Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 120–142

Studying the objectivity of educational assessment in schools based on the system of automated monitoring and evaluation

Tikhonova L. P. 1 (Cherepovets, Russian Federation), Popova S. I. 1 (Cherepovets, Russian Federation), Mironenko S. N. 1 (Cherepovets, Russian Federation), Vakhrameev P. S. 1 (Cherepovets, Russian Federation), Pitertsev M. E. 1 (Cherepovets, Russian Federation)
1 Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education "Cherepovets state University"

Introduction. The article focuses on increasing the objectivity of educational assessment of schoolchildren’s learning achievements. The purpose of the research is to substantiate the increase in the objectivity of educational assessment on the basis of an automated monitoring and evaluation system.
Materials and Methods. The study followed an interdisciplinary approach, characterized by integrative properties of educational assessment theory and designing automated learning tools. The authors used the following theoretical research methods: analysis, synthesis and generalization on the problems of improving the objectivity of assessment and the development of automated learning tools. Empirical methods included questionnaires, testing, and educational action research.
Results. The factors contributing to the decrease in the objectivity of educational assessment are identified: the subjective and ascertaining nature of assessment, inconsistent recording of students’ academic performance, and delayed correction of students’ learning activities. A system of automated monitoring and evaluation has been developed and implemented, which includes processing, analysis and interpretation of information and monitors the dynamics of students’ learning achievements in real time. During the application of the system, positive changes in the indicators of students’ involvement, motivation and emotional attitude to learning were revealed. The most significant changes were observed in the following indicators: cognitive efficiency, learning motivation, and anxiety (a decrease in the high level of anxiety, an increase in the levels of motivation and cognitive efficiency). The design and implementation of the system were based on organizational, educational and technical conditions. The organizational and educational conditions include various formats for incorporating the system in the structure of the assessment process, while the technical ones set the requirements for the system.
Conclusions. The introduction of the automated monitoring and evaluation system contributes to formulating clear criteria for educational assessment, expanding the possibilities for building individual learning trajectories, and increasing the transparency of learning process. The objectivity of the assessment is realized due to the clarity of the requirements for the level of knowledge, skills and abilities of students; specification of the objects of assessment; compliance of the tasks with the goals of educational assessment; well-timed analysis of learning outcomes; and increasing primary schoolchildren’s motivation for learning.


Educational achievements; Objectivity of assessment; Automated monitoring and control system.

For citation:
Tikhonova L. P., Popova S. I., Mironenko S. N., Vakhrameev P. S., Pitertsev M. E. Studying the objectivity of educational assessment in schools based on the system of automated monitoring and evaluation. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 120–142. DOI:
  1. Musina V. E. Monitoring educational achievements of schoolboys in professional work of a teacher. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2009, no. 2, pp. 71–73. (In Russian) URL:
  2. Soloshchak Ye. A., Konstantinova V. V. Research on the level of motivation of young schoolchildren to study at school. Primary School: Problems and Prospects, Values and Innovations, 2016, no. 9, pp. 270–274. (In Russian) URL:
  3. Timofeeva A. G. The problem of school-based anxietyfrom the position of the environmental approach. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta. New series. Acmeology of Education. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7 (3), pp. 293–298. (In Russian) DOI: URL:
  4. Popova S. I. Development of self-regulation in adolescents in the context of educational process. Psychological Science and Education, 2017, vol. 22 (6), pp. 99–108. (In Russian)  DOI: URL:
  5. Soloshchak Ye. A., Konstantinova V. V. Research on the level of motivation of young schoolchildren to study at school. Primary School: Problems and Prospects, Values and Innovations, 2016, no. 9, pp. 270–274. (In Russian) URL:
  6. Broadben J., Panadero E., Boud D. Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 43 (2), pp. 307–322. DOI:
  7. Shapovalova O. N., Efremova N. F. Formative assessment as a technique to develop schoolchildren’s educational autonomy. Pedagogy. Questions of Theory and Practice, 2020, vol.  5  (1), pp. 1–8. (In Russian) DOI:  URL:
  8. Hansen G., Ringdal R. Formative assessment as a future step in maintaining the mastery-approach and performance-avoidance goal stability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2018, vol. 56, pp.  59–70. DOI:
  9. Zemlyanskaya E. N. Formative assessment (assessment for learning) educational achievements of students. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2016, vol. 5 (3), pp. 50–58. (In Russian) DOI: URL:
  10. Varakuta A. A. A flexible approach to assessing students' learning outcomes taking into account working efforts of the teacher. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 187–202. (In Russian) DOI: URL:
  11. Jönsson A., Balan A. Analytic or holistic: A study of agreement between different grading models. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2018, vol. 23, pp. 12. DOI:
  12. Hoth J., Döhrmann M., Kaiser G., Busse A., König J., Blömeke S. Diagnostic competence of primary school mathematics teachers during classroom situations. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 2016, vol. 48, pp. 41–53. DOI:
  13. Chuprina E. A. The system of monitoring of evaluation of educational achievements of students in the implementation of the GEF: experience, prospects. School Technologies, 2016, no. 2, pp. 120–130. (In Russian) URL:
  14. Fokides E. Digital educational games and mathematics. Results of a case study in primary school settings. Education and Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 23 (2), pp. 851–867. DOI:  
  15. Hsu Y.-C. Exploring the learning motivation and effectiveness of applying virtual reality to high school mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2020, vol. 8 (2), pp. 438–444. DOI:
  16. Melo F., Mascarenhas S., Paiva A. A tutorial on machine learning for interactive pedagogical systems. International Journal of Serious Games, 2018, vol. 5 (3), pp. 79–112. DOI:
  17. Touw K. W. J., Vogelaar B., Bakker M., Resing W. C. M. Using electronic technology in the dynamic testing of young primary school children: Predicting school achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2019, vol. 67, pp. 443–465. DOI:
  18. Davison D. P., Wijnen F. M., van der Meij J., Reidsma D., Evers V. designing a social robot to support children’s inquiry learning: A contextual analysis of children working together at school. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2020, vol. 12, pp. 883–907. DOI: 
  19. Cutumisu M., Schwartz D. L. The impact of critical feedback choice on students' revision, performance, learning, and memory. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, vol. 78, pp. 351–367. DOI:
  20. Tärning B. Review of feedback in digital applications – does the feedback they provide support learning. Journal of Information Technology EducationResearch, 2018, vol. 17, pp. 247–283. DOI:
  21. Humphry D., Hampden-Thompson G. Primary school pupils' emotional experiences of synchronous audio-led online communication during online one-to-one tuition. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 135, pp. 100–112. DOI:
  22. Tikhonova L. P. On the relevance of the introduction of modern digital technologies into education. Bulletin of Cherepovets State University, 2019, no. 1, pp. 203–221. (In Russian) DOI: URL:
  23. Bochis L., Florica S. Intervention program to reduce the level of test anxiety in a primary school class. A pilot study. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multi-dimensională, 2018, vol. 10 (4), pp. 23–31. DOI: URL:
Date of the publication 31.08.2022