Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 42–57
© Morozova I. S., Kargina A. E., Grinenko D. N., Medovikova E. A., 2021
UDC: 
159.99+37.032

Formation of psychological safety in university students through developing self-regulatory personality mechanisms

Morozova I. S. 1 (Kemerovo, Russian Federation), Kargina A. E. 1 (Kemerovo, Russian Federation), Grinenko D. N. 1 (Kemerovo, Russian Federation), Medovikova E. A. 1 (Kemerovo, Russian Federation)
1 Kemerovo State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 689
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article considers the problem of psychological safety formation in future professionals at the stage of pursuing a university degree through the development of self-regulating personality mechanisms. The purpose of the research is to determine the features of the formation of psychological safety among university students through the development of self-regulating personality mechanisms.

Materials and Methods. Data collection was carried out using the following inventories: H. Zakher and M. Frese’s ‘Occupational future time perspective’, S. S. Goncharova’s ‘Ways to overcome negative situations’, S. Norman, D. F. Endler, D. A. James, M. I. Parker’s ‘Coping inventory for stressful situations (adapted by T.A. Kryukova), Test of resilience by S. Muddy (adapted by D. A. Leontiev). The sample consisted of 50 senior students in the final year at university. The data obtained were interpreted and subjected to statistical analysis using Student's t-test.

Results. The authors have defined the concept of ’formation of psychological safety in university students’, as a purposeful, controlled interaction of stakeholders in education which results in the systematization of ideas about psychological safety, acceptable ways of regulating one's activity, taking into account the specifics of the life situation. It has been revealed that reflexive seminars contribute to formation of psychological safety in future professionals of industrial enterprises.

Conclusions. The article concludes that senior students who have participated in reflexive seminars demonstrate a detailed approach to the analysis of events in the surrounding reality, set clear goals and think over action plans, independently make decisions, appropriately respond to emerging difficulties, which are criteria for the formation of psychological safety of a person. The authors argue that the research results can be used for designing formative programs for higher educational institutions in order to enhance students’ psychological safety.

Keywords: 

Professional training; Psychological safety of a person; Educational process; Students; Choice of decision-making methods; Psychological and pedagogical interventions; Reflective seminars.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46233034

For citation:
Morozova I. S., Kargina A. E., Grinenko D. N., Medovikova E. A. Formation of psychological safety in university students through developing self-regulatory personality mechanisms. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 42–57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2103.03
References: 
  1. Kraiger K., Ford J. K. The science of workplace instruction: Learning and development applied to work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2021, vol. 8 (1), pp. 45–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-060109
  2. Hazan Liran B., Miller P. The role of psychological capital in academic adjustment among university students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019, vol. 20 (1), pp. 51–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9933-3
  3. Kulagina I. Y., Apasova E. V. Personality development in the context of university training: A comparative study. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2018, vol. 14 (2), pp. 12–23. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140202  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35126143
  4. Lavrinenko S. V. Approaches to optimization of professional training of technical university students. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 2017, vol. 8 (7), pp. 175–192. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2017-7-175-192  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30487254
  5. Baluku M. M., Mugabi E. N., Nansamba J., Matagi L., Onderi P., Otto K. Psychological capital and career outcomes among final year university students: The mediating role of career engagement and perceived employability. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 2021, vol. 6 (1), pp. 55–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00040-w
  6. Kuk A., Guszkowska M., Gala-Kwiatkowska A. Changes in emotional intelligence of university students participating in psychological workshops and their predictors. Current Psychology, 2019, vol. 40 (4), pp. 1864–1871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0115-1
  7. Gilemkhanova E. N. The relationship of socio-psychological security and academic performance of the educational environment of municipalities. Education and Self Development, 2019, vol. 14 (2), pp. 68–78. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/esd14.2.06 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39212238
  8. Segerstrom S. C., Smith G. T. Personality and coping: Individual differences in responses to emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 2019, vol. 70 (1), pp. 651–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102917
  9. Pukhareva T. S. Psychological security and its role in the professional development of the individual. Psychology, 2016, no. 2, pp. 9–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8701.2016.2.19195 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26183299

10. Ford J. K., Baldwin T. T., Prasad J. Transfer of training: The known and the unknown. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, vol. 5 (1), pp. 201–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104443

11. Andrews M. E., Borrego M., Boklage A. Self-efficacy and belonging: The impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2021, vol. 8 (1), pp. 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0

12. Hernandez D., Jacomino G., Swamy U., Donis K., Eddy S. L. Measuring supports from learning assistants that promote engagement in active learning: Evaluating a novel social support instrument. International Journal of STEM Education, 2021, vol. 8 (1), pp. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00286-z

13. Eby L. T., Robertson M. M. The psychology of workplace mentoring relationships. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2020, vol. 7 (1), pp. 75–100. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044924

14. Raettig T., Weger U. Learning as a shared peak experience: Interactive flow in higher education. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 2018, vol. 2 (1–3), pp. 39–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-018-0011-9

15. Salas E., Bisbey T. M., Traylor A. M., Rosen M. A. Can teamwork promote safety in organizations? Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2020, vol. 7 (1), pp. 283–313. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045411

16. Auzoult L., Priolo D., Blanchet C., Guilbert L. Self- and coregulation of health and performance at workplace. Psychological Studies, 2021, vol. 66 (1), pp. 14–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00570-y

17. Podymova L. S., Podymov N. A., Alisov E. A. Readiness of teaching staff to ensure personality safety in innovative educational environment. Integration of Education, 2018, no. 4, pp. 663–680. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.093.022.201804.663-680  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36546000

18. Zapf D., Kern M., Tschan F., Holman D., Semmer N. K. Emotion work: A work psychology perspective. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2021, vol. 8 (1), pp. 139–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062451

19. Hobfoll S. E., Halbesleben J., Neveu J.-P., Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, vol. 5 (1), pp. 103–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

20. O'Connor D. B., Thayer J. F., Vedhara K. М. Stress and health: A review of psychobiological processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 2021, vol. 72 (1), pp. 663–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-062520-122331

21. Haslam C., Haslam S. A., Jetten J., Cruwys T., Steffens N. K. Life change, social identity, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 2021, vol. 72 (1), pp. 635–661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060120-111721

22. Hall D. T. (Tim), Yip J., Doiron K. Protean careers at work: Self-direction and values orientation in psychological success. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, vol. 5 (1), pp. 129–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104631

23. Duckworth A. L., Taxer J. L., Eskreis-Winkler L., Galla B. M., Gross J. J. Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 2019, vol. 70 (1), pp. 373–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230

24. Kharlamenkova N. E. The concept of psychological safety and its justification from different scientific perspectives. Psychological Journal, 2019, vol. 40 (1), pp. 28–37. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920002985-9 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37109784

25. Medovikova E. A., Morozova I. S. Ensuring the safety of production activities of coal mining personnel: Taking into account individual characteristics, stimulating motivation, and training in self-regulation techniques. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 2020, no. 5, pp. 526–532. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2020.5.p526-532  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43056283

26. Bazarov T., Paramuzov A. Psychometric analysis of the russian version of “te occupational future time perspective” by H. Zacher and M. Frese. Organizational Psychology, 2019, vol. 9 (1), pp. 57–80. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39387396

27. Kargina A. E., Morozova I. S., Medovikova E. A., Grinenko D. N. Developing coping skills for managing difficult situations in the future workplace of senior undergraduate students by means of reflexive seminars. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (4), pp. 75–90. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2004.05  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43933905

Date of the publication 30.06.2021