Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 59–74
UDC: 
159.923

Value and activity-based orientations of university students: The choice between safety and innovativeness

Atamanova I. 1 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Bogomaz S. 1 (Tomsk, Russian Federation)
1 Tomsk State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The study addresses the issues of value and activity-based orientations in order to understand and explore personal and professional development processes in in the current higher education context with the main focus on innovativeness. The study aims to reveal the specifics of the relationship between value and activity-based orientations of university students in terms of their choice between safety and innovativeness.
Materials and Methods. The research methodology involves questionnaires grouped according to three research vectors: 1) university students’ cultural value orientations (R. Inglehart’s Survey) and individual value preferences (Schwartz Value Survey); 2) activity-based orientations (psychological characteristics of activity) were evaluated using the authors’ scale of personal readiness for activity based on E. Y. Mandrikova, D. A. Leontiev, E. N. Osin and E. Diener’s questionnaires; c) to evaluate university students’ innovative orientations, N. M. Lebedeva and A. N. Tatarko’s technique was applied. The study was conducted in Tomsk universities and involved 260 students. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and regression analysis.
Results. The factor and regression analyses revealed that choosing the ‘innovativeness vector’ by university students in the context of their personal and professional development is determined by personal qualities associated with innovativeness: creativity, risk for success and orientation to the future. Choosing the ‘safety vector’ is more inherent in modern university students and is determined by the degree of their adherence to traditional values and by their personal readiness for activity, the core of which is purposefulness and consistency in achieving the life goals.
Conclusions. The results obtained indicate the necessity for developing appropriate programmes of psychological support for university students in their personal and professional development processes in order to involve them in research, innovative and entrepreneurial activities.

Keywords: 

Safety values; Traditional values; Innovativeness of personality; Personal and professional development; Higher education; Personal readiness for activity.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:44849693

For citation:
Atamanova I., Bogomaz S. Value and activity-based orientations of university students: The choice between safety and innovativeness. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 59–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.04
References: 

1. Gretchenko A. A., Bobrovskaya K. A. Forecasting needs of the digital economy in qualified personnel. Scientific and Analytical Journal Science and Practice of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2017, no. 4, pp. 131–138. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32438714

2. Gretchenko A. I., Gorokhova I. V., Gretchenko A. A. Developing digital economy in Russia. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2018, no. 3, pp. 3–11. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-3-3-11 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35095325

3. Zinchenko Yu. P., Morosanova V. I., Kondratyuk N. G., Fomina T. G. Conscious self-regulation and self-organization of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2020, vol. 13 (4), pp. 168–182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0411 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44525159

4. Wang Y., Di Y., Ye J., Wei W. Study on the public psychological states and its related factors during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some regions of China. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 2021, vol. 26 (1), pp. 13–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1746817

5. Mikidenko N. L., Storozheva S. P., Kharlamov A. V. The competence-based model of higher engineering education: Features of implementation in the modern labor market. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (3), pp. 169–184. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.10 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38538214

6. Mansfeld M. N., Hölzle K., Gemünden H. G. Personal characteristics of innovators – An empirical study of roles in innovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2010, vol. 14 (6), pp. 1129–1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610003033

7. Hassi L., Rekonen S. How individual characteristics promote experimentation in innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2018, vol. 22 (04), pp. 1850038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961850038X

8. Perikova E. I., Atamanova I. V., Bogomaz S. A. Specific features of psychological readiness for innovative activity (with the main focus on young adults in St. Petersburg and Tomsk). Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (1), pp. 62–78. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.04 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42525586

9. Nasip S., Amirul S. R., Sondoh Jr. S. L., Tanakinjal G. H. Psychological characteristics and entrepreneurial intention: A study among university students in North Borneo, Malaysia. Education & Training, 2017, vol. 59 (7/8), pp. 825–840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2015-0092

10. Chaudhary R. Demographic factors, personality and entrepreneurial inclination. Education & Training, 2017, vol. 59 (2), pp. 171–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2016-0024

11. Otache I. Entrepreneurship education and undergraduate students’ self- and paid-employment intentions: A conceptual framework. Education & Training, 2019, vol. 61 (1), pp. 46–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2017-0148

12. Bogomaz S. A., Karakulova O. V. Personal and communicative potential of innovation-oriented and entrepreneurship-oriented individuals. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2010, no. 37, pp. 48–51. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15634174

13. Sun Y., Huang J. Psychological capital and innovative behavior: Mediating effect of psychological safety. Social Behavior and Personality, 2019, vol. 47 (9), pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8204

14. Sutalaksana I. Z., Zakiyah S. Z. Z., Widyanti A. Linking basic human values, risk perception, risk behavior and accident rates: The road to occupational safety. International Journal of Technology, 2019, vol. 10 (5), pp. 918–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i5.2165

15. Levickaya T. E., Trenkaeva N. A., Kozlova N. V., Bogomaz S. A., Cexmejstruk E. A. Safety in the structure of values of young people living in an urban environment. Psychology and Law, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 20–33. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2018080403 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36667430

16. Buravleva N. A., Bogomaz S. A. Readiness for innovative activities among students of technical universities. Russian Psychological Journal, 2020, vol. 17 (3), pp. 30–43. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2020.3.3 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44156130

17. Klochko V. Y., Galazhinskiy E. V. Innovative potential of a personality: System anthropological context. Tomsk State University Journal, 2009, no. 325, pp. 146–151. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13418869

18. Schwartz S., Butenko T. P., Sedova D. S., Lipatova A. S. Theory of basic personal values: Validation in Russia. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2012, vol. 9 (2), pp. 43–70. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20147380

19. Leontiev D. A., Osin E. N. “Good” and “bad” reflection: From an explanatory model to differential assessment. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, vol. 11 (4), pp. 110–135. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24899593

20. Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larsen R. J., Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, vol. 49 (1), pp. 71–75. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

21. Buravleva N. A., Bogomaz S. A. Personal characteristics of students as predictors of their readiness to innovate. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2020, no. 76, pp. 155–180. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/76/10 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43128080

22. Perikova E. I., Bysova V. M., Atamanova I. V., Bogomaz S. A. Change response styles in the structure of the psychological system of activity in youth from St. Petersburg and Tomsk. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 13 (70), pp. 3. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43947038

23. Lebedeva N., Tatarko A. The vectors of development of the countries in a combined space cultural dimensions. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2019, vol. 40 (6), pp. 99–111. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920007368-0 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41484309

Date of the publication 28.02.2021