Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 46–63
© Kharlanova E. M., Roslyakova S. V., Sivrikova N. V., Ptashko T. G., Sokolova N. A., 2021
UDC: 
378.987

Studying students’ opinions as a stage of designing proactive preparation for providing moral education

Kharlanova E. M. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Roslyakova S. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Sivrikova N. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Ptashko T. G. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Sokolova N. A. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation)
1 South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 943
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of taking into account students’ opinions (their attitudes, preferences and suggestions) in preparing future professionals in the social sphere for providing moral education. Traditionally, students are included in the assessment of the implemented degree program in order to evaluate its outcomes, but their capacity to influence the transformation of programs has not been properly investigated.
The purpose of this article is to study students’ opinions about their satisfaction with university preparation for providing moral education in order to improve its quality.
Materials and Methods. By adopting a systematic approach, the authors have used the following theoretical methods: systemic analysis, synthesis, and modeling. An online survey was conducted to collect empirical data. The study involved 674 undergraduate students (3rd, 4th and 5th years). For the mathematical analysis, Cramer V-test was used.
Results. The authors justify the expediency of developing a proactive programme aimed at preparing undergraduates for providing moral education, within the framework of which students are involved in the interaction and transformation of themselves, educational practices and educational environment, responding to urgent tasks and challenges of the future.
The study has revealed general satisfaction of students with their preparation for providing moral education, as well as a range of shortcomings. Significantly, there is a correlation between the dissatisfaction with university preparation and proposals for improving it.
It is noted that students’ proposals are aimed at changes in all subsystems of proactive training: subject-environmental (ensuring engaged collaboration of stakeholders both on-campus and off-campus); contents (enhancing practical components of the curriculum and ensuring students’ personal development); procedural (using active and interactive teaching methods).
However, the implementation of students’ proposals requires collaborative efforts of all the stakeholders who create conditions for the manifestation of students’ subjectivity. At the same time, students’ proposals is a valuable resource for the transition to proactive preparation for providing moral education.
The research findings have enabled the authors to clarify the purpose, content, methods of ensuring students’ subject position in proactive preparation for providing moral education.
Conclusions. The investigation of students’ opinions has expanded the understanding of risks and opportunities for improving preparation for providing moral education, indicated the significance of proactive training future professionals in the social sphere for providing moral education and the need to ensure the continuing development of students’ subjectivity in the process of studying, implementation, critical analysis and transformation of practical educational activities into interactions with other subjects. The introduction of tools for collaborative thinking and action in the process of practical training will enable students to influence its implementation and improvement.

Keywords: 

Moral education; Proactivity; Proactive preparation; Subjectivity; Interaction.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46513825

For citation:
Kharlanova E. M., Roslyakova S. V., Sivrikova N. V., Ptashko T. G., Sokolova N. A. Studying students’ opinions as a stage of designing proactive preparation for providing moral education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 46–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.03
References: 
  1. Nurullin A. F., Rassolova E. N., Galkin K. A. Career expectations of young scientists in the context of the VUCA world. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2020, vol. 4 (8), pp. 42–46. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2020.05657
  2. Zinchenko V. V. Institutional trends and integrated international transformations of educational system in the context of the global sustainable development of society. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2019, no. 2, pp. 10–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.2.1 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38169060
  3. Deepika, Chitranshi J. Leader readiness of Gen Z in VUCA business environment. Foresight, 2021, vol. 23 (2), pp. 154–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-05-2020-0048 URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/FS-05-2020-0048/full/html
  4. Hadar L. L., Ergas O., Alpert B., Ariav T. Rethinking teacher education in a VUCA world: Student teachers' social-emotional competencies during the COVID-19 crisis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 43 (4), pp. 573–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1807513
  5. Mukhin M. I. Education of the twenty first century: Features of development. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2020, no. 5, pp. 22–44. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.5.2 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44130088
  6. Singh S. Education for peace through transformative dialogue: Perspectives from Kashmir. International Review of Education, 2018, vol. 64 (1), pp. 43–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9697-3
  7. Golovanova N. F., Lomakina I. S. Anthropological Inconsistencies in Educational Characteristics: Comparative Approach. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2018, no. 6, pp. 10–17. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2018.6.1 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36646645
  8. Ponce R. S., Sarmiento A. S., Bertolín A. G. Education for citizenship: An educational urgency for the 21st century. Educação & Sociedade, 2020, vol. 41, pp. 225–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/ES.225347
  9. Behtoui A. Swedish young people’s after-school extra-curricular activities: Attendance, opportunities and consequences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2019, vol. 40 (3), pp. 340–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1540924

10. Högberg B. Educational policies and social inequality in well-being among young adults. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2019, vol. 40 (5), pp. 664–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1576119

11. Van der Walt J. L. Citizenship Education for living successfully in 2050 and beyond. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 2020, vol. 60 (4–2), pp. 1204–1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2020/v60n4-2a6

12. Ittner D., Hagenauer G., Hascher T. Swiss principals' emotions, basic needs satisfaction and readiness for change during curriculum reform. Journal of Educational Change, 2019, vol. 20 (2), pp. 165–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09339-1

13. Polyakov S. D. About the phenomenology of educational activity. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2012, no. 18, pp. 23–25. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17737764 

14. Savchenkov A. V., Uvarina N. V. Motivational and value-based component of future teachers’ readiness for moral education: Concept clarification. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (2), pp. 55–79. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45741069

15. Astashova N. A., Bondyreva S. K., Smantser A. P. Development of the axiosphere of the future teacher in the dialogue space of modern education. The Education and Science Journal, 2018, vol. 20 (7), pp. 32–67. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-7-32-67  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35594374

16. Kurteeva O. V. Technology of formation of future pedagogue’s commitment to designing the educational project content. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2021, no. 2, pp. 176–186. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.2.12 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45804539

17. Iranzo-García P., Camarero-Figuerola M., Barrios-Arós C., Tierno-García J.-M., Gilabert-Medina S. What do teachers say about school leadership competencies and their initial formation? REICE. Ibero-American Journal on Quality, Efficacy, and Change in Education, 2018, vol. 16 (3), pp. 29–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2018.16.3.002

18. Köhler T., Drummer J. Recent Technological challenges in (vocational) education. Vocational Teacher Education in Central Asia. Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 2018, vol. 28, pp. 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73093-6_1 

19. Baiborodova L. V., Gruzdev M. V., Kharisova I. G. Training of future teachers to educational activity. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, no. 2, pp. 17–25. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2018-20002  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35013622

20. Shchurkova N. E. Education strategy: A person in the space of values of humanistic culture. National Education, 2017, no. 8, pp. 95–104. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34549664

21. Selivanova N. L., Stepanov P. L. Preparation of a future teacher as a social and moral educator: A theoretical underpinning. Education and Self Development, 2018, vol. 13 (2), pp. 45–52. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/esd13.2.07 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36335288

22. Hudyakova N. L., Nevelev A. B., Neveleva V. S. Personal culture as a goal of continuing developmental education: Philosophical and methodological substantiation. The Education and Science Journal, 2020, vol. 22 (7), pp. 9–32. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-7-9-32 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43898801

23. Hodko A. F. Pedagogical support of formation of moral awareness of student. The Education and Science Journal, 2015, no. 6, pp. 143–153. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-6-143-153 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23731875

24. Minaz M. B., Tas H. Effect of biography-based values education on the attitudes of 4th grade primary school students towards the value of patriotism. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, vol. 10 (2), pp. 555–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.019

25. McDermid C. Informal patriotic education in Poland: Homeland, history and citizenship in patriotic books for children. London Review of Education, 2020, vol. 18 (1), pp. 65–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.18.1.05

26. Bennetts K., Bone J. Adult leadership and the development of children's spirituality: Exploring Montessori's concept of the prepared environment. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 2019, vol. 24 (4), pp. 356–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1685949

27. Taylor H. F., Vestal A. R., Wood C. L. “I need you to show me”: Coaching early childhood professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 2021, vol. 3, pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01172-7

28. Daum D. N., Marttinen R., Banville D. Service-learning experiences for pre-service teachers: cultural competency and behavior management challenges when working with a diverse low-income community. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2021, vol. 2, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1891210

29. Pianta R. C. Teacher-student interactions: measurement, impacts, improvement, and policy. Ricerche di Psicologia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 69–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2019-001005

30. Othman A., Ruslan N. Intercultural communication experiences among students and teachers: implication to in-service teacher professional development. Journal for Multicultural Education, 2020, vol. 14 (3/4), pp. 223–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-04-2020-0024

31. Stunell K. Supporting student-teachers in the multicultural classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2021, vol. 44 (2), pp. 217–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1758660

32. Gutu V., Boghian I. A. Bidimensional psycho-pedagogical model for tolerance education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educati Emultidimensionala, 2019, vol. 11 (4), pp. 1–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/153

33. Leon-del-Barco B.,  Mendo-Lazaro S., Felipe-Castano E., Fajardo-Bullon F., Iglesias-Gallego D. Measuring responsibility and cooperation in learning teams in the university setting: Validation of a questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, vol. 9, pp. 326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00326

34. Sokolova N. A., Sivrikova N. V., Chernikova E. G., Ptashko T. G., Harlanova E. M., Roslyakova S. V. Conflict management training for future educators. The Education and Science Journal, 2020, vol. 22 (7), pp. 101–124. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-7-101-124 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43898805

35. Torrijos Fincias P., Torrecilla Sánchez E. M., Rodríguez Conde M. J. Evaluación experimental de programas para el desarrolloemocional en docentes de Educación Secundaria. Annals of Psychology, 2017, vol. 34 (1), pp. 68–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.1.273451

36. Gundogan A. The necessity of value education according to the opinions of pre-service primary teachers and functionality of life science course. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 2020, vol. 8 (2), pp. 599–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.8m 

37. Fraser W J. Filling gaps and expanding spaces – voices of student teachers on their developing teacher identity South African Journal of Education, 2018, vol. 38 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n2a1551

38. Buyanova G. V. The main fields of educational activity in the system of modern higher education. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2019, no. 1, pp. 37–50. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.1.3 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36996140

39. Kharlanova E. M., Sokolova N. A., Roslyakova S. V. Scientific and methodological support of the conflictological training for future teachers: proactive modeling. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2020, no. 5, pp. 102–121. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.5.7 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44130093

40. Cangiano F., Parker S. K., Yeo G. B. Does daily proactivity affect well-being? The moderating role of punitive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2019, vol. 40 (1), pp. 59–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2321 

41. Zobkov A. V. Personal features of formation of students as subjects of innovative pedagogical activity. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2019, no. 1, pp. 275–289. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.1.20 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36996161

Date of the publication 31.08.2021