Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–41
© Nikolaeva E. I., Golovacheva E., 2021
UDC: 
159/9

Comparative analysis of aggression levels in left-handed and right-handed adolescents

Nikolaeva E. I. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation), Golovacheva E. 2 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
2 Herzen State Pedagigical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 909
Abstract: 

Introduction. The study examines the problem of aggression in education. Previous studies have discussed a number of reasons for school aggression. Left-handedness is frequently reported as an important risk factor of aggressive behaviours. The aim of this study is to compare the levels of aggressiveness between right-handed and left-handed adolescents.
Materials and Methods. To date there has been little agreement on the assessment of handedness in scholarly literature. The authors of this article have divided the inventories aimed at assessing handedness into two groups: those identifying genetic predisposition, and those that assess the influence of social pressure. The study was conducted in St. Petersburg and involved 86 secondary school students aged between 11 and 15 years. Handedness was assessed using 7 tools frequently mentioned in scholarly literature. To assess the aggressiveness, the authors used Ch.D. Spielberger’s questionnaire (STAXI) adapted by A.B. Leonova.
Results. It was found that the use of different inventory sets for assessing handedness significantly changes the distribution of adolescents according to this parameter. Tools which do not take into account social pressure identify significantly more left-handed people than those that depend on social pressure. The study has not identified significant differences between right-handed and left-handed adolescents in terms of the level of aggressiveness. At the same time, it was revealed that aggressiveness directed outward is higher in supposedly retrained left-handers.
Conclusions. The study has not shown any significant differences in the level of aggressiveness between left-handed and right-handed adolescents. Future research should concentrate on the investigation of aggressiveness in retrained heft-handed adolescents.

Keywords: 

Lateral preferences; Asymmetry; Aggressiveness; Aggression; Adolescents; Left-handedness; Right-handedness.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:44849691

For citation:
Nikolaeva E. I., Golovacheva E. Comparative analysis of aggression levels in left-handed and right-handed adolescents. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.02
References: 
  1. Greer B., Taylor R. W., Cella M., Stott R., Wykes T. The contribution of dynamic risk factors in predicting aggression: A systematic review including inpatient forensic and non-forensic mental health services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2020, vol. 53, pp. 101433. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101433
  2. Healy S. R., Valente J. Y., Caetano S. C., Martins S. S., Sanchez Z. M. Worldwide school-based psychosocial interventions and their effect on aggression among elementary school children: A systematic review 2010–2019. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2020, vol. 55, pp. 101486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101486
  3. Casey B. J. Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior. Annual Review in Psychology, 2015, vol. 66 (1), pp. 295–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156 
  4. Liran B., Miller P. The role of psychological capital in academic adjustment among university students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019, vol. 20 (1), pp. 51–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9933-3
  5. Fávero M., Pinto C., Del Campoc A., Moreira D., Sousa-Gomes V. Power dressed in black: A comprehensive review on academic hazing. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2020, vol. 55, pp.  101462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101462
  6. Dudina M. N. Education under the conditions of uncertainty: The problems of anthropological proportionality. Philosophy of Education, 2019, vol. 19 (2), pp. 20–35. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20190202 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38505558
  7. Bolger N., Amarel D. Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: experimental evidence. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 2007, vol. 92 (3), pp. 458–475. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
  8. Boudrias V., Trépanier S-Ch., Salin D. A systematic review of research on the longitudinal consequences of workplace bullying and the mechanisms involved. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2021, vol. 56, pp. 101508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101508
  9. Mielke M., Farrington D. P. School-based interventions to reduce suspension and arrest: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2021, vol. 56, pp. 101508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101518
  10. Garofalo C., Neumann C. S., Velotti P.    Difficulties in emotion regulation and psychopathic traits in violent offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2018, vol. 57, pp. 116–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.05.013
  11. Ribeiro da Silva D., Randall D. R., Salekin T. Psychopathic traits in children and youth: The state-of-the-art after 30 years of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2020, vol. 55, pp. 101454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101454
  12. Caldwell B. M., Anderson N. E., Harenski K. A., Sitney M. H., Caldwell M. F., Van Rybroek  G.  L., Kiehl K. A. The structural brain correlates of callous-unemotional traits in incarcerated male  adolescents. NeuroImage: Clinical, 2019, vol. 22, pp. 101703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101703
  13. Carrière S. M., Raymond M. Handedness and aggressive behavior in an Ntumu village in southern Cameroon. Acta Ethologica, 2000, vol. 2 (2), pp. 111–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s102119900011
  14. Bless J. J., Westerhausen R., Torkildsen J. V., Gudmundsen M., Kompus K., Hugdahl K. Laterality across languages: Results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application. Laterality, 2015, vol. 20 (4), pp. 434–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2014.997245
  15. Versace E., Martinho-Truswell A., Kacelnik A., Vallortigara G. Priors in animal and artificial intelligence: where does learning begin? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2018, vol. 22 (11), pp. 963–965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.005
  16. Tremblay R. E., Vitaro F., Cote S. M. Developmental origins of chronic physical aggression: A bio-psycho-social model for the next generation of preventive interventions. Annual Review in Psychology, 2018, vol. 69, pp. 383–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1621329
  17. Shirokova I. V. Psychological aspects of left-handedness: Concept, causes, and peculiarities. Comprehensive Child Studies, 2019, vol. 1 (1), pp. 73–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2019-1-1-73-79 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42496563
  18. Zaki J. Integrating Empathy and Interpersonal Emotion Regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 2020, vol. 71 (1), pp. 517–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050830
  19. Angstmann S., Madsen K. S., Skimminge A., Jernigan T. L., Baare W. F., Siebner H. R. Microstructural asymmetry of the corticospinal tracts predicts right-left differences in circle drawing skill in right-handed adolescents. Brain Structure and Function, 2016, vol. 221 (9), pp.  4475–4489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1178-5 
  20. Westerhausen R. A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 2019, vol. 24 (6), pp. 740–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1598426
  21. Van Wijk I. C., Van Den Bulk B. G,  Marinus B., Van IJzendoorn M. H. Social judgments, frontal asymmetry, and aggressive behavior in young children: A replication study using EEG. Neuropsychologia, 2019, vol. 126, pp. 120–127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.022
  22. Hill Ch., Van G emmert A. W. A., Fang Q.,  Hou L., Wang J., Pan Zh. Asymmetry in the aging brain: A narrative review of cortical activation patterns and implications for motor function. Laterality, 2020, vol. 25 (4), pp. 413–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1707219
  23. Mohammadi H., Papadatou-Pastou M. Cerebral laterality as assessed by hand preference measures and developmental stuttering. Laterality, 2020, vol. 25 (2), pp. 127–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1621329
Date of the publication 28.02.2021