Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–192
© Khaustov S. A., Dubynin V. A., 2022
UDC: 
611.868+372.857

Human pheromones: An analysis of misconceptions, problems and study perspectives (review)

Khaustov S. A. 1 (Pushchino, Russian Federation), Dubynin V. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Lomonosov Moscow State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 597
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article reviews a range of studies into human pheromones and a possible system of their reception called an additional olfactory system.
The purpose of the study is to summarize current scholarly literature into the problem of human pheromones, to conduct a comparative analysis of hypotheses and concepts in this area for use in medical and biological education, and attract the attention of young researchers to investigating this topic.
Materials and Methods. A critical analysis of scholarly publications on the problem under study was carried out focusing on the identification of primary sources, possible refutation or experimental data confirmation.
Results. The ambiguous and contradictory results of experimental studies are summarized, confirming, questioning or refuting the possibility of human pheromones and the sensory system of their perception existence, including the functionality of the vomeronasal organ (Jacobson's organ). Controversial experimental data on the impact of potential pheromones on the synchronization of ovulatory cycles, the development of sexuality, the formation of married couples, the tendency to homosexual behavior, the newborn's attachment to the mother, the impact on stress resistance and the level of attention in learning are analyzed.
Conclusions. The study concludes that the additional olfactory system lost its role in the course of evolution in the distant ancestors of human beings, and some of its functions are being gradually transited to other tissues of the body, including the main olfactory system. At the same time, the inconsistency of the experimental results makes the use of this topic in the educational process extremely interesting for the formation of students’ critical and research thinking, demonstrating non-linearity of the scientific knowledge path with the stable presence and replication of scientific misconceptions, and existence of significant prospects for setting new tasks and further research.

Keywords: 

Vomeronasal organ; Jacobson’s organ; Human pheromones; Accessory olfactory system; Sexual behavior; Biological education; Medical education; Scientific fallacies.

For citation:
Khaustov S. A., Dubynin V. A. Human pheromones: An analysis of misconceptions, problems and study perspectives (review). Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–192. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.09
References: 
  1. Trotier D. Vomeronasal organ and human pheromones. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 2011, vol. 128 (4), pp. 184–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2010.11.008
  2. Bhatnagar K. P., Smith T. D. The human vomeronasal organ. V. An interpretation of its discovery by Ruysch, Jacobson, or Kölliker, with an English translation of Kölliker (1877). Anatomical Record. Part B, New Anatomist, 2003, vol. 270 (1), pp. 4–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.10001
  3. Stoyanov G. S., Matev B. K., Valchanov P., Sapundzhiev N., Young J. R. The human vomeronasal (Jacobson’s) organ: A short review of current conceptions, with an English translation of potiquet's original text. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 2018, vol. 10 (5), pp. e2643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2643
  4. Stoyanov G., Moneva K., Sapundzhiev N., Tonchev A. B. The vomeronasal organ – incidence in a Bulgarian population. Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 2016, vol. 130 (4), pp. 344–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116000189
  5. Trotier D., Eloit C., Wassef M., Talmain G., Bensimon J. L., Døving K. B., Ferrand J. The vomeronasal cavity in adult humans. Chemical Senses, 2000, vol. 25 (4), pp. 369–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.4.369
  6. Bhatnagar K. P., Smith T. D. The human vomeronasal organ. III. Postnatal development from infancy to the ninth decade. Journal of Anatomy, 2001, vol. 199 (3), pp. 289–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930289.x
  7. D'Aniello B., Semin G. R., Scandurra A., Pinelli C. The Vomeronasal Organ: A Neglected Organ. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00070
  8. Ibarra-Soria X., Levitin M. O., Logan D. W. The genomic basis of vomeronasal-mediated behaviour. Mammalian Genome, 2014, vol. 25 (1–2), pp. 75–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-013-9463-1
  9. Rodriguez I., Greer C. A., Mok M. Y., Mombaerts P. A putative pheromone receptor gene expressed in human olfactory mucosa. Nature Genetics, 2000, vol. 26, (1), pp. 18–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/79124
  10. Wallrabenstein I., Gerber J., Rasche S., Croy I., Kurtenbach S., Hummel T., Hatt H. The smelling of Hedione results in sex-differentiated human brain activity. Neuroimage, 2015, vol. 113, pp. 365–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.029
  11. Precone V., Paolacci S., Beccari T., Dalla Ragione L., Stuppia L., Baglivo M., Guerri G., Manara E., Tonini G., Herbst K. L., Unfer V., Bertelli M. Pheromone receptors and their putative ligands: Possible role in humans. European Review for Medical Pharmacological Sciences, 2020, vol. 24 (4), pp. 2140–2150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202002_20394
  12. Meredith M. Human vomeronasal organ function: a critical review of best and worst cases. Chemical Senses, 2001, vol. 26 (4), pp. 433–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/26.4.433
  13. Monti-Bloch L., Grosser B. I. Effect of putative pheromones on the electrical activity of the human vomeronasal organ and olfactory epithelium. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1991, vol. 39 (4–2), pp. 573–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(91)90255-4
  14. Zhang J., Webb D. M. Evolutionary deterioration of the vomeronasal pheromone transduction pathway in catarrhine primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, vol. 100 (14), pp. 8337–8341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1331721100
  15. Wessels Q., Hoogland P. V., Vorster W. Anatomical evidence for an endocrine activity of the vomeronasal organ in humans. Clinical Anatomy, 2014, vol. 27 (6), pp. 856–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22382
  16. Hare R. M., Schlatter S., Rhodes G., Simmons L. W. Putative sex-specific human pheromones do not affect gender perception, attractiveness ratings or unfaithfulness judgements of opposite sex faces. Royal Society Open Science, 2017, vol. 4 (3), pp. 160831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160831
  17. Balasubramanian R., Dwyer A., Seminara S. B., Pitteloud N., Kaiser U. B., Crowley W. F. Jr. Human GnRH deficiency: A unique disease model to unravel the ontogeny of GnRH neurons. Neuroendocrinology, 2010, vol. 92 (2), pp. 81–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000314193
  18. Jin Z. W., Cho K. H., Shibata S., Yamamoto M., Murakami G., Rodríguez-Vázquez J. F. Nervus terminalis and nerves to the vomeronasal organ: A study using human fetal specimens. Anatomy & Cell Biology, 2019, vol. 52 (3), pp. 278–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.19.020
  19. Sonne J., Reddy V., Lopez-Ojeda W. Neuroanatomy, Cranial Nerve 0 (Terminal Nerve). Treasure Island. StatPearls Publishing, 2021. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459159
  20. Monti-Bloch L., Jennings-White C., Berliner D. L. The human vomeronasal system. A review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1998, vol. 855 (1), pp. 373–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10595.x
  21. Doty R. L. The great pheromone myth. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 296 p. URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/596
  22. Lunde K., Egelandsdal B., Skuterud E., Mainland J. D., Lea T., Hersleth M., Matsunami H. Genetic variation of an odorant receptor OR7D4 and sensory perception of cooked meat containing androstenone. PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7 (5), pp. e35259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035259
  23. Hummer T. A., Phan K. L., Kern D. W., McClintock M. K. A human chemosignal modulates frontolimbic activity and connectivity in response to emotional stimuli. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2017, vol. 75, pp. 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.023
  24. Burke S. M., Veltman D. J., Gerber J., Hummel T., Bakker J. Heterosexual men and women both show a hypothalamic response to the chemo-signal androstadienone. PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7 (7), pp. e40993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040993
  25. Savic I., Hedén-Blomqvist E., Berglund H. Pheromone signal transduction in humans: What can be learned from olfactory loss. Human Brain Mapping, 2009, vol. 30 (9), pp. 3057–3065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20727
  26. Doty R. L. Human Pheromones: Do They Exist? Neurobiology of Chemical Communication. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2014. Chapter 19. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24830029/
  27. Wyatt T. D. Reproducible research into human chemical communication by cues and pheromones: Learning from psychology's renaissance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 2020, vol. 375 (1800), pp. 0262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0262
  28. Wyatt T. D. The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 2015, vol. 282 (1804), pp. 2994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994
  29. Milinski M., Croy I., Hummel T., Boehm T. Major histocompatibility complex peptide ligands as olfactory cues in human body odour assessment. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 2013, vol. 280 (1755), pp. 2889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2889
  30. Dandine-Roulland C., Laurent R., Dall'Ara I., Toupance B., Chaix R. Genomic evidence for MHC disassortative mating in humans. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 2019, vol. 286 (1899), pp. 2664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2664
  31. Qiao Z., Powell J. E., Evans D. M. MHC-Dependent mate selection within 872 spousal pairs of European ancestry from the health and retirement study. Genes (Basel), 2018, vol. 9 (1), pp. 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010053
  32. Croy I., Ritschel G., Kreßner-Kiel D., Schäfer L., Hummel T., Havlíček J., Sauter J., Ehninger G., Schmidt A. H. Marriage does not relate to major histocompatibility complex: A genetic analysis based on 3691 couples. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 2020, vol. 287 (1936), pp. 1800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1800
  33. McClintock M. K. Menstrual synchorony and suppression. Nature, 1971, vol. 229 (5282), pp. 244–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/229244a0
  34. Preti G., Cutler W. B., Garcia C. R., Huggins G. R., Lawley H. J. Human axillary secretions influence women's menstrual cycles: The role of donor extract of females. Hormones and Behavior, 1986, vol. 20 (4), pp. 474–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506x(86)90009-7
  35. Morozova S. V., Savvateeva D. M., Svistushkin V. M., Toporkova L. A. The role of the vomeronasal system in the formation of the human sexual behaviour. Vestnik Oto-Rino-Laringologii, 2017, vol. 82 (2), pp. 90–94. (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201782190-94 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29141583
  36. Voznessenskaya V. V., Laktionova T. K. Influence of the male axillary extracts on regulation of menstrual cycles in women. Doklady Biological Sciences, 2018, vol. 478 (1), pp. 19–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496618010076
  37. Wisman A., Shrira I. Sexual chemosignals: Evidence that men process olfactory signals of women's sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2020, vol. 49 (5), pp. 1505–1516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8
  38. Roberts S. C., Havlíček J., Schaal B. Human olfactory communication: Current challenges and future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 2020, vol. 375 (1800), pp. 0258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0258
  39. Schaal B., Coureaud G., Langlois D., Giniès C., Sémon E., Perrier G. Chemical and behavioural characterization of the rabbit mammary pheromone. Nature, 2003, vol. 424 (6944), pp. 68–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01739
  40. Schaal B. Pheromones for Newborns. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2014. Chapter 17. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24830031/
  41. Berger S., Hatt H., Ockenfels A. Exposure to hedione increases reciprocity in humans. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00079
  42. Pützer A., Brüne M., Hatt H., Wolf O. T. Hedione reduces subjective vicarious stress. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2020, vol. 13, pp. 297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00297
  43. Seo J. S., Yoon S. W., Hwang S. H., Nam S. M., Nahm S. S., Jeong J. H., Lee J., Youn H. N., Kim J. B., Kim W. The Microvillar and Solitary chemosensory cells as the novel targets of infection of SARS-CoV-2 in Syrian golden hamsters. Viruses, 2021, vol. 13 (8), pp. 1653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v13081653
  44. Pandolfi E. C., Hoffmann H. M., Schoeller E. L., Gorman M. R., Mellon P. L. Haploinsufficiency of SIX3 abolishes male reproductive behavior through disrupted olfactory development, and impairs female fertility through disrupted GnRH neuron migration. Molecular Neurobiology, 2018, vol. 55 (11), pp. 8709–8727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1013-0
  45. Deng H. Y., Feng J. R., Zhou W. H., Kong W. F., Ma G. C., Hu T. F., Luo S. G., Xi Y., Zhang Y., Yang Q. T. Olfactory sensitivity is related to erectile function in adult males. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020, vol. 8, pp. 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00093
  46. Henningsson S., Hovey D., Vass K., Walum H., Sandnabba K., Santtila P., Jern P., Westberg L. A  missense polymorphism in the putative pheromone receptor gene VN1R1 is associated with sociosexual behavior. Translational Psychiatry, 2017, vol. 7 (4), pp. e1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.70
  47. Pfau D., Jordan C. L., Breedlove S. M. The de-scent of sexuality: Did loss of a pheromone signaling protein permit the evolution of same-sex sexual behavior in primates? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021, vol. 50 (6), pp. 2267–2276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1377-2
  48. McGann J. P. Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science, 2017, vol. 356 (6338), pp.  eaam7263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7263
Date of the publication 30.04.2022