Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 57–70
© Vlasova O. A., 2022
UDC: 
1(091)+37.013.46

Discussions on historicism in education and transformation of educational models

Vlasova O. A. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Saint-Petersburg State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 196
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper examines modern historicist discussions in education. The purpose of the research is to determine the specifics of discussions on historicism in Education and show their influence on the transformation of educational models in higher education.
Materials and Methods. The work implements integrated and interdisciplinary approaches, comparative methods, perspectivist approach, and dialectical method. The article reviews and analysis monographs and research papers published between 1990 and 2021 which address the issues of classical historicism, anti-historicism and new historicism in education.
Results. The authors summarize the main directions of discussions in education devoted to the problems of historicism. It is pointed out that within the framework of these problematic discussions, the new historicism and intellectual history allowed the sciences to move away from linear models of history to contextual ones. The productive features of ‘new stories’ in education are highlighted: the possibility of discussing conflict interpretations in a dialogue, taking into account the multicultural mechanisms of the historical process, development of critical thinking and practical approaches. The main result of the rethinking of historicism in education is transition from the theoretical orientation to practice in the context of the current situation based on the analysis of the past. It allows to combine several sciences and disciplines in the educational process.
Conclusions. The article concludes that problematic discussions on historicism in higher education are extremely important for updating educational strategies and for structural renovation of curricula. They lead to the contextual teaching, requiring its practical adjustment, as well as the development of interdisciplinary educational trajectories.

Keywords: 

Historicism; New history; Anti-historicism; Education studies; Education; Interdisciplinarity; Historical past; Strategies based on history of education

For citation:
Vlasova O. A. Discussions on historicism in education and transformation of educational models. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 57–70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.04
References: 
  1. Iggers G. G. Historicism: The History and meaning of the term. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1995, vol. 56 (1), pp. 129–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2710011
  2. Kuntz P. G. The dialectic of historicism and anti-historicism. The Monist, 1969, vol. 53 (4), pp. 656–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196953437
  3. Hutton S. Intellectual history and the history of philosophy. HistoryofEuropeanIdeas, 2014, vol. 40 (7), pp. 925‒937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2014.882054
  4. Vlasova O. A. The status of the history of philosophy in the humanitarian field and the university system: The perspective of self-consciousness. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (4), pp. 93–105. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.06  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39256956  
  5. Berger S. Meaning and understanding in intellectual history. Global Intellectual History, 2020, vol. 5 (3), pp. 329‒354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2020.1729463 
  6. Hunter I. The contest over context in intellectual history. History & Theory, 2019, vol. 58 (2), pp. 185‒209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12109
  7. Hicking M. New historicism. Brock Education Journal, 2018, vol. 27 (2), pp. 53‒57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v27i2.577 
  8. Balkaya M. A. Basic principles of new historicism in the light of Stephen Greenblatt’s resonance and wonder and invisible bullets. European Academic Research, 2014, vol. 2 (5), pp. 7068‒7078. URL: https://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/867.pdf
  9. Levinson M. Reflections on the new historicism. European Romantic Review, 2012, vol. 23 (3), pp. 355‒362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2012.674269
  10. Ankersmit F. R. An appeal from the new to the old historicists. History and Theory, 2003, vol. 42 (2), pp. 253‒270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00242   
  11. Ankersmit F. R. A Narrativist revival? Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2021, vol. 15, pp. 215‒239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341456
  12. Lovett B. J. The new history of psychology: A review and critique. History of Psychology, 2006, vol. 9 (1), pp. 17–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.9.1.17 
  13. Watrin J. P. The “new history of psychology” and the uses and abuses of dichotomies. Theory & Psychology, 2017, vol. 27 (1), pp. 69–86. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354316685450  
  14. Alpatov V. M. On historicism in linguistics. New Russian Humanitarian Research, 2001, no. 6, p. 48. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21979401
  15. Nikitina A. G. Historicism of a socio-political phenomenon: The relationship of sociology and historiography in the light of problem of historicism. Polis. Political Studies, 2000, no. 5, pp. 167‒177. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5078426
  16. Derkach V. V. Historicism as a principle of knowledge of modern social processes. Bulletin of the Ufa State Aviation Technical University, 2006, no. 4, pp. 161–164. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9289697
  17. Petrov K. V. The principle of historicism in the study of the history of state and law. Leningrad Yuridical Journal, 2007, no. 1, pp. 169‒183. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15264974
  18. Klein L. S. Historicism in archeology. Archaeological News, 1993, no. 2, pp. 135‒144. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14868745
  19. Vaneev A. N. On the principle of historicism and historical approach in library research. Bibliosphere, 2010, no. 2, pp. 5–9. (In Russian)  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15015234
  20. Zhuravleva O. N. The principle of historicism as a phenomenon of modern mathematical education. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of the Forest, 2006, no. 6, pp. 188–191. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11162143
  21. Sergeeva S. V. Vagaeva O. A., Kozlova E. V. Systematic approach to the research of historical and pedagogical phenomena. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2013, no. 6, p. 247. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21162680
  22. Gerashchenko N. V., Gerashchenko I. G. The role of content-historical approach in sports pedagogy. Scientific and Sports Bulletin of the Urals and Siberia, 2018, no. 3, pp. 65–70. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35041882
  23. Lobanov V. V. Historicism in university pedagogical disciplines. Higher Education in Russia, 2013, no. 7, pp. 90–94. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20159461
  24. Demchenko A. I. The principle of historicism and integration of humanitarian disciplines in a musical university. Horizons of Musicology, 2009, no. 1, pp. 19‒21. (In Russian) https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11729980
  25. Khudin A. A. Return to the study of the history of architecture in the age of postmodernism abroad. Academic Bulletin UralNIIproekt, 2019, no. 3, pp. 31–34. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25628/UNIIP.2019.42.3.006 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41265027
  26. Dickey J., Oliva J. L. Multiplicity and freedom in theatre history pedagogy: A reassessment of the undergraduate survey course. Theatre Topics, 1994, vol. 4 (1), pp. 45–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2010.0045
  27. Li S. C. Advancing Multicultural Education: New Historicism in the High School English Classroom. The High School Journal, 2015, vol. 99 (1), pp. 4‒26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2015.0015
  28. Vlasova O. A. Philosophy of education and history of philosophy: Transformation of the dialogue between educators and philosophers in the 21st century. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30 (10), pp. 108‒116. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-10-108-116 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47119126
Date of the publication 30.10.2022