Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 172–191
UDC: 
811+378

The potential of using corpus-based technologies for incidental vocabulary learning of General Maritime English [in English]

Mironenko A. A. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation), Mironenko E. V. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article addresses the problem of expanding the potential vocabulary of cadets of maritime educational institutions in the process of listening comprehension determined by the need to develop strategies for independent vocabulary acquisition necessary for autonomous learning of maritime English.
The purpose of this article is to justify the application of corpus technologies for the selection of vocabulary items, which will allow students to master the strategies required to expand vocabulary in the process of autonomous listening, and increase the efficiency of learning and teaching maritime English.
Materials and Methods. The study follows the two-level Maritime English learning model incorporating General Maritime English and Specialized Maritime English. The first component focuses on the linguistic content embedded in the generalized maritime context and prioritizes the lexical and cognitive approaches highlighting the necessity of their integration and emphasizing corpus tools the application of which is helpful in topic-related vocabulary selection through instructional, linguistic and statistic principles on the basis of authentic texts.
Results. The article describes the preliminary stage of potential vocabulary acquisition by junior cadets through listening comprehension and proposes the procedure of text selection for context-specific raw corpus design and thematic word list generation. Through the computer processing of the wordlist and the analysis of the concordance lines, the independent vocabulary learning strategies were identified and ranked. The conclusion was drawn about the correlations between the basic word learning potential and the number of independent word learning strategies applied.
Conclusions. The findings of the research add to the understanding of the potential of corpus-based technologies for the topical vocabulary selection and analysis in order to develop cadets’ independent word learning strategies that are significant for potential vocabulary acquisition through listening comprehension.
The results achieved suggest that the word lists generated from the subject corpus should be integrated into the basic vocabulary of General Maritime English, which should be mastered under the teacher’s guidance.

Keywords: 

General Maritime English; Corpus-based technologies; Incidental vocabulary learning; Vocabulary size; Context-specialized corpus; Word learning strategies.

For citation:
Mironenko A. A., Mironenko E. V. The potential of using corpus-based technologies for incidental vocabulary learning of General Maritime English [in English]. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 172–191. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2302.08
References: 
  1. Zhang Y., Cole C. Maritime English as a code-tailored ESP: Genre-based curriculum development as a way out. Ibérica, 2018, vol. 35, pp. 145–170. URL: http://www.aelfe.org/documents/35_06_IBERICA.pdf
  2. Matthews J. Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 2018, vol. 72, pp. 23–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.005
  3. Li Y., Zhang X. L2 Vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening comprehension: a structural equation model. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2019, vol. 22 (1), pp. 85–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1060907ar
  4. Zhang P., Graham S. Learning vocabulary through listening: The role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. Language Learning, 2020, vol. 70 (4), pp. 1017–1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12411
  5. Krasnov S. V., Kalmykova S. V., Krasnova S. A. Methodological aspects of the educational process in the context of e-learning. Global Scientific Potential, 2020, no. 5, pp. 23–28. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43310045
  6. Ermolova T. V., Savitskaya N. V., Dedova O. V., Guzova A. V. The problem of choosing universal tools for foreign language teaching in conditions of changing educational paradigms. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (6), pp. 179 –194. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.10 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47447644
  7. Krylova E. A. Blended learning in higher education. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2020, no. 1, pp. 86–93. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2020-1-86-93 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41722368
  8. Sari L. I., Sari R. H. Lecturers’ challenges and strategies in teaching Maritime English online to students with low English proficiency. Register Journal, 2022, vol., 15 (2), pp. 222–244. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i2.222-244
  9. Boers F. Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 2013, vol. 46 (2), pp. 208–224. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000450
  10. James A. J., Schriever U. G., Jahangiri S., Girgin S. C. Improving maritime English competence as the cornerstone of safety at sea: a focus on teaching practices to improve maritime communication. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2018, vol. 17, pp. 293–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0145-4
  11. Dorfman O., Chernova O. Development of the communicative competence of students of technical universities as a strategy for teaching effective communication. Litera, 2022, vol. 4, pp. 27–35. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2022.4.37806 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48309034
  12. Dervić M., Bećirović S. Prerogative of the lexical approach in communicative language teaching. European Journal of Education Studies, 2020, vol. 7 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3748039
  13. Igolkina M. I., Yazynina V. S. Lexical approach to foreign language teaching in a technical university. Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2022, no. 1, pp. 7. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2022-1-763 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48415204
  14. Sun B. Cognitive approach of vocabulary learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education, 2016, pp. 1517–1521. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icadce-16.2016.373
  15. Chiew M. T. L., Ismail H. H. Exploring vocabulary learning strategies in a second language setting: A review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 11 (12), pp. 1298–1309. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11376
  16. Nekrasova-Beker T., Becker A., Sharpe A. Identifying and teaching target vocabulary in an ESP course. TESOL Journal, 2019, vol. 10 (1), pp. e00365. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesj.365 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/tesj.365
  17. Yakubson V., Zakharov V. Initial step of specialized corpora building: Cleaning procedures. NORDSCI Conference proceedings: Language and linguistics, 2020, pp. 155–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32008/NORDSCI2020/B1/V3/16 URL: https://www.nordsci.org/nordsci-library/p/initial-step-of-specialized-corpora-building%3A-cleaning-procedures
  18. Ahrabi Fakhr M., Borzabadi Farahani D., Khomeijani Farahani A. A. Incidental vocabulary learning and retention from audiovisual input and factors affecting them. English Teaching & Learning, 2021, vol. 45 (1), pp. 167–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00066-y
  19. Logvina S. A., Yagenich L. V., Saxno E. M. Potential teaching vocabulary forming methods retrospective analysis. Bulletin of N.A. Nekrasov Kostroma State University: Pedagogy, Psychology, Social Work, Juvenile Studies, 2015, vol. 21 (2), pp. 181–184. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24095168
  20. Tinkel I. The interconnectedness of mindset and learning strategies: How teaching the lexical approach could support deep learning. MAP Education and Humanities, 2022, vol. 2 (2), pp. 30–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2373.2022.2.2.30
  21. Hussein K. S. The potentialities of corpus-based techniques for analyzing literature. Journal of Literature, Language & Culture, 2020, vol. 1 (2), pp. 28–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25255/2378.3591.2020.1.2.28.43
Date of the publication 30.04.2023