Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–107
© Gumerova F. F., Amirova L. A., Kalimullina G. I., Mustaev A. F., Gumerova O. V., 2023
UDC: 
373.1+316.6+371

Determining conditions for improving the quality of education in rural schools with low educational outcomes

Gumerova F. F. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Amirova L. A. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Kalimullina G. I. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Mustaev A. F. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Gumerova O. V. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation)
1 Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 431
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors investigate the problem of improving the quality of teaching and learning in comprehensive schools. The purpose of the study is to determine the conditions for improving the quality of education in rural schools with low educational outcomes.
Materials and Methods. The research investigation follows systemic, student-centered, activity-oriented and environmental approaches, which are adopted in accordance with the context of the study in the concepts of personalized learning, the development of information and communication culture, open education, interaction and cooperation of a regional pedagogical university with rural and small schools. The research methods used include scientific literature analysis, comparison, concretization, synthesis of conclusions and generalization, empirical research methods, methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results obtained.
The developed model is used by the authors as a universal technology for forecasting, planning and solving the problem of cognitive uncertainty. It fulfills a methodological function and is considered as a universal variant of specially organized activities to minimize risks when achieving the desired high educational results in rural educational institutions.
Results. The authors summarize the trends and priorities of improving the quality of education in educational institutions based on the analysis of Russian and foreign studies. The authors summarize the ideas about the modeling of teaching and learning processes in the education system.
In the course of the study, the authors identify the conditions for a universal variant of the model aimed at improving the quality of education for rural schools with low educational outcomes as a regional management tool.
Based on the developed and tested model for improving the quality of education and the results of preliminary comprehensive diagnostics for each educational organization of a single region, the authors determine the most characteristic regional risks using the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan.
It is noted that one of the effective mechanisms for improving the quality of education in general education institutions include activities that take into account the specifics and risk of a particular region.
Conclusions. The study concludes that the developed model is a conceptual support for building the process of obtaining high educational results in rural schools. The results obtained can be used by local educational authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation, federal districts of the Russian Federation, and educational institutions to improve the quality of education.

Keywords: 

Model of improving the quality of education; Quality of education; Monitoring of the quality of education; Rural educational institutions; Conditions for improving quality; High educational outcomes.

For citation:
Gumerova F. F., Amirova L. A., Kalimullina G. I., Mustaev A. F., Gumerova O. V. Determining conditions for improving the quality of education in rural schools with low educational outcomes. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2301.05
References: 
  1. Dakhin A. N. Pedagogical modeling: Essence, effectiveness and... uncertainty. Standards and Monitoring in Education, 2002, no. 4, pp. 22–26. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24456201 
  2. Lyakh Yu. A. Factors effecting development of education quality. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, no. 2, pp. 8–16. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2018-10001 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35013621
  3. Salomov Sh. N. Problems of the quality of education in pedagogical theory and practice: Analysis of the terms “quality of education” and “quality of vocational education”. Bulletin of the Pedagogical University, 2020, no. 4, pp. 101–106. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46658926
  4. Shevchenko N. N., Shevchenko V. I. On the issue of assessing the quality of modern education. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2021, no. 5, pp. 27–37. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47697255
  5. Shkuratova A. P. Methodology of a systematic approach in pedagogy. Proceedings of the Bratsk State University. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 2014, no. 1, pp. 255–259. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22029058
  6. Yagodkina O. K. Medium approach to educative institution upbringing system formation. Bulletin of the Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov, 2011, vol. 17 (4), pp. 118–122. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17736009
  7. Afzal Tajik M., Shamatov D., Fillipova L. Stakeholders’ perceptions of the quality of education in rural schools in Kazakhstan. Improving Schools, 2021, vol. 25 (2), pp. 187–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13654802211031088
  8. Altinyelken H. K., Hoeksma M. Improving educational quality through active learning: Perspectives from secondary school teachers in Malawi. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2021, vol. 16 (2). pp. 117–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499921992904
  9. Belkastro A. T. Rebalancing quality education in a democratic society. Creative Education, 2015, vol. 6 (4), pp. 428–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64043
  10. Cui T., Kam C. C. S., Cheng E. H., Liu Q. Exploring the factors relating to academic resilience among students with socioeconomic disadvantages: Factors from individual, school, and family domains. Psychology in the Schools, 2022, early view. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22824
  11. Davis E. A., Palincsar A. S. Engagement in high-leverage science teaching practices among novice elementary teachers. Science Education, 2022, vol. 107 (2), pp. 291–332. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21766
  12. Garira E. A proposed unified conceptual framework for quality of education in schools. SAGE Open, 2020, vol. 10 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899445
  13. Fedorchuk Yu. M., Gordashnikova O. Yu., Kuznetsov A. N. Development of efficiency assessment tools for education managers, and regional education development strategy as its basis. EDULEARN 21. 13th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Spain, 2021. pp. 3085–3093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0659   URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46488034
  14. Gupta N., Vrat P., Ojha R. Achieving education excellence through teacher–student duality: An analysis of NIRF scores. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 2020, vol. 19 (2), pp. 79–93.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09726225211007249
  15. Haulle E., Kabelege E. Relevance and quality of textbooks used in primary education in Tanzania: A case of social studies textbooks. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 2020, vol. 18 (1), pp. 12–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184920962702
  16. Hou Yu., Morse R., Ins M., Chen H. J., Chiang K. L., Chan Yu. Is the Asian quality assurance system for higher education going glonacal? Assessing the impact of three types of program accreditation on Taiwanese universities. Research in Higher Education, 2015, vol. 40 (1), pp. 83–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818638
  17. Jong М., Chen G., Tam V., Hue M., Chen M. Design-based research on teacher facilitation in a pedagogic integration of flipped learning and social enquiry learning. Sustainability, 2022, vol.  14  (2), pp. 996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020996
  18. Joseph S. The politics of education reform: practices that militate against change in a developing country. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2020, vol. 29 (4), pp. 371–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056787920917389
  19. Kurniady D. A., Susilana R., Widodo M., Halimi A. K. Managerial performance in developing school climate to improve school quality. Journal of Education, 2022, online first. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211016405 
  20. Liu Sh.-Y., Tang M., Meng Zh.-R. Impact of quality assurance on higher education institutions: A literature review. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 2015, vol. 9 (2), pp. 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6197/HEED.2015.0902.02
  21. Mertanen K., Vainio S., Brunila K. Educating for the future? Mapping the emerging lines of precision education governance. Policy Futures in Education, 2021, vol. 20 (6), pp. 731–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211049914
  22. Milinga J. R. Rethinking gifted education in Tanzania: Toward its development in the country. Gifted Child Today, 2021, vol. 44 (4), pp. 216–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175211030534
  23. Molchanov S. V., Kirillov N. P., Molchanova V. S. Features of the law enforcement and regulation of the activities of education management bodies in the sphere of assessment of the quality of general education. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Development of Education in Eurasia (ICDEE 2019), 2019, pp. 60–65. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45566154
  24. Órdenes M., Treviño E., Escribano R., Carrasco D. Teacher motivation in Chile: Motivational profiles and teaching quality in an incentive-based education system. Research in Education, 2022, onlinefirst. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237221090541
  25. Razinkina E., Pankova L., Pozdeeva E., Evseeva L., Tanova A. Education quality as a factor of modern student's social success. E3S Web of Conferences. Topical Problems of Green Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (TPACEE 2019), 2020, vol. 164, pp. 12008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016412008 
  26. Sakız H., Çuhadar P., Çirkin Z. Quality of education from a social justice and capabilities perspective: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2022, onlinefirst. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221121638
  27. Salal Ya. Kh., Abdullaev S. M. Monitoring of the education quality and implementing of individual learning: Demonstration of approaches and educational data mining algorithms. Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences, 2020, no. 3, pp. 112–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2311-3103-2020-3-112-122 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44502753
  28. Saluja A. Education for social justice: A critique of national education policies of India. Policy Futures in Education, 2022, vol. 21 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221089474
  29. Sohel-Uz-Zaman A. S. Md., Anjalin U. Introduction of total quality management in education: Compatibility and problems. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2016, vol. 4 (11), pp. 207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.411017  
  30. Sing M. N. Inroad of digital technology in education: Age of digital classroom. Higher Education for the Future, 2021, vol. 8 (1), pp. 20–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120980272
  31. Tumlovskaja J. Тhe influence of performance quality evaluation in general education schools on the recognition of the educational values. Power and Education, 2022, vol. 14 (2), pp.102–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438211062348
Date of the publication 28.02.2023