Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 65–83
© Zakiryanova I. A., Mikhaylova A. G., 2023
UDC: 
17.022.1+37.013+39(045)

The use of educational technologies for the development of students’ axiological potential (based on studying the ethnoculture of the Crimea)

Zakiryanova I. A. 1 (Sevastopol, Russian Federation), Mikhaylova A. G. 2 (Sevastopol, Russian Federation)
1 Nakhimov Black Sea Higher Naval School
2 Sevastopol State university
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 220
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents a study on the problem of designing educational activities that contribute to spiritual, moral and patriotic education of the younger generation, aimed at preserving culture, historical memory, and continuity of generations. The purpose of the research is to uncover and prove the capacity of student-centered technologies for the development of students' axiological potential during the study of Crimean ethnoculture.
Materials and Methods. The study follows the axiological approach, from which the assessment of the educational capacity of the Crimean ethnoculture for spiritual and moral formation of the individual was made.
Psychodiagnostic techniques were used to assess students' understanding of the main indicators of spiritual and moral development. The sample consisted of 1st and 2nd year undergraduate students of the Polytechnic Institute of Sevastopol State University, majoring in Technosphere safety.
Results. The article reviews the research on the issues of spiritual and moral education in modern conditions and the problem of developing the axiological potential of the future professional.
It should be noted that in modern conditions the problem of creating important life values (citizenship and patriotism, spirituality and morality, respect) are strategic priorities of social development. The authors emphasize that the self-understanding of a person as part of their nation and the formation of historical memory are based on the development of ethnoculture.
This study substantiates that the Crimean region is a special socio-cultural platform favorable for the education of new generations on the basis of its specificity, contained in the ethno-cultural heritage.
The authors argue that the educational environment of the university, including the use of student-centered technologies, ensures the development of individual’s axiological potential (realizing life purposes, moral meanings and sources of spiritual development).
Conclusions. The authors come to the conclusion that developing axiological potential of students on the basis of studying Crimean ethnoculture contributes to the formation of a humanistically oriented personality, ready for intercultural dialogue, open to interaction and cooperation with people of different nationalities and faiths in the single multicultural ethnic society.

Keywords: 

Axiological potential of personality; Spiritual and moral development; Student-centered technologies; Ethno-cultural heritage; Crimean region

For citation:
Zakiryanova I. A., Mikhaylova A. G. The use of educational technologies for the development of students’ axiological potential (based on studying the ethnoculture of the Crimea). Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 65–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2301.04
References: 
  1. Gluzman A. V., Redkina L. I. The concept of ethno-cultural education. Humanitarian Sciences (Yalta), 2015, no. 3, pp. 11–23. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25075776  
  2. Efimova I. V. Spiritual and moral education of students in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Luhansk National Taras Shevchenko University, 2018, no. 4, pp. 89–95. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41476015
  3. Zhilyaeva M. S. Ethno-cultural competence of future specialists in the social sphere: Dynamics of the communicative component. Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University, 2018, vol. 24 (3), pp.  63–71. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2018-24-3-63-71  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35081046
  4. Mikhaylova A. G., Kokodey T. A., Mikhailov M. A. The development of the moral sphere of personality in the context of the axiologisation of education. E-Scio, 2022, no. 2, pp. 261–273. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48119746
  5. Mungieva N. Z. A culture of international communication as a means of forming ethnic tolerance. Pedagogical Education and Science, 2013, no. 1, pp. 117–120. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19142561
  6. Popkov Yu. V., Tyugashev E. A. Sociocultural transformation: Interpretation options, diagnostics of Russian experience. Ideas and Eidolons, 2020, vol. 12 (1–2), pp. 405–421. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2020-12.1.2-405-421 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42736138
  7. Popkov Yu. V., Tyugashev E. A. “The lost world”: Tuvan culture in the center-peripheral interpretation of the geocultural and socio-cultural space. New Researches of Tuva, 2022, no. 1, pp.  225–236. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.1.15 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48069303
  8. Samsonov S. I. Spiritual and moral education of students through the orthodox culture potential (Saratov region case). Historical and Socio-Educational Idea, 2016, vol. 8 (3–1), pp. 196–200. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2016-8-3/1-196-200 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26455317
  9. Tishkov V. A., Stepanov V. V. Interethnic relations and ethnocultural education in Russia. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2017, vol. 87 (10), pp. 879–890. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869587317100024  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30267112
  10. Arsaliev S. M-Kh., Andrienko A. S. The development of ethnocultural competence of university students during COVID-19 pandemic in Russia. Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Seminar on Education Research and Social Science (ISERSS 2020): Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2021, vol. 516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.010 
  11. Ernawati D. K., Sutiari N. K., Astuti I. W., Onishi H., Sunderland B. Correlation between intercultural sensitivity and collaborative competencies amongst Indonesian healthcare professionals. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 2022, vol. 29, pp. 100538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100538 
  12. Groves P. Chapter 18 – Spiritual and religious influences. The Handbook of Alcohol Use. Editor(s): Daniel Frings, Ian P. Albery. Academic Press, 2021, pp. 399–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816720-5.00008-6 
  13. Liu L. Intercultural crisis communication: Translation, interpreting and languages in local crises, Federico M. Federici and Christophe Declercq. System, 2022, vol. 108, pp. 102832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102832 
  14. Luke D. M., Prentice M., Fleeson W. Chapter 46 – Dynamic processes underlying individual differences in moral behavior. The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes. (Eds) J.  F.  Rauthmann. Academic Press, 2021, pp. 1183–1207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00046-7
  15. Luo J., Chan C. K Y. Qualitative methods to assess intercultural competence in higher education research: A systematic review with practical implications. Educational Research Review, 2022, vol. 37, pp. 100476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100476
  16. Markovina I., Lenart I., Matyushin A., Hien P. Russian–Vietnamese mutual perceptions from linguistic and cultural perspectives. Heliyon, 2022, vol. 8 (6), pp. e09763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09763
  17. Meng Q., Li A., Zhang H. How can offline and online contact predict intercultural communication effectiveness? Findings from domestic and international students in China. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2022, vol. 89, pp. 63–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.05.007 
  18. Mikhailova A., Smetanina O., Golovko O., Mirontseva S., Baiko V. Communicative technology in the multidisciplinary maritime field of activity. Transportation Research Procedia, 2022, vol. 63, pp. 329–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.020 
  19. Miron E., Erez M., Naveh E. Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, vol. 25 (2), pp. 175–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.237 
  20. Rankin W. L., Grube J. W. A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1980, vol. 10 (3), pp. 233–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420100303 
  21. Stauner N., Exline J. J., Wilt J. A. Chapter 20 – Meaning, Religious/Spiritual Struggles, and Well-being. In: The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism. (Eds) K. E. Vail, C.  Routledge. Academic Press, 2020, pp. 287–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817204-9.00021-4
  22. Wong S. P., Soh S. B., Wong M. L. L. Intercultural mentoring among university students: The importance of meaningful communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2022, vol. 91, pp. 13–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.08.008 
  23. Xu Y. Understanding language, intercultural competence and harmony from the Taoist philosophy: An investigation of an EU-exchange sail-training voyage. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2022, vol. 91, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.08.007
Date of the publication 28.02.2023