Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 200–224
© Lykova I. A., Mayer A. A., 2022
UDC: 
37.018.1+316.4

Systematization of family education traditions: A socio-pedagogical classifier

Lykova I. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Mayer A. A. 2 (Orehovo-Zuevo, Russian Federation)
1 Federation Federal State Budget Scientific Institution "Institute for the Study of Childhood, Family and Education Russian Academy of Education"
2 State Humanitarian and Technological University"
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 894
Abstract: 

Introduction. Based on an interdisciplinary analysis, the authors have found a contradiction between a wide range of approaches which describe the essence and mechanisms of family education, and the lack of a universal tool which allows to identify, analyze, compare, classify, rank, describe, reveal the essence and specifics of various traditions, which are the bases for the inheritance of culture and transfer of experience from generation to generation. The problem of the article is the lack of tools to systematize and generalize family education traditions. The purpose of the research is to substantiate the approach to investigating traditions of family education and to develop a method that allows to systematize the traditions of family education in their significance, diversity, variability, and transformability.
Materials and Methods. Based on a systematic analysis of philosophical, cultural, ethnographic, sociological, psychological, educational, and linguistic literature (n =70, including 35 international studies), the following ten methodological approaches were identified: axiological, hermeneutic, integrative, cognitive, cultural-historical, cultural, ontological, psychosocial, synergetic, and existential. By systematizing them, the main dominants in the study of family education traditions are determined. The typology of these approaches enabled the authors to determine the basis for classifying the traditions of family education.
Results. The authors revealed the essential characteristics of family education traditions, identified their basic core based on the national culture values. In order to structure the diversity of family education traditions, the authors used the classification method and developed a research tool - a socio-pedagogical classifier of family education traditions. The tool classifies various traditions according to the following 16 bases: 1) mechanisms of origin; 2) causes of appearance; 3) ways of occurrence; 4) scale; 5) historical heritage; 6) sustainability; 7) the nature of the changes; 8) family functions; 9) methods of inheritance (transfer); 10) forms and methods of fixation; 11) orientation of educational influence; 12) the main purpose; 13) the content of the interaction between family members; 14) style of family education; 15) value-semantic guidelines; 16) goals, objectives, content of moral education of the younger generation.
Conclusions. The interdisciplinary approach made it possible to determine the dominants of the identified approaches to the study of family education traditions. Diversity, variability and transformability of family education traditions are taken into account by the authors when developing a research method - a socio-pedagogical classifier. This tool serves as a basis for developing a model methodology for studying the transformation of family education traditions.

Keywords: 

Value foundations of culture; Family values; Family education; Family education traditions; Diversity of traditions; Socio-pedagogical classifier.

For citation:
Lykova I. A., Mayer A. A. Systematization of family education traditions: A socio-pedagogical classifier. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 200–224. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.11
References: 
  1. Alikhanova R. A. Psychological and pedagogical characteristics of family values. Economic and Humanitarian Researchesof the Regions, 2021, no. 6, pp. 12–15. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47905155
  2. Biktagirova G. F., Valeeva R. A., Biktagirov R. R. Family traditions: Theory and social projecting: Monograph. Kazan, Publishing house "Otechestvo", 2012, 229 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21654868
  3. Bugakova T. A. Analysis of the phenomenon of family traditions in the social sciences. Man. Science. Society, 2021, no. 4, pp. 107–128. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47420725
  4. Varlamova S. N., Noskova A. V., Sedova N. N. Family and children in life attitudes of the Russians. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 2006, no. 11, pp. 61–73. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17323636
  5. Dementieva I. F. Social values transformation in the contemporary Russian family. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2004, no. 1. pp. 150–160. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9123986
  6. Diuldina J. Family values and traditions as the basis of the foundations of Russian society and the state. Vlast', 2013, no. 11, pp. 97–100. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20744480
  7. Kulakovskaya-Dyakonova A. Z. Ethnopedagogical traditions in raising pedagogical potential of family. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 179–182. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/po16-01-31 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25718574
  8. Lotova I. P. Formation of traditional family values in preschool children. Management of a Preschool Educational Institution, 2019, no. 4, pp. 16–25. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41460708
  9. Lykova I. A., Borisova D. A. The methods of art education in the family (dialogic approach to modeling of cultural environment). Pedagogy of Art, 2022, no. 1, pp. 12–23. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48666691  
  10. Mardakhaev L. V. Family education: Problems and features. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2014, no. 13, pp. 173–178. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22253438  
  11. Platonov G. V., Novikova E. Yu. Spirituality of the Russian people and our reforms. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2008, no. 6, pp. 285–297. (In Russian)  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15285741  
  12. Potapovskaya O. Pedagogy. Value priorities of family education in Russia. Saint Tikhon's University Review. Series IV: Pedagogy. Psychology, 2011, no. 1, pp. 110–138. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15645460  
  13. Rostovskaya T. K., Egorychev A. M., Gulyaev S. B. Russian family as the main social institution, taking on the role of a custodian, culture-bearer and point man of national culture patterns. Management Issues, 2019, no. 3, pp. 215–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-3-215-225  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41314228
  14. Savin M. V. The content and structure of pedagogical traditions. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Journal, 2004, no. 3, pp. 75–85. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18920646
  15. Svadbina T. V. Family and Russian society in search of update: monograph. N. Novgorod: NGPU, 2000, 339 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47901852
  16. Chen Ch., Kulikova S. V. Humanistic traditions of family education in Russia and China:  Monograph. Volgograd, GAOU DPO "VGAPO", 2017, 140 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30370760
  17. Anderstaf S., Lecusay R., Nilsson M. Sometimes we have to clash': how preschool teachers in Sweden engage with dilemmas arising from cultural diversity and value differences. Intercultural Education, 2021, vol. 32 (3), pp. 296–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2021.1878112
  18. Baer J. Theory in creativity research: The pernicious impact of domain generality. In: Mullen C. (eds) Creativity Under Duress in Education? Creativity Theory and Action in Education, Springer, Cham 2019, pp. 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_7 
  19. Christiansen B. Global Applications of Multigenerational Management and Leadership in the Transcultural Era. Global Research Society, LLC, USA, 2020. 328 p. ISBN: 9781522599067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9906-7
  20. Davis S., Palmer L., Etienne J. Comparative Approaches to the Dogital Age Revolution in Europe and the Americas. Austin, 2016. 540 p. ISBN: 9781466687400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8740-0.ch022
  21. Deci E. L., Ruan R. M. Intrinsic motivation and determination in human behavior. New York. Plenum Press, 1985. 256 p. ISBN: 978-1-4899-2271-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 
  22. Dowdney L., Skuse D., Morris K., Pickles A. Short normal children and environmental disadvantage: A longitudinal study of growth and cognitive development from 4 to 11 years. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 1998, vol. 39 (7), pp. 1017–1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00404
  23. Eliyahu-Levi D., Ganz-Meishar M. The personal relationship between the kindergarten teacher and the parents as a mediator between cultures. International Journal of Early Years Education, 2019, vol. 27 (2), pp. 184–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2019.1607263 
  24. Grishina G., Mayer A. Specific of parent’s attitude in preschool education. Psychology of Subculture: Phenomenology and Contemporary Tendencies of Development, 2019, pp. 392–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.07.51
  25. Lee E. J. Living with risk in the age of “intensive motherhood”: Maternal identity and infant feeding. Health, Risk & Society, 2008, vol. 10 (5), pp. 467–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802383432 
  26. Leong S., Qiu X.-L. Designing a ‘creativity and assessment scale’ for arts education. Educational Psychology, 2013, vol. 33 (5), pp. 596–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.827154 
  27. Leshkevich T., Motozhanets A. Social perception of artificial intelligence and digitization of cultural heritage: Russian content. Applied Sciences (Switzeriand), 2022, vol. 12 (5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052712 
  28. Little S., Golledge M., Agarwalla H., Griffiths B., McCamlie D. Gobal teachers as global learners: Intercultural teacher training in international settings. London Review of Education, 2019, vol. 17 (1), pp. 38–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.1.04 
  29. Maccoby E. E. The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. In R. D. Parke, P. A. Ornstein, J. J. Rieser, & C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), A Century of Developmental Psychology, 1994, pp. 589–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10155-021 
  30. Mascadri J., Brownlee J. L., Walker S., Alford J. Exploring intercultural competence through the lens of self-authorship. Early Years, 2017, vol. 37 (2), pp. 217–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1174930 
  31. McGaw S., Lewis C. Should parenting be taught? Sue Mcgaw argues that parenting classes are long overdue. Charlie Lewis worries that they are yet another attempt at social control. The Psychologist, 2002, vol. 5 (10), pp. 510–512. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Should-parenting-be-taught-SUE-MCGAW-argues-that-at-Mcgaw-Lewis/754c7bd9449c185e395269af5786d3f772fb3fbb
  32. Merzlikina I. V., Kozhevnikova V. V., Lykova I. A. Readiness of teachers to dialogue in the educational environment: Problem Statement. Education Environment for the Information Age, 2018, pp. 409–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.09.02.48
  33. Merzlikina I. V., Kozhevnikova V. V., Lykova I. A. The dialogue in contemporary educational environment: discovering values and meanings. Education Environment for the Information Age, 2019, pp. 543–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.09.02.62  
  34. Mikander P., Zilliacus H., Holm G. Intercultural education in transition: Nordic perspectives. Education Inquiry, 2018, vol. 9 (1), pp. 40–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1433432  
  35. Rasmussen К., Northrup P., Colson R. Competency-Based Education in University Settings. National University, USA, 2016. 454 p. ISBN: 9781522509325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0932-5
  36. Santana F. D. T. Teacher creativity strengthening for establishment of culture identity. International Conference on Arts and Design Education (ICADE 2018), 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icade-18.2019.77
  37. Shirani F., Henwood K., Coltart C. Meeting the challenges of intensive parenting culture: Gender, risk management and the moral parent. Sociology, 2011, vol. 46 (1), pp. 25–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416169 
  38. Sistek-Chandler C. M. Exploring Online Lacrning Througn Synchronous and Asynchronous Instructinal Methods. National University, USA, 2019. 333 p. ISBN: 9781799816225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1622-5
  39. Sullivan P., Sullivan B., Lantz J. Cases on Innovative and Successful Uses of Digital Rescurces for Onlinne Learning. James Madison University, USA, 2022. 396 p. ISBN: 9781799890041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9004-1 
  40. Venn M. L. Embedding instruction in art activities to teach preschoolers with disabilities to imitate their peers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 1993, vol. 8 (3), pp. 277–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(05)80068-7 
  41. Wagner I., Frishman I., Golovanov V., Nezdemkovskaya G., Andrianova R., Berlyand J. Development of education for prevention of the aggressive behavior of children. The Annual International Conference on Cognitive – Social, and Behavioural Sciences, 2019, pp. 153–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.20121.18 
  42. Walker A. J., Allen K. R., Connidis I. A. Theorizing and studying sibling ties in adulthood. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, D. M. Klein (Eds.) Source Book of Family Theory & Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2005. pp. 167–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172.D36 
  43. Wilson S. R., Gettings P. E., Guntzviller L. M., Munz E. A. Parental self-efficacy and sensitivity during playtime interactions with young children: Unpacking the curvilinear association. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 2014, vol. 42 (4), pp. 409–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911937
  44. Winnicott D. W. The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. London, Routledge. eBook Published 2019. 296 p. ISBN: 9780429482410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429482410
  45. Zinsser K., Shewark E., Denham S., Curby Т. A mixed‐method examination of preschool teacher beliefs about social–emotional learning and relations to observed emotional. Support Infant and Child Development, 2014, vol. 23 (5), pp. 471–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1843
  46. Zoughbi S. G. Planning and Designing Smart Cities in Developing Nations. Independent Researcher, Palestine, 2022. 282 p. ISBN: 9781668435090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3509-0
Date of the publication 30.10.2022