Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 27–39
© Merenkova V. S., Elnikova O. Y., Nikolaeva E. I., 2020
UDC: 
159.94+159.938.363.6

A comparative analysis of the interrelation between the level of executive functions, which are viewed as cognitive control parameters, and the level of the inner picture of health in students of different ages

Merenkova V. S. 1 (Yelets, Russian Federation), Elnikova O. Y. 1 (Yelets, Russian Federation), Nikolaeva E. I. 2 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Bunin Yelets State University
2 Herzen State pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1004
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper analyses the interrelation between a person’s cognitive control and their inner picture of health, which is a component of the person’s conscious attitude to one’s health, at different stages of ontogenesis. The purpose of the research is to analyze the relationships between the level of one’s executive functions development (inhibitory control and working memory) and the level of the internal picture of health (hereinafter IPH) in primary school age, adolescence and early adulthood.
Materials and Methods. The research into how executive functions (inhibitory control and working memory) and the IPH are interrelated was based upon the analysis and study of scholarly literature and the experimental work which involved methods of inhibitory control assessment (Vergunov, Nikolaeva), a technique for assessing visual working memory (Rasumnikova, Savinykh) and a quick modified child’s diagnostic technique (Nikolaeva et al.) used for assessing the IPH. The obtained data were processed by means of the quantitative and qualitative data analyses methods and the SPSS-21 programme pack. The total number of the experiment participants was 262 people, among them primary schoolchildren (9.8 ± 0.8 years, n = 66), adolescents (12.8 ± 1.5 years, n = 101) and university students (20.4 ± 1.3 years, n = 95).
Results. It was found that neither of the working memory parameters was associated with the IPH level in any of the three groups. The inhibitory control, however, had different interconnections with the students’ IPH at different age stages. It was found that only in adolescents the inhibitory control is closely associated with the IPH, which is proved by their independent decision-making regarding their behaviour and attitude to health at this age. The found interconnection decreases in early adulthood, which may indicate the presence of some additional factors affecting both the IPH and inhibitory control.
Conclusions. The connection between the IPH and the person’s executive functions depends on the person’s age and it is most evident in adolescence.

Keywords: 

Inhibitory control; Working memory; Internal health picture; Primary school children; Adolescence; Early adulthood.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:44478880

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 98.632 Executive Function | School Readiness | Inhibitory Control

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099470889&origin=...

A comparative analysis of the interrelation between the level of executive functions, which are viewed as cognitive control parameters, and the level of the inner picture of health in students of different ages

For citation:
Merenkova V. S., Elnikova O. Y., Nikolaeva E. I. A comparative analysis of the interrelation between the level of executive functions, which are viewed as cognitive control parameters, and the level of the inner picture of health in students of different ages. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 27–39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2006.02
References: 
  1. Zelazo P. D. Executive function: Reflection, iterative reprocessing, complexity, and the developing brain. Developmental Review,2015, vol. 38, pp. 55–68. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.001
  2. Roell M., Viarouge A., Houdé O., Borst G. Inhibitory control and decimal number comparison in schoolaged children. PLoS ONE, 2017, vol. 12 (11), pp. e0188276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188276  
  3. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, vol. 64 (1), pp. 135–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  4. Luna B., Marek S., Larsen B., Tervo-Clemmens B., Chahal R. An integrative model of the maturation of cognitive control. Annual Review Neuroscience, 2015, vol. 38 (1), pp. 151–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-171714-034054
  5. Friedman N. P., Miyake A., Robinson J. L., Hewitt J. K. Developmental trajectories in toddlers’ self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 2011, vol. 47 (5), pp. 1410–1430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023750
  6. Friedman N. P., Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 2017, vol. 86, pp. 186–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023
  7. Brydges C. R., Fox A. M., Reid C. L., Anderson M. The differentiation of executive functions in middle and late childhood: A longitudinal latent-variable analysis. Intelligence, 2014, vol. 47, pp.  34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.08.010
  8. McKenna R., Rushe T., Woodcock K. A. Informing the structure of executive function in children: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00154
  9. Nikolaeva E. I., Merenkova V. S. The effect of a mother’s level of attachment and her emotional intelligence on a child’s health during its first year of life. Psychology, 2013, vol. 28 (S1), pp. 483–487. DOI: https://doi.org/110.4236/psych.2013.45068 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43049743
  10. Nikolaeva E. I., Merenkova V. S. An inner picture of health as a factor in changing a child’s behavior to health-promoting behavior. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2017, no. 4, pp.  162–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2017.0414  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32484718
  11. Vergunov E. G., Nikolaeva E. I., Balioz N. V., Krivoshchekov S. G. Lateral preferences as the possible phenotypic predictors of the reserves of the cardiovascular system and the features of sensorimotor integration in climbers. Human Physiology, 2018, vol. 44 (3), pp. 320–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0131164618030116  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35237679
  12.  Nikolaeva E. I., Yavorovich K. N. Characteristics of the sensorymotor reaction in boys and girls with different expression of lateral characteristics. Question of Psychology, 2013, no. 5, pp. 133–141. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21195796
  13. Razumnikova O. M., Nikolaeva E. I. Inhibitory brain functions and age-associated specificitiesin organization of cognitive activity. Advances in Physiological Sciences, 2019, vol. 50 (1), pp. 75–89. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0301179819010090 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37068888
  14. Gärtner K. A., Vetter V. C., Schäferling M., Reuner G., Hertel S. Inhibitory control in toddlerhood  – The role of parental co-regulation and self-efficacy beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 2018, vol. 13 (3), pp. 241–264. DOI: https://doi.org/110.1007/s11409-018-9184-7     
  15. Razumnikova O. M., Nikolaeva E. I. Age characteristics of inhibition control in the model of proactive interference. Question of Psychology, 2019, no. 2, pp. 124–132. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38533324
  16. Shirokova I. V., Burkova S. A. Features of inhibitory control among junior schoolchildren with different level of the internal picture of health. Bulletin of Psychophysiology, 2018, vol. 4, pp. 95–103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37098284
  17. Park J., Ellis W. S., Kaushanskaya M. Changes in executive function over time in bilingual and monolingual school-aged children. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1842–1853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000562
  18. Lee K., Bull R., Ho R. M. Developmental changes in executive functioning. Child Development, 2013, vol. 84 (6), pp. 1933–1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12096
  19. Nelson T. D., Nelson J. M., Mason W. A., Tomaso C. C., Kozikowski Ch., Espy K. A. Executive control and adolescent health: toward a conceptual framework. Adolescent Research Review, 2019, vol. 4 (1), pp. 31–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0094-3  
  20. Constantinidis C., Luna B. Neural substrates of inhibitory control maturation in adolescence. Trends in Neurosciences, 2019, vol. 42 (9), pp. 604–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.07.004
  21. Ekerim M., Selcuk B. Longitudinal predictors of vocabulary knowledge in Turkish children: The role of maternal warmth, inductive reasoning, and children’s inhibitory control. Early Education and Development, 2018, vol. 29 (3), pp. 324–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1407607  
  22. Luna B., Marek S., Larsen B., Tervo-Clemmens B., Chahal R. An integrative model of the maturation of cognitive control. Annual Review Neuroscience, 2015, vol. 38 (1), pp. 151–170. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-034054
  23. Tamm L., Menon V., Reiss A. L. Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2002, vol. 41 (10), pp. 1231–1238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013
  24. Tamnes Ch. K., Ostby Y., Walhovd K. B. Neuroanatomical correlates of executive functions in children and adolescents: A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of cortical thickness. Neuropsychologia, 2010, vol. 48 (9), pp. 2496–2508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.024  
  25. Nikolaeva E. I. Executive functions in early childhood. A review of foreign sources. Comprehensive Child Studies, 2019, vol. 1 (4), pp. 330–337. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2019-1-4-330-337  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43047890
Date of the publication 31.12.2020