Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 64–90
© Bezgodova S. A., Miklyaeva A. V., 2021
UDC: 
316

Digital academic dishonesty: A socio-psychological analysis

Bezgodova S. A. 1 (St. Petersburg , Russian Federation), Miklyaeva A. V. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 793
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents a review of psychological studies aimed at analyzing digital academic dishonesty (academic misconduct with the use of the Internet). The socio-psychological specifics of digital academic dishonesty, which distinguishes it from traditional forms of academic dishonesty, have been studied quite fragmentally to date. The purpose of this study is to identify socio-psychological factors that determine the involvement of students in digital academic dishonesty in terms of digitalization of education.
Materials and Methods. In order to achieve the research goal, we used the method of systematic review of research articles published in 1995-2021 and indexed in the databases ‘Scopus’ and ‘Web of Science’. According to the criteria (relevant keywords; availability of a detailed description of the research program, empirical results; Russian or English), 55 articles were included in the final array of analysis.
Results. We identified individual-psychological and contextual-environmental factors of digital academic dishonesty. Individual psychological factors include: students’ attitudes towards digital academic dishonesty; students’ academic experience; students’ personal characteristics; socio-demographic characteristics of students. Contextual and environmental factors include: students’ attitude to the prevalence of digital academic dishonesty among peers; teachers’ attitude to digital academic dishonesty; institutional policy on digital academic dishonesty.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that the socio-psychological risk factors for involving schoolchildren and students in digital academic dishonesty are their previous experience of academic dishonesty, the idea of the acceptability of this form of academic behavior, the lack of educational motivation and self-regulation, insufficient level of knowledge and information competence (individual psychological factors), as well as the prevalence of digital academic dishonesty in an educational institution with the background of the lack of an institutional policy to prevent digital academic dishonesty and relevant actions of teachers (contextual and environmental factors).

Keywords: 

Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Digitalization of education; Digital academic dishonesty; Involvement in digital academic dishonesty; Socio-psychological factors; Schoolchildren; Students.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46513826

For citation:
Bezgodova S. A., Miklyaeva A. V. Digital academic dishonesty: A socio-psychological analysis. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 64–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.04
References: 

Spasennikov V. V., Androsov K. Y. Academic fraud and motivation of modern universities students’ educational activities. Ergodesign, 2020, no. 2, pp. 72–80. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2020-2-72-80 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42975752

2. Lawson R. A. Is Classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “Real World? Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, vol. 49 (2), pp. 189–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015784.34148.cb  

3. Simkin M. G, Mcleod A. Why do college students cheat? Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, vol. 94 (3), pp. 441–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0275-x 

4. Cuadrado D, Salgado J. F, Moscoso S. Personality, intelligence, and counterproductive academic behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2021, vol. 120 (2), pp. 504–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/psP0000285

5. Grechkina L. Yu. Academic dishonesty as pseudo-adaptive behavior of university students. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Education. Personality. Society, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 27–35. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38173391   

6. Molnar K., Kletke M., Chongwatpol J. Ethics vs IT ethics: Do undergraduate students perceive a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, vol. 83 (4), pp. 657–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9646-3 

7. LaDuke R. D. Academic dishonesty today, unethical practices tomorrow? Journal of Professional Nursing, 2013, vol. 29 (6), pp. 402–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.009 

8. Shmeleva E. Plagiarism and cheating in Russian universities: The role of the learning environment and personal characteristics of students. Educational Studies Moscow, 2016, no. 1, pp. 84–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-84-109 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25774647

9. Daniels L. M., Goegan L. D., Parker P. C. The impact of COVID-19 triggered changes to instruction and assessment on university students’ self-reported motivation, engagement and perceptions. Social Psychology of Education, 2021, vol. 24 (1), pp. 299–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09612-3

10. Hanafy S. M., Jumaa M. I., Arafa M. A. A comparative study of online learning in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic versus conventional learning. Saudi Medical Journal, 2021, vol. 42 (3), pp. 324–331. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20200741

11. Djajadikerta H. G., Trireksani T., Ong T., Roni S. M., Kazemian S., Zhang J., Noor A. H. M., Ismail S., Ahmad M. A. N., Azhar Z., Shahbudin A. S. M., Maradona A. F., Yanto H., Wahyuningrum I. F. S. Australian, Malaysian and Indonesian accounting academics’ teaching experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 2021, vol. 15 (2), pp. 103–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v15i2.7  

12. McGee P. Supporting academic honesty in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 2013, vol. 10 (1), pp. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2013.1.1

13. Caskurlu S., Richardson J. C., Maeda Y., Kozan K. The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 2021, vol. 165 (2), pp. 104111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111

14. LoSchiavo F. M., Shatz M. A. The impact of the honor code on online course fraud. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 2011, vol. 7 (2), pp. 179–184. URL: https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no2/loschiavo_0611.pdf 

15. Faucher D., Caves S. Academic dishonesty: Innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 2009, vol. 4 (2), pp. 37–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2008.09.003

16. Hosny M., Fatima S. Attitude of students toward cheating and plagiarism: University case study. Journal of a Plied Sciences, 2014, vol. 14 (8), pp. 748–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2014.748.757

17. Gaberson K. B. Academic dishonesty among nursing students. Nursing Forum, 1997, vol. 32 (3), pp. 14–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.1997.tb00205.x 

18. McCabe D. L. Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Nursing Education, 2009, vol. 48 (11), pp. 614–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090716-07 

29. Yu H., Glanzer P. L., Johnson B. R. Examining the relationship between student attitude and academic cheating. Ethics & Behavior, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1pp.817746 

20. Graham M. A., Monday J., O’Brien K., Steffen S. Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviours. Journal of College Student Development, 1994, vol. 35 (4) pp. 255–260. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ489082

21. Balbay S., Kilis S. Perceived effectiveness of turnitin in detecting plagiarism in presentation slides. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2019, vol. 10 (1), pp. 25–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512522 

22. Jereb E., Perc M., Lämmlein B., Jerebic J., Urh M., Podbregar I., Šprajc P. Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students. PloS One, 2018, vol. 13(8), pp. e0202252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202252 

23. Kauffman Y., Young M. F. Digital plagiarism: An experimental study of the effect of instructional goals and copy-and-paste affordance. Computers & Education, 2015, vol. 83 (1), pp. 44–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.016 

24. Camara S. K., Eng-Ziskin S., Wimberley L., Dabbour K. S., Lee C. M. Predicting students’ intention to plagiarize: An ethical theoretical framework. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2017, vol. 15 (1), pp. 43–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9269-3

25. Mâță L., Lazăr I. M., Ghiațău R. Exploring academic dishonesty practices among science education university students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2020, vol. 19 (1), pp. 91–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.91

26. Bretag T., Harper R., Burton M., Ellis C., Newton P. H., Rozenberg P., Saddiqui S., van Haeringen K. Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 44 (11), pp. 1837–1856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788

27. Draper M. J., Reid-Hutchings C. Are essay mills committing fraud? A further analysis of their behaviours vs the 2006 fraud act (UK). International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2019, vol. 15 (1), pp. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0050-4

28. Ruiperez-Valiente J. A., Munoz-Merino P. J., Alexandron G., Pritchard D. E. Using machine learning to detect 'multiple-account' cheating and analyze the influence of student and problem features. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2019, vol. 12 (1), pp. 112–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2784420

29. Amigud A., Dawson P. The law and the outlaw: Is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 45 (1), pp. 98–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851

30. Şendağ S., Duran M., Fraser M. R. Surveying the extent of involvement in online academic dishonesty (academic dishonesty) related practices among university students and the rationale students provide: One university’s experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, vol. 28 (3), pp. 849–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.004

31. Namlu A. G., Odabasi H. F. An unethical computer using a behavior scale: A reliability and validity study on Turkish university students. Computers and Education, 2007, vol. 48 (2), pp. 205–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.006

32. Chatterjee S., Sarker S., Valacich J. S. The behavioral roots of information systems security: Exploring key factors related to unethical its use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2015, vol. 31 (4), pp. 49–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001257

33. Mengist W., Soromessa T., Legese G., Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 2020, vol. 7, pp. 100777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

34. King C. G., Guyette Jr. R. W., Piotrowski C. Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students' views. Journal of Educators Online, 2009, vol. 6 (1), pp. 1–11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2009.1.5

35. Al-Shehri M. Code of ethics for teaching-learning for an e-learning system. International Journal of Computer A Plications, 2017, vol. 166 (5), pp. 16–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914043

36. Nelson L., Nelson R., Tichenor L. Understanding today's students: Engaging entry-level students in scientific dishonesty. Journal of College Science Teaching, 2013, vol. 42 (3), pp. 52–57. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631795

37. Ma H. J., Wan G., Lu E. Y. Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools. Theory into Practice, 2008, vol. 47 (3), pp. 197–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153809

38. Morarji B. The Internet world and plagiarism. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 6 (4), pp. 1747–1752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2019/104842019 

39. Chankova M. Teaching academic integrity: The missing link. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2020, vol. 18 (2), pp. 155–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09356-y URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43436691

40. Chang S. H., Shu Y., Lin Y. S., Wang C. L. “I Believe”, “I Think”, then “I Will”? Investigating the mediator role of ethical judgment between internet ethical self-efficacy and ethical behavioral intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, vol. 101, pp. 387–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.034

41. Thayan B. M. Fraud and plagiarism in the context of the middle east university. Journal of Education and Training, 2017, vol. 6 (1), pp. 158–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p158

42. Cilliers L. Evaluation of information ethical issues among undergraduate students: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Information Management, 2017, vol. 19 (1), pp. a767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.767

43. Chang C.‐M., Chen Y.-L., Huang Y.-y., Chou С. Why Do They become potential cyber-plagiarizers? Exploring the alternative thinking of copy-and-paste youth in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 2015, vol. 87, pp. 357–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.006

44. Trushell J., Byrne K., Simpson R. Cheating behaviours, the internet and education undergraduate students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2011, vol. 28 (2), pp. 136–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00424.x

45. Uzun A. M., Kilis S. Investigating antecedents of plagiarism using extended theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 2020, vol. 144, pp. 103700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103700

46. Molnar K. K., Kletke M. G. Does the type of cheating influence undergraduate students' perceptions of cheating? Journal of Academic Ethics, 2012, vol. 10 (3), pp. 201–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9164-5

47. Stephens J. M., Young M. F., Calabrese T. Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates' beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics and Behavior, 2007, vol. 17 (3), pp. 233–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519197

48. Akbulut Y., Dönmez O. Predictors of digital piracy among Turkish undergraduate students. Telematics and Informatics, 2018, vol. 35 (5), pp. 1324–1334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.004

49. Bacon A. M., McDaid C., Williams N., Corr P. J. What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020, vol. 90 (1), pp. 152–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12269

50. Curtis G., Cowcher E., Greene B., Rundle K., Paull M., Davis M. Self-control, injunctive norms, and descriptive norms predict engagement in plagiarism in a theory of planned behavior model. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2018, vol. 16 (3), pp. 225–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9309-2

51. Miller A., Shoptaugh C., Wooldridge J. Reasons not to cheat, academic-integrity responsibility, and frequency of cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 2011, vol. 79 (2), pp. 169–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903567830

52. Etter S., Cramer J. J., Finn S. Origins of academic dishonesty: Ethical orientations and personality factors associated with attitudes about cheating with information technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2006, vol. 39 (2), pp. 133–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782477

53. Payan J., Reardon J., McCorkle D. E. The effect of culture on the academic honesty of marketing and business students. Journal of Marketing Education, 2010, vol. 32 (3), pp. 275–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475310377781

54. Underwood J., Szabo A. Academic offences and e-learning: Individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2003, vol. 34 (4), pp. 467–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00343

55. Bates I. P., Davies J. G., Murphy C., Bone A. A multi-faculty exploration of academic dishonesty. Pharmacy Education, 2005, vol. 5 (1), pp. 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210500086264

56. Ercegovac Z., Richardson J. V. Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College & Research Libraries, 2004, vol. 65 (4), pp. 301–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.4.301

57. Kohl E. K. Fostering academic competence or putting students under general suspicion? Voluntary plagiarism check of academic papers by means of a web-based plagiarism detection system. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 2011, vol. 19 (s. 1), pp. 90–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i3.7611

58. Trushell J., Byrne K., Hassan N. ICT facilitated access to information and undergraduates' cheating behaviours. Computers and Education, 2013, vol. 63, pp. 151–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.006

59. Tayaben J. L. Attitudes of student nurses enrolled in E-learning course towards academic dishonesty: A descriptive-exploratory study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2014, vol. 201, pp. 32–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-415-2-32

60. Anderman E. M., Won S. Academic cheating in disliked classes. Ethics & Behavior, 2019, vol. 29 (1), pp. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1373648

61. Costley J. Students ' perception of academic dishonesty at a cyber university in South Korea. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2019, vol. 17 (2) pp. 205–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9318-1

62. Stogner J. M., Miller B. L., Marcum C. D. Learning to E-cheat: A criminological test of internet facilitated academic cheating. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 2013, vol. 24 (2), pp. 175–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.693516

63. Shmeleva, E., Semenova, T. Academic dishonesty among college students: Academic motivation vs contextual factors. Educational Studies Moscow, 2019, no. 3, pp. 101–129. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-3-101-129 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39555186

64. Conradson S., Hernández-Ramos P. Computers, the internet, and cheating among secondary school students: Some implications for educators. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2004, vol. 9 (1), pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/by4q-kx23

65. Blau G., Kunkle M., Mittal N., Rivera M., Ozkan B. Measuring business school faculty perceptions of student cheating. Journal of Education for Business, 2017, vol. 92 (6), pp. 263–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1339663

66. Chirikov I., Shmeleva E., Loyalka P. The role of faculty in reducing academic dishonesty among engineering students. Studies in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 45 (12), pp. 2464–2480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1616169 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45547150

67. Sattler S., Wiegel C., Veen F. V. The use frequency of 10 different methods for preventing and detecting academic dishonesty and the factors influencing their use. Studies in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 42 (6), pp. 1126–1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085007

68. Mahmud S., Bretag T., Foltynek T. Students’ perceptions of plagiarism policy in higher education: A comparison of the United Kingdom, Czechia, Poland, and Romania. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2019, vol. 17 (3), pp. 271–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9319-0

69. Vehviläinen S., Löfström E., Nevgi A. Dealing with plagiarism in the academic community: Emotional engagement and moral distress. Higher Education, 2018, vol. 75 (1), pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0112-6

70. Ng C. K. C. Evaluation of academic integrity of online open book assessments implemented in an undergraduate medical radiation science course during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 2020, vol. 51 (4), pp. 610–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.009

71. Golden J., Kohlbeck M. Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online classes. Journal of Accounting Education, 2020, vol. 52, pp. 100671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100671

72. Alessio H. M., Messinger J. D. Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity in technology-assisted learning and testing. Frontiers in Education, 2021, vol. 6, pp. 629220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.629220

73. Levine J., Pazdernik V. Evaluation of a four-prong anti-plagiarism program and the incidence of plagiarism: A five-year retrospective study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 43 (7), pp. 1094–1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434127

74. Muhammad A., Ghalib M., Ahmad F., Naveed Q., Shah A. Research on the state of ethical development in e-learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and A Plications (IJACSA), 2016, vol. 7 (4), pp. 284–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070436

75. Rettinger D. A., Jordan A. E., Peschiera F. Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 2004, vol. 45 (8), pp. 873–890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-5952-0

76. Koscielniak M., Bojanowska A. The role of personal values and student achievement in academic dishonesty. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, pp. 1887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01887

77. Mathrani A., Han B., Mathrani S., Jha M., Scogings C. Interpreting academic integrity transgressions among learning communities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2021, vol. 17 (1), pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00073-x

78. Baran L., Jonason P. K. Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy. PLoS One, 2020, vol. 15 (8), pp. e0238141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238141

79. Yu H., Glanzer P. L., Sriram R., Johnson B. R., Moore B. What contributes to college students’ cheating? A Study of Individual Factors, Ethics & Behavior, 2017, vol. 27 (5), pp. 401–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1169535

80. Barque-Duran А., Pothos Е. M., Hampton J. A., Yearsley J. M. Contemporary morality: Moral judgments in digital contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, vol. 75, pp. 184–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020 

81. Francis K. B., Howard C., Howard I. S., Gummerum M., Ganis G., Anderson G., Terbeck S. Correction: virtual morality: Transitioning from moral judgment to moral action? PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12 (1), pp. e0170133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170133

82. Eremenko T. V. Cases of plagiarism in the context of information ethics of Russian higher education community: review of academic and professional journals (2006–2015). Naukovedenie, 2015, vol. 7 (4). pp. 108. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15862/49PVN415 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24312493

83. Alt D. Assessing the connection between students’ justice experience and attitudes toward academic cheating in higher education new learning environments. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2014, vol. 12 (2), pp. 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9202-6

Date of the publication 31.08.2021