67. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1603.06
  20. Pushkareva E. A., Pushkarev Y. V. Philosophy of continuing education: cognitive foundations of personal development in modern conditions. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019, 143 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43300997
  21. Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, vol. 25, pp. 1–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960281-6
  22. Qu Yu., Fu P. P., Sun C. Past, Present and Future of Personal Values Research: Inspirations from Literature. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2019, vol. 2019 (1), pp. 12235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.12235abstract
  23. Schwartz S. H., Bilsky W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 53, pp. 550–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
  24. Bardi A., Schwartz S. H. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003, vol. 29, pp. 1207–1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602 
  25. Prentice D. A. Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 53, pp. 993–1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.993
  26. Berson Y., Oreg S., Dvir T. CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, vol. 29, pp. 615–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.499
  27. Zu L., Song L. Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, vol. 88, pp. 105–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9828-7
  28. Rohan M. J. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2000, vol. 4, pp. 255–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
  29. Hitlin S., Piliavin J. A. Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review Sociology, 2004, vol.  30, pp. 359–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.30.012703.110640
  30. Kirkman B. L., Lowe K. B., Gibson C. B. A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, vol. 37 (3), pp. 285–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202
  31. Roccas S., Sagiv L. Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010, vol. 4, pp. 30–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-9004.2009.00234.X
  32. Boer D., Fischer R. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, vol. 139, pp.  1113–1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347
  33. Shabatura L., Yazovskikh A. Actualization of axology development: Problems, searches, solutions. Filosophiya-Philosophy, 2020, vol. 29 (4), pp. 383–390. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44332344
  34. Pawlowski A. Sustainable Development and Globalization. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 2013, vol. 8 (2), pp. 5–16. URL: https://paperity.org/p/230586292/sustainable-development-and-globalization
  35. Voirol O. Solidarity as social reconstruction against “regressive communities”, beyond the neoliberal agenda. Comparative Sociology, 2020, vol. 19 (6), pp. 708–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341531
  36. Blaj E.-C. On moral ideal between philosophy and religion in the globalizing context. CBU International Conference on Innovations in Science and Education, 2017, vol. 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.982
  37. Wilson M. COVID-19 and the modern plantation: Debunking the neoliberal moral economy. Cultural Dynamics, 2021, vol. 33 (3), pp. 185–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740211014310
  38. Korobeynikova L. A., Zabulionite K. I. Reinterpretation of values of modern culture. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Cultural Studies and Art Criticism, 2017, no. 27, pp. 44–56. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/27/5 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30672591
  39. Aniskina N. V., Ukhova L. V. The axiological world view of a modern advertising consumer. Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia, 2015, vol. 25 (3), pp. 477–484. URL: http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-WX1V8YEN
  40. Ivanovskaya, O. V. Identity crisis and sacralization in the globalizing world. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, 2011, no. 1, pp. 38–44. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16862554
  41. Witteveen H. J. Economic globalization from a broader long-term perspective: Some questions and concerns. Economist, 1998, vol. 146 (4), pp. 539–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003438914834
  42. Urmanbetova J. K. Social isolation and loneliness. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 247–253. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46264938
  43. Daniel E., Bardi A., Fischer R., Benish-Weisman M., Lee J. A. Changes in personal values in pandemic times. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2021, vol. 13 (2), pp. 572–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211024026
  44. Ciravegna L., Michailova S. Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53 (1), pp. 172–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00467-6 
  45. Brakman S., Gattersen H., van Witteloostuijn A. Robots do not get the coronavirus: The COVID-19 pandemic and the international division of labor. Journal of International Business Studies, 2021, vol. 52 (6), pp. 1215–1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00410-9  
  46. Contractor F. J. The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53 (1), pp. 156–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y
  47. Thangavel P., Pathak P., Chandra B. Covid-19: Globalization-will the course change? Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 2022, vol. 26 (1), pp. 7–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920984571
  48. Litonjua M. D. ‘The Socio-Political Construction of Globalization’. International Review of Modern Sociology, 2008, vol. 34 (2), pp. 253–278. URL: https://www.academia.edu/26411940/THE_SOCIO_POLITICAL_CONSTRUCTION_OF_GLOBALIZATION
  49. Arandjelovic O. On the Value of Life. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2022, online first. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap2022422169    
  50. Rahman M., Younus A., Uddin K.Crisis of Morals and Values: A Bangladesh Perspective. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2018, vol. 6 (11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i11.3687 
Date of the publication 30.04.2023