Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 31–47
© Kazakevich I. V., Sinko T. V., Pishchik V. I., 2022
UDC: 
371.132

The model of teachers’ attitude to uncertainty construct: With the main focus on different generations of educators

Kazakevich I. V. 1 (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation), Sinko T. V. 1 (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation), Pishchik V. I. 1 (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
1 Don State Technical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 469
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article analyzes the concepts of tolerance to uncertainty. The problem of the research is that very few studies have investigated the essence of the construct of uncertainty and its determining factors in teaching practice of educators belonging to different types of generations. The purpose of the research is to build a model of the construct of attitude to uncertainty among teachers of different generations.
Materials and Methods. 163 teachers aged between 23 and 67 years (Belaya Kalitva, Rostov-on-Don) were interviewed. Data for this study were collected using the following methods and inventories: “Determination of the reflexivity level”; “Tolerance to uncertainty”; “Ten-point personality questionnaire”; methodology of basic stereotypes of normative attitudes in social behavior. Statistical data processing was carried out using the Mann-Whitney difference criterion, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Results. The authors summarized the ideas about the phenomenon of uncertainty in personal, cognitive, situational and affective aspects. The empirical study focusing on comparing the indicators of tolerance to uncertainty was conducted and its relationships with the level of reflexivity, behavior stereotypes and personality traits of teachers – representatives of the "Informational" and "Transitional" generations were identified. Significant differences between representatives of generations in measured indicators were revealed. Both groups demonstrated collectivism in basic behavioral stereotypes. The connection between tolerance to uncertainty and reflexivity was confirmed. Based on empirical data, a four-factor model of teachers' attitude to uncertainty has been constructed, including the level of reflexivity, tolerance to uncertainty, behavior stereotypes, and personality traits.
Conclusions. The authors identified the structure and internal connections within a complex psychological object – tolerance to uncertainty. A four-factor model of the construct of the attitude to uncertainty as a difficult-to-formalize object has been constructed and correlated to empirical data.

Keywords: 

Attitude to uncertainty; Tolerance to uncertainty; Four-factor model; Level of reflexivity; Behavior stereotypes; Generational identification; Types of generations; Personality traits.

For citation:
Kazakevich I. V., Sinko T. V., Pishchik V. I. The model of teachers’ attitude to uncertainty construct: With the main focus on different generations of educators. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 31–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.02
References: 
  1. Asmolov A., Svinarenko A., Soboleva E. The main task of the school is to keep the connection of generations. Educational Policy, 2020, no. S5, pp. 6–17. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44669456
  2. Gutnik I. Y. Designing an evaluation inventory for identifying teachers’ professionalism deficits in the context of transformation of contemporary education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol.  11 (4), pp. 33–45. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.02 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46513824
  3. Ivanova N. L., Rumyantseva T. V. Social identity: theory and practice. Moscow: Social and Humanitarian University. 2009, 453 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19667810
  4. Karpov A. V. Psychology of reflexive mechanisms of activity. M.: Publishing house "Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences". 2004, 32 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20247682
  5. Kornilova T. V. Tolerance-intolerance of ambiguity new questionnaire. Psychological Journal, 2010, vol. 31 (1), pp. 92–110. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14280668  
  6. Pishchik V. I. The mentality of generations in the fluid modernity. M., INFRA-M. 2019, 150 p. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/monography_5ba0ee24675441.11909669 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35684459
  7. Savchenkov A. V. Sustainable motivation for teaching as a component of teacher education students’ professional flexibility. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (1), pp. 43–61. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42525585
  8. Sizikova T. E. The influence of polymodality of reflection on personality self-organization. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (1), pp. 57–75. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38165984
  9. Abakumova I., Bakaeva I., Grishina A., Dyakova E. Active learning technologies in distance education of gifted students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 2019, vol. 7 (1), pp. 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901085A URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37294786
  10. Alexandrache C. Journal Reflexive, an Instrument for Student Preparation in the Teaching Profession. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 149, pp. 20‒24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.172
  11. Aydın A. Kuşak çalişmalarindaki tartişmali konulara ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi, 2020, vol. 8 (1), pp. 17‒34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744
  12. Bardi A., Guerra V. M., Ramdeny G. S. D. Openness and ambiguity tolerance: Their differential relationships to well-being in the context of an academic life transition. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, vol. 47 (3), pp. 219–223. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.003
  13. Birchinall L., Spendlove D., Buck R. In the moment: Does mindfulness hold the key to improving the resilience and wellbeing of pre-service teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 2019, vol.  86, pp. 102919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102919
  14. Borracci R. A., Ciambrone G., Arribalzaga E. B. Tolerance for Uncertainty, Personality Traits and Specialty Choice Among Medical Students. Journal of Surgical Education, 2021, vol. 78 (6), pp.  1885–1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.018
  15. Byrne K. A., Peters C., Willis H. C., Phan D., Cornwall A., Worthy D. A. Acute stress enhances tolerance of uncertainty during decision-making. Cognition, 2020, vol. 205, pp. 104448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104448
  16. Сampbell S. M., Twenge J. M., Campbell W. K. Fuzzy But Useful Constructs: Making Sense of the Differences Between Generations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2017, vol. 3 (2), pp. 130–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wax001
  17. Carleton R. N., Norton M. A., Asmundson G. J. Fearing the unknown: a short version of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2007, vol. 21, pp. 105–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014
  18. Curtis E., Brownlee J. L., Spooner-Lane R. Teaching perspectives of philosophical inquiry: Changes to secondary teachers’ understanding of student learning and pedagogical practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2020, vol. 38, pp. 100711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100711
  19. Cvetković B. N., Stošić L., Belousova A. Media and Information Literacy – the Basis for Applying Digital Technologies in Teaching from the Discourse of Educational Needs of Teachers. Croatian Journal of Education, 2018, vol. 20 (4), pp. 1089–1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v20i4.3001
  20. Felsman P., Gunawardena S., Seifert C. M. Improv experience promotes divergent thinking, uncertainty tolerance, and affective well-being. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2020, vol. 35, pp.  100632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100632
  21. Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., Swann Jr., W. B. A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 2003, vol. 37 (6), pp. 504–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
  22. Grisham J. R., Roberts L., Cerea S., Isemann S., Svehla J., Norberg M. M. The role of distress tolerance, anxiety sensitivity, and intolerance of uncertainty in predicting hoarding symptoms in a clinical sample. Psychiatry Research, 2018, vol. 267, pp. 94–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.084
  23. Han P. K., Klein W. M., Arora, N. K. Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy. Medical Decision Making, 2011, vol. 31, pp. 828–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10393976
  24. Hillen M. A., Gutheil C. M., Strout T. D., Smets E. M. A., Han P. K. J. Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 2017, vol. 180, pp. 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024
  25. Kim L. E., Jörg V., Klassen R. M. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Personality on Teacher Effectiveness and Burnout. Educational Psychology Review, 2019, vol. 31, pp. 163–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2
  26. Korkmaz H., Güloğlu B. The role of uncertainty tolerance and meaning in life on depression and anxiety throughout Covid-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 2021, vol. 179, pp. 110952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110952
  27. Kornilova T. V., Chumakova M. A. Tolerance and intolerance of ambiguity in the modification of Budner’s questionnaire. Experimental Psychology, 2014, vol. 7 (1), pp. 92–110. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21588520
  28. Lee C. S., Hung D. K. M., Ling T. C. Work Values of Generation Y Preservice Teachers in Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 65, pp. 704–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.187
  29. Lissitsa S., Laor T. Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y: Identifying generational differences in effects of personality traits in on-demand radio use. Technology in Society, 2021, vol. 64, pp. 101526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101526
  30. Matta S., Rogova N., Luna-Cortés G. Investigating tolerance of uncertainty, COVID-19 concern, and compliance with recommended behavior in four countries: The moderating role of mindfulness, trust in scientists, and power distance. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, vol. 186, pp.  111352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111352 
  31. Pishchik V. Internal professional mobility of lyceum teachers belonging to different past generations. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 2020, vol. 8 (4), pp. 917–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8489 
  32. Zhu D., Xie X., Xie J. When do people feel more risk? The effect of ambiguity tolerance and message source on purchasing intention of earthquake insurance. Journal of Risk Research, 2012, vol. 15 (8), pp. 951–965. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2012.686051
Date of the publication 30.06.2022