Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 172–196
© Piskun O. Y., Baskina I. S., Petrochenko V. A., Shtatnyh E. D., Agavelyan R. O., 2021
UDC: 
376+159.9+378

Bilingual learning environment as a resource for the development of creative abilities and socio-psychological adaptation of hearing-impaired children

Piskun O. Y. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Baskina I. S. 2 (Naariya, State of Israel), Petrochenko V. A. 3 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Shtatnyh E. D. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Agavelyan R. O. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
2 Company "I hear the world around me"
3 Master's student of the Department of Correctional Pedagogy and Psychology
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1060
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article addresses the problem of bilingualism of deaf children in the educational process with the main focus on enhancing their creative abilities and socio-psychological adjustment. The purpose of the research is to study and describe the resource for the development of creative abilities and socio-psychological adaptation of children with hearing impairment.
Materials and Methods. In this paper the authors provide a review of Russian and international studies into the role of bilingualism in deaf education. The evaluation of creative abilities and socialization of children with hearing impairment was conducted using the following projective methods: ‘Measurement of creative thinking’ (E. Torrance’s Incomplete figure test), N. V. Shaidurova’s measurement of older preschoolers’ creativity, ‘A picture of the family’ by T. G. Khomentauskas (adaptated by O. Y. Piskun and R. O. Agavelyan) as well as sets of survey methods including M. A. Panfilova’s “Sociometric questionnaire for children” and V. V. Tkacheva’s “Questionnaire for parents”. The sample consisted of 16 senior preschool age deaf children and their parents (n = 16).
Results. Results. The authors identify the features of the development of creative abilities in children with hearing impairment: a slow formation of verbal speech, role-play interaction, and abstract thinking. The study reveals low socio-psychological adaptation, high parental deprivation and anxiety. In some cases, children are deprived of constructive interaction with their parents. It is emphasized that bilingual learning environment can be considered as a tool of deaf children’s social adjustment. The relevant learning environment can be created within the center of development and psychological and educational support for individuals with special education needs. Competent professionals (including those with disabilities) who use Russian sign language are motivated to communicate with deaf children and their parents for subsequent successful social integration and adjustment.
Conclusions. The study concludes that within a personality-centered paradigm of a bilingual educational environment for creative development of children with hearing impairment and their socio-psychological adjustment, the leading factor is the bilingual approach to creating the center for psychological and educational support for families with the main focus on constructive interaction with deaf children.

Keywords: 

Children with hearing impairment; Bilingual educational environment; Development of creative abilities; Socio-psychological adjustment; Personality-oriented paradigm; Russian sign language; Communication; Bilingualism; Motivation; Professional competence.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:45741075

For citation:
Piskun O. Y., Baskina I. S., Petrochenko V. A., Shtatnyh E. D., Agavelyan R. O. Bilingual learning environment as a resource for the development of creative abilities and socio-psychological adaptation of hearing-impaired children . Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 172–196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.08
References: 
  1. Golovchits L. A. Special educational needs of the deaf and hard of hearing preschoolers with mental disorders. Bulletin of Cherepovets State University, 2017, no. 5, pp. 170–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23859/1994-0637-2017-5-80-21  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30114301
  2. Allen T. E., Clark M. D., del Giudice A., Koo D., Lieberman A., Mayberry R., Miller P. Phonology and reading: A response to Wang, Trezek, Luckner, and Paul. American Annals of the Deaf, 2009, vol. 154 (4), pp. 338–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0109
  3. Parault S. J., Williams H. M. Reading motivation, reading amount, and text comprehension in deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2010, vol. 15 (2), pp.120–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enp031
  4. Kuftyak E. V., Khanukhova L. M., Poymanova E. V. Bilingualism in children: influence on cognitive and communicative development and measurement tools. Modern Preschool Education, 2019, no. 2, pp.30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1997-9657-2018-10042 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38585093
  5. Baulina M. E. Comparative analysis of internal consultations and internet counseling parents of children with disabilities. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2015, vol. 23 (3), pp. 67–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2015230305 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25613953
  6. Bulgarova B. A., Bragina M. A., Novoselova N. V., Zolotykh E. A. Classification and typology of bilingualism. Bulletin of the RUDN. Series: Education Issues: Languages and Specialty, 2017, vol. 14 (3), pp.384–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8011-2017-14-3-384-392 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30114232
  7. Snoddon K. American Sign Language and early intervention. Canadian Modern Language Review, 2008, vol. 64 (4), pp. 581–604. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ799724
  8. Scheele A. F., Leseman P. P. M., Mayo A. Y. The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2010, vol. 31 (1), pp. 117–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990191
  9. Mellon N. K., Niparko J. K., Rathmann C., Mathur G., Humphries T., Napoli D. J., Handley T., Cambler S., Lantos J. D. Should all deaf children learn sign language? Pediatrics, 2015, vol. 136 (1), pp. 170–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1632

10. Ponomarenko E. P., Krasavina Y. V., Zhuykova O. V., Serebryakova Y. V. Specific features of intellectual and cognitive processes in hearing impaired students of technical university. Pedagogical Image, 2019, no. 4, pp. 664–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32343/2409-5052-2019-13-4-664-675 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41861839

11. Kyle F. E., Harris M. Predictors of reading development in deaf children: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2010, vol. 107(3), pp. 229–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.011

12. Kelly L. Considerations for designing practice for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2003, vol. 8 (2), pp. 171–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng005

13. Kelly L. The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2003, vol. 8 (3), pp. 230–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng013

14. Nagornaya L. A., Nagornyi N. N. Popularization of Russian sign language as one of the conditions for inclusion of deaf people in the modern Russian society. Philosophy and Culture, 2020, no. 6, pp. 9–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2020.6.33346  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43081388

15. Shand M. A. Sign-based short-term coding of American Sign Language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, vol. 14, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90002-0

16. Swanwick R., Wright S., Salter J. ‘Investigating deaf children's plural and di-verse use of sign and spoken languages in a super diverse context’. Applied Linguistics Review, 2016, vol. 7 (2), pp. 117–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-0009

17. Baulina M. E. Educational path and neuropsychological support for children after cochlear implantation. Integration of Education, 2018, vol. 22 (4), pp. 696–711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.093.022.201804.696-711 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36546002

18. Svituk S. Y. General concepts of bilingualism in psychology. Psychology in Economics and Management, 2017, vol. 9 (2), pp. 26–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17150/2225-7845.2017.9(2).26-32 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34978928

Date of the publication 30.04.2021