Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 28–49
UDC: 
028.5+371+159

Characteristics of modern adolescents’ digital reading: Results of theoretical and empirical research

Borisenko N. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Mironova K. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Shishkova S. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Granik G. G. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education
Abstract: 

Introduction. This article investigates the relationship between digital and paper reading within modern adolescents’ reading activities. The purpose of the study is to reveal the characteristics of adolescents’ digital reading compared to paper reading.
Materials and Methods. The study involved theoretical analysis and consolidation of research findings on digital reading. Empirical data were collected via questionnaires, the focus group method, expert evaluation and structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the obtained data were carried out. Participants were 1835 schoolchildren in grades 5-8 (aged between 11 and 15 years) from 14 regions of the Russian Federation.
Results. The authors summarized the findings of the theoretical and empirical study of adolescents’ digital reading compared to paper reading. In order to identify the specifics of modern adolescents’ digital reading, ‘Paper vs screen (reading from paper and reading from screens)’ questionnaire has been developed and empirically verified. The authors analyzed the content of students’ online reading, its range and intensity, reading preferences regarding the environment (analog/digital) and the medium (the type of device).
Conclusions. The article concludes that at present adolescents’ reading activities are characterized by the cohesion of traditional and new reading practices. Nevertheless, paper reading remains the dominant format of book reading. Characteristics of modern adolescents’ digital reading include spontaneity, pragmatism, and situatedness. The findings suggest that digital reading preferences include informative and entertaining texts related to the field of everyday communication. Purposeful teaching of digital reading at school is highlighted as an important factor enhancing the effectiveness of reading performance.

Keywords: 

Digital reading; Reading from paper; Adolescents aged between 11 and 15 years; Electronic sources; Paper sources; Reading preferences

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 83.577 Font | Typeface | Legibility

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096931553&origin=...

Characteristics of modern adolescents’ digital reading: Results of theoretical and empirical research

For citation:
Borisenko N. A., Mironova K. V., Shishkova S. V., Granik G. G. Characteristics of modern adolescents’ digital reading: Results of theoretical and empirical research. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 28–49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2005.02
References: 
  1. Chudinova V. Reading and literary preferences of generation Z students: sociocultural context. Observatory of Culture, 2018, vol. 15, no 6, pp. 668–681. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-6-668-681
  2. Balakina Yu. V. Electronic text: a fundamentally new type of text? Bulletin of Volgograd State University.  Series 2. Linguistics, 2016, vol. 15, no 3, pp. 17–27.  (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.3.2
  3. Selemeneev S. V. Computer and text. Open Education, 2005, no 6. (In Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompyuter-i-tekst
  4. Melentieva Yu. Digital reading as a technology for learning and education. Bibliografiya i knigovedenie, 2018, no 5, pp. 47–51. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36287490    
  5. MсЕneaney J. Agent-Based Literacy Theory. Reading Research Quarterly, 2006, vol. 41 (3), pp. 352–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.3.3
  6. Carr N. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010. 276 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.758481
  7. Kara P. F-Shaped Pattern of Reading on the Web: Misunderstood, But Still Relevant, 2017. URL: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content/
  8. Salmerón L., Kammerer Y., Strømsø H., Stadtler M. Comprehension processes in digital reading. Learning to read in a digital world (publ. John Benjamins), July 2018, рp. 91–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.17.04sal   
  9. Wastlund E., Reinikkaa H., Norlandera T., Archer T. Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, no 21, pp. 377–394. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007

10. Kerr A., Symons E. Computerized Presentation of Text: Effects on Children’s Reading of Informational Material. Reading and writing, 2006, no 19 (1), pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-003-8128-y

11. Mangen А., Walgermo B., Brønnick K. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 61–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

12. Golan D., Barzillai M., Katzir T. The Effect of Presentation Mode on Children’s Reading Preferences, Performance, and Self-evaluations. Computers & Education, 2018, no 126, pp. 346–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.001

13. Zolotarev D. A., Belko T. V. Comparative analysis of the perception of text on paper and in an interactive environment. Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011, no 1-2. (In Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-osobennostey-vospriyatiya-teksta-na-bumazhnom-nositele-i-v-interaktivnoy-srede.

14. McEneaney J. A transactional theory of hypertext structure // 52nd yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference, 2003, no 1, pp. 272–284. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249905058_A_Transactional_Theory_of_Hypertext_Structure

15. Nielsen J. F-Shaped Pattern For Reading Web Content (original study). Nielsen Norman Group, April 2006. URL: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content-discovered/

16. Ackerman R., & Lauterman T. Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, vol. 28 (5), pp. 1816–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023

17. Mangen A. et al. Mystery story reading in pocket print book and on Kindle: possible impact on chronological events memory. Conference paper presentation, IGEL (The International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media), Turin, Italy, 2014, July 21-25. https://www.academia.edu/7868162/Mangen_A._et_al._2014_._Mystery_story_reading_in_pocket_print_book_and_on_Kindle_possible_impact_on_chronological_events_memory._Conference_paper_presentation_IGEL_The_International_Society_for_the_Empirical_Study_of_Literature_and_Media_Turin_Italy_July_21-25

18. Myrberg C., Wiberg N. Screen vs. paper: what is the difference for reading and learning? Insights, 2015, vol. 28, no 2, pp. 49-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.236   

19. Baron N.S. Redefining Reading: the Impact of Digital Communication Media. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 2013, no 128 (1), pp. 193–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/23489277

20. Lombina T., Mansurov V., Yurchenko O. Literacy problems in the new digital reality (by the example of schoolchildren). Part 1. Sociological science and social practice, 2019,no 4 (28). (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.4.6803

21. Zagidullina M.V. Teenagers: reading and the Internet in everyday life. Sociological studies, 2016, no. 5, pp. 115–123. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26125621_30494668.pdf

22. Moscow teenagers’ reading in real and electronic environments.  Materials of a sociological research / comp.  V.P. Chudinova. Moscow: Interregional Center for Library Cooperation, 2012, 141 p. (In Russian). URL: http://mcbs.ru/files/chudinova.pdf

23. Milgram P., Kishino A. Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on information and systems, E77-D, 1994, no 12, pp. 1321-1329.  URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231514051_A_Taxonomy_of_Mixed_Reality_Visual_Displays

24. Sobkin V., Fedotova A. A teenager in social networks: on the issue of socio-psychological well-being. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2018, no 31, pp. 23–36. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2018.0303

25. Elley W. B. How in the World Do Students Read? IEA Study of Reading Literacy. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 1992, 136 p. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED360613

26. Soldatova G. U. Digital childhood: competence and security, 2019. (In Russian). URL:   https://www.kirovipk.ru/sites/default/files/files/1275009_0.pdf

27. Delgado P., Vargas C., Ackerman R., Salmerón L. Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 2018, no 25, pр. 23–38. URL: https://www.uv.es/lasalgon/papers/Delgado%202018%20dont%20throw%20away%20your%20printed%20books.pdf

28. Loh C., Sun B. “I’d still prefer to read the hard copy”: adolescents’ print and digital reading habits. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 2019, no 62 (6), pp. 663–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.904

29. Gubanova A. Yu. Electronic reading of children and adolescents. 21st Century Childhood: socio-humanitarian thesaurus / ed. S. N. Mayorova-Scheglova, Moscow: Publishing house of ROS, 2018, pp. 334–339. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36726370_67007729.pdf

30.  Soldatova G. U., Rasskazova E. I. Digital competency models and online activities of Russian teenagers. National Psychological Journal, 2016, no. 2 (22), pp. 50-60. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2016.0.0205  

Date of the publication 31.10.2020