Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 100–121
© Emikh N. A., Fomina M. N., 2023
UDC: 
37.01+378+004

Specifics of the new paradigm of higher education in the context of its digitalization

Emikh N. A. 1 (Chita, Russian Federation), Fomina M. N. 1 (Chita, Russian Federation)
1 Transbaikal State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 368
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines the problem of digital transformation of higher education. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of the new paradigm of higher education in the context of its digitalization.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of scientific research consists of phenomenological, philosophical and anthropological approaches and the principle of correlation, which allow us to consider the problem under study in the context of substantiating a new paradigm of higher education, identifying its specifics. The research methods include a comparative analysis of scientific theories and concepts, which allows to reveal the opportunities and risks of digital education in the international field, as well as synthesis and generalization. Following the paradigm approach makes it possible to explain addressing the interpretation of the new educational paradigm.
Results. The authors consider the problem of digital education, defined as a change in the relationship between a person and digital technologies, on the one hand, and as the development of a relationship between a person and a cultural and communication environment, on the other hand. The specifics of the new (techno-anthropo-oriented) paradigm of higher education in the context of its digitalization are revealed. The new paradigm is a reflection that demonstrates the interaction of a person with the technological environment; its content is the cultural and communication environment where a new type of dialogue is formed on the basis of practice. Within the new paradigm, a person who creates meaning appears as a creator of themselves and the meaning of cultural communication by means of digital technologies. The techno-cultural function of the paradigm allows to act in the educational process of value-semantic and digital cultural-instrumental practices. The authors argue that in the new paradigm of education, a person surrounded by technology is focused on a new type of dialogue, strives to possess digital culture, to be its member and creator.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the characteristic features of the new paradigm of higher education in the context of its digitalization.

Keywords: 

Digitalization; Techno-anthropo-oriented paradigm; Meaning-creating person; Higher education; Educational process; Online learning; Cultural communication; Technological environment

For citation:
Emikh N. A., Fomina M. N. Specifics of the new paradigm of higher education in the context of its digitalization. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 100–121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.05
References: 
  1. Thomas M., Yager Z., Quinton H. W. ‘You need to be flexible normally, and here, even more flexible’: teaching academics’ experiences and perceptions of COVID-19 disruptions to teaching, learning, and assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2023, vol. 47 (2), pp. 215–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2102415
  2. Alhawsawi H., Alhawsawi S., Sadeck O. Understanding resilience and coping in a digitally transformed educational environment during COVID-19. Journal of Further and Higher Education,2023, vol. 47 (2). pp. 242–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2106124
  3. Atchison E. S. Enhancing institutional research capacity in the midst of a pandemic: A system approach. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2020, vol. 2020 (187–188), pp. 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20347
  4. O’Dea X., Stern J. Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post COVID-19 era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 437–442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13211
  5. Cope B., Kalantzis M. Futures for research in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2022, vol. 54 (11), pp. 1732–1739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1824781
  6. Marcelo C., Yot-Dominguez C. From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: Changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2019, vol. 43 (7), pp. 975–988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
  7. Osipov G. V., Karepova S. G., Klimovitsky S. V., Nekrasov S. V., Pinchuk A. N., Kostolomova M. V., PopovM. Yu. New social reality: System-creating factors, security and development prospects. Edited by G. V. Osipova, S. G. Karepova, S. V. Nekrasova, A. N. Pinchuk, T. V. Gredneva. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Nestor-History, 2020, 208 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42623780
  8. Krasilnikova E. V., Kayimova S. V., Kakotkin N. S., Lukovnikov N. N., Tyulina A. V., Tomashevskaya N. P. On humanization of digitalization of modern education. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2020, no. 2, pp. 13. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.29618  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42918228
  9. Uvarov A. Yu., Gable E., Dvoretskaya I. V., Zaslavsky I. M., Karlov I. A., Mertsalova T. A., Sergomanov P. A., Frumin I. D. Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education. Edited by A. Yu. Uvarova, I. D. Frumina. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019, 344 p. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1990-5  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39198135

10. Roman P. G., Ballesteros C. R., Noguera M. D. D. Academic whatsapp groups as alternative communication and motivation systems in higher education. Revista Espacios, 2018, vol. 39 (10), pp. 29. URL: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n10/18391029.html

11. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Evaluating the development of reflexive personality skills in the conditions of distance educational technologies. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (4), pp. 92–118. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2204.05  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49425111

12. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Factors determining the development of cognitive abilities in the context of digitalization of educational processes (a review article). Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (6), pp. 111–136. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2206.05  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50026299

13. Mironov V. V. After the pandemic: Vectors for future development. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 2020, no. 3, pp. 522–529. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2020-223-3-522-529  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43843379

14. Zenkov A. R. Digitalization of education: directions, opportunities, risks. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: ProblemsofHigherEducation, 2020, no. 1, pp. 52–55. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42873886

15. Anderson T., Rivera-Vargas P. A Critical look at educational technology from a distance education perspective. Digital Education Review, 2020, vol. 37, pp. 208–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.208-229 URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Critical-look-at-Educational-Technology-from-a-Anderson-Rivera-Vargas/aa893003114d342b4cbf72b4cdf9967539584319

16. Bondarenko O. R. Mergency remote foreign language class management as a tertiary teaching issue. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Psychology. Pedagogics. Education Series, 2021, no. 3, pp. 130–141. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2021-3-130-141  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46533009

17. Alhazzani N. MOOC’s impact on higher education. Social Science & Humanities Open, 2020, vol. 2 (1), pp. 100030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100030

18. Reich J. Failure to Disrupt: Why Technology Alone Can't Transform Education. Cambridge; Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2020, 336 p. ISBN(s): 9780674249684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674249684

19. Ince E. Y., Kabul A., Diler I. Distance education in higher education in the COVID-19 pandemic process: A case of Isparta Applied Sciences University. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 2020, vol. 4 (4), pp. 343–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.112

20. Muravyova A. A., Oleynikova O. N. Digitalization in higher education: Possible ways of development. Philosophy of Education, 2021, vol. 21 (4), pp. 5–18. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20210401  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47359819

21. Shepelova N. S., Shepelov N. N. The main problems of digital transformation of higher education in Russia. Economic Research and Development,2020, no. 2, pp. 46–52. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42630506

22. Razzaque A., Hamdan A. Students’ learner-readiness empowers their imaginative-capacity as they interact while e-learning. Revista Espacios, 2019, vol. 40 (41), pp. 10. URL: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n41/19404110.html

23. Pugacheva L. G. Paradigm shift: from the classical culture of “interpretation” to the post-non-classical culture of “understanding”. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 2019, no. 1, pp. 17–24. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37616706

24. Begalinov A. S., Ashilova M. S., Begalinova K. K. On the image of higher education in the post-Covid world: Formation and development of the new type of thinking. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 110–123. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.07  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44849696

25. Sanchez-Rojo A., Garcia del Dujo A., Munoz-Rodriguez J. M., Dacosta A. Grammars of “onlife” identities: Educational re-significations. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 2022, vol. 41 (1), pp. 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-021-09811-7

26. Goncharova V. A. The principle of the ideal-building in the anthropology of modern education. PhilosophyofEducation, 2022, vol. 22 (1), pp. 28–58. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15372/PHE20220103  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48165906

27. Kolomytseva O. N., Stativka A. M., Shujin D., Stativka V. I. The determinism of the information society and the educational system: Enhancing academic attainments within distance learning. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (2), pp. 102–121. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.05  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45741071

28. Ovinova L. N., Shraiber E. G. SWOT analysis of educational process in digital educational environment of university. Pedagogy. Theory & Practice, 2021, vol. 6 (4), pp. 700–707. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/ped210098  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46531571

29. Gibbs P. Transdisciplinary possibilities after the pandemic. Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655

30. Danek J. Philosophical and societal elements of human upbringing. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 66–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.06  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42254245

31. Hebebci M. T., Bertiz Y., Alan S. Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 2020, vol. 4 (4), pp. 267–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.113

32. Ucar H., Bozkurt A., Zawacki-Richter O. Academic procrastination and performance in distance education: A causal-comparative study in an online learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2021, vol. 22 (4), pp. 13–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1002726

33. Manikovskaya M. A. Digitalization of education: Challenges to traditional norms and moral principles. Power and Administration in the East of Russia, 2019, no. 2, pp. 100–106. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2019-87-2-100-106  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39374705

34. Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Begalinova K. K. Philosophical discourse of education in conditions globalization and digitalization. Pedagogical Education in Altai, 2022, no. 1, pp. 113–120. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49219208

35. Smirnov M. Yu. Digitalization as “zeroing” of religions. A. S. Pushkin Bulletin of the Leningrad State University, 2019, no. 3, pp. 137–146. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39954713

36. St-Onge C., Ouellet K., Lakhal S., Dube T., Marceau M. COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (2), pp. 349–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169

37. Tkacova H., Pavlikova M., Jenisova Z., Maturkanic P., Kralik R. Social media and students’ wellbeing: An empirical analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13 (18), pp. 10442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442

38. Erstad O., Silseth K. Futuremaking and digital engagement: From everyday interests to educational trajectories. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2019, vol. 26 (4), pp. 309–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1646290

39. Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Begalinova K. K. About the impact of digitalization of society on education in Kazakhstan. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (6), pp. 40–51. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1906.03  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41586632

40. Willatt C., Flores L. M. The presence of the body in digital education: A phenomenological approach to embodied experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 2022, vol. 41 (1), pp. 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-021-09813-5

Date of the publication 31.08.2023