Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 57–75
© Novikova A. A., 2023
UDC: 
37.03+159.9

Research on the influence of modern educational technology on the students’ cognitive competence formation

Novikova A. A. 1 (Tobolsk, Russian Federation)
1 Tobolsk Industrial Institute, Tyumen Industrial University, branch in Tobolsk
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1071
Abstract: 

Introduction. This paper studies the formation of students’ cognitive ability in modern conditions, which is related to identifying the components within the structure of cognitive competence and identifying factors determining development. The purpose of this research is to assess the level of students’ cognitive competence and to reveal efficient educational technologies contributing to their formation.
Materials and Methods. Research methods include literature analysis, generalization and comparative analysis, and the rank correlation method. The sample included 93 students aged between 15 and 24 years from Tobolsk secondary schools, vocational schools and universities. In the diagnostic part of the study, the psychosocial tests and questionnaires by E. E. Tunik, T. D. Dubovitskaya, A. V. Karpov, A. V. Pashkevich and O. V. Gordeeeva were used. The structure of cognitive competence were measured using socio-psychological scales: 6 subtests by R. Amthauer, conceptual thinking scales as well as through the expert teachers assessment of students’ learning and cognitive competencies. Mathematical statistical methods were used to process the results obtained.
Results. The study reveals key components within the structure of cognitive competence: analytical and conceptual thinking; informational, motivational, and learning cognitive competencies; and students’ personal qualities (curiosity, independent judgment, resourcefulness, creativity, reflection, self-control, responsibility).
The author identified leading teaching interventions that contribute to increasing interest in learning, the assimilation of knowledge and the independence of cognitive activities. They include immersive and innovative educational technologies. Moreover, the author substantiated the effectiveness of using traditional educational forms in teaching and learning process, which determine the formation of basic components of cognitive competence, associated with the conceptual and analytical thinking. Low academic motivation index affects the formation level of students’ overall cognitive ability.
Conclusions.
Within the framework of the competency-based approach, the formation of cognitive competence is the basis for the development of students’ key competencies within different stages of modern educational system. In order to evaluate students’ cognitive competence, it is advisable to single out its components and determine tools for their measurement. Based on the correlation study of applied educational technologies with the structural components of students’ cognitive competencies, it is necessary to single out the most efficient educational means of their formation.

Keywords: 

Cognitive competence; Cognitive competence formation factors; Educational technology.

For citation:
Novikova A. A. Research on the influence of modern educational technology on the students’ cognitive competence formation. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 57–75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2302.03
References: 
  1. Akopova M. A. Studying the influence of developing metacognitive processes on students' academic performance (with the main focus on psychological disciplines). Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (5), pp. 22–38. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.02  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49623126 
  2. Bataeva E. V. Cognitive and metacognitive skills of students in the context of smart-education. Education and Science, 2019, vol. 21 (4), pp. 36–59. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-4-36-59  URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37422323
  3. Bezusova T. A., Richter T. V. The impact of using the model of research supervising on the formation of research competence in students majoring in education. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (2), pp. 92–110. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.05  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48392224
  4. Vasetskaya N. O. Сognitive competencies of graduates in the conditions of formation of the knowledge-diital economy. World of New Economics, 2020, vol. 14 (1), pp. 101–107. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-1-101-107  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42691066
  5. Gorkaltseva E. N. Cognitivity in modern education. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012, vol. 14 (2), pp. 1134–1137. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18824305
  6. Grinshkun V. V., Zaslavskaya O. Yu. Pandemic lessons: New strategies and technologies of teaching. Computer Science and Education, 2022, vol. 37 (3), pp. 5–11. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-3-5-11  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49326640
  7. Dudko V. D. Future teacher's cognitive competence and dynamics of its development. News of the Russian State Pedagogical University after A.I. Herzen, 2008, no. 2, pp. 63–67. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13921874
  8. Lemeshova E. V. Formation at students of cognitive competence on the basis of interactive technologies of training of higher education institution. Bulletin of the Bryansk State University, 2015, no. 1, pp. 48–53. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=233962128.
  9. Nekrasov V. P. On formation and diagnostics of higher school students’ cognitive competences. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2016, no. 1, pp. 27–32. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25897774
  10. Novikova A. A., Mehrishvili L. L. Development means of students’ social competence in high school in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Surgut State Pedagogical University, 2022, no. 5, pp. 54–60. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2022.80.5.009  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49868557
  11. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Factors determining the development of cognitive abilities in the context of digitalization of educational processes (a review article). Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (6), pp. 111–136. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2206.05  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50026299
  12. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Specifics of information and communication developments in education: Analysis of value changes before and after 2020 (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (6), pp. 96–119. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.06 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47447640
  13. Fedotova E. O. Development of cognitive component of social competence of university students in the process of professional training. Bulletin of the Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 2019, no. 2, pp. 128–134. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2308-7218-2019-10223  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44197059
  14. Churakova A. V. The importance of the cognitive component in the formation of universal competencies of future teachers. Bulletin of the Surgut State Pedagogical University, 2022, no. 4, pp. 73–80. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2022.79.4.010  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49601468
  15. Charters M., Murphy C. Taking art school online in response to COVID 19: From rapid response to realising potential. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 2021, vol. 40 (4), pp. 723–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12384 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jade.12384
  16. Chi M. T. H, Adams J., Bogusch E. B., Bruchok C., Kang S., Lancaster M., Levy R., Li N., McEldoon K. L., Stump G. S., Wylie R., Xu D., Yaghmourian D. L. Translating the ICAP theory of cognitive engagement into practice. Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2018, vol. 42 (2), pp. 1777–1832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12626  URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29954048/
  17. Chi M. T., Wylie R. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 2014, vol. 49 (4), pp. 219–243.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 URL: https://education.asu.edu/sites/default/files/lcl/chiwylie2014icap_2.pdf
  18. Clement E. Successful solution discovery and cognitive flexibility. Cognitive Flexibility: The Cornerstone of Learning, 2022, pp. 113–142.  ISBN: 9781119902737  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119902737.ch5  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119902737.ch5
  19. Hogenova A. Uncertainty in education. Philosophy of Education, 2022, vol. 22 (2), pp. 71–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20220205  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48967964
  20. Liu B., Xing W., Zeng Y., Wu Y. Linking cognitive processes and learning outcomes: The influence of cognitive presence on learning performance in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (5), pp. 1459–1477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13193
  21. May R. J., Tyndall I., McTiernan A., Roderique-Davies G., McLoughlin S. The impact of the SMART program on cognitive and academic skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (5), pp. 1244–1261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13192
  22. Pennequin V. Metacognition and flexibility: What are the theoretical links and what links have been observed? Cognitive Flexibility: The Cornerstone of Learninghed, 2022, pp. 53–76. ISBN: 9781119902737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/97 81119902737.ch3  URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119902737.ch3
  23. Sun R. C. F., Hui E. K. P. Cognitive competence as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, vol. 2012, pp. 210953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/210953 URL:  https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/210953/
  24. Sitnikova M. A., Malykh S. B. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy applications in developmental cognitive neuroscience. Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I.P. Pavlova, 2021, vol. 71 (4), pp. 485–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044467721040092  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46322156  (In Russian)
  25. Kassymova M. R., Arpentieva B. M. Triyono B. M., Sangilbayev O. S., Kenzhaliyev B. K.  Science, education & cognitive competence based on e-learning. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, no 1, pp. 269–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.31  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42367670
  26. Siegel S. T., Biesta G. The problem of educational theory. Teoria de la Educacion, 2022, vol. 34 (1), pp. 33–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/TERI.27157 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47511976
  27. Terzieva Т., Rahneva O., Dilyanov V. Pedagogical strategies for development of cognitive skills in a digital environment. Journal of Differential Equations and Applications, 2021, vol. 20 (2), pp. 251–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12732/ijdea.v20i2.11
  28. Terzieva Т. Development of cognitive skills through computer educational games, pedagogy. Bulgarian Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 2021, vol. 93, pp. 879–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2021-7.01
Date of the publication 30.04.2023