Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 32–54
© Tavstukha O. G., Ganaeva E. A., Muratova A. A., Shavshaeva L. Y., Matvievskaya E. G., 2022
UDC: 
371.2+373.1+159.9.072

Ways of overcoming academic failures: A review article

Tavstukha O. G. 1 (Orenburg, Russian Federation), Ganaeva E. A. 1 (Orenburg, Russian Federation), Muratova A. A. 1 (Orenburg, Russian Federation), Shavshaeva L. Y. 1 (Orenburg, Russian Federation), Matvievskaya E. G. 1 (Orenburg, Russian Federation)
1 Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 697
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines the problem of low learning outcomes of schoolchildren in the modern education system. The purpose of the article is to identify and summarize the ways of overcoming students’ academic failure from the standpoint of foreign and Russian studies for their use at schools.
Materials and Methods. To achieve the aim of the review, 63 full-text sources were analyzed. The study used general research methods of theoretical knowledge, thematic content analysis, synthesis of theoretical foundations, and comparative method for identifying and summarizing research on ways of overcoming students’ academic failure in foreign and Russian theory and practice and their use at schools. The generalization of the research results was based of the systematic approach.
Results. Analysis of the studies has shown that in order to overcome student failure at school, it is necessary to introduce practical methods in schools that will bring about a reduction in the level of unsuccessful students. Schools' work to involve parents in their children's education and school activities (engagement at home, engagement at school, academic socialization) has a positive impact on reducing student failure at school. A special role of the parent community is to develop students’ motivation to learn.
The work of schools to integrate formal and non-formal education expands the educational space and contributes to overcoming school failure, developing the emotional, intellectual, communicative sphere, educational motivation and social advancement of students.
The use of various forms of mentoring in schools mainly leads to the design of programs for students' personal growth, building their own professional path of self-development and developing motivation for learning. Using international experience in applying developmental programs in Russian schools will ensure equalization of starting opportunities for students with low socio-economic status.
Conclusions. The review concludes that the introduction of ways to overcome the academic failure (parental involvement, supplementary education, using various forms of mentoring and international practices of developmental education programs) in the school practice will contribute to reducing the rate of student failure in school.

Keywords: 

Academic failure; Ways of overcoming academic failure; Parent involvement; Supplementary education; Mentoring; Mentoring forms; Developmental education programs, Students’ motivation for learning.

For citation:
Tavstukha O. G., Ganaeva E. A., Muratova A. A., Shavshaeva L. Y., Matvievskaya E. G. Ways of overcoming academic failures: A review article. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 32–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2206.02
References: 
  1. Ambarova P. A., Zborovsky G. E., Zakharova L. P. Additional education as a resource for overcoming educational failure. Bulletin of Surgut State Pedagogical University, 2020, no. 5, pp.  114–123. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2020.68.5.002 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44671911 
  2. Antipkina I. V. Research of parent involvement in Russia and abroad. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 1 (4), pp. 102–114. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30276551
  3. Bochaver A. A., Verbilovich O. E., Pavlenko K. V., Polivanova K. N., Sivak E. V. Children’s involvement in supplementary education: Monitoring and value of education on the part of parents. Psychological Science and Education, 2018, vol. 23 (4), pp. 32–40. (In Russian) DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419841567 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36375957
  4. Bratashova M. V. Learning motivation as a factor in the development of intellectual abilities of younger adolescents. Izvestiya Saratov University, 2020, no. 1, pp. 94–99. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2020-20-1-94-99 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42661906
  5. Bykova E. A., Istomina S. V., Samylova O. A. Features of parental competence of a modern Russian family. Prospects of Science and Education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 111–125. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.4.7  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43917946
  6. Goshin M. E., Mertsalova T. A., Gruzdev I. A. Types of parental involvement in children’s schooling. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2019, no. 2, pp. 282–303. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.2.13 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38304089
  7. Dolgaya O. I. Risks in education abroad: Measures to eliminate them (experience of different countries). Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 2021, vol. 1 (6), pp. 142–158. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-0772-2021-80-142-158  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47283224
  8. Zborovsky G. E. Educational failure: Key problems of the conception. Izvestiya Ural Federal University, 2020, vol. 26 (1), pp. 170–179. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42642844
  9. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. Risks of educational failure for studying youth. Sociological Journal, 2020, vol. 26 (2), pp. 60–81. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.7265  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43165269
  10. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. Social context of educational failure of students. Education and Science, 2021, vol. 23 (2), pp. 114–139. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-2-114-139 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45168227
  11. Zolotareva A. V., Kulichkina M. A., Sinitsyn I. S. Concept of ensuring availability of additional general education programs. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, no. 6, pp. 61–75. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2018-10229 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36805992
  12. Zolotareva A. V., Sinitsyn I. S. Improving availability of supplementary education for children as a new agenda in the implementation of the state educational policy. Educational Panorama, 2018, no. 1, рp. 8–16. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36366638
  13. Ivanova N. V., Minaeva E. V., Vorobyeva N. A. Analysis of foreign experience in organizing interaction between an educational institution and parents of younger schoolchildren. Pedagogy and Enlightenment, 2018, no. 4, pp. 27–42. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2018.4.28007  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37032527
  14. Ilyasov D. F. Stoyankina N. N., Naumenko L. S., Shishina V. V. Readiness formation of successful schoolchildren to implementation of mentor in the system of “student-student” relationships. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2018, no. 6, pp. 108–114. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36643812
  15. Isaev E. I., Kosaretsky S. G., Mikhailova A. M. Western European experience of prevention and overcoming school failure among children living in families with low socio-economic status. Modern Foreign Psychology, 2018, vol. 8 (1), pp. 7–16. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2019080101  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37642735
  16. Ichetovkina N. M. Theoretical grounds for tutor support problem of students with the risks of educational failure. Science and School, 2022, no. 4, pp. 103–112. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2022-4-103-112 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49450721
  17. Klyachko T. L., Semionova E. A., Tokareva G. S. Success and failure of school students: Parental expectations and teachers’ perceptions. Educational Studies. Moscow, 2019, no. 4, pp. 71–92. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-4-71-92  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41505550
  18. Kosaretsky S. G., Mertsalova T. A., Senina N. A. Improving low academic performance: Opportunities and deficits in Russian schools. Psychological Science and Education, 2021, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 69–82. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260605  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47455536
  19. Kotomina O. V., Sazhina A. I. The influence of family on the academic performance of schoolchildren and students. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 2021, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 143–156. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44792594
  20. Kuzmina K. E. The psychological features of parents’ involvement in the creation of children’s educational environment. Socio-Psychological Problems of Mentality / Mentality, 2020, no. 16, pp.  93–101. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44874270
  21. Ostankina E. N. On the factors of students' academic failure. Bulletin of Cherepovets State University, 2013, no. 1-1, pp. 127–131. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18872799
  22. Polivanova K. N. New educational discourse: The well-being of schoolchildren. Cultural and Historical Psychology, 2020, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 26–34. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160403  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44366477 
  23. Soina V. M. Mentoring as a subject of scientific reflection. The World of Science, Culture, Education, 2020, no. 5, pp. 232–234. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00943 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44172406 
  24. Sokolova E. V., Kholodilov S. S., Grudev Ya. E. Mentoring in vocational guidance, socio-pedagogical adaptation and resocialization of children in difficult life situations (on the example of the project “steps to the profession”). Innovative Development of Vocational Education, 2021, no.  2, pp. 134–141. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46361584
  25. Teplova T. N. New technologies of pedagogical mentoring in a general education institution. Researcher, 2020, no. 1, pp. 202–212. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42943297
  26. Burns E. C., Martin A. J., Collie R. J. Adaptability, personal best (PB) goals, and gains in students academic outcomes: A longitudinal examination from a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2018, vol. 53, pp. 57–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.001
  27. Burns E. C., Van Bergen P., Leonard A., Amin Y. Positive, complicated, distant, and negative: How different teacher-student relationship profiles relate to students’ science motivation. Journal of Adolescence, 2022, vol. 94 (8), pp. 1150–1162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12093
  28. Cheung A., Xie Ch., Zhang T., Neitzel A., Slavin R. E. Success for all: A quantitative synthesis of U. S. evaluations. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021, vol. 14 (1), pp. 90–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1868031
  29. Flecha R., Soler M. Turning difficulties into possibilities: Engaging Roma families and students in school through dialogic learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2013, vol. 43 (4), pp. 451–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.819068
  30. French R., Sariaslan A., Larsson H., Kneale D., Leckie G. Estimating the importance of families in modeling educational achievement using linked Swedish administrative data. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2054480
  31. Golle J., Zettler I., Rose N., Trautwein U., Hasselhorn M., Nagengast B. Effectiveness of a “grass roots” statewide enrichment program for gifted elementary school children. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2018, vol. 11 (3), pp. 375–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1402396
  32. Huber C. Risks and risk‐based regulation in higher education. Institutions Tertiary Education and Management, 2009, vol. 15 (2), pp. 83–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880902869554
  33. Hutchinson J., Dickinson B. Employers and schools: How Mansfield is building a world of work approach. Local Economy, 2014, vol. 29 (3), pp. 257–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214528158
  34. Ibabe I. Academic failure and child-to-parent violence: Family protective factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01538
  35. Kalkan F., Dağlı E. The relationship between school climate school belonging and school burnout according to the views of secondary school students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2021, vol. 8 (4), pp. 59–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.878682
  36. Leversen I., Danielsen A. G., Birkeland M. S., Samdal O. Basic psychological need satisfaction in leisure activities and adolescents life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2012, vol. 41, pp. 1588–1599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9776-5
  37. Lim C., Ab Jalil H., Ma'rof A. M., Saad W. Z. Assisting peer learning performance using online collaborative tools in virtual learning environments. Preparing 21st Century Teachers for Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) Pedagogies, 2020, pp. 108–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1435-1.ch007  
  38. Matthes B., Stoeger H. Influence of parents’ implicit theories about ability on parents’ learning-related behaviors, children’s implicit theories, and children’s academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2018, vol. 54, pp. 271–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.001
  39. Matthes B., Stoeger H. Parents’ implicit theories and their relationships with parents’ learning-related behavior, their children’s implicit theories and their children’s learning and achievement behavior: A literature review. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-022-00157-8  URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42010-022-00157-8#citeas
  40. Meyers D. C., Domitrovich C. E., Dissi R., Trejo J., Greenberg M. T. Supporting systemic social and emotional learning with a schoolwide implementation model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2019, vol. 73, pp. 53–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.005
  41. Morelli M., Chirumbolo A., Baiocco R., Cattelino E. Academic failure: Individual, organizational, and social factors. Psicología Educativa, 2021, vol. 27 (2), pp. 167–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a8 URL: https://journals.copmadrid.org/psed/art/psed2021a8
  42. Narasimhan P. A Conceptual overview of risk management in education sector projects. Holistic Research Perspectives, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 138–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47059/CIIR/BP20002/13
  43. Needham B. L., Crosnoe R., Muller C. Academic failure in secondary school: the inter-related role of health problems and educational context. Social Problems, 2004, vol. 51 (4), pp. 569–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.4.569
  44. Pekrun R. Teachers need more than knowledge: Why motivation, emotion, and self-regulation are indispensable. Educational Psychologist, 2021, vol. 56 (4), pp. 312–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991356
  45. Pigott T. D., Polanin J. R. Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 2020, vol. 90 (1), pp. 24–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
  46. Rafoth M. A. Academic failure, prevention. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, Academic Press, 2004, pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00757-1
  47. Rogach O., Frolova E., Ryabova T., Vetrova E. Reflection of labor market interests and expectations in educational order for contemporary school. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 2019, vol. 7 (5), pp. 1160–1167. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.75153 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41357585
  48. Rhodes J. E., DuBois D. L. Mentoring relationships and programs for youth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2008, vol. 17 (4), pp. 254–258. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00585.x
  49. Rogers M. A., Theule J., Ryan B. A., Adams G. R., Keating L. Parental involvement and children's school achievement: Evidence for mediating processes. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2009, vol. 24 (1), pp. 34–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573508328445 
  50. Sainio P. J., Eklund K. M., Ahonen T. P. S., Kiuru N. H. The role of learning difficulties in adolescents academic emotions and academic achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2019, vol. 52 (4), pp. 287–298. DOI:   https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419841567
  51. Silinskas G., Kikas E. Parental involvement in math homework: Links to children’s performance and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2019, vol. 63 (1), pp. 17–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324901
  52. Singh P., Singh M. P. The role of teachers in motivating students to learn. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 29–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-4105.01.2021.6 
  53. Sole B. J. The educational change in front of the technological innovation, the pedagogy of competences and the discourse of the emotional education. A critical approach. Teoria de la educacion. Revista Interuniversitaria, 2020, vol. 32 (1), pp. 101–121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/teri.20945
  54. Subero D., Esteban-Guitart M. Overcoming school learning: The role of the subjectivity in the funds of identity approach. Teoria de la educacion. Revista Interuniversitaria, 2020, vol. 32 (1), pp. 213–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.20955
  55. Tan C. Y., Lyu М., Peng В. Academic benefits from parental involvement are stratified by parental socioeconomic status: A meta-analysis. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2020, vol. 20 (4), pp.  241–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2019.1694836
  56. Tavakoli R., Müller R., Jeske E., Schäfbuch N., Schmitz B. Promoting well-being in students through an art-of-living intervention: Developing an online training for eighth and ninth graders. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 2022, vol. 230 (3), pp. 229–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000501
  57. Thurston A., Cockerill M., Chiang T.-H. Assessing the differential effects of peer tutoring for tutors and tutees. Education Sciences, 2021, 11 (3), pp. 97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030097 
  58. Tullis J. G., Goldstone R. L. Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5
  59. Vattoy K. D., Gamlem S. M. Teacher-student interactions and feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2020, vol. 50 (3), pp. 371–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1707512
  60. Weir S., Kavanagh L., Moran Е., Ryan А. Partnership in DEIS schools: A survey of home-school-community liaison coordinators in primary and post-primary schools in Ireland. Dublin: Educational Research Centre, 2018, 56 p. URL: http://www.erc.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/HSCL-report-2018.pdf
  61. Weixler L., Valant J., Bassok D., Doromal J. B., Gerry A. Helping parents navigate the early childhood education enrollment process: Experimental evidence from New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2020, vol. 42 (3), pp. 307–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720922237
  62. Wilder S. Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 2014, vol. 66 (3), pp. 377–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780009
  63. Wuyts D., Vansteenkiste M., Mabbe E., Soenens B. Effects of social pressure and child failure on parents’ use of control: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2017, vol. 51, pp. 378–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.010   

 

Date of the publication 31.12.2022